Root system of potato genotypes under greenhouse conditions.

Authors

  • S. Cortez Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro.
  • S. A. Camacho Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro.
  • Gaspar Martínez Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro.
  • S. Kuruvadi Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro.
  • Mariano Mendoza Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v11i1.17391

Abstract

The objectives of this research were to study variability of growing and distribution of the root system in 10 commercial and experimental potato clones and to identify the best materials in different soil profiles. It was used a complete random block design, under greenhouse conditions at the Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Saltillo, Mexico. Black polyethylene containers of 90 cm long and 30 cm diameter were used for evaluating root system. Restricted irrigation was applied to increase root growing. Experimental plot was one container with two plants. After flowering and 125 days of growing, shoot was cut. Soil in every container was divided in four sections. Shoot and roots were dried at 70 °C for 48 hours and weighted. Analysis of variance revealed highly significant differences for dry root weight among potato varieties at the four considered profiles: 0-20, 20-40, 40- 60, 60-80 cm, and for total profile (0-80 cm). Boer, Russet Burbanck and Utatlan were outstanding varieties for the total production of roots. Boer Russet Burbanck, Atlantic and Gigant varieties produced the higher amount of roots in the 60- 80 cm profile and produced a good roots growing patterns in different profiles.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALMONTE, J.A. 1991. Respuesta de genotipos de papa (Solanum tuberosum L.). La fertilización, bajo condiciones de riego y temporal. Tesis de maestría en la Universidad Autónoma Agraría Antonio Narro. pp. 52-56.

BERTRAND, A.R. 1965. Water conservation through improved practices. In: “Plant environment and efficient water use”. Amer. Soc. Agron. Soil Sci. Madison, Wisconsin. pp 207-235.

DONALD, C.M. 1963. Competition among crop and pasture plants. Advances Agronomy 15:1-118.

HURD, E.A. 1974. Root study of three wheat varieties and their resistance to drought and damage by soil cracking. Canadian Journal Plant Science.44:440-448.

KAIGAMA, B. K.; TEARE,I; STONE,L.; POWERS,W. 1977. Root and top growth of irrigated an non irrigated grain sorghum Crop. Sci. 17: 555-559.

KLEPPER, B.; TAYLOR, H. M.; HUCK, M.G.;FISCUS, E. L. 1973. Water relations and growth of cotton in drying soil. Agron. J. 65:307-310.

KURUVADI, S.; CORTINAS, E. 1987. Papel de componentes del rendimineto, correlaciones y sus implicaciones en el mejoramiento genético del frijol (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Revista Agraria Científica de la Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro. Vol. 3(1). 1-15.

KURUVADI, S., CHARLES,E.; PÉREZ,G. 1991. Variabilidad genética para rendimineto y sus componentes en ciertas líneas del banco de germoplasma en papa. Memorias del IV Congreso nacional de papa. Los Mochis Sinaloa, México.

KURUVADI, S.; ROMERO, J. M.; ALMONTE, J. A.; GOMEZ, H. C.; PARGA, V. T.; PÉREZ , G. U. 1993. Identificación de variedades sobresalientes de papa (Solanum tuberosum L.) bajo condiciones de temporal. Boletín Agrometereológico de la Universidad Autonóma Agraria Antonio Narro. pp. 37-43.

SMITH, O.D. 1976. Potatoes production storage and processing. De AVI Publishing Company. Inc. U.S.A. pp. 199-206.

TAYLOR, H.M. 1986. Methods of studying root systems in the field. Hort Science. 21(40): 952-956.

WATSON, D.J. 1968. A prospect of crop physiology. Ann. Appl. Biol. 62:1-9.

VILLAREAL, G.M.J. 1984. Marco de referencia del cultivo de la papa. INIA. pp.1-16

WHITE, J. W.; SPONCHIADO,B. 1995. Tolerancia de frijol a la sequía. Interrogantes y algunas respuestas. Boletín informativo del programa de frijol en CIAT. 7(1):1-3.

How to Cite

Cortez, S., Camacho, S. A., Martínez, G., Kuruvadi, S., & Mendoza, M. (2006). Root system of potato genotypes under greenhouse conditions. Agronomía Mesoamericana, 11(1), 139–143. https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v11i1.17391

Most read articles by the same author(s)