Reaction of common bean varieties to Fusarium spp. and Rhizoctonia solani in Mexican Highlands.

Authors

  • Rosa Navarrete-Maya UNAM
  • Jorge Acosta-Gallegos CEVAMEX-INIFAP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v10i1.17996

Abstract

Two trials were carried out at Texcoco, State of Mexico: in the first one 32 bean genotypes were sowed under irrigation on April 24 and May 8, 1997, in order to study their reaction to Fusarium spp. in a naturally infested soil. In the second one, protection against Fusarium spp. y R. solani was evaluated by applying captan or benomyl to the seeds of eight genotypes. In the first trial most genotypes were susceptible to Fusarium spp., particularly in the third evaluation (R6), on both sowing dates; with the exception of Negro Tacana and Amarillo de Calpan, both of which showed an intermediate reaction in the second sowing date. Incidence of Fusarium spp. was higher than 80%. On the first sowing date the Pinto Villa and Negro Perla genotypes were moderately resistant. In the second experiment the chemical treatment produced more vigorous seedlings. Pinto Villa and BAT 477 genotypes showed lower severity scores when treated with benomyl and captan, respectively. It was observed that plants of resistant genotypes survived because they developed adventitious roots.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ABAWI, G. S.; CROSIER, D. C.; COBB, A. C. 1985. Root rot of snap beans in New York. New York’s Food and Life Sciences Bulletin Num. 110:1-7.

ABAWI, G. S. 1989. Root rots. In: Schwartz, H. F., and M. A. Pastor-Corrales (eds.). Bean production problems in the tropics. 2nd Ed. Cali, Colombia. CIAT (Centro Internacional de AgriculturaTropical) pp.105-158.

ABAWI, G. S.; PASTOR, M. A.C. 1990. Root rots of beans in Latin America and Africa: Diagnosis, research methodologies, and management strategies. Cali, Colombia. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT). 114 p.

ACOSTA, G. J. A.; NAVARRETE, M. R. 1996.Identificación de genotipos de frijol con resistencia múltiple a enfermedades en la Mesa Central de México. Agric. Téc. México. 22 :187-197.

ACOSTA, G. J. A; NAVARRETE, M. R.; OCHOA , M. R. 1991. Identificación de material tolerante a las pudriciones de raíz en frijol de temporal. Phaseolus, Pub. Especial No. 8. INIFAP-MSU. Durango, México. pp. 103-108.

BECERRA, N.; LÓPEZ, S. E. 1994. Enfermedades del cultivo del frijol en el trópico de México. XXI Congreso Nacional de Fitopatología. Soc. Mex. de Fitopatología. Cuernavaca, Mor. p. 56.

CAMPOS, A. J. 1987. Enfermedades del Frijol. México. Trillas. 132 p.

CENTRO INTERNACIONAL DE AGRICULTURA TROPICAL (CIAT). 1987. Sistema estándar para la evaluación de germoplasma de frijol. Schoonhoven A. v. y M.A. Pastor-Corrales (comps.). Cali, Colombia. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical 52 p.

ESTEVEZ, DE J. C.; MERONUCK, R.; PERCICH, J. A. 1998. Etiology and control of kidney bean root rot in Minnesota. Ann. Rep. Bean Improv. Coop. 41:55-57.

GARCÍA, E. 1981. Modificaciones al sistema de clasificaciones climáticas de Köeppen. UNAM. México. 252 p.

JAMES, W. C. 1974. Disease assessment keys. Ann. Rev. Phytopath. 12:27-48.

LÓPEZ, F. L. C. 1991. Definición de prioridades de investigación fitopatológica para la zona templada del Altiplano Central de México. Agric. Téc. México. 17: 17-54

LÓPEZ, G. H. 1974. Herencia del carácter de resistencia a marchitez (Fusarium sp.) en garbanzo (Cicer arietinum) bajo condiciones de campo. Agric. Téc. México. 3:286-289.

NAVARRETE, M. R.; ACOSTA, G. J. A. 1996. Sanidad y germinación de semilla de frijol producida en diferentes fechas de siembra. Phaseolus. Publicación especial No. 8 INIFAP-MSU. Durango, México. pp. 169-178

O’BRIEN, R. G.; O’HARE, P. J.; GLASS, R. J. 1991. Cultural practices in the control of bean root rot. Australian J. Exp. Agric. 31:551-555.

PASTOR C.M. A.; ABAWI, G. S. 1987. Reactions of selected bean germ plams to infection by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. phaseoli. Plant Dis. 71:990-993.

RODRÍGUEZ, G. R. 1996. Calidad física y sanitaria de la semilla de frijol utilizada por los agricultores de Durango

para la siembra en temporal. Memorias del XXIII Congreso Nacional de la Sociedad Mexicana de Fitopatología. Guadalajara, Jal. p. 80.

RHEENEN, V. H. A.; REDDY, M. V.; KUMAR, J.; HAWARE, M. P. 1992. Breeding for resistance to soil-borne diseases in chickpea. In: Disease resistance breeding in chickpea. Singh, K. B., and C. Saxena (eds.) International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA). Aleppo, Syria. pp. 55-70.

SÁNCHEZ, A. J. H.; CÁRDENAS, M. 1988. Etiología y daño de las pudriciones radicales del frijol (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) en el estado de Durango. Rev. Chapingo 12(58-59): 43-49.

SILBERNAGEL, M. J.; MILLS, L. J. 1990. Genetic and cultural control of Fusarium root rot in bush snap beans. Plant Dis. 74:61-66.

SINGH, S. P. 1992. Common bean improvement in the tropics. Plant Breed. Rev. 10: 199-269.

SINGH, S. P.; GEPTS, P.; DEBOUCK, D. G. 1991. Races of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae). Econ Bot. 45: 379-396.

VELASQUEZ V. R.; SCHWARTZ, H. F. 1997. Reaction of selected mexican and USA bean lines to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. phaseoli. Ann. Rep. Bean Improv. Coop. 40:95-96.

Published

2015-06-03

How to Cite

Navarrete-Maya, R., & Acosta-Gallegos, J. (2015). Reaction of common bean varieties to Fusarium spp. and Rhizoctonia solani in Mexican Highlands. Agronomía Mesoamericana, 10(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v10i1.17996