Revista de Biología Tropical ISSN Impreso: 0034-7744 ISSN electrónico: 2215-2075

OAI: https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/rbt/oai
Attractiveness of Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) to different baits in the Brazilian Amazon region
PDF
Untitled
PDF
HTML

Supplementary Files

Cover letter

Keywords

Dung beetles
dung attractiveness
food preference
trophic guild
tropical forest.
Escarabajos peloteros
atracción del estiércol
preferencia de alimentación
agrupación trófica
bosque tropical.

How to Cite

Cajaiba, R. L., Périco, E., da Silva, W. B., & Santos, M. (2017). Attractiveness of Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) to different baits in the Brazilian Amazon region. Revista De Biología Tropical, 65(3), 917–924. https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v65i3.29433

Abstract

Dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) are considered essential for enhancing the physicochemical characteristics of soils, principally by changing organic materials (e.g. dead animals, faeces, fruits e leaf litter). This study compared the species richness and abundance of dung beetles captured using various types of baits, to demonstrate attractiveness differences in variable habitats of the Brazilian Amazon. Samplings were carried out with pitfall traps baited with human faeces, rotten banana, rotten meat and a non-baited trap, in February, March, June, September and October 2015. Habitats included native forests, agriculture areas, pastures and disturbed forests in different regeneration stages. A total of 13 736 Scarabaeinae beetles were captured, distributed over 98 species. Most individuals were captured using traps baited with faeces (76.7 % of individuals), followed by rotten meat baited traps (17.8 % of individuals), fermented banana baited traps (3.9 % of individuals) and finally by non-baited traps (1.6 % of individuals). A significant difference in attractiveness of the different baits used and habitats types was observed. Most of the captured assemblages were composed by coprophagous (42 %), generalist species (32 %), necrophagous (15 %) and none was classified as saprophagous. Approximately 54 % of the specimens were tunnelers, 25 % were rollers and 12 % were dwellers. The species of Scarabaeinae sampled in the region revealed qualitative and quantitative differences among their assemblages and the phytophysiognomies. The forest environments housed the greatest species richness observed, and a fraction of these is exclusive of those areas. We concluded that some species of Scarabaeinae have an important potential as disturbance indicators in the Amazonian ecosystem.

https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v65i3.29433
PDF
Untitled
PDF
HTML

References

Almeida, S. S. P., & Louzada, J. N. C. (2009). Estrutura da comunidade de Scarabaeinae (Scarabaeidae: Coleoptera) em fitofisionomias do Cerrado e sua importância para a conservação. Neotropical Entomology, 38, 32-43.

Andresen, E. (2002). Dung beetles in a Central Amazonian rainforest and their ecological role as secondary seed dispersers. Ecological Entomology, 27, 257-270.

Andresen, E. (2008). Dung beetle assemblages in primary forest and disturbed habitats in a tropical dry landscape in western Mexico. Journal Insect of Conservation, 12, 639-650.

Arellano, L. (2016). A Novel method for measuring dung removal by tunneler dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in pastures. The Coleopterists Bulletin, 70, 185-188.

Bogoni, J. A., & Hernández, I. M. (2014). Attractiveness of native mammal’s faeces of different trophic guilds to dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae). Journal of Insect Science, 14, 1-7.

Cajaiba, R. L., Cabral, J. A., & Santos, M. (2015b). A minimal invasive method to forecast the effects of anthropogenic disturbance on tropical cave beetle communities. Neotropical Entomology, 4, 1-9.

Cajaiba, R. L., Perico, E., Cabral, J. A., & Santos, M. (2015a). Assessing the potential role of ground beetles (Coleoptera) as ecological indicators in tropical ecosystems: A review (pp. 51-84). In C. Starck (Ed.), Beetles: Biodiversity, ecology and role in the environment (1ed, v. 1.). New York, Nova Science Publishers.

Da Silva, P. G., & Audino, L. D. (2011). Escarabeíneos (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) atraídos a diferentes iscas em campo nativo de Bagé, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoociências, 13, 241-247.

Da Silva, P. G., & Di Mare, R. A. (2012). Escarabeíneos copro-necrófagos (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Scarabaeinae) de fragmentos de Mata Atlântica em Silveira Martins, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Iheringia Serie Zoologia, 102, 197-205.

Da Silva, P. G., Vaz-De-Mello, F. Z., & Di Mare, R. A. (2012). Attractiveness of Different Bait to the Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in Forest Fragments in Extreme Southern Brazil. Zoological Studies, 51, 429-441.

Filgueiras, B. K. C., Liberal, C. N., Aguiar, C. D., Hernández, M. M., & Iannuzzi, L. (2009). Attractivity of omnivore, carnivore and herbivore mammalian dung to Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) in a tropical Atlantic rainforest remnant. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 53, 422-427.

Galetti, M., & Dirzo, R. (2013), Ecological and evolutionary consequences of living in a defaunated world. Biological Conservation, 163, 1-6.

Halffter, G. (1991). Historical and ecological factors determining the geographical distribution of beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). Folia Entomologica Mexicana, 82, 195-238.

Halffter, G., & Edmonds, W. D. (1982). The nesting behavior of dung beetles (Scarabaeinae): an ecologic and evolutive approach. México D.F., Mexico: Man and Biosphere Program Unesco.

Halffter, G., & Matthews, E. G. (1966). The natural history of dung beetles of the subfamily Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Folia Entomologica Mexicana, 12, 1-312.

Hammer, O., Harper, D. A. T, & Ryan, P. D. (2001). PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4, 1-9.

Huerta, C., Martínez, M. I., Montes, O. E., & Favila, M. E. (2013). The role of dung beetles in the sustainability of pasture and grasslands (pp. 441-463). In A. Yáñez-Arancibia, R. Dávalos-Sotelo, J. W. Day, & E. Reyes (Eds.), Ecological Dimensions for Sustainable Socio Economic Development. Boston, MA: WitPress, Southampton.

Larsen, T. H., Lopera, A., & Forsyth, A. (2006). Extreme trophic and habitat specialization by Peruvian dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). The Coleopterists Bulletin, 60, 315-324.

Lima, J. D. N., Silva, V. C., Bianch, V., Da Silva, P. G., & Di Mare, R. A. (2015). Estrutura e organização de assembleias de Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) em diferentes fitofisionomias no sul do Brasil. Iheringia, Série Zoologia, 105, 393-402.

Louzada, J. N. C., & Lopes, F. S. (1997). A comunidade de Scarabaeidae copro-necrófagos (Coleoptera) de um fragmento de Mata Atlântica. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 41, 117-121.

Marchiori, C. H. (2016). Técnicas de coleta e captura de insetos das ordens Diptera e Hymenoptera coletadas no estado de Goiás. Biológico, 78, 1-5.

Nichols, E., Spector, S., Louzada, J., Larsen, T., Amézquita, S., & Favila, M. E. (2008). Ecological functions and ecosystem services provided by Scarabaeinae dung beetles. Biological Conservation, 141, 1461-1474.

Pacheco, T. L., & Vaz-de-Mello, F. Z. (2015). Dung beetles of the tribe Phanaeini (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidade: Scarabaeinae) from Roraima state, Northern Brazil: checklist and key to species. Biota Neotropica, 15(2), e20140145.

Paoletti, M. G. (1999). Using bioindicators based on biodiversity to assess landscape sustainability. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 74, 1-18.

Peel, M. C., Finlayson, B. L., & Mcmahon, T. A. (2007). Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 11, 1633-1644.

Rafael, J. A. (2002). A amostragem. Protocolo e técnicas de captura de Diptera. (2th.ed., pp. 301-304), Zaragoza: PrIBES.

Simmons, L. W., & Ridsdill-Smith, T. J. (2011). Reproductive competition and its impact on the evolution and ecology of dung beetles. In L. W. Simmons, & T. J. Ridsdill-Smith (Eds.), Ecology and Evolution of Dung Beetles (pp. 1-20). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.

Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T., Castel, V., Rosales, M., & Haan, C. (2006). Livestock's Long Shadow: Environmental issues and options. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Ueda, A., Dwibadra, D., Noerdjito, W. A., Kon, M., & Fukuyama, K. (2015). Comparison of baits and types of pitfall traps for capturing dung and carrion scarabaeoid beetles in East Kalimantan. Bulletin of FFPRI, 14, 15-28.

Vaz-de-Mello, F. Z., Edmonds, W. D., Campo, F. C., & Schoolmeesters, P. (2011). A multilingual key to the genera and subgenera of the subfamily Scarabaeinae of the New World (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Zootaxa, 2854, 1-73.

Vieira, L., Louzada, J. N. C., & Spector, S. (2008). Effects of degradation and replacement of Southern Brazil coastal sandy vegetation on the dung beetles (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). Biotropica, 40, 719-727.

West, C. P., & Nelson, C. J. (2003). Naturalized grassland ecosystems and their management, p. 315-337. In R. F. Barnes, C. J. Nelson, M. Collins, K. J. Moore (Eds.), Forages: An Introduction to Grassland Agriculture. Ames, IA: Blackwell Publishing Professional.

Comments

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Biología Tropical

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.