Phosphorus fertilization management in corn crop, El Ejido, Panama 2004-2013.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v27i1.21889Keywords:
broadcast, residual effect, critical level, optimal physical.Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine medium and long management of phosphorus fertilization with two application methods on the maize. An experiment was established in El Ejido, Panama, from 2004 to 2013 on Udic Haplustalf soil. Two factors were evaluated in a 5 x 4 factorial arrangement of split plot under a randomized block design with three replications. The main plot was the broadcast application of P in rates of 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100 kgP/ha (applied only the first year), while in sub-plots applied P in band, for ten years, together with N and K doses of 0, 10, 20 and 30 kgP/ha. The maximum grain yield was achieved by applying average 304 kg (average of 30.4 kgP/year). It was observed that the residual effect broadcast applications of 0 and 25 kgP/ha had a relative yield below 80%. Treatment of 50 kgP/ha remained at 82%, while 75 kgP/ha declined from the year 2007 and is at a value close to 80%. Treatment of 100 kgP/ha broadcast presents a relative yield close to 100%. The results indicate that the broadcast application over 50 kgP/ha did not differ from the response obtained with annual applications of 30 P/ha in the first five years. These results suggest that the residual effect of phosphorus broadcast and incorporated before planting, on the type of soil used, varies according doses applied initially, where dosages above 50 kg/ha should be repeated after six years to maintain good productivity, since, from this time the residual effect is drastically reduced.
Downloads
References
Bernal, J.H., G.E. Navas, y R.S Hernández. 2014. Requerimientos y respuestas a la fertilización del maíz en suelos de sabanas ácidas de Colombia. IPNI, Inf. Agron. Hispanoamérica 15:6-10.
Bolaños, J., y H. Barreto. 1991. Análisis de los componentes de rendimiento de los ensayos regionales de maíz de 1990. En: W. Raun, H. Barreto, y G. Saín, editores, Análisis de los resultados experimentales del PRM 1990, Vol. 2. CIMMYT, Guatemala, GUA. p 9-27.
Bordoli, J.M., and A.P. Mallarino. 1998. Deep and shallow banding phosphorus and potassium as alternatives to broadcast fertilization for no-till corn. Agron. J. 90:27-33. doi: 10.2134/agronj1998.00021962009000010006x
Colpo-Gatiboni, L., C.M. Boiera de Oliveira, P.R. Ernani, J.A. Almeida, and D.J. Miquelluti. 2010. Soil available phosphorus by Mehlich-1, Mehlich-3 and anion exchange resin and its sensitivity to soil clay content. [DVD]. 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World. 1–6 Aug. 2010, Brisbane, AUS. http://www.iuss.org/19th%20WCSS/Symposium/pdf/0827.pdf (accessed 17 apr. 2015).
Cordell, D., J.O. Drangert, and S. White. 2009. The story of phosphorus: global food security and food for thought. Global Env. Change 19:292-305.
Díaz-Romeu, R., y A. Hunter. 1982. Metodología de muestreo de suelos, análisis químico de suelos y tejido vegetal y de investigaciones en invernadero. CATIE, Turrialba, CRC.
Dawson, C.J., and J. Hilton. 2011. Fertilizer availability in a resource-limited world: production and recycling of nitrogen and phosphorus. Food Policy 36:14-22.
Ferraris, G. 2008. Fertilización fosforada en cultivos extensivos. Criterios de diagnóstico y herramientas tecnológicas para su manejo en el norte – Centro-oeste de Buenos Aires y sur de Santa Fe. En: AIANBA, editores. IV Jornada de Maíz INTA EEA Pergamino. AIANBA 23 de julio de 2008, Pergamino, ARG. 9 p.
García, F. 2001. Fertilización del maíz en la región pampeana. En: AIANBA, editores, Actas VII Congreso Nacional de Maíz. AIANBA 7 al 9 noviembre de 2001. Pergamino, Buenos Aires, ARG. 6 p.
Gordon, R., N. De Gracia, A. González, J. Franco, y A.P. de Herrera. 1995. Respuesta del cultivo de maíz a la aplicación de Fósforo y Azufre, Panamá 1989-1992. Rev. Cienc. Agropecu. 8:193-214.
Gordon, R., N. De Gracia, A. González, J. Franco, A. Herrera, y S. Jaramillo. 1992. Evaluación de la respuesta física y económica al N, P y K en el cultivo de maíz en la Región de Azuero, Panamá, 1991. En: IDIAP, editores. Síntesis de los Resultados Experimentales del Programa de Maíz Panamá 1991- 1992. IDIAP, Los Santos, PAN. p. 135-141.
Gordon, R., J. Franco, y A. González. 2004. Determinación de la dosis óptima de Nitrógeno para el cultivo de maíz con tres modelos de respuesta, Azuero, Panamá, 2000-2002. Rev. Cienc. Agropecu. 15:1-16.
Gordon, R., A. González, y J. Franco. 2000. Manejo de la fertilización nitrogenada en el cultivo de maíz. Azuero, Panamá, 1996–1998. Rev. Cienc. Agropecu. 10:123-134.
Hinsinger, P., E. Betencourt, L. Bernard, A. Brauman, C. Plassard, J. Shen, X. Tang, and F. Zhang. 2011. P for two, sharing a scarce resource e soil phosphorus acquisition in the rhizosphere of intercropped species. Plant Physiol. 156:1078-1086.
Howard, D.D., M.E. Essington, and J. Logan. 2002. Longterm broadcast and banded phosphorus fertilization of corn produced using two tillage systems. Agron. J. 94:51-56. doi: 10.2134/ agronj2002.5100
Jauregui, M.A., and G. Saín. 1990. Continuous economic analysis of crop response to fertilizer in on farm research. CIMMYT, México D.F., MEX.
Khan, S., and M. Hanjra. 2009. Footprints of water and energy inputs in food production - Global perspectives. Food Policy 34:130-140.
Littell, R.C., G.A. Milliken, W.W. Stroup, R.D. Wolfinger, and O. Schabenberger. 2006. SAS for mixed models. 2nd. ed. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA.
McWilliams, D.A., D.R. Berglund, and G.J. Endres. 1999. Corn growth and management quick guide. NDSU Extension Service. University of North Dakota y University of Minnesota. http://library.ndsu.edu/tools/dspace/load/?file=/repository/bitstream/handle/10365/9112/A1173_1999.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed 17 apr. 2015).
Name, B., y A. Cordero. 1987. Recomendaciones para la fertilización de suelos: Hojas guías por cultivo. En: S. Jaramillo editor, Compendio de los resultados de Investigación presentados en la Jornada Científica. IDIAP. Santiago, PAN. p. 22.
Pérez, M.J. 1995. Comparación de cuatro métodos extractantes de fósforo disponible en suelos tratados con fuentes de fósforo de diferentes grados de solubilidad. Agron. Trop. 45:507-526.
Pineda-Mares, P., J.F. Martínez, A. Amante, y V.M. Ruíz. 2001. Respuesta del maíz al fósforo y un mejorador de suelos en áreas yesosas de la zona media de San Luís Potosí. Rev. Chapingo, Serie Zonas Áridas 2:106-113.
Prystupa, P., F.H. Gutiérrez, F. Salvagiotti, G. Ferraris, and L. Couretot. 2006. Measuring corn response to fertilization in the Northern Pampas. Better Crops 90 (2):25-27.
Ramírez, R., M.D. Beg, O. Colmenares, E. Meléndez, P. Marbal, F. Blanco, E. Guzmán, C. Hernández, y A. Chirinos. 1988. Relación de la respuesta del maíz a la aplicación de fósforo y el P asimilable del suelo. Agron. Trop. 38:5-20.
Randall, G., and R. Hoeft. 1988. Placement methods for improved efficiency of P and K fertilizers: A review. J. Prod. Agric. 1:70-79. doi:10.2134/jpa1988.0070
Senigagliesi, C., R. García, y M.L. de Galetto. 1984. Evaluación de la respuesta del maíz a la fertilización nitrogenada y fosfatada en el área centro-norte de Buenos Aires y sur de Santa Fe. En: Actas III Congreso Nacional de Maíz. 6 al 9 Nov. 1984. Pergamino, Buenos Aires, ARG.
Villarreal, J., L. Barahona, y O. Castillo. 2015. Determinación de las principales formas de fósforo en suelos de Panamá. En: Actas LX Reunión Anual del Programa Cooperativo Centroamericano para el Mejoramiento de Cultivos y Animales (PCCMCA), 4 al 7 de mayo de 2015. Ciudad de Guatemala, GUA.
Villarreal, J., B. Name, y R. García. 2013. Zonificación de suelos de Panamá en base a niveles de nutrientes. Rev. Cienc. Agropecu. 21:71-89.
Welch, L.F., D.L. Mulvaney, L.V. Boone, G.E. McKibben, and J.W. Pendleton. 1966. Relative efficiency of broadcast versus banded phosphorus for corn. Agon. J. 58:283:287. doi:10.2134/agronj1966.00021962005
x
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. Proposed policy for open access journals
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
a. Authors retain the copyright and assign to the journal the right to the first publication, with the work registered under the attribution, non-commercial and no-derivative license from Creative Commons, which allows third parties to use what has been published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and upon first publication in this journal, the work may not be used for commercial purposes and the publications may not be used to remix, transform or create another work.
b. Authors may enter into additional independent contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book) provided that they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (e.g. on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it may lead to productive exchanges and faster and wider dissemination of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).