Revisión Bibliográfica 2 | Recibido: 28 de junio del 2018 | Corregido: 29 de noviembre del 2018 | Aceptado: 06 de diciembre del 2018 | Publicado: 01 de enero de 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15517/ECI.V1I1.33807
¿Cómo citar este artículo?
Cruz Alvarado, M.A. y Bazán, P. (2019). Understanding the Internet of Nano Things: overview, trends, and challenges. e-Ciencias de la Información, 9(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.15517/ECI.V1I1.33807
e-Ciencias de la Información, volumen 9, número 1, Ene-Jun 2019
ISSN: 1649-4142
RESUMEN
A través de los años, los avances tecnológicos han llevado a un rápido crecimiento de entornos inteligentes (oficinas, hogares, ciudades, etc.). El aumento de entornos inteligentes sugiere la interconectividad de las aplicaciones y el uso de la Internet. Por esta razón, surge lo que se conoce como Internet de las cosas (IoT, por sus siglas en inglés). La ampliación del concepto IoT brinda acceso a la Internet de las nano cosas (IoNT, por sus siglas en inglés), un nuevo paradigma de redes de comunicación basado en nanotecnología y IoT, en otras palabras, un paradigma con la capacidad de interconectar dispositivos a nano escala a través de redes existentes. Este nuevo paradigma denominado IoNT se presenta al mundo como una opción para diversos campos de aplicación. Por lo tanto, surgen nuevos desafíos y oportunidades de investigación. En consecuencia, este trabajo tiene como objetivo investigar el estado del arte y analizar las tendencias para el uso de IoNT, su aplicación y los desafíos futuros en diferentes campos de interés social, debido a que IoNT se presenta como una opción para la investigación con las capacidades necesarias para involucrarse en muchos campos del bienestar social. Se concluye que la literatura actual de IoNT está prevalecida por las tecnologías, las aplicaciones se enfocan en el cuidado de la salud y no se dispone de una estandarización internacional en cuanto a la privacidad, seguridad o la arquitectura de las nano redes.
Palabras Clave: Internet de las nano cosas, Internet de las cosas, nanotecnología, nano redes, nano comunicación.
ABSTRACT
Over the years, technological advancements have led to rapid growth of smart environments (offices, homes, cities, etc.). The increase of intelligent environments suggests the interconnectivity of applications and the use of the Internet. For this reason, arise what is known as the Internet of Things (IoT). The expansion of the IoT concept gives access to the Internet of Nano Things (IoNT). A new communication networks paradigm based on nanotechnology and IoT, in other words, a paradigm with the capacity to interconnect nano-scale devices through existing networks. This new paradigm so-called IoNT is presented to the world as an option for various fields of application. Therefore, new challenges and research opportunities have arisen. Consequently, this work aims to investigate state of the art and analyze trends for the use of IoNT, its application and future challenges in different fields of social interest, because IoNT is presented as an option for research with the capacities needed to get involved in many fields of social welfare. It is concluded that technologies prevail current IoNT literature, applications are focused on health care, and there is no international standardization regarding privacy, security or architecture of nano-networks.
Keywords: Internet of Nano Things (IoNT), Internet of Things (IoT), Nanotechnology, Nano-Networks, Nano Communication.
1. INTRODUCTION
New technological trends such as the Internet of Things (IoT) have shown that computers are not the only ones with a gateway to the Internet and that there are various devices and objects with this access capability. It has become the most important research topic in the last 10 years (Akyildiz, Pierobon, Balasubramaniam, & Koucheryavy, 2015), whose objective is based on everyday objects having identification, detection, interconnection and processing capabilities to communicate with each other and with services through the Internet to solve a specific and useful need of people (Whitmore, Agarwal, & Da Xu, 2015).
Therefore, IoT has given researchers a thorough view of the interconnection of objects to the Internet, and with it, the Internet of Nano Things (IoNT) has emerged. IoNT adds a new scale in IoT incorporating nano-sensors in the devices, which in turn allows it to connect and communicate through the nanotechnology network with internet.
This new paradigm of communication networks will have an impact in almost all fields of our society, from health to the protection of the environment. Therefore, there are nano-scale properties that require new solutions for communication and that must be provided by the information and communication sciences (Akyildiz & Jornet, 2010b).
The focus of this work is based on the study of the current state of IoNT, which links two approaches where there have been significant advances in recent years such as IoT and nanotechnologies. The aim of this work is to investigate state of the art and analyze trends in the use of IoNT, its application and future challenges in different fields of social interest.
This document specifies the methodology used in section two. Then, we offer the conceptual bases of the study, detailing the definitions and characteristics of IoNT, the capabilities, and possibilities of IoNT in the third and fourth section. In addition, we present the analysis of trends and challenges of IoNT for its use and application in different fields of social interest according to the classification of the literature, emphasizing that current research is based on the dissemination of technologies and that communication aspects are the main challenges that the IoNT systems face. Finally, the conclusions are addressed.
2. METHODOLOGY
This work is carried out from a qualitative methodology in which research on state of the art and an analysis of IoNT trends is carried out. A search, review, and evaluation of the bibliography related to research topics are carried out. The above allows to establish state of the art, determine definitions, characteristics, and possibilities of IoNT. Also, it enables the creation of a series of criteria for the analysis of IoNT trends and challenges
Kitchenham´s work (Kitchenham, 2004) was considered for the selection of the bibliographic material, where several composures were established, such as research questions, keywords, search strings, inclusion and exclusion criteria and selected articles.
2.1. Research Questions
The research questions are based on the stated objective. They will be used for the evaluation of the documents found, responding to the goal of the investigation: RQ1-what is IoNT? RQ2-What are the characteristics of IoNT? RQ3-What are the practices related to IoNT? RQ4-What are the possibilities and trends of IoNT?
2.2. Search Strategy
The search strategy defines the sources of information, keywords and search strings used to locate the bibliographic material. The databases selected were IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect and Springer Link they have various documents (articles, books, conferences, etc.) with the support of the scientific community (Martínez, 2016). In the same way, Google Scholar search engine was used to carry out inquiries of other documents.
The keywords used were: Nanotechnology, Nanosensors, Nanonetworks, Communication, Internet of nano things, Architecture, Applications, Challenges and they were combined for convenience with logical operators to make the search strings: Nanotechnology “Internet of nano thing”, Nanosensor “Internet of nano things”, Architecture “Internet of nano things”, Applications “Internet of nano things”, Challenges “Internet of nano things”.
2.3. Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria
The criteria consist of descriptions by which the articles must be considered to download and subsequently apply the research questions. In the inclusion criteria, the articles included will be those with a description of IoNT Characteristics, proposals for IoNT applications, new communication paradigms, proposed devices based on nanotechnology and challenges and IoNT opportunities. The exclusion criteria were the language and incomplete text.
2.4. Selected Articles
In the localized literature, actions were carried out such as reading the title, abstract, and keywords. Subsequently, the inclusion/exclusion criteria and research questions are applied, whose purpose is to obtain information relevant to the research topic. The search provided a total of 269 articles. After applying the inclusion/exclusion criteria and research questions with an answer “yes” 47 articles were selected. Table 1 shows the chosen items.
TablE 1
Selected articles from the search, review, and evaluation process of the bibliographic material.
ID |
Authors |
Title |
D-1 |
El-din & Manjaiah (2017) |
Internet of Nano Things and Industrial Internet of Things |
D-2 |
Nayyar, Puri, & Le (2017) |
Internet of Nano Things (IoNT): Next Evolutionary Step in Nanotechnology |
D-3 |
Dabhi & Maheta (2017) |
Internet of Nano Things-The Next Big Thing |
D-4 |
Llopis-Lorente et al. (2017) |
Interactive models of communication at the nanoscale using nanoparticles that talk to one another |
D-5 |
Gandino, Celozzi, & Rebaudengo (2017) |
A Key Management Scheme for Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks |
D-6 |
Balasubramaniam, Jornet, Pierobon, & Koucheryavy (2016) |
Guest editorial special issue on the internet of nano things |
D-7 |
Akkari et al. (2016) |
Distributed Timely Throughput Optimal Scheduling for the Internet of Nano-Things |
D-8 |
Ali, Aleyadeh, & Abu-Elkhair (2016) |
Internet of Nano-Things Network Models and Medical Applications |
D-9 |
Jarmakiewicz, Parobczak, & Maslanka (2016) |
On the Internet of Nano Things in healthcare network |
D-10 |
OTEC, IBEC, & VHIR (2016) |
BENCHMARKING INTERNACIONAL |
D-11 |
Afsharinejad, Davy, Jennings, & Brennan (2016) |
Performance analysis of plant monitoring nanosensor networks at THz frequencies |
D-12 |
Ali & Abu-Elkheir (2015) |
Internet of nano-things healthcare applications: Requirements, opportunities, and challenges |
D-13 |
Dressler & Fischer (2015) |
Connecting in-body nano communication with body area networks: Challenges and opportunities of the Internet of Nano Things |
D-14 |
Miraz, Ali, Excell, & Picking (2015) |
A review on Internet of Things (IoT), Internet of Everything (IoE) and Internet of Nano Things (IoNT) |
D-15 |
Akyildiz, Pierobon, Balasubramaniam, & Koucheryavy (2015) |
The internet of Bio-Nano things |
D-16 |
Bhargava, Ivanov & Donnelly (2015) |
Internet of Nano Things for Dairy Farming |
D-17 |
Stuerzebecher, Fuchs, Zeitner, & Tuennermann (2015) |
High-resolution proximity lithography for nano-optical components |
D-18 |
Loscri, Marchal, Mitton, Fortino, & Vasilakos (2014) |
Security and privacy in molecular communication and networking: Opportunities and challenges |
D-19 |
Balasubramaniam & Kangasharju (2013) |
Realizing the internet of nano things: Challenges, solutions, and applications |
D-20 |
Jornet & Akyildiz (2013) |
Graphene-based Plasmonic Nano-Antenna for Terahertz Band Communication in Nanonetworks |
D-21 |
Dressler & Kargl (2012a) |
Security in nano communication: Challenges and open research issues |
D-22 |
Dressler & Kargl (2012b) |
|
|
D-23 |
Jornet & Akyildiz (2012b) |
|
|
D-24 |
Jornet & Akyildiz (2012a) |
The internet of multimedia Nano-Things |
|
D-25 |
Smith et al. (2012) |
Design and fabrication of nanoscale ultrasonic transducers |
|
D-26 |
Maynard (2012) |
Nano-technology and nano-toxicology |
|
D-27 |
Kalkan & Levi (2012) |
Key distribution scheme for peer-to-peer communication in mobile underwater wireless sensor networks |
|
D-28 |
Hung, Hsu, Shu, & Wen (2012) |
On the performance of a rapid synchronization algorithm for IR-UWB receivers |
|
D-29 |
Akyildiz, Jornet, & Pierobon (2011) |
Nanonetworks: A New Frontier in Communications |
|
D-30 |
Sorkin & Zhang (2011) |
Graphene-based pressure nano-sensors |
|
D-31 |
Wu et al. (2011) |
High-frequency scaled graphene transistors on diamond-like carbon |
|
D-32 |
Takeuchi & Mora (2011) |
Divulgación y formación en nanotecnología en México |
|
D-33 |
Akyildiz & Jornet (2010a) |
Electromagnetic wireless nanosensor networks |
|
D-34 |
Akyildiz & Jornet (2010b) |
The Internet of nano-things |
|
D-35 |
Gregori & Akyildiz (2010) |
A new NanoNetwork architecture using flagellated bacteria and catalytic nanomotors |
|
D-36 |
Liu, Lai, & Ho (2010) |
High Spatial Resolution Photodetectors Based on Nanoscale Three-Dimensional Structures |
D-37 |
Záyago-Lau & Foladori (2010) |
|
|
D-38 |
Atakan & Akan (2010) |
|
|
D-39 |
Parcerisa (2009) |
Molecular communication options for long range nanonetworks |
|
D-40 |
Parcerisa & Akyildiz (2009) |
Molecular communication options for long range nanonetworks |
|
D-41 |
Rutherglen & Burke (2009) |
Nanoelectromagnetics: Circuit and electromagnetic properties of carbon nanotubes |
|
D-42 |
Akyildiz, Brunetti, & Blázzque (2008) |
Nanonetworks: A new communication paradigm |
|
D-43 |
Kaviani, Sadr, & Abrishamifar (2008) |
Generation and detection of nano ultrasound waves with a multiple strained layer structure |
|
D-44 |
Hegg & Lin (2007) |
Nano-scale nanocrystal quantum dot photodetectors |
|
D-45 |
Foladori & Invernizz (2006) |
La nanotecnología: una solución en busca de problemas |
|
D-46 |
Djenouri, Khelladi, & Badache (2005) |
A survey of security issues in mobile ad hoc and sensor networks |
|
D-47 |
Britto & Castro (2012) |
Nanotecnología, hacia un nuevo portal científico-tecnológico |
Source: Authors’ elaboration, 2018
Therefore, from the search, review, and evaluation process of the bibliographic material was collected a total 47 articles to build state of the art; identifying characteristics, applications, and capacities for their later analysis in which the possibilities and IoNT trends in various fields social welfare are exposed.
3. IONT FEATURES
IoNT has emerged mainly from the new technological trends that have arisen in recent years, resulting from the search for new research spaces and emerging technologies to produce hardware devices at scale. Therefore, to understand IoNT, it is necessary to know the primary definitions, understand how nano-things are communicated, describe their architecture and present the application domains.
3.1. Purpose of IoNT
By Nayyar, Puri, & Le (2017), the first concept of IoNT was proposed by Akyildiz & Jornet a paper entitled “The Internet of Nano-Things” in 2010. Describing the term of IoNT as “The interconnection of nanoscale devices with existing communication networks and ultimately the Internet defines a new networking paradigm that is further referred to as the Internet of Nano-Things” (Akyildiz & Jornet, 2010b, p. 58). Similarly, Miraz, Ali, Excell, & Picking (2015) presents to IoNT as one extension of the Internet of everything, but where you have the possibility of incorporating nano-sensors in various objects and using nano-networks.
Moreover, in Balasubramaniam & Kangasharju (2013) it is mentioned that these miniature sensors, interconnected through nano-networks, could obtain fine-grained data within objects and from hard-to-access areas, leading to the discovery of novel insights and applications. That is, the purpose of IoNT consists of the capacity to interconnect diverse types of devices developed at a nano-scale in a communication network, where it allows the collection of data in places with difficult access.
Figure 1 illustrates the definitions presented for IoNT, show the interconnection which is established between different devices, as are nano-sensor through nano-networks, with the aim provide essential information within complex-to-access areas. For example, on-body nano-sensors could provide electrocardiographic and other vital signals, while environmental nano-sensors could collect information about pathogens and allergens in a given area. (Balasubramaniam & Kangasharju, 2013).
FigurE 1
Nano-communication
Source: Taken from Balasubramaniam & Kangasharju (2013, p. 63).
In Akyildiz, Brunetti, & Blázzque (2008), for 2008 the works of literature that be referred to a term of nano-networks figured as electronic components with the capacity of interconnection within a nano-scale chip. However, defined the term as nano-networks “are not a simple extension of traditional communication networks at the nano-scale. They are a complete new communication paradigm, in which most of the communication processes are inspired by biological systems found in nature” (Akyildiz et al., 2008, p. 2266). Figure 2 shows two alternatives in nano-scale communications. These are molecular communications and nano-electromagnetic communications (Akyildiz & Jornet, 2010b).
FigurE 2
Communications in wireless nanosensor networks
Sourcee: Taken from Akyildiz & Jornet (2010a, p. 4).
Molecular communication is a new approach to communications between nano-machines (Gregori & Akyildiz, 2010), it is inspired by the communication mechanisms that occur between living cells (Parcerisa, 2009). It is defined as the transmission and reception of information encoded in molecules (Akyildiz & Jornet, 2010b). As well as in molecular communication the authors Akyildiz & Jornet indicate that nano-electromagnetic communication is defined as the transmission and reception of electromagnetic (EM) radiation from components based on novel nano-materials (Akyildiz & Jornet, 2010b).
3.2. IoNT Architecture
This new paradigm of networks based on the intercommunication of nano-devices requires a series of components to form an IoNT architecture model. Figure 3 shows two models of IoNT architecture proposed by Akyildiz & Jornet (2010b); On the left side, intracorporal nanotechnologies for sanitary applications and on the right side, the architecture for interconnected offices.
The components of the network architectures shown in Figure 3 are the same for both healthcare applications and offices, among which are: Nano-node, Nano-router, Nano-micro interface, and Gateway.
FigurE 3
Network architectures for IoNT
Sourcee: Taken from Akyildiz & Jornet (2010b, p. 59).
In Nayyar et al. (2017), Dabhi & Maheta (2017) and Akyildiz & Jornet (2010b) the authors express that the Nano-node, Nano-router, Nano-micro interface and Gateways components are part of the IoNT architecture regardless of the type of application. Also, they describe the terms in the following way:
3.3. IoNT domains
IoNT contains two domains: Internet of the Nano-Things Multimedia (IoMNT) and Internet of the Bio-Nano Things (IoBNT) (El-din & Manjaiah, 2017), also, the architecture of the nanodevices can be different, depending on the capabilities that it provides nanotechnology. In Jornet & Akyildiz(2012a), IoMNT is specified as “The interconnection of pervasively deployed multimedia nano-devices with existing communication networks and ultimately the Internet defines a novel communication paradigm that is further referred to as the Internet of Multimedia Nano-Things” (p. 242) .
The vision or perspective of multimedia nano-things concludes that nano-components have to be integrated into a single device (Jornet & Akyildiz, 2012a). As seen in Figure 4, a single device is made up of different nano-components (nano-cameras, nano-phones, nano-antenna, etc.). Moreover, this device must be tiny of at least a few cubic micrometers (Akyildiz & Jornet, 2010a; Akyildiz, Jornet, & Pierobon, 2011).
FigurE 4
The architecture of multimedia nano-things
.
Sourcee: Taken from Jornet & Akyildiz (2012a, p. 244)
Next, some particularities of the architecture of IoMNT are described:
The capabilities of multimedia, processing, data storage, energy, etc., of the nano-devices, will not always be the same, these capacities vary according to their size (Jornet & Akyildiz, 2012a).
On the other hand, the IoBNT domain has the perspective on biological structures. It is mainly based on biological cells. IoBNT is defined as “uniquely identifiable basic structural and functional units that operate and interact within the biological environment” (Akyildiz et al., 2015, p. 33).
Figure 5 shows how the comparison of elements by a biological cell with the features or components that make up an electronic device is carried out. For example, the nucleus of the cell with the control unit and the cytoplasm with the memory.
FigurE 5
Elements of a biological cell and IoT components
Sourcee: Taken from Akyildiz et al. (2015, p. 33).
Next, some particularities of the architecture of IoBNT are described:
4. CAPABILITIES AND POSSIBILITIES OF IONT
This section takes a tour of the leading possibilities and capabilities of IoNT, including nanotechnology; directly responsible for IoNT systems.
The concept of nanotechnology was proposed for the first time in 1974, in a paper in which it was explained that nanotechnology was based on the processing, separation, consolidation, etc., of materials by an atom (Akyildiz et al., 2011). Nayyar et al. (2017) defines the most basic concept of nanotechnology as the engineering of functional systems at the molecular scale. It can manipulate matter in tiny scales or manometric scale (Foladori & Invernizz, 2006; Záyago-Lau & Foladori, 2010).
The Ministry of Science, Technology and Productive Innovation of the government of Argentina (Observatorio Tecnológico [OTEC], Instituto de Bioingeniería de Cataluña [IBEC], & Fundació Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron– Institut de Recerca [VHIR], 2016) indicates that nanotechnology will have an essential attribution on products and services worldwide, mainly in nanotechnological fields such as Nano-biotechnology, Nano-analytical, Nano-materials, Nano-optics, Nanoelectronics, and Nanochemistry.
In short, nanotechnologies are new, are expanding at high speeds (Llopis-Lorente et al., 2017; Maynard, 2012), and will transform the world’s leading products and services. For Takeuchi & Mora (2011) in a period of between 10 and 20 years, a significant part of the industrial production, medical care, and interaction with the environment will change due to the use of new technologies. So, the possibilities and capabilities of IoNT will increase, due to its dependence on nanotechnology.
4.1. Security in nano-things
IoNT is vulnerable to all types of attacks, either physical or through wireless technologies, given that this type of device does not meet with constant vigilance (Dressler & Fischer, 2015; Dressler & Kargl, 2012a; Jornet & Akyildiz, 2012a; Loscri, Marchal, Mitton, Fortino, & Vasilakos, 2014). The attacks can occur to acquire private data through the theft of sensors, interrupt applications controlled utilizing computers or modify the communication links in the nano-networks.
In Jornet & Akyildiz (2012a, 2012b) there are three dimensions to be investigated to find greater security and privacy in IoNT. These dimensions are: new mechanisms for authentication, guarantee the integrity of the data and guarantee the confidentiality of the user. Also, Dressler & Fischer (2015) shows the existence of new security methods among nano-communications, especially the connections between IoNT and IoT. These security aspects mentioned are nano-communication security, security objectives and security mechanisms for IoNT systems. The security objectives are a series of concepts that guarantee the security of communication systems (Dressler & Kargl, 2012b). They are made up of “confidentiality, integrity, and availability” (Dressler & Kargl, 2012a, p. 6184).
4.2. Security mechanisms for IoNT systems
One way to increase the security of IoNT systems is to consider the following mechanisms to establish secure communications in nano-sensor networks:
4.3. Protocols for nano-networks
Unique features provided by nanotechnology characterizes the nano-scale devices. They also present a series of drawbacks regarding communication, mainly to establish a network connection of multiple nano-devices. Next, is shows preliminary ideas for the creation of network connections of various nano-scale devices. This is elaborated from information collected in Akyildiz & Jornet (2010b).
4.4. Applications of IoNT
The possibilities offered by the new techniques for the collection of fine-grained information by IoNT allows to increase the existing applications and to venture into new fields in contrast with IoT. Here are some applications of IoNT:
The paradigm of IoNT and its high capacity of application in different fields have managed to transform the day to day of people, boosts the economy and above all offers the possibility of continuing research in various areas (Balasubramaniam, Jornet, Pierobon, & Koucheryavy, 2016). The breadth of the capabilities and opportunities of IoNT in the world indicates that the IoNT market is planning a high economic investment, with an approximate of $ 9.69 billion by the year 2020 (Dabhi & Maheta, 2017).
5. AN ANALYSIS OF CHALLENGES AND TRENDS FOR IONT
The analysis of the study was done by grouping the literature analyzed and then by defining criteria. Table 2 shows the categories and classification of the criteria for each of the categories
TablE 2
Categories and classification criteria
Categories |
Criteria |
Perceptible |
Hardware |
Software |
|
Architecture |
|
Applications |
Healthcare |
Industrial |
|
Environmental |
|
Challenges |
Security |
Privacy |
|
Communications |
Source: Authors’ elaboration, 2018.
5.1. Application of criteria
Then, the application of criteria in the selected literature for the study is carried out. It is necessary to highlight that 26 publications were chosen from the results provided by the application of the research questions RQ2 or RQ4 with “yes” answer. Because these provide direct contents and referring to characteristics, possibilities, and challenges of IoNT. Table 3 presents the 26 publications that will apply the criteria that will determine trends (technologies and applications) and IoNT challenges.
TablE 3
List of publications for the application of criteria
ID |
Authors |
D-1 |
El-din & Manjaiah (2017) |
D-2 |
Nayyar et al. (2017) |
D-3 |
Dabhi & Maheta (2017) |
D-6 |
Balasubramaniam et al. (2016) |
D-7 |
Akkari et al. (2016) |
D-8 |
Ali et al. (2016) |
D-9 |
Jarmakiewicz et al. (2016) |
D-11 |
Afsharinejad et al. (2016) |
D-12 |
Ali & Abu-Elkheir (2015) |
D-13 |
Dressler & Fischer (2015) |
D-14 |
Miraz et al. (2015) |
D-15 |
Akyildiz et al. (2015) |
D-16 |
Bhargava et al. (2015) |
D-18 |
Loscri et al. (2014) |
D-19 |
Balasubramaniam & Kangasharju (2013) |
D-20 |
Jornet & Akyildiz (2013) |
D-22 |
Dressler & Kargl (2012b) |
D-23 |
Jornet & Akyildiz (2012b) |
D-24 |
Jornet & Akyildiz (2012a) |
D-29 |
Akyildiz et al. (2011) |
D-33 |
Akyildiz & Jornet (2010a) |
D-34 |
Akyildiz & Jornet (2010b) |
D-35 |
Gregori & Akyildiz (2010) |
D-38 |
Atakan & Akan (2010) |
D-40 |
Parcerisa & Akyildiz (2009) |
D-42 |
Akyildiz et al. (2008) |
Source: Authors’ elaboration, 2018.
Then, in the following sub-sections, the analysis of the literature for each of the categories and their respective criteria is provided.
5.1.1. Technology IoNT
The category of technologies contains the criteria that the IoNT information systems depend on in their combination. The application determines the focus and trends of the selected publications, this is established through the “yes” or “no” responses that each work contains in each criterion.
Figure 6 illustrates the results of the application of the criteria, highlighting that the publications are more focused on providing details regarding the types of hardware and architectures of the IoNT systems on the implementation of software for the administration of the systems. This could be happening because industrial systems have a very critical security parameter, and that is that they must guarantee and protect people’s lives. Therefore, the field of software development would be progressing very slowly because it is not clear how data will be protected when this network is connected to the Internet.
FigurE 6
Results found of the application of the technologies criteria
Sourcee: Authors’ elaboration. 2018.
Concerning the hardware criterion, 16 of 26 publications emphasize the essential and, more common devices that should be used for the creation of an IoNT system and highlights the importance of nanotechnology as a fundamental basis for the discovery and development of the nano-devices of IoNT. The software criterion, only 3 of 26 of the publications mention the importance of incorporating a middleware, with the purpose of obtaining an administration of the systems, data analysis, and conservation of energy. But most publications do not even mention the need for software.
Regarding the architecture criterion, 18 of 26 documents analyzed show the importance of establishing an architecture, mainly highlighting which hardware devices are necessary for the establishment of a nano-sensor network.
5.1.2. Applications IoNT
In the category of applications, the criteria to determine the trends of the work related to IoNT is highlighted, mainly highlighting the works developed under this criterion and which aim to provide a possible solution or improvement in that field. It is added that IoNT contains finer techniques for the collection of information in comparison with IoT, therefore, it allows IoNT to get involved in both new and existing applications.
Figure 7 contains the results of the application of criteria for the classification of applications in IoNT. Although there are multiple application areas that IoNT has in different fields, they do not determine the existence of works made and published in each one of them. On the contrary, it can be observed that among the publications studied there are only six works focused on the application of IoNT in a specific area.
FigurE 7
Results found of the application of the criteria of the application
Sourcee: Authors’ elaboration. 2018.
The healthcare criterion stipulates that 4 out of 26 of the publications (D-8, D-9, D-12, and D-13) focus on the biomedical field and represent the highest proportion of jobs applied in a specific area on the part of IoNT. It is necessary to emphasize that many of the publications studied refer to hardware or architectures focused on this criterion, but do not aim to provide or establish a solution in this field, rather than providing a vision or possibility for a future application.
The application criteria of industry and environment indicate only 1 of 26 of the publications studied, in the case of industry (D-16) focuses on dairy farming, consists of a work that is in process. They present IoNT with great possibilities and benefits for the monitoring of pastures, animal health, and reduction in the resistance of antibiotics.
The environmental area (D-11) presents a series of high-resolution models for plant monitoring by applying channel modeling, communication with the Terahertz band and nano-sensors through a Wireless Nano Sensor Network.
It is specified that the significant advances and applications of IoNT are focusing on medical health, highlighting among them the separation of IoNT in two application domains such as IoBNT and IoMNT.
5.1.3. Challenges IoNT
In this category, the application of the criteria seeks to determine in which critical aspects IoT systems face. If it consists of security, privacy or communication. Regarding the criteria of challenges, Figure 8 illustrates the results of the application in each of the publications studied, where the communication criterion stands out as the biggest IoNT challenge.
FigurE 8
Results found of the application of the criteria of the challenge
Sourcee: Authors’ elaboration. 2018.
The results obtained in the security criteria indicate that 10 out of 26 of the publications emphasize the importance of the protection of the IoNT systems. Particularly the security of the data that is collected through the nano-sensors, considering it necessary to comply with the aspects mentioned in Section 4, such as key management, intrusion detection, access control, etc.
For the privacy criterion, 9 of 26 of the studies studied show the importance of establishing new and better privacy mechanisms, remembering that in the application trends of the IoNT systems are located the care of human health. The most important thing about privacy in the biomedical field is that as soon as the data is collected from the human body, it must be protected against unauthorized access, as it is evident that these are private data. Based on this criterion, Section 4 presented the security objectives, which, if met, would ensure the privacy of the data, but it is necessary to establish mechanisms that can be trusted since most of the security techniques current systems cannot be implemented due to size and capacity.
The criterion of communication is the most relevant of the challenges, 20 of 26 publications mention the importance of establishing and consolidating communication mechanisms, mainly due to the problems they face today. Some of the communication problems are: addressing of nano-devices, routing of information, sharing of communication channels, detection of networks and reliability. In recent years, a high deal of research has emerged in the field of communication. However, communication techniques or methods have not yet been consolidated, fulfilling the communication problems mentioned in the previous section. Even more, integrating and solving security and privacy environments.
Furthermore, we must remember that communication in IoNT is faced in two domains; molecular communication and nano-electromagnetic communication. In both cases, the routing problems stand out. In the fact of molecular communication, they indicate that the information-carrying molecules move very slowly and may lose information. In nano-electromagnetic communication, the limited memory, the low computational power and the limitation of energy stand out.
5.1.4. Trends and challenges of IoNT
IoNT is a paradigm whose research is active and has increased year after year since 2010 where Akyildiz & Jornet make the first definition. Based on the analysis carried out, it can be seen in Figure 9 that 21 of 26 publications focus on exceeding the technologies and 22 of 26 indicate challenges they face to achieve the establishment of IoNT, recalling that the most significant problem centers on in aspects of communication.
It is reasonable that the investigations are focused on the technologies, and these present challenges because IoNT is a new paradigm and has not been fully established. The studies are focused on the possibilities and capabilities of nanotechnologies for the implementation of hardware and architectures as observed in Section 3.
FigurE 9
Result obtained from the application of the criteria by category
Sourcee: Authors’ elaboration. 2018.
Finally, only 6 of 26 of the publications are focused on an application to a specific field, with health care being the most involved.
It is understandable that so far there are few concrete works in IoNT because it is a paradigm that is maturing and still faces many challenges.
6. CONCLUSIONS
This paper offers a description of the current state of IoNT, analyzing the literature and identifying characteristics, trends, and possibilities, describing challenges that in one way or another are threats for the diffusion and establishment of IoNT. A list of bibliographical references was compiled which were classified into three main categories (Technologies, Applications, and Challenges) and a set of criteria.
IoNT presents capabilities and possibilities to improve many aspects of people’s lives. Its main qualities are focused on monitoring and diagnostic services, which would help and enhance decision making and results in various fields of application. For example, it could allow progress in the establishment of telemedicine and eHealth.
It provides a great variety of nano-devices with diverse capacities independent of the type of architecture that is required, to obtain data of objects, people, animals, plants, etc. However, there is no homogeneity between the development of hardware and software. The hardware advances faster than the software, therefore, the deficiencies in the security and privacy of the data.
There are many challenges that IoNT faces, but nanotechnology provides diverse fields of study that advance with increasing force and increase the possibilities of solving current deficiencies. But, the current market directs research to particular situations that usually do not benefit most of the population.
The relevant issues regarding privacy, security and the architecture of nano-networks of IoNT do not apply under any standard of international standardization. A way forward would be to define standard interfaces where protocols and primitives are included to allow transmissions through nano-devices, interfaces that are also available with higher-magnitude systems, with the possibility of monitoring the networks.
Said the previous thing, creating new standards would allow establishing the communications between the nano-devices, obtaining that these normalizations can be implemented in diverse applications of IoNT.
Only time will tell how long it will last IoNT to establish itself thoroughly, but it’s clear that it is a way to gather new technologies and that will transform products and services in the world.
In summary, the review of the literature provided some significant findings, where future research efforts can be focused. These include:
7. REFERENCES
Afsharinejad, A., Davy, A., Jennings, B., & Brennan, C. (2016). Performance analysis of plant monitoring nanosensor networks at THz frequencies. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 3(1), 59–69. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2015.2463685
Akkari, N., Wang, P., Jornet, J., Fadel, E., Elrefaei, L., Ghulam, M., Akyildiz, I. F. (2016). Distributed Timely Throughput Optimal Scheduling for the Internet of Nano-Things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 3(6), 1202–1212. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2016.2573679
Akyildiz, I. F., Brunetti, F., & Blázzque, C. (2008). Nanonetworks: A new communication paradigm. Computer Networks, 52(12), 2260–2279. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2008.04.001
Akyildiz, I. F., & Jornet, J. (2010a). Electromagnetic wireless nanosensor networks. Nano Communication Networks, 1(1), 3–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nancom.2010.04.001
Akyildiz, I. F., & Jornet, J. (2010b). The Internet of nano-things. IEEE Wireless Communications, 17(6), 58–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.2010.5675779
Akyildiz, I. F., Jornet, J., & Pierobon, M. (2011). Nanonetworks: A New Frontier in Communications. Communications of the ACM, 54(11), 84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2018396.2018417
Akyildiz, I. F., Pierobon, M., Balasubramaniam, S., & Koucheryavy, Y. (2015). The internet of Bio-Nano things. IEEE Communications Magazine, 53(3), 32–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2015.7060516
Ali, N., & Abu-Elkheir, M. (2015). Internet of nano-things healthcare applications: Requirements, opportunities, and challenges. In 2015 IEEE 11th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications, (WiMob) (pp. 9–14). Abu-Dhabi, United Arab Emirate. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/WiMOB.2015.7347934
Ali, N., Aleyadeh, W., & Abu-Elkhair, M. (2016). Internet of Nano-Things Network Models and Medical Applications. In Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC) (pp. 211–215). Paphos, Cyprus: IEEE. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/IWCMC.2016.7577059
Atakan, B., & Akan, O. (2010). Carbon nanotube-based nanoscale ad hoc networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 48(6), 129–135. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2010.5473874
Balasubramaniam, S., Jornet, J., Pierobon, M., & Koucheryavy, Y. (2016). Guest editorial special issue on the internet of nano things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 3(1), 1–3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2016.2516838
Balasubramaniam, S., & Kangasharju, J. (2013). Realizing the internet of nano things: Challenges, solutions, and applications. Computer, 46(2), 62–68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2012.389
Bhargava, K., Ivanov, S., & Donnelly, W. (2015). Internet of Nano Things for Dairy Farming. Proceedings of the Second Annual International Conference on Nanoscale Computing and Communication - NANOCOM’ 15 (pp. 1–2). Boston, United States. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2800795.2800830
Britto, F., & Castro, G. (2012). Nanotecnología, hacia un nuevo portal científico-tecnológico. QuimicaViva, 11(3), 171–183. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=86325090003
Dabhi, K., & Maheta, A. (2017). Internet of Nano Things-The Next Big Thing. IJESC, 7(4), 10602–10604. Retrieved from http://ijesc.org
Djenouri, D., Khelladi, L., & Badache, N. (2005). A survey of security issues in mobile ad hoc and sensor networks. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, 7(4), 2–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2005.1593277
Dressler, F., & Fischer, S. (2015). Connecting in-body nano communication with body area networks: Challenges and opportunities of the Internet of Nano Things. Nano Communication Networks, 6(2), 29–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nancom.2015.01.006
Dressler, F., & Kargl, F. (2012a). Security in nano communication: Challenges and open research issues. In IEEE International Conference on Communications (pp. 6183–6187). Ottawa, Canada. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2012.6364977
Dressler, F., & Kargl, F. (2012b). Towards security in nano-communication: Challenges and opportunities. Nano Communication Networks, 3(3), 151–160. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nancom.2012.08.001
El-din, H., & Manjaiah, D. (2017). Internet of Nano Things and Industrial Internet of Things. In D. P. Acharjya & M. Kalaiselvi Geetha (Eds.), Internet of Things: Novel Advances and Envisioned Applications (Vol. 25, pp. 109–123). Berlin, Germany: Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53472-5
Foladori, G., & Invernizz, N. (2006). La nanotecnología : una solución en busca de problemas. Comercio Exterior, 56(1), 326–334. Retrieved from http://revistas.bancomext.gob.mx/rce/magazines/90/5/Foladori.pdf
Gandino, F., Celozzi, C., & Rebaudengo, M. (2017). A Key Management Scheme for Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks. Applied Sciences, 7(5), 490. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app7050490
Gregori, M., & Akyildiz, I. F. (2010). A new NanoNetwork architecture using flagellated bacteria and catalytic nanomotors. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 28(4), 612–619. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2010.100510
Hegg, M., & Lin, L. (2007). Nano-scale nanocrystal quantum dot photodetectors. In Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics, 2007, CLEO 2007 (Vol. 2, pp. 10–11). Baltimore, MD, USA: IEEE. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/CLEO.2007.4453119
Hung, H.-L., Hsu, H.-C., Shu, S.-L., & Wen, J.-H. (2012). On the performance of a rapid synchronization algorithm for IR-UWB receivers. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, (2012), 557–564. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcm.2205
Jarmakiewicz, J., Parobczak, K., & Maslanka, K. (2016). On the Internet of Nano Things in healthcare network. In 2016 International Conference on Military Communications and Information Systems, ICMCIS. Brussels, Belgium. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMCIS.2016.7496572
Jornet, J., & Akyildiz, I. F. (2012a). The internet of multimedia Nano-Things. Nano Communication Networks, 3(4), 242–251. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nancom.2012.10.001
Jornet, J., & Akyildiz, I. F. (2012b). The Internet of Multimedia Nano-Things in the Terahertz Band. In European Wireless. Poznan, Polonia: VDE. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6216866/
Jornet, J., & Akyildiz, I. F. (2013). Graphene-based Plasmonic Nano-Antenna for Terahertz Band Communication in Nanonetworks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications/Supplement, 31(12), 685–694. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2013.2260115
Kalkan, K., & Levi, A. (2012). Key distribution scheme for peer-to-peer communication in mobile underwater wireless sensor networks. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 698–709. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-012-0182-2
Kaviani, B., Sadr, A., & Abrishamifar, A. (2008). Generation and detection of nano ultrasound waves with a multiple strained layer structure. Optical and Quantum Electronics, 40(8), 577–586. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-008-9246-1
Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele University, 33(TR/SE-0401), 28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1.1.122.3308
Liu, B., Lai, Y., & Ho, S.-T. (2010). High Spatial Resolution Photodetectors Based on Nanoscale Three-Dimensional Structures. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 22(12), 929–931. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2010.2047255
Llopis-Lorente, A., Díez, P., Sánchez, A., Marcos, M., Sancenón, F., Martínez-Ruiz, P., … Martínez-Máñez, R. (2017). Interactive models of communication at the nanoscale using nanoparticles that talk to one another. Nature Communications, 8(May), 15511. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15511
Loscri, V., Marchal, C., Mitton, N., Fortino, G., & Vasilakos, A. (2014). Security and privacy in molecular communication and networking: Opportunities and challenges. In IEEE Transactions on Nanobioscience, 13(3), 198–207. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNB.2014.2349111
Martínez, L. J. (2016). Cómo buscar y usar información científica. Guía para estudiantes universitarios 2016. Santander, España: Competencias Informáticas e Informacionales. Retrieved from http://eprints.rclis.org/29934/
Maynard, R. (2012). Nano-technology and nano-toxicology. Emerging Health Threats Journal, 5(1), 1–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.3402/ehtj.v5i0.17508
Miraz, M., Ali, M., Excell, P., & Picking, R. (2015). A review on Internet of Things (IoT), Internet of Everything (IoE) and Internet of Nano Things (IoNT). In Internet Technologies and Applications, ITA 2015 (pp. 219–224). Wrexham, UK. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ITechA.2015.7317398
Nayyar, A., Puri, V., & Le, D.-N. (2017). Internet of Nano Things (IoNT): Next Evolutionary Step in Nanotechnology. Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 7(1), 4–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.5923/j.nn.20170701.02
Observatorio Tecnológico, Instituto de Bioingeniería de Cataluña, & Fundació Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron– Institut de Recerca. (2016). Estudios de consultoría en el sector nanotecnológico: Benchmarking internacional (pp. 1-71). Ciudad Atónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina: Mincyt. Retrieved from http://www.mincyt.gob.ar/adjuntos/archivos/000/046/0000046951.pdf
Parcerisa, L. (2009). Molecular communication options for long range nanonetworks. UPCommons. España: Universidad Politécnica de Catalunya. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2099.1/8361
Parcerisa, L., & Akyildiz, I. F. (2009). Molecular communication options for long range nanonetworks. Computer Networks, 53(16), 2753–2766. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2009.08.001
Rutherglen, C., & Burke, P. (2009). Nanoelectromagnetics: Circuit and electromagnetic properties of carbon nanotubes. Small, 5(8), 884–906. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.200800527
Smith, R., Arca, A., Chen, X., Marques, L., Clark, M., Aylott, J., & Somekh, M. (2012). Design and fabrication of nanoscale ultrasonic transducers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 353(1), 012001. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/353/1/012001
Sorkin, V., & Zhang, Y. W. (2011). Graphene-based pressure nano-sensors. Journal of Molecular Modeling, 17(11), 2825–2830. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-011-0972-0
Stuerzebecher, L., Fuchs, F., Zeitner, U., & Tuennermann, A. (2015). High-resolution proximity lithography for nano-optical components. Microelectronic Engineering, 132, 120–134. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2014.10.010
Takeuchi, N., & Mora, M. (2011). Divulgación y formación en nanotecnología en México. Mundo Nano, 4(2), 59–64. Retrieved from http://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/nano/article/view/44978/40539
Whitmore, A., Agarwal, A., & Da Xu, L. (2015). The Internet of Things - A survey of topics and trends. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(2), 261–274. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-014-9489-2
Wu, Y., Lin, Y., Bol, A., Jenkins, K., Xia, F., Farmer, D., … Avouris, P. (2011). High-frequency, scaled graphene transistors on diamond-like carbon. Nature, 472(7341), 74–78. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09979
Záyago-Lau, E., & Foladori, G. (2010). La nanotecnología en México: un desarrollo incierto. Economía, Sociedad y Territorio, 10(32), 143–178. doi: https://doi.org/oa?id=11112509006