InterSedes, N°44. Vol XXI (2020). ISSN 2215-2458
18
a life cycle, in which living involves death and death living is not only necessary but essential.
Most human beings have been taught to have living as the center of their interests and fear death.
Though, for Kinnell the latter starts at the moment of birth; it is a paradox that when an individual
starts living in the world s/he also launches its death. In other words, “living life” is accepting death
as our companion; besides, according to Kinnell’s vision of the world, both are part of a necessary
cycle to become one with nature. Furthermore, that this cycle is life’s relentless continuum. Octavio
Paz (1995) confirms this revelation when he states that
¿Quizás nacer sea morir y morir nacer? Nada sabemos, todo nuestro ser aspira a escapar de
esos contrarios que nos desgarran, pues si todo (conciencia de sí mismo, tiempo, razón,
costumbres, hábitos) tiende a ser de nosotros los expulsados de la vida, todo también nos
empuja a volver, a descender al seno creador de donde fuimos arrancados. Y le pedimos al
amor – que, siendo deseo es hambre de comunión, hambre de caer y morir tanto como de
renacer – que nos dé un pedazo de vida verdadera, de muerte verdadera. No le pedimos la
felicidad, ni el reposo, sino un instante, sólo un instante, de vida plena, en la que se fundan
los contrarios y vida y muerte, tiempo y eternidad pacten. Oscuramente sabemos que vida
y muerte no son sino dos movimientos, antagónicos pero complementarios, de una misma
realidad. Creación y destrucción se funden en el acto amoroso; y durante una fracción de
segundo el hombre entrevé un estado más perfecto (p. 343).
2
Like Paz, through his poetry, it can be asserted that Kinnell believes that humanity denies
itself the deepest experience of real life: there must be a reconciliation of binary oppositions
3
in
this unremitting experience that individuals have defined as life.
Rites and myth, within their symbolic nature, have permeated human life for ages; however,
reasoning has displaced their significance. It has become easier to belittle significant moments of
2
“Perhaps being born is dying and dying is being born? We know nothing, our whole being longing to escape opposites
that tear us apart, if everything (consciousness of ourselves, time, reason, customs) belongs to us, those expelled from
life, everything pushes us forward to go back too, to descend to the bosom of the creator from which we were pulled
out. And we ask love – that being desire is hunger for communion, longing to fall and die just as to being reborn – to
give us a piece of true life, true death. We do not ask for happiness, nor for rest, but for an instant, one single instant
of complete life in which the opposites, life and death, and time and eternity, merge and come to an agreement.
Obscurely, we know that life and death are but two movements, antagonistic but complementary of the same reality.
Creation and destruction merge in the loving act; and during a fraction of a second, man has a glimpse to a more perfect
state” (my translation).
3
According to Selden (1989), “’Binary oppositions’ (BO’s) are fundamental to structuralist thought. They also appear
to be fundamental not only to human thought in general but even in some cases to the natural order itself. Forms of
binarism are present in human thought from the earliest tunes. Dualisms in philosophy and religion (subject and object,
God and man, mind and the external world, organic and mechanical, temporal and eternal, and so on) are the very
foundations of entire world-views. The concept of ‘privatives’ is also important in this context. We can describe the
world in terms of the absence of certain qualities. Darkness is the absence of light; the iron is cold when it lacks heat;
an object is still when it lacks movement. (…) Structuralists have argued that binary oppositions are fundamental to