Aday, L.A. et al. (1998). Evaluating the Healthcare System: Effectiveness, Efficiency and Equity. Chicago, Illinois: Health Administration Press.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Estados Unidos (2001). A Quick Look at Quality. Your Guide to Choosing Quality Health Care. AHCPR Publication No. 99-0012. Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/consum/qntascii/qntqlook.htm
Angeles, G. & Mroz T.A. (2001). A Simple Guide to Using Multilevel Models for the Evaluation of Program Impacts. Universidad de Carolina del Norte en Chapel Hill, The Carolina Population Center: MEASURE-Evaluation.
Baldridge National Quality Program, Estados Unidos (2002). Health Care Criteria for Performance Excellence. Documento disponible en internet en www.quality.nist.gov
Bambas, A. y Casas, J.A. (2001). Assessing equity in health: Conceptual criteria. En Equity and Health: Views from the Pan American Sanitary Bureau. Documento de internet disponible en http://www.paho.org/English/DBI/OP08.htm
Bertrand, J. T. et al. (1996). Evaluación de Programas de Planificación Familiar con Adaptaciones para Salud Reproductiva. Universidad de Carolina del Norte en Chapel Hill, The Carolina Population Center: MEASURE-Evaluation.
Birch, K.; Field, S. & Scrivens, E. (2000). Quality in General Practice. Abingdon, Oxon, Inglaterra: Radcliffe Medical Press.
Bruce, J. (1990). Fundamental elements of the quality of care: A simple framework. Studies in Family Planning, vol 21, no. 2.
Carey, R.G. y Lloyd, R.C. (2001). Measuring Quality Improvement in Healthcare: A guide to Statistical Process Control Applications. Milwaukee, Wisconsin: American Society for Quality.
Cook, T.D. y Reichardt, Ch.S. (1995). Métodos cualitativos y cuantitativos en investigación evaluativa. Madrid: Ediciones Morata.
Chen, H.T. (1990). Theory Driven Evaluations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
Departamento de Salud y Servicios Humanos, Estados Unidos (1998). “The Challenge and Potential for Assuring Quality Health Care for the 21st Century”. Informe.
Donabedian, A. (1980). The definition of quality: A conceptual exploration. En Explorations in Quality Assessment and Monitoring, vol. 1. Ann Arbor: Health Administration Press.
Mohr, L. (1995). Impact Analysis for Program Evaluation. Sage Publications.
OECD (1998). Review of the DAC Principles. http://www.oecd.org/dac/evaluation
Restrepo, H.E. & Málaga, H. (2001). Promoción de la Salud: Cómo Construir Vida Saludable. Bogotá: Editorial Médica Panamericana.
Rossi, P.H.; Freeman, H.E. & Lipsey, M.W. (1999). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. Sage Publications.
Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation Thesaurus. Cuarta edición. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Worthen, B.R.y Sanders, J.R. (1987). Educational Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines. New York: Longman.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Estados Unidos (2001). A Quick Look at Quality. Your Guide to Choosing Quality Health Care. AHCPR Publication No. 99-0012. Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/consum/qntascii/qntqlook.htm
Angeles, G. & Mroz T.A. (2001). A Simple Guide to Using Multilevel Models for the Evaluation of Program Impacts. Universidad de Carolina del Norte en Chapel Hill, The Carolina Population Center: MEASURE-Evaluation.
Baldridge National Quality Program, Estados Unidos (2002). Health Care Criteria for Performance Excellence. Documento disponible en internet en www.quality.nist.gov
Bambas, A. y Casas, J.A. (2001). Assessing equity in health: Conceptual criteria. En Equity and Health: Views from the Pan American Sanitary Bureau. Documento de internet disponible en http://www.paho.org/English/DBI/OP08.htm
Bertrand, J. T. et al. (1996). Evaluación de Programas de Planificación Familiar con Adaptaciones para Salud Reproductiva. Universidad de Carolina del Norte en Chapel Hill, The Carolina Population Center: MEASURE-Evaluation.
Birch, K.; Field, S. & Scrivens, E. (2000). Quality in General Practice. Abingdon, Oxon, Inglaterra: Radcliffe Medical Press.
Bruce, J. (1990). Fundamental elements of the quality of care: A simple framework. Studies in Family Planning, vol 21, no. 2.
Carey, R.G. y Lloyd, R.C. (2001). Measuring Quality Improvement in Healthcare: A guide to Statistical Process Control Applications. Milwaukee, Wisconsin: American Society for Quality.
Cook, T.D. y Reichardt, Ch.S. (1995). Métodos cualitativos y cuantitativos en investigación evaluativa. Madrid: Ediciones Morata.
Chen, H.T. (1990). Theory Driven Evaluations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
Departamento de Salud y Servicios Humanos, Estados Unidos (1998). “The Challenge and Potential for Assuring Quality Health Care for the 21st Century”. Informe.
Donabedian, A. (1980). The definition of quality: A conceptual exploration. En Explorations in Quality Assessment and Monitoring, vol. 1. Ann Arbor: Health Administration Press.
Mohr, L. (1995). Impact Analysis for Program Evaluation. Sage Publications.
OECD (1998). Review of the DAC Principles. http://www.oecd.org/dac/evaluation
Restrepo, H.E. & Málaga, H. (2001). Promoción de la Salud: Cómo Construir Vida Saludable. Bogotá: Editorial Médica Panamericana.
Rossi, P.H.; Freeman, H.E. & Lipsey, M.W. (1999). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. Sage Publications.
Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation Thesaurus. Cuarta edición. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Worthen, B.R.y Sanders, J.R. (1987). Educational Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines. New York: Longman.
Copyright
© Población y Salud en Mesoamérica, 2014
Affiliations
Eiliana Montero Rojas
PhD. Evaluación Educativa, Florida State University, Investigadora Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas, Universidad de Costa Rica
Comments
Marco conceptual para la evaluación de programas de salud
Abstract
Evaluation, as a discipline, is an relatively new area of the Social Sciences, thus, its explicit incorporation in health programs and systems has appeared somehow late. This article presents elements of a conceptual framework to conceive and use the evaluation in health programs. Evaluation is defined as a tool for decision making, current tendencies and themes in the field are discussed, as well as key concepts such as program theory and needs assessment. Finally, a first approach to two key concepts in evaluation of health programs, quality and equity, is presented.