Revisiting Open Science Through a Global Health Lens: Critical Reflections

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/6k3yyb38

Keywords:

Open science; Access to information; Global health; Interdisciplinary research; Citizen science; Global health.

Abstract

Open Science has become a global movement promoting accessibility, transparency, and collaboration in research. It encompasses open access, open data, citizen science, and digital innovations, fostering inclusion and public participation, particularly in social and health sciences. This shift challenges traditional scientific models by emphasizing ethical integrity, research transparency, and knowledge co-creation. However, issues like authorship, funding, and scientific misconduct remain critical concerns. Open Science enhances research efficiency, democratizes knowledge, and strengthens institutional impact. This article aims to map current and future Open Science initiatives in global health, providing a systematic framework to support decision-making and scientific adaptation to this evolving landscape.

References

G. Yoshizawa, N. Shinomiya, S. Kawamoto, N. Kawahara, D. Kiga, K.I. Hanaki, et al., Limiting open science? Three approaches to bottom-up governance of dual-use research of concern, Pathog. Glob. Health. 118 (2023) 285-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/20477724.2023.2265626

P. Winke, Sharing, collaborating, and building trust: How Open Science advances language testing, Lang. Test. 41 (2024) 845859. https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322231211159

B. Xie, Z. Shen, K. Wang, Is preprint the future of science? A thirty year journey of online preprint services, arXiv: 2102.09066 [Preprint]. 2021 [cited 2025 May 17]. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.09066

J. Brainard, Fast-growing open-access journal stripped of coveted impact factors: Web of Science delists some 50 journals, including one of the world’s largest, Science. 379 (2023) 1283-1284. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adi0092

C.K. Huang, C. Neylon, L. Montgomery, et al., Open access research outputs receive more diverse citations, Scientometrics. 129 (2024) 825-845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04894-0

J.-C. Burgelman, Politics and open science: how the European open science cloud became reality (the untold story), Data Intell. 3 (2021) 5-19. https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_a_00069

J. Diprose, C. Neylon, B. Kramer, Language diversity in scholarly publishing [Internet]. Curtin Open Knowledge Initiative News; 2022 [cited 2025 May 17]. Available from: https://openknowledge.community/language-diversity/

C. Neylon, C.-K. Huang, The global state of open access 2021 [Internet]. Zenodo; 2022 [cited 2025 May 17]. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7059176

D.R. Isbell, B. Kremmel, Open Science and the next generation of language testing research, Lang. Test. 41 (2024) 898-908. https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322241264082

G. Spitale, F. Germani, N. Biller-Andorno, Disruptive technologies and open science: how open should open science be? A ‘Third Bioethics’ ethical framework, Sci. Eng. Ethics. 30 (2024) 36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-024-00502-3

Q. Zong, Z. Huang, J. Huang, Do open science badges work? Estimating the effects of open science badges on an article’s social media attention and research impacts, Scientometrics. 128 (2023) 3627-3648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04720-7

H. Desmond, Gatekeeping should be conserved in the open science era, Synthese. 203 (2024) 160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-024-04559-2

Published

2025-08-28