The Visual and Instrumental Analyses of Different Single-Shade Resin Composites
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.2023.55068Keywords:
Color; Color matching; CIEDE2000; Blending effect; Single-shade resin composites; Smile Lite MDP.Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the color adaptation of single-shade resin composites applied to different tooth shades. A total of 108 class III preparations (n=6) were performed on the acrylic denture maxillary incisors (2mm depth and 2mm height). 5 single-shade resin composites (Vittra APS Unique, Omnichroma, ZenChroma, Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Universal, Charisma Topaz One) and 1 multishade resin composite (Estelite Asteria) were placed in the cavities and polished. I performed visual and instrumental color analyses. The CIEDE2000 formula was used to assess the shade differences (∆E) between teeth and restorations. The obtained ∆E values were recorded and statistically analyzed. For the instrumental analysis, ZenChroma in A1 shade groups showed statistically significant higher differences (p<0.05). Among all tested materials, A3 shade groups showed lower ∆E values (p<0.05). For the visual analysis, there were no significant differences between materials and scores in A1 and A3 shade groups (p>0.05). There were statistically significant differences between the materials and the scores in A2 shade groups (p<0.05). As a result of this study, it was concluded that, making esthetic restorations with single-shade resin composites promises proper color adaptation, but their properties still need improvement. Single-shade resin composites can reduce chair-time and technical sensitivity with good color matching.
Downloads
References
Igiel C., Weyhrauch M., Wentaschek S., Scheller H., Lehmann K.M. Dental color matching: A comparison between visual and instrumental methods. Dent Mater. 2016; 35 (1): 63-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2015-006
Demarco F.F., Collares K., Coelho-de-Souza F.H., Correa M.B., Cenci M.S., Moraes R.R., Opdam N.J. Anterior composite restorations: A systematic review on long-term survival and reasons for failure. Dent Mater. 2015; 31 (10): 1214-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.07.005
Ferracane J.L. Resin composite-state of the art. Dent Mater. 2011; 27 (1): 29-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.020
Badra V.V., Faraoni J.J., Ramos R.P., Palma-Dibb R.G. Influence of different beverages on the microhardness and surface roughness of resin composites. Oper Dent. 2005; 30 (2): 213-9.
Ardu S., Rossier I., Di Bella E., Krejci I., Dietschi D. Resin composite thickness’ influence on L* a* b* coordinates and translucency. Clin. Oral Investing. 2019; 23 (4): 1583-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2585-9
Take-aways K. Single-shaded direct anterior composite restorations: a simplified technique for enhanced results. Compend. 2012; 33 (2).
Da Costa J., Fox P., Ferracane J. Comparison of various resin composite shades and layering technique with a shade guide. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2010; 22 (2): 114-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2010.00322.x
Pereira Sanchez N., Powers J.M., Paravina R.D. Instrumental and visual evaluation of the color adjustment potential of resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019; 31 (5): 465-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12488
Iyer R.S., Babani V.R., Yaman P., Dennison J. Color match using instrumental and visual methods for single, group, and multi-shade composite resins. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021; 33 (2): 394-400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12621
Igiel C., Lehmann K.M., Ghinea R., Weyhrauch M., Hangx Y., Scheller H., Paravina RD. Reliability of visual and instrumental color matching. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017; 29 (5): 303-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12321
Ruschel V., Martins M., Bernardon J., Maia H. Color match between composite resin and tooth remnant in Class IV restorations: a case series. Oper. Dent. 2018; 43 (5): 460-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2341/17-132-S
Villavicencio-Espinoza C.A., Narimatsu M.H., Furuse A.Y. Using cross-polarized photography as a guide for selecting resin composite shade. Oper. Dent. 2018; 43 (2): 113-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2341/16-227-T
Lehmann K.M., Devigus A., Igiel C., Wentaschek S., Azar M.S., Scheller H. Repeatability of color-measuring devices. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2011; 6 (4): 428-35.
Ghinea R., Perez M.M., Herrera L.J., Rivas M.J., Yebra A., Paravina R.D. Color difference thresholds in dental ceramics. J Dent. 2010; 38 Suppl 2: e57-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.07.008
Paravina R.D., Pérez M.M., Ghinea R. Acceptability and perceptibility thresholds in dentistry: A comprehensive review of clinical and research applications. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019; 31 (2): 103-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12465
Luo M.R., Cui G., Rigg B. The development of the CIE 2000 colour-difference formula: CIEDE2000. Color Res Appl. 2001; 26 (5): 340-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/col.1049
CIE C. Technical Report: Improvement to Industrial Colordifference Evaluation. CIE Publication. 2001;142.
CId Ec. CIE Technical Report: Colorimetry. CIE Pub No. 15.3. CIE Central Bureau Vienna, Austria; 2004.
Miletic V., Stasic J.N., Komlenic V., Petrovic R. Multifactorial analysis of optical properties, sorption, and solubility of sculptable universal composites for enamel layering upon staining in colored beverages. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021; 33 (6): 943-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12679
Suh Y.-R., Ahn J.-S., Ju S.-W., Kim K.-M. Influences of filler content and size on the color adjustment potential of nonlayered resin composites.Dent. Mater. J. 2017: 2016-083. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2016-083
Hardan L. Mobile dental photography (MDP): A new era in dental documentation. Int. Arab J. Dent. 2017; 8 (3): 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.65314/2218-0885.1115
Gasparik C., Grecu A.G., Culic B., Badea M.E., Dudea D. Shade-Matching Performance Using a New Light-Correcting Device. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015; 27 (5): 285-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12150
Rocca G.T., Rizcalla N., Krejci I., Dietschi D. Evidence-based concepts and procedures for bonded inlays and onlays. Part II. Guidelines for cavity preparation and restoration fabrication. Int J Esthet Dent. 2015; 10 (3): 392-413.
Paravina R.D., Westland S., Imai F.H., Kimura M., Powers J.M. Evaluation of blending effect of composites related to restoration size. Dent Mater. 2006; 22 (4): 299-307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.022
Paravina R.D., Ghinea R., Herrera L.J., Bona A.D., Igiel C., Linninger M., Sakai M., Takahashi H., Tashkandi E., Mar Perez M.d. Color difference thresholds in dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015; 27: S1-S9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12149
de Abreu J.L.B., Sampaio C.S., Benalcazar Jalkh E.B., Hirata R. Analysis of the color matching of universal resin composites in anterior restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021; 33 (2): 269-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12659
Ahmed M.A., Jouhar R., Vohra F. Effect of Different pH Beverages on the Color Stability of Smart Monochromatic Composite. Appl. Sci. 2022; 12 (9): 4163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12094163
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Özlem Erçin, Dilan Kopuz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
ODOVTOS - Int. J. Dent. Sc. endorses CC BY-NC-SA
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms. CC BY-NC-SA includes the following elements:
BY: credit must be given to the creator.
NC: Only noncommercial uses of the work are permitted.
SA: Adaptations must be shared under the same terms.
