Stress Distribution in Occlusal Veneers with Different Finish Lines When Applying Vertical and Tangential Forces
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.2022.51841Keywords:
Occlusal veneer; Finish line; Lithium disilicate; Composite resin; Finite element analysis; Bite force.Abstract
To evaluate stress distribution when applying vertical and tangential forces to 1mm thick occlusal veneers with different finish lines preparations, using the finite element method. One extracted third molar was prepared for occlusal veneers, firstly without any bevel. It was scanned in order to design two groups of lithium disilicate (G1A, G2A) and composite resin (G1B, G2B) occlusal veneers. Then, the third molar preparation was modified, beveling the finish line and it was subsequently scanned again to design the occlusal veneer groups with bevel (LD: G3A, G4A and CR: G3B, G4B). The four groups were subjected to different forces (400 N vertical and 900 N tangential). At 400 N, the non-beveled veneers showed slightly higher Von Mises stress values (G1A: 783 MPa and G1B 736.5 MPa) than the beveled veneers (G3A: 685.7 MPa and G3B: 675.8 MPa). However, when 900 N tangential forces were applied, the beveled occlusal veneers showed higher Von Mises stress values (G4A: 4297 MPa and G4B: 4133 MPa) than the non-beveled occlusal veneers (G2A: 2581.1 MPa and G2B: 3519.1 MPa). Furthermore, it was observed that the tissue under the occlusal veneers with bevel showed higher Von Mises stress values than the models without any bevel. Beveled and non-beveled occlusal veneers of lithium disilicate and composite resin presented similar stress distribution values when vertical forces of 400 N were applied; whereas with tangential forces of 900 N applied near to the finish line, the beveled groups presented notably higher stress values than the non-beveled groups. However, both finish line preparations presented adequate values for possible clinical performance.
Downloads
References
Tribst J.P.M., Dal Piva A.M.O., Penteado M.M., Borges A.L.S., Bottino M.A. Influence of ceramic material, thickness of restoration and cement layer on stress distribution of occlusal veneers. Braz Oral Res. 2018; 32: 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0118
Azeem R.A., Sureshbabu N.M. Clinical performance of direct versus indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth: A systematic review. J Conserv Dent. 2018 Jan-Feb; 21 (1): 2-9.
Sampaio F.B.W.R., Özcan M., Gimenez T.C., Moreira M.S.N.A., Tedesco T.K., Morimot S. Effects of manufacturing methods on the survival rate of ceramic and indirect composite restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019; 31 (6): 561-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12555
Al-Akhali M., Chaar M.S., Elsayed A., Samran A., Kern M. Fracture resistance of ceramic and polymer-based occlusal veneer restorations. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017; 74: 245-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.06.013
Al-Akhali M., Kern M., Elsayed A., Samran A., Chaar M.S. Influence of thermomechanical fatigue on the fracture strength of CAD-CAM-fabricated occlusal veneers. J Prosthet Dent. 2019; 121 (4): 644-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.07.019
Andrade J.P., Stona D., Bittencourt H.R., Borges G.A., Burnett L.H. Júnior, Spohr A.M. Effect of Different Computer-aided Design/Computer-aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) Materials and Thicknesses on the Fracture Resistance of Occlusal Veneers. Oper Dent. 2018; 43 (5): 539-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2341/17-131-L
Ioannidis A., Mühlemann S., Özcan M., Hüsler J., Hämmerle C.H.F., Benic G.I. Ultra-thin occlusal veneers bonded to enamel and made of ceramic or hybrid materials exhibit load-bearing capacities not different from conventional restorations. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019; 90: 433-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.09.041
Johnson A.C., Versluis A., Tantbirojn D., Ahuja S. Fracture strength of CAD/CAM composite and composite-ceramic occlusal veneers. J Prosthodont Res. 2014; 58 (2): 107-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2014.01.001
Abu-Izze F.O., Ramos G.F., Borges A.L.S., Anami LC, Bottino MA. Fatigue behavior of ultrafine tabletop ceramic restorations. Dent Mater. 2018; 34 (9): 1401-09. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.06.017
Guess P.C., Zavanelli R.A., Silva N.R., Bonfante E.A., Coelho P.G., Thompson V.P. Monolithic CAD/CAM lithium disilicate versus veneered Y-TZP crowns: comparison of failure modes and reliability after fatigue. Int J Prosthodont. 2010; 23 (5): 434-42.
Tysowsky G.W. The science behind lithium disilicate: a metal-free alternative. Dent Today. 2009; 28 (3):112-3.
Angerame D., De Biasi M., Agostinetto M., Franzò A., Marchesi G. Influence of preparation designs on marginal adaptation and failure load of full-coverage occlusal veneers after thermomechanical aging simulation. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019; 31 (3): 280-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12457
Schlichting L.H., Maia H.P., Baratieri L.N., Magne P. Novel-design ultra-thin CAD/CAM composite resin and ceramic occlusal veneers for the treatment of severe dental erosion. J Prosthet Dent. 2011; 105 (4): 217-26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60035-8
Vianna A.L.S.V., Prado C.J.D., Bicalho A.A., Pereira R.A.D.S., Neves F.D.D., Soares C.J. Effect of cavity preparation design and ceramic type on the stress distribution, strain and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM onlays in molars. J Appl Oral Sci. 2018; 26: 1-10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0004
Veneziani M. Posterior indirect adhesive restorations: updated indications and the Morphology Driven Preparation Technique. Int J Esthet Dent. 2017; 12 (2): 204-30.
Guess P.C., Schultheis S., Wolkewitz M., Zhang Y., Strub J.R. Influence of preparation design and ceramic thicknesses on fracture resistance and failure modes of premolar partial coverage restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2013; 110 (4): 264-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60374-1
Resende T.H., Reis K.R., Schlichting L.H., Magne P. Ultrathin CAD-CAM Ceramic Occlusal Veneers and Anterior Bilaminar Veneers for the Treatment of Moderate Dental Biocorrosion: A 1.5-Year Follow-Up. Oper Dent. 2018; 43 (4): 337-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2341/17-007-T
Ferraris F. Posterior indirect adhesive restorations (PIAR): preparation designs and adhesthetics clinical protocol. Int J Esthet Dent. 2017;12 (4): 482-502.
Magne P., Stanley K., Schlichting L.H. Modeling of ultrathin occlusal veneers. Dent Mater. 2012; 28 (7): 777-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.002
Magne P., Schlichting L.H., Maia H.P., Baratieri L.N. In vitro fatigue resistance of CAD/CAM composite resin and ceramic posterior occlusal veneers. J Prosthet Dent. 2010; 104 (3): 149-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60111-4
Huang X.Q., Hong N.R., Zou L.Y., Wu S.W., Li Y. Estimation of stress distribution and risk of failure for maxillary premolar restored by occlusal veneer with different CAD/CAM materials and preparation designs. Clin Oral Investig. 2020; 24 (9): 3157-67 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03190-7
Krummel A., Garling A., Sasse M., Kern M. Influence of bonding surface and bonding methods on the fracture resistance and survival rate of full-coverage occlusal veneers made from lithium disilicate ceramic after cyclic loading. Dent Mater. 2019; 35 (10): 1351-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.07.001
Yazigi C., Kern M., Chaar MS. Influence of various bonding techniques on the fracture strength of thin CAD/CAM-fabricated occlusal glass-ceramic veneers. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017; 75: 504-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.08.016
Federlin M., Krifka S., Herpich M., Hiller K.A., Schmalz G. Partial ceramic crowns: influence of ceramic thickness, preparation design and luting material on fracture resistance and marginal integrity in vitro. Oper Dent. 2007; 32 (3): 251-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2341/06-70
Cortellini D., Canale A. Bonding lithium disilicate ceramic to feather-edge tooth preparations: a minimally invasive treatment concept. J Adhes Dent. 2012; 14 (1): 7-10.
Schmitz J.H., Beani M. Effect of different cement types on monolithic lithium disilicate complete crowns with feather-edge preparation design in the posterior region. J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 115 (6): 678-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.10.007
Karagözoğlu İ., Toksavul S., Toman M. 3D quantification of clinical marginal and internal gap of porcelain laminate veneers with minimal and without tooth preparation and 2-year clinical evaluation. Quintessence Int. 2016; 47 (6): 461-71.
Baldissara P., Monaco C., Onofri E., Fonseca R.G., Ciocca L. Fatigue resistance of monolithic lithium disilicate occlusal veneers: a pilot study. Odontology. 2019. 107 (4): 482-90 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-019-00417-7
Kirzioglu Z., Ceyhan D., Sengul F., Altun A.C. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the composite and compomer onlays in primary molars. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2019; 22 (10): 936-941. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2019.1604951
Koc D., Dogan A., Bek B. Bite force and influential factors on bite force measurements: a literature review. Eur J Dent. 2010; 4 (2): 223-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1697833
Padma S., Umesh S., Asokan S., Srinivas T. Bite force measurement based on fiber Bragg grating sensor. J Biomed Opt. 2017; 22 (10): 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.22.10.107002
Jeong C.W., Kim K.H., Jang H.W., Kim H.S., Huh J.K. The relationship between oral tori and bite force. Cranio. 2019; 37 (4): 246-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08869634.2017.1418617
Waltimo A., Könönen M. A novel bite force recorder and maximal isometric bite force values for healthy young adults. Scand J Dent Res. 1993; 101 (3): 171-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1993.tb01658.x
Rosa R.S., Balbinot C.E., Blando E., et al. Evaluation of mechanical properties on three nanofilled composites. Stomatologija. 2012; 14 (4): 126-30.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
ODOVTOS - Int. J. Dent. Sc. endorses CC BY-NC-SA
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms. CC BY-NC-SA includes the following elements:
BY: credit must be given to the creator.
NC: Only noncommercial uses of the work are permitted.
SA: Adaptations must be shared under the same terms.
