How is the Use of Digital Dental Radiology in a Developing Country? An Overview of Brazil

Authors

  • Larissa Moreira-Souza Department of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6722-3183
  • Larissa de Oliveira Reis Department of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4795-5248
  • Fernanda Nogueira-Reis Department of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2448-0195
  • Eliana Dantas da Costa Department of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4463-7436
  • Deborah Q. Freitas Department of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1425-5966

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.2022.50787

Keywords:

Dental digital radiography; Diagnostic imaging; Radiographic image enhancement; Radiography; Panoramic.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the use of digital dental radiology in Brazil, by focusing on the use of image receptors, imaging exams and digital image enhancement tools, also assessing the methods of professional image transfer. Questionnaires were distributed in person on dental meetings and digitally via messaging (WhatsApp®) and mailings list. The sample of this cross-sectional study consisted of 478 questionnaires. Most participants were woman (n=315, 65.9%), with average age of 33.8±9.2 years. Descriptive and frequency analysis was performed. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used (α=0.05). Most dentists worked at shared dental clinics (34.7%) and use digital image receptors (51.1%), but a representative percentage (48.9%) still exclusively use radiographic films. Photostimulable phosphor plate is the most used digital image receptor. Among extraoral exams, panoramic radiography (PAN) is the most used. Regarding dental specialties, oral radiologists and oral and maxillofacial surgeons mostly use cone-beam computed tomography (p<0.001). Most dentists who use digital systems make use of digital image enhancement tools (87.8%), mainly contrast, zoom, brightness and measurements. The most common method of professional image transfer (professional-professional and professional-patiens) is by email, with few dentists using online app and social media (26%). Therefore, while most Brazilian dentists use digital imaging systems, a significant percentage still exclusively use radiographic films. The most extraoral imaging exams used is PAN. Regarding image enhancement tools, brightness and contrast adjustments, zoom and measurements are the most applied. Finally, dentists generally use email for professional image transfer.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Wenzel A., Møystad A. Workflow with digital intraoral radiography: a systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand 2010; 68 (2): 106-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/00016350903514426

Moreira-Souza L., Michels M., Lagos de Melo L.P., Oliveira M.L., Asprino L., Freitas D.Q. Brightness and contrast adjustments influence the radiographic detection of soft tissue calcification. Oral Dis 2019; 00: 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.13148

Gaêta-Araujo H., Nascimento E.H.L., Brasil D.M., Gomes A.F., Freitas D.Q., De Oliveira-Santos C. Detection of Simulated Periapical Lesion in Intraoral Digital Radiography with Different Brightness and Contrast. Eur Endod J 2019; 4 (3): 133-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2019.46036

Snel R., Van De Maele E., Politis C., Jacobs R. Digital dental radiology in Belgium: A nationwide survey. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 2018; 47 (8): 20180045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20180045

Rovaris K., Vasconcelos K. de F., do Nascimento E.H.L., Oliveira M.L., Freitas D.Q., Haiter-Neto F. Brazilian young dental practitioners’ use and acceptance of digital radiographic examinations. Imaging Sci Dent 2016; 46: 239-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2016.46.4.239

Berkhout W.E.R., Verheij J.G., Syriopoulos K., Li G., Sanderink G.C..H, van der Stelt P.F. Detection of proximal caries with high-resolution and standard resolution digital radiographic systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007; 36: 204-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/99904877

Brian J.N., Williamson G.F. Digital radiography in dentistry: a survey of Indiana dentists. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007; 36: 18-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/18567861

Costa E.D., Peyneau P.D., Ambrosano G.M.B., Oliveira M.L. Influence of cone beam CT volume orientation on alveolar bone measurements in patients with different facial profiles. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2019; 48 (6): 20180330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20180330

Kullendorff B., Nilsson M. Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions. II. Effects on diagnostic accuracy after application of image processing. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996; 82 (5): 585-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(96)80207-1

Madarati A.A. Usage of image-enhancement tools when reading radiographs taken during root-canals treatments’ procedures. Eur Endod J 2020; 5: 95-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2019.39974

Krupinski E. Technology and perception in the 21st century reading room. J Am Coll Radiol 2006; 3: 433-440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2006.02.022

Raitz R., Assunção J.A..N, Fenyo-Pereira M., Corrêa L., De Lima L.P. Assessment of using digital manipulation tools for diagnosing mandibular radiolucent lesions. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 2012; 41: 203-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/78567773

Abesi F., Nikafshar N., Haghanifar S,. Khafri S., Hamzeh M. Can the inversion filter improve the visibility of the mandibular incisive canal? Iran J Radiol 2016; 13: 4-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.22698

Scaf G., Morihisa O., Loffredo L.D.C.M. Comparison between inverted and unprocessed digitized radiographic imaging in periodontal bone loss measurements. J Appl Oral Sci 2007; 15: 492-4. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572007000600007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572007000600007

Freitas D.Q, Ramos-Perez F.M.M., De-Azevedo S.L.V., Bóscolo F.N., Almeida S.M. Teaching of Oral Radiology in Brazilian Dental Schools. JJ Dent Res 2014; 2: 1-5.

Madlum D.V., Gaêta-Araujo H., Brasil D.M, Lima C.A.S., Oliveira M.L., Haiter-Neto F. Influence of the file format and transmission app on the radiographic diagnosis of caries lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2020: S2212-4403(20): 31390-0.

Miranda-Viana M., Madlum D.V., Oliveira-Santos N., Gaêta-Araujo H., Haiter-Neto F., Oliveira M.L. Influence of the image file format of digital periapical radiographs on the diagnosis of external and internal root resorptions. Clin Oral Investig 2021; 25 (8): 4941-4948. Epub 2021 Jan 26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03803-0

Costa E.D., Martins L.A.C., Cral W.G., Peroni L.V., Freitas D.Q., Oliveira M.L. Assessment of dentists’ behaviour on the use of patients’ images. Eur J Dent Educ 2020; 24: 513-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12530

Downloads

Published

2026-05-26

Issue

Vol. 24 No. 3 (2022): (September-December) Odovtos-International Journal of Dental Sciences

Section

Original Clinical Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2022 CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

ODOVTOS - Int. J. Dent. Sc. endorses CC BY-NC-SA

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms. CC BY-NC-SA includes the following elements:

 BY: credit must be given to the creator.
 NC: Only noncommercial uses of the work are permitted.
 SA: Adaptations must be shared under the same terms.