Influence of Etching Mode and Composite Type on Bond Strength to Biodentine Using a “No-Wait” Universal Adhesive
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.2021.47842Keywords:
Biodentine; Self-etch adhesive; Shear bond strength.Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of four resin-based composite materials to a silicate-based cement using a “no-wait” universal bond with self-etch (SE) and etch-and-rinse (ER) modes. Acrylic blocks (n=80, 2mm depth, 5mm diameter central hole) were prepared. The holes were filled with BiodentineTM (BD) and divided into 4 main groups (n=20) according to the composite resin type used: Group FZ250: FiltekTM Z250 Universal Restorative (microhybrid), Group SDR: SDR Plus U Bulk Fill Flowable (low-viscosity bulk-fill), Group FBP: FiltekTM Bulk Fill Posterior (high-viscosity bulk-fill), Group EF: EsFlow™ Universal Flowable Composite (nanohybrid). A ‘no-wait’ universal bond (Clearfil Universal Bond Quick) was used for bonding application. Then each group was divided into 2 subgroups according to the etching mode applied (ER and SE). SBSs were measured and stereomicroscope was used to identify the failure modes. Selected samples of fracture surfaces were imaged by SEM. Tukey’s post-hoc and One-way ANOVA tests were used to analyze data. There were statistically significant differences among the composite groups (p<0.05). When SDR showed the highest bond strength values in SE (17.13 ± 2.98 MPa) mode, FBP showed the lowest bond strength values in ER (8.89 ± 2.46 MPa) mode. The mean SBS was not different between the SE and ER modes (p> 0.05). The SBS of BD to the resin composites depends on the composite type but application of the ‘no-wait’ universal bond in different etching modes is regardless of the SBS of BD to resin composites.
Downloads
References
Kodonas K., Fardi A., Gogos C., Economides N. Scientometric analysis of vital pulp therapy studies. Int Endod J. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13422
Cushley S., Duncan H.F., Lappin M.J., Chua P., Elamin A.D., Clarke M. Efficacy of direct pulp capping for management of cariously exposed pulps in permanent teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13449
Schmidt A., Schäfer E., Dammaschke T. Shear Bond Strength of Lining Materials to Calcium-silicate Cements at Different Time Intervals. J Adhes Dent. 2017; 19 (2): 129-135.
Kaup M., Schäfer E., Dammaschke T. An in vitro study of different material properties of Biodentine compared to ProRoot MTA. Head Face Med. 2015; 11:16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-015-0074-9
Malkondu Ö., Karapinar Kazandağ M., Kazazoğlu E. A review on biodentine, a contemporary dentine replacement and repair material. BioMed Res Int. 2014; 2014: 160951. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/160951
Koubi G., Colon P., Franquin J.C., Hartmann A., Richard G., Faure M.O. Clinical evaluation of the performance and safety of a new dentine substitute, Biodentine, in the restoration of posterior teeth - a prospective study. Clin Oral Investig. 2013; 17 (1): 243-249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0701-9
Cantekin K., Avci S. Evaluation of shear bond strength of two resin-based composites and glass ionomer cement to pure tricalcium silicate-based cement (Biodentine®). J Appl Oral Sci. 2014; 22 (4): 302-306.
Heymann H.O., Ritter A.V., Sturdevant C.M. Sturdevant’s Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. 6th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier/ Mosby; 2013.
Çolak H., Tokay U., Uzgur R., Uzgur Z., Ercan E., Hamidi M.M. The effect of different adhesives and setting times on bond strength between Biodentine and composite. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2016; 14 (2): 217-222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5301/jabfm.5000266
Odabaş M.E., Bani M., Tirali R.E. Shear bond strengths of different adhesive systems to biodentine. ScientificWorldJournal. 2013; 2013: 626103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/626103
Meraji N., Camilleri J. Bonding over Dentin Replacement Materials. J Endod. 2017; 43 (8): 1343-1349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.025
Cengiz E., Ulusoy N. Microshear Bond Strength of Tri-Calcium Silicate-based Cements to Different Restorative Materials. J Adhes Dent. 2016; 18 (3): 231-237.
Altunsoy M., Tanriver M., Ok E., Kucukyilmaz E. Shear Bond Strength of a Self-adhering Flowable Composite and a Flowable Base Composite to Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Calcium-enriched Mixture Cement, and Biodentine. J Endod. 2015; 41 (10): 1691-1695. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.06.013
Cantekin K., Avci S. Evaluation of shear bond strength of two resin-based composites and glass ionomer cement to pure tricalcium silicate-based cement (Biodentine(R)). J Appl Oral Sci: revista FOB 2014; 22 (4): 302-306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720130660
International Standards Organization. ISO/TS 11405. Dentistry-Testing of Adhesion to Tooth Structure. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO; 2015.
Alzraikat H., Taha N.A., Qasrawi D., Burrow M.F. Shear bond strength of a novel light cured calcium silicate based-cement to resin composite using different adhesive systems. Dent Mater J. 2016; 35: 881-887. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2016-075 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2016-075
Tsujimoto M., Tsujimoto Y., Ookubo A., Shiraishi T., Watanabe I., Yamada S., Hayashi Y. Timing for composite resin placement on mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod. 2013;39:1167-1170. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.06.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.06.009
Ahmed M.H., Yoshihara K., Mercelis B., Van Landuyt K., Peumans M., Van Meerbeek B. Quick bonding using a universal adhesive. Clin Oral Investig. 2020; 24 (8): 2837-2851. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03149-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03149-8
Kuraray Noritake (2018) Clearfil Universal Bond quick brochure. https://kuraraydental.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/clearfil-universal-bond quick-new-cap-brochure-sm.pdf Accessed 01 Nov 2018
Hashem D.F., Foxton R., Manoharan A., et al. The physical characteristics of resin composite calcium silicate interface as part of a layered/laminate adhesive restoration. Dent Mater. 2014; 30: 343-349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.12.010
Camilleri J. Investigation of Biodentine as dentine replacement material. J Dent. 2013; 41: 600-610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.05.003
Anastasiadis K., Koulaouzidou E.A., Palaghias G., Eliades G. Bonding of composite to base materials: effects of adhesive treatments on base surface properties and bond strength. J adhes Dent. 2018; 20: 151-164. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a40302
Mahdan M.H., Nakajima M., Foxton R.M., Tagami J. Combined effect of smear layer characteristics and hydrostatic pulpal pressure on dentine bond strength of HEMA-free and HEMA-containing adhesives. J Dent. 2013; 41: 861-871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.07.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.07.002
Gregoire G., Dabsie F., Dieng-Sarr F., Akon B., Sharrock P. Solvent composition of one-step self-etch adhesives and dentine wettability. J Dent. 2011; 39: 30-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.09.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.09.008
Sezinando A. Looking for the ideal adhesive–a review. Rev Port Estomatol Med Dent Circ Maxilofac. 2014; 55: 194-206. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.rpemd.2014.07.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpemd.2014.07.004
Namazikhah M.S., Nekoofar M.H., Sheykhrezae M.S., et al. The effect of pH on surface hardness and microstructure of mineral trioxide aggregate. Int Endod J. 2008; 41: 108-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01325.x
Shokouhinejad N., Nekoofar M.H., Iravani A. Effect of acidic environment on the push-out bond strength of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod. 2010; 36: 871-874. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.025
Torabinejad M., Chivian N. Clinical applications of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod. 1999; 25: 197-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80142-3
Watts J.D., Holt D.M., Beeson T.J., et al. Effects of pH and mixing agents on the temporal setting of tooth-colored and gray mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod. 2007; 33: 970-973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.01.024
Roy C.O., Jeansonne B.G., Gerrets T.F. Effect of an acid environment on leakage of root-end filling materials. J Endod. 2001; 27: 7-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200101000-00002
Ilie N., Keßler A., Durner J. Influence of various irradiation processes on the mechanical properties and polymerisation kinetics of bulk‑fill resin based composites. J Dent. 2013;41:695‑702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.05.008
Van Ende A., De Munck J., Van Landuyt K.L., Poitevin A., Peumans M., Van Meerbeek B., et al. Bulk‑filling of high C‑factor posterior cavities: Effect on adhesion to cavity‑bottom dentin. Dent Mater. 2013; 29: 269‑277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.11.002
Moorthy A., Hogg C.H., Dowling A.H., Grufferty B.F., Benetti A.R., Fleming G.J., et al. Cuspal deflection and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with bulk‑fill flowable resin‑based composite base materials. J Dent. 2012; 40: 500‑505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.015
Saito T., Takamizawa T., Ishii R., Tsujimoto A., et al. Influence of Application Time on Dentin Bond Performance in Different Etching Modes of Universal Adhesives. Oper Dent. 2020; 45 (2): 183-195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2341/19-028-L
Palma P.J., Marques J.A., Falacho R.I., Vinagre A., Santos J.M., Ramos J.C. Does delayed restoration improve shear bond strength of different restorative protocols to calcium silicate-based cements?. Materials (Basel). 2018;11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11112216 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11112216
Oskoee S.S., Kimyai S., Bahari M., Motahari P., Eghbal M.J., Asgary S. Comparison of shear bond strength of calcium-enriched mixture cement and mineral trioxide aggregate to composite resin. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2011; 12: 457-462. https://doi.org/10.5005/jpjournals-10024-1076 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1076
Bachoo I.K., Seymour D., Brunton P. A biocompatible andbioactive replacement for dentine: is this a reality? The properties and uses of a novel calcium-based cement. Br Dent J. 2013; 214 (2): 1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.57
Placido E., Meira J.B.C., Lima R.G., Muench A., de Souza R.M., Ballester R.Y. Shear versus micro-shear bond strength test: afinite element stress analysis. Dent Mater. 2007; 23 (9): 1086-1092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.10.002
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
ODOVTOS - Int. J. Dent. Sc. endorses CC BY-NC-SA
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms. CC BY-NC-SA includes the following elements:
BY: credit must be given to the creator.
NC: Only noncommercial uses of the work are permitted.
SA: Adaptations must be shared under the same terms.
