Influencia de la relación polvo-gel sobre las propiedades fisicoquímicas de un sellador de silicato de calcio

Autores/as

  • Fernanda F. E. Torres Department of Restorative Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Dentistry, Araraquara, SP, Brazil. Autor/a
  • Patricia Perinoto Department of Restorative Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Dentistry, Araraquara, SP, Brazi Autor/a
  • Roberta Bosso-Martelo Integrated Clinical Department, Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), School of Dentistry, Salvador, BA, Brazil. Autor/a
  • Gisselle M. Chávez-Andrade Department of Restorative Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Dentistry, Araraquara, SP, Brazil. Autor/a
  • Juliane M. Guerreiro-Tanomaru Department of Restorative Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Dentistry, Araraquara, SP, Brazil. Autor/a
  • Mario Tanomaru-Filho Department of Restorative Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Dentistry, Araraquara, SP, Brazil. Autor/a

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.2020.42998

Palabras clave:

Silicato de calcio; Materiales dentales; Endodoncia; Propiedades fisicoquímicas; Cemento sellador del conducto radicular; Material de reparación radicular.

Resumen

Las diferencias en la proporción líquido/polvo pueden afectar las propiedades de los materiales a base de silicato de calcio. Este estudio evaluó la influencia de la proporción polvo/gel en las propiedades fisicoquímicas del cemento NeoMTA Plus. El tiempo de fraguado (minutos), la fluidez (mm y mm²), el pH (en diferentes períodos), la radiopacidad (mmAl) y la solubilidad (% de pérdida de masa) fueron evaluados utilizando las consistencias para el material de reparación radicular (NMTAP-RP; 3 cucharadas de polvo/2 gotas de gel) y para cemento sellador del conducto radicular (NMTAP-SE; 3 cucharadas de polvo/3 gotas de gel), en comparación con el cemento Biodentine (BIO) y el cemento TotalFill BC (TFBC). El análisis estadístico se realizó utilizando las pruebas ANOVA y Tukey unidireccionales (α=0.05). BIO tuvo el tiempo de fraguado más corto, seguido de NMTAP-RP y NMTAP-SE. TFBC mostró el mayor tiempo de fraguado y radiopacidad. BIO, NMTAP-RP y NMTAP-SE tuvieron una radiopacidad similar. Todos los materiales promovieron un pH alcalino. NMTAP-RP/SE tuvieron una solubilidad menor que BIO y TFBC. Con respecto a la fluidez, TFBC tuvo los valores más altos, seguido de NMTAP-SE y NMTAP-RP. BIO tuvo la fluidez más baja. En conclusión, NMTAP en la relación polvo/gel mostró un pH alto y una baja solubilidad. El aumento en la proporción de polvo disminuyó el tiempo de fraguado y la fluidez. Estos hallazgos son importantes con respecto a su consistencia y tiempo de trabajo durante la aplicación clínica.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Referencias

Tanomaru-Filho M., Viapiana R., Guerreiro-Tanomaru J.M. From MTA to New Biomaterials Based on Calcium Silicate. Odovtos-Int. J. Dental Sc. 2016; 18 (1): 18-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.v18i1.23483

Grazziotin-Soares R., Nekoofar M.H., Davies T., Hubler R., Meraji N., Dummer P.M.H. Crystalline phases involved in the hydration of calcium silicate-based cements: Semi-quantitative Rietveld X-ray diffraction analysis. Aust Endod J. 2019; 45 (1): 26-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12226

Cordeiro M.M., Santos A.S., Reyes C.J.F. Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Calcium Hydroxide Promotes In Vivo Intratubular Mineralization. Odovtos-Int. J. Dental Sc. 2016;18 (1): 49-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.v18i1.23548

Camilleri J., Formosa L., Damidot D. The setting characteristics of MTA Plus in different environmental conditions. Int Endod J. 2013; 46 (9): 831-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12068

Parirokh M., Torabinejad M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review--Part I: chemical, physical, and antibacterial properties. J Endod. 2010; 36 (1): 16-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.006

Keskin C., Sariyilmaz E., Kele S.A. The effect of bleaching agents on the compressive strength of calcium silicate-based materials. Aust Endod J. 2019; 45 (3): 311-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12318

Camilleri J. Staining Potential of Neo MTA Plus, MTA Plus, and Biodentine Used for Pulpotomy Procedures. J Endod. 2015;41 (7): 1139-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.02.032

Tran D., He J., Glickman G. N., Woodmansey K. F. Comparative Analysis of Calcium Silicate-based Root Filling Materials Using an Open Apex Model. J Endod. 2016; 42 (4): 654-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.01.015

Siboni F., Taddei P., Prati C., Gandolfi M.G. Properties of NeoMTA Plus and MTA Plus cements for endodontics. Int Endod J. 2017; 50 Suppl 2: e83-e94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12787

Urkmez E.S. Pinar Erdem A. Bioactivity evaluation of calcium silicate-based endodontic materials used for apexification. Aust Endod J. 2020; 46 (1): 60-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12367

McMichael G. E., Primus C.M., Opperman L.A. Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Tricalcium Silicate Sealers. J Endod. 2016; 42 (4): 632-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.12.012

Singh S., Podar R., Dadu S., Kulkarni G., Purba R. Solubility of a new calcium silicate-based root-end filling material. J Conserv Dent. 2015;18 (2): 149-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.153053

Camilleri J., Sorrentino F., Damidot D. Investigation of the hydration and bioactivity of radiopacified tricalcium silicate cement, Biodentine and MTA Angelus. Dent Mater. 2013; 29 (5): 580-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.03.007

Tanomaru-Filho M., Torres F. F. E., Chavez-Andrade G.M., de Almeida M., Navarro L.G., Steier L., Guerreiro-Tanomaru J.M. Physicochemical Properties and Volumetric Change of Silicone/Bioactive Glass and Calcium Silicate-based Endodontic Sealers. J Endod. 2017; 43 (12): 2097-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.07.005

Camilleri J. Is Mineral Trioxide Aggregate a Bioceramic? Odovtos-Int. J. Dental Sc. 2016; 18 (1):13-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.v18i1.23482

Xuereb M., Vella P., Damidot D., Sammut C. V., Camilleri J. In situ assessment of the setting of tricalcium silicate-based sealers using a dentin pressure model. J Endod. 2015; 41 (1): 111-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.09.015

Zhou H.M., Shen Y., Zheng W., Li L., Zheng Y.F., Haapasalo M. Physical properties of 5 root canal sealers. J Endod. 2013; 39 (10): 1281-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.06.012

Zordan-Bronzel C.L., Esteves Torres F.F., Tanomaru-Filho M., Chavez-Andrade G.M., Bosso-Martelo R., Guerreiro-Tanomaru J.M. Evaluation of Physicochemical Properties of a New Calcium Silicate-based Sealer, Bio-C Sealer. J Endod. 2019; 45 (10): 1248-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2019.07.006

Cavenago B.C., Pereira T.C., Duarte M.A., Ordinola-Zapata R, Marciano MA, Bramante CM, Bernardineli N. Influence of powder-to-water ratio on radiopacity, setting time, pH, calcium ion release and a micro-CT volumetric solubility of white mineral trioxide aggregate. Int Endod J. 2014; 47 (2): 120-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12120

Fridland M., Rosado R. Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) solubility and porosity with different water-to-powder ratios. J Endod. 2003; 29 (12): 814-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200312000-00007

Carvalho-Junior J.R., Correr-Sobrinho L., Correr A.B., Sinhoreti M.A., Consani S., Sousa-Neto M.D. Solubility and dimensional change after setting of root canal sealers: a proposal for smaller dimensions of test samples. J Endod. 2007; 33 (9): 1110-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.06.004

Parirokh M., Torabinejad M., Dummer P.M.H. Mineral trioxide aggregate and other bioactive endodontic cements: an updated overview - part I: vital pulp therapy. Int Endod J. 2018; 51.(2):.177-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12841

Camilleri J. Characterization of hydration products of mineral trioxide aggregate. Int Endod J. 2008; 41 (5): 408-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01370.x

Jimenez-Sanchez M.D.C., Segura-Egea J.J., Diaz-Cuenca A. Higher hydration performance and bioactive response of the new endodontic bioactive cement MTA HP repair compared with ProRoot MTA white and NeoMTA plus. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2019;107 (6): 2109-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34304

Quintana R.M., Jardine A.P., Grechi T.R., Grazziotin-Soares R., Ardenghi D.M., Scarparo R.K., Grecca F.S., Kopper P.M.P. Bone tissue reaction, setting time, solubility, and pH of root repair materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2019; 23 (3): 1359-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2564-1

Dawood A.E., Manton D.J., Parashos P., Wong R., Palamara J., Stanton D.P., Reynolds E.C. The physical properties and ion release of CPP-ACP-modified calcium silicate-based cements. Aust Dent J. 2015; 60 (4): 434-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12255

Poggio C., Dagna A., Ceci M., Meravini M.V., Colombo M., Pietrocola G. Solubility and pH of bioceramic root canal sealers: A comparative study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(10):e1189-e94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.54040

Gandolfi M.G., Siboni F., Prati C. Properties of a novel polysiloxane-guttapercha calcium silicate-bioglass-containing root canal sealer. Dent Mater. 2016; 32 (5): e113-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.03.001

Okabe T., Sakamoto M., Takeuchi H., Matsushima K. Effects of pH on mineralization ability of human dental pulp cells. J Endod. 2006; 32 (3): 198-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.041

Candeiro G.T., Correia F.C., Duarte M.A., Ribeiro-Siqueira D.C., Gavini G. Evaluation of radiopacity, pH, release of calcium ions, and flow of a bioceramic root canal sealer. J Endod. 2012; 38 (6): 842-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.02.029

Kaup M., Schafer E., Dammaschke T. An in vitro study of different material properties of Biodentine compared to ProRoot MTA. Head Face Med. 2015;11:16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-015-0074-9

Ochoa-Rodriguez V.M., Tanomaru-Filho M., Rodrigues E.M., Guerreiro-Tanomaru J.M., Spin-Neto R., Faria G. Addition of zirconium oxide to Biodentine increases radiopacity and does not alter its physicochemical and biological properties. J Appl Oral Sci. 2019; 27: e20180429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0429

Padmanabhan P., Das J., Kumari R.V., Pradeep P.R., Kumar A., Agarwal S. Comparative evaluation of apical microleakage in immediate and delayed postspace preparation using four different root canal sealers: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2017; 20 (2): 86-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.212230

Tanomaru-Filho M., Torres F.F.E., Bosso-Martelo R., Chavez-Andrade G.M., Bonetti-Filho I., Guerreiro-Tanomaru J.M. A Novel Model for Evaluating the Flow of Endodontic Materials Using Micro-computed Tomography. J Endod. 2017; 43 (5): 796-800. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.12.002

Gandolfi M.G., Siboni F., Botero T., Bossu M., Riccitiello F., Prati C. Calcium silicate and calcium hydroxide materials for pulp capping: biointeractivity, porosity, solubility and bioactivity of current formulations. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2015;13 (1): 43-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5301/jabfm.5000201

Elyassi Y., Moinzadeh A.T., Kleverlaan C.J. Characterization of Leachates from 6 Root Canal Sealers. J Endod. 2019; 45 (5): 623-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2019.01.011

Williamson A.E., Dawson D.V., Drake D.R., Walton R.E., Rivera E.M. Effect of root canal filling/sealer systems on apical endotoxin penetration: a coronal leakage evaluation. J Endod. 2005; 31 (8): 599-604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000153843.25887.69

Vouzara T., Dimosiari G., Koulaouzidou E.A., Economides N. Cytotoxicity of a New Calcium Silicate Endodontic Sealer. J Endod. 2018; 44 (5): 849-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.01.015

Publicado

2026-06-15

Número

Sección

Artículos de Investigación Básica