Bilateral Parotid Sialocele After Facial Endolifting: A Case Report

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/9evbwv08

Keywords:

Sialocele; Parotid gland; Salivary ducts; Latrogenic disease; Lasers; Rejuvenation.

Abstract

Subcutaneous laser-assisted procedures, such as Endolift®, are minimally invasive techniques widely used for facial rejuvenation. Although considered safe, they are not free of complications, particularly in the presence of unanticipated anatomical variations. The formation of an iatrogenic sialocele following a subcutaneous laser procedure is a rarely reported complication. A 36-year-old woman presented with a bilateral, fluctuant, painful swelling of the masseteric region that appeared one month after a subcutaneous laser aesthetic procedure, with no response to systemic corticosteroids, physical therapy, or self-performed aspiration puncture. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging revealed two bilateral subcutaneous collections in the premasseteric subdermal plane, anterior to both parotid glands, consistent with sialoceles, along with distal dilation of both parotid ducts. The diagnosis of bilateral traumatic sialocele secondary to accessory parotid tissue injury was established. Management consisted of a bilateral transjugal approach with placement of adapted drainage tubes to create a neo-duct toward the oral cavity. Thorough knowledge of maxillofacial anatomical variations is critical for the safe performance of subcutaneous laser procedures. The accessory parotid gland represents a relevant surgical challenge due to its thinner fascial coverage. In this patient, the bilateral transjugal drainage technique was effective, technically simple and low-cost, achieving complete resolution without compromising the aesthetic outcome at one month after drain removal, although its reproducibility cannot be established from a single case. High-resolution facial ultrasound may be considered a useful adjunct in selected patients at increased anatomical risk, in order to identify anatomical variations that cannot be anticipated by clinical examination alone. Further reports and longer follow-up are necessary.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Dell’Avanzato R. Endolift® the “lunch-time” laser lifting for the lower eyelids: case report. Laser Ther. 2022;29(3):157-159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/ltj.2022.307

Nilforoushzadeh MA, Heidari A, Ghane Y, Heidari N, Azizi H, Fakhim T, et al. The endo-lift laser (intralesional 1470 nm diode laser) for dermatological aesthetic conditions: a systematic review. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2024;48(23):5097-5114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-04082-2

Modena DAO, de Melo Yamamoto AP, da Silva TBF. Endolift® is a non-surgical treatment for skin tissue conditions. Is there evidence for its application? Lasers Med Sci. 2025;40:22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04288-z

Toure G, Foy JP, Vacher C. Surface anatomy of the parotid duct and its clinical relevance. Clin Anat. 2015;28(4):455-459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22510

Rosa MA, Łazarz DP, Pękala JR, Skinningsrud B, Lauritzen SS, Solewski B, et al. The accessory parotid gland and its clinical significance. J Craniofac Surg. 2020;31(3):856-860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000006092

Lazaridou M, Iliopoulos C, Antoniades K, Tilaveridis I, Dimitrakopoulos I, Lazaridis N. Salivary gland trauma: a review of diagnosis and treatment. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2012;5(4):189-195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1313356

Borges FDS, Jahara RS, Meyer PF, de Almeida ACT, Almeida M, Mendonça AC. Complications from laser Endolift use: case series and literature review. World J Biol Pharm Health Sci. 2023;16(3):23-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjbphs.2023.16.3.0496

Asha’ari ZA, Razali MS, Leman WI, Ahmad A. A simple, safe, and effective surgical technique for the treatment of post-traumatic parotid sialocoele. Malays J Med Sci. 2014;21(1):72-74.

Kulkarni A, Chandrasala S, Nimbeni BS, Singh SP, Golai S. Management of an unusual case of iatrogenic parotid sialocele using an infant feeding tube: a novel approach. BMJ Case Rep. 2014;2014:bcr2014205845. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2014-205845

Rahpeyma A, Khajehahmadi S. Delayed management of parotid sialocele: role for two-week intraoral drainage. Curr Med Sci. 2022;42(4):902-904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-022-2619-z

Alimova S, Tlaiss Y, Truten V, Warrak J. Clinical algorithm for ultrasound-guided facial and neck rejuvenation. J Med Ultrasound. 2025;33(3):253-259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jmu.JMU-D-24-00015

Belcastro A, Reed W, Puscas L. The management of salivary fistulas. Semin Plast Surg. 2023;37(1):4-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1759561

Nguyen L, Kimmig W, Hammes S, Schneider SW, Seeber N. Complications of Laser and Energy-Based Procedures in Dermatology: Classification, Management, and Prevention. JDDG. 2026;24:372–383. doi: 10.1111/ddg.70102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ddg.70102

Published

2026-11-12