A living fossil Tetrapus fig wasp ( Hymenoptera : Agaoninae ) developing in extant Neotropical fig species ( Moraceae : Ficus , section Pharmacosycea )

It has been assumed that Tetrapus female wasps (Agaonidae s.s.), the pollinators of the figs of the New World, section Pharmacosycea, are mainly characterized by the presence of one mandibular appendange only, and that it is the most ancestral clade of extant Agaonidae s.s., and the males are tetrapodous. The main objective of this work was to study five Tetrapus morphotypes, whose females have two mandibular appendages and the males are hexapodous, their fig host association and phylogenetic position to the family Agaonidae. The question of which group of fig pollinating wasps and associated figs are the sister to the rest of the pollinating agaonids, and figs respectively remain open. I report a group of New World extant Tetrapus morphotypes (Agaonidae: Agaoninae) provisionally assigned to Hexapus subg. nov. in preparation. Currently, Tetrapus appears as the sister taxon to all other fig pollinating taxa. Howeveer, morphologically, ecologically, geographically and historically Hexapus seems to be the ancestral clade of the extant Agaoninae. Hexapus morphotypes develop in fig species of subsection Petenenses (section Pharmacosycea). In the known extant Tetrapus, the females have one mandibular appendage and the males have reduced one or two short-lobe atrophied non-functional midlegs (tetrapodous). Hexapus females have two free mandibular appendages, and the males have five segmented functional mid-legs (hexapodous). Molecularly Hexapus seems to be the ancestral clade of extant Agaoninae; e.g., a Tetrapus sp. of Ficus crassivenosa was placed by other author as the ancestral clade of 101 wasp species, representing 19 worldwide Agaoninae genera, including four Tetrapus species. In Tetrapus sp. of Ficus crassivenosa, the female has two mandibular appendages and the male is hexapodous. The females of T. apopnus and T. delclosi, preserved in Early to mid-Miocene amber from the Dominican Republic, also have two mandibular appendages and the general morphology of extant Hexapus. I suggest that Hexapus stands up as a living fossil and the sister clade of Tetrapus s.s. The presence of extant Hexapus; as well as extant Tetrapus and their fig host species, especially in South America supports a Southern Gondwanaland origin for both of them, but not a trans-Pacific migrating connection with tropical America for section Pharmacosycea (the host of Tetrapus and Hexapus), a long oceanic dispersal, high levels of stem extinction of Tetrapus or Atlantic land connections, as proposed by other authors. However, lastly it has been assumed that figs and their pollinators arose simultaneously in Eurasia during early Tertiary and spread southwards from it. Most of the morphological and molecular studies of the fig biology of Agaoninae and Ficus, did not include Hexapus morphotypes and their fig hosts, and assumed that Tetrapus is the most ancestral clade of the extant fig pollinating wasps. Rev. Biol. Trop. 64 (4): 1721-1735. Epub 2016 December 01.

Ficus is a Pantropical group that comprises about 735 species worldwide (Berg & Corner, 2005).It is found in all regions where frost does not occur (Corner, 1958), especially in areas of the Southern Hemisphere, including very small isolated oceanic islands (McKey, 1989;Yokoyama, 2003;Azuma, Harrison, Nakamura, & Su, 2010;Ramírez, Gómez, Salazar, & Aguilar, 2011).New World Ficus has two endemic sections: Pharmacosycea (Miq.) Benth.& Hook.f. subgenus Pharmacosycea (Miq.)Miq., pollinated by Tetrapus Mayr; and section Americana Miq.subgenus Urostigma (Gasp.)Miq., pollinated by Pegoscapus Cameron.Section Pharmacosycea is a relatively small group (Berg, 1989), comprising at least 25 species (Berg, 2009), of which 19 are found in Ecuador.Ficus is characterized by its unique flask-like urceolate inflorescence (fig or syconium) with internal staminate and pistillate flowers and a small circular or split-shaped terminal orifice, the ostiolum, barred by stiff bracts, through which the symbiotic pollinating wasps must pass to reach the syconial cavity, oviposit in some of the female florets that become galls, where their larvae develop, and pollinate some of them that become seeds.Dispersal of Ficus is a double problem, since the pollinators must accompany the host plant (Corner, 1958).Furthermore, Ficus pollen grains are very small (7-22 µm), ellipsoid or oblate, with smooth exine (Berg & Corner, 2005) and probably lack the vacuolated stage (Ramírez, 2007); consequently, they must suffer fast dehydration and death during long distant transportation or emigration journeys (Ramírez, 1989;2007).Furthermore, fig seeds are small, 0.5-5 mm long (Corner, 1958), short-lived, and the seedlings initially grow very slowly (Ramírez pers. obs.).New World section Pharmacosycea has free standing leptocaulous terrestrial trees, although Ficus crassiuscula Standl.(a host of an Hexapus morphotype) is usually hemi-epiphytic (Berg, 2009).According to Berg and Corner (2005), events of long-distance in Ficus dispersal will probably rarely result in reproduction and establishment by absence of pollinators, and population of trees to allow establishment of the pollinators as well.However, Cruaud et al. (2011) proposed fruit pigeons, in part, for long distance trans-oceanic dispersal for fig fruits.Ecologically, Ficus provides one of the most important continuous food resources year around, e.g., Harrison (2005) noted that over 1 200 vertebrate species feed on figs.Furthermore, the eclosing new generation of female wasps is eagerly consumed by ants, flying swallows and Anisoptera dragon flies; while the wingless males are consumed by ants and staphylinid beetles.Furthermore, the dead foundresses are internally consumed by Parasitodiplogaster nematodes (Ramírez & Salazar, 2015).It has been suggested that the mutual relationship between Ficus and the pollinating Agaoninae was probably established before the break of Gondwana (Weiblen, 2002); while Berg and Corner (2005) noted that the general pattern of distribution and diversification suggest that the genus Ficus originated in Eastern Gondwana.Interestingly, Corner (1967) noted that subgenus Pharmacosycea seems to connect with an even earlier stock of Ficus.
The pollinators of section Pharmacosycea: Currently, Tetrapus has been assumed to be the exclusive passive pollinator of section Pharmacosycea (Corner, 1960;Ramírez, 1970;Bouček, 1993;Ramírez, 1994;Wiebes, 1995).Ramírez (1978;1991) considered that Tetrapus seemed to be composed of two well defined groups: in one group (Tetrapus), the females have one mandibular appendage and the males are tetrapodous; in the other, the females have two mandibular appendages and the males are hexapodous.Bouček (1993) referred about three Tetrapus with the female mandible split from the apex; while Wiebes (1995), mentioned two saw-like appendages.
Geographical origin and dispersal of subgenus Pharmacosycea and Tetrapus: Corner (1967) suggested that subgenus Pharmacosycea originated in the region that connected the Solomon Islands, New Hebrides and New Caledonia, it traveled via Caledonia to Asia, but very early a detachment went to America.He also noted that subgenus Pharmacosycea clearly has a trans-Pacific history that was not of small islands, but of high forest and that North America could not have been the source supply of Pharmacosycea to South America.Rønsted et al. (2005) noted that, if their age estimates are correct, this could imply that long distance oceanic dispersal is an important process in the present distribution of Ficus as also noted by Datwiler and Weiblen (2004); and that, the South American section Pharmacosycea would have separated from the rest of Ficus only 60 Myr ago, which postdates the separation of South America from Africa (about 90-100 Myr ago) during the break-up of Gondwana.Lopez-Vaamononde et al. (2009) noted that if their estimates and ancestral areas are correct reconstructions, it would imply that the current presence of Tetrapus and its associated Pharmacosycea figs in South America could be the result of long distance oceanic dispersal from Asia to the Neotropics; and that alternatively, high levels of stem lineage extinction could explain the observed young age for extant species of Tetrapus and section Pharmacosycea.Cruaud et al. (2012) estimated 74.9 Ma for the stem Pharmacosycea/Tetrapus, and that, biogeographic analyses indicated that the present-day distribution of fig and pollinator lineages, is consistent with a Eurasian origin and subsequent dispersal, rather than with Gondwanan vicariance.Furthermore, Cruaud et al. (2012) concluded that neither their study nor previous ones have strong basis for inferring which group was sister to all other agaonids.Time evolution of the Ficus-Agaoninae association with special reference to section Pharmacosycea and Tetrapus: The age, geographical origin and major periods of diversion of Ficus remain controversial (Lopez-Vaamonde et al., 2009).For the geographical origin of the association of Ficus-Agaonidae, it has been suggested that the pollinating wasps evolved during the Cretaceous period (Corner, 1958) in the Southern Hemisphere (Gondwanaland) (Murray, 1985).According to Machado, Jousselin, Kjellberg, Compton and Herre (2001), Ficus and its pollinating wasps seem to be of late Cretaceous origin.Ramírez (1978, Fig. 21;1991, Fig. 18), in his morphological cladistic analyses about the evolution of the mandibular appendage, and the pollinating syndromes of the Agaoninae, placed Tetrapus as the most basal clade to all other extant Agaoninae groups, and section Pharmacosycea, as the most ancestral group of Ficus.Those cladistic positions were corroborated by molecular phylogenetic analyses by Herre et al. (1996), Weiblen (2000), Rønsted et al. (2005), Rønsted, Weiblen, Clement, Zerega and Savolainen (2008), and Munro et al. (2011).Machado et al. (2001) noted that the passively pollinating Tetrapus appears to be the most ancient pollinator genus associated with the monoecious Neotropical subgenus Pharmacosycea; and that, both morphological and molecular data, support New World section Pharmacosycea as the earliest derivation among existing figs.Furthermore, Machado, Herre, McCafferty and Bermingham (1996) noted that the ancestors of Neotropical Pharmacosycea and Tetrapus probably arose at the origin of their mutualism ca.90 Myr ago in Gondwana.Rønsted et al. (2005) supported that section Pharmacosycea is the oldest group of Ficus.Lopez-Vaamonde et al. (2009)  .However, the Tetrapus species molecularly analyzed by those authors, as well as others, correspond to extant Tetrapus (Herre et al., 1996;Machado et al., 1996;2001;Jousselin, Rasplus, & Kjellberg, 2003;Datwyler & Weiblen, 2004;Rønsted et al., 2005;2008;Jian, Zhu, & Zhen, 2006;Lopez-Vaamonde et al., 2009;Azuma et al., 2010;Erasmus, van Noort, Jousselin, & Greeff, 2010;Munro et al., 2011;Cruad et al., 2009Cruad et al., , 2011Cruad et al., , 2012)).The objectives of this work were to study the association of five Tetrapus morphotypes whose females have two independent mandibular appendages and hexapodous males; explain their origin and morphological relationships to other pollinating wasps of subgenus Pharmacosycea and other pollinating genera, their taxonomic position, and its origin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Syconia of F. crassiuscula Standl.were collected in Santa Cruz, Turrialba, Costa Rica (09°58´02" N -83°44´15" W, at 1 430 m of elevation), from F. macbridei Standl. in Tapantí National Park, Costa Rica (09°46´13.2"N -83°47´59" W, at 1 239 m in elevation) and of F. crassivenosa W. Burger, from near Quebrada Cataratitas, San Ramón, Alajuela, Costa Rica (10°14'3.26"N -84°31'29.39"W, at 755 m in elevation).Naturally colonized syconia of Ficus crassiuscula and of F. macbridei were collected one day before they reached the male phase.Each syconium was individually enclosed in a tightly capped jar.Once the wasps emerged from the syconia, they were put to sleep with acetone and preserved in ethanol 70 % for further identification and dissection.Hexapus females and males were also collected by the author from the syconia of a cauliflorous riparian Pharmacosycea sp. in Jiménez, Biscucuy, Portuguesa State, Venezuela in 1966.The pollinators of F. petenensis Lundell was collected from Veracruz, Mexico, and described as Hexapus ramirezi by Xochitl M. Cuevas-Figueroa (2009, unpublished).A female of H. ramirezi was obtained from a preserved syconium of F. petenensis Lundell (=F.apollinaris Dugand); voucher number 2502 deposited at INBio Herbarium, Santo Domingo de Heredia, Costa Rica.The illustrations of two fossil female Hexapus are used with the permission of Enrique Peñalver (2006, Fig. 2a y Fig. 2b).The dissections of the wasps were made with the help of a dissecting microscope while the wasps were submerged in 70 % ethanol in a Syracuse container, the body structures were dislodged by mean of minute Nadel hook and mounted in Hoyer's fluid to be illustrated.
The species of Ficus studied were identified by the author using the descriptions of Burger (1977) and Berg (2009).The scientific names of the figs were consulted in Tropicos® of the Missouri Botanical Garden and in Berg (2009).The term Agaoninae corresponds to the pollinating wasps, sensu Bouček (1988) or to Agaonidae sensu Rasplus, Kerdelhué, Le Clainche and Mondor (1998).The term Tetrapus refers to Tetrapus Mayr (1885), and Hexapus to a Tetrapus group, who's female have two independent mandibular appendages and hexapodous males, noted as Hexapus subg.nov. in preparation.Since the five morphotypes of Hexapus studied were collected from five defined Ficus spp.and from different geographical areas, they are assumed to be distinct morphotypes until they are definitely described.The mandibles of Nigeriella excavata were also studied.

RESULTS
Females of the five Hexapus morphotypes studied had two free mandibular appendages (Fig. 1) and males with functional mid legs (hexapodous).They were the passive pollinators of five New World fig species of section Pharmacosycea, subsection Petenenses.The females are further characterized by an elongate head with a gular bridge without a sclerotized median carina or a felted line, mandibles with one gland only, absence of labrum, bilobed clypeus with a median setose carina, pedicel without axial spines, third segment with three completely fused anelli and a short unsegmented acuminated projection, labiomaxillary complex with distinct stipes and galea, bacilliform process pointing backward, segmented labium, forewing closed costal cell, spurious veins and moderate pilosity, and a twelfth flagellomere.
The males have two mandibular glands and antennae basically 4-segmented with an anellus, while the female has one gland and do not break off the antennae and wings when they penetrate through the ostiolum (Ramírez, 1970).

DISCUSSION
Hexapus subg.nov.ined., in preparation, belongs to Tetrapus Mayr which has five extant nominal species (Wiebes, 1995).The five Hexapus morphotypes studied are the specific pollinators of five species of section Pharmacosycea: subsection Petenenses.Two fossil female Tetrapus (T.apopnus and T. delclosi), described by Peñalver et al. (2006), like those of the extant Hexapus, also have two mandibular appendages, forewing closed costal cell, and most of the general morphology (Peñalver et al., 2006).The ostiola of fig species associated with extant Hexapus morphotypes, have an entrance morphology not found in other fig groups, and are usually protracted at the bottom of a cavity in the apex of the syconium (Berg, 2009); they have several layers of superficial interlocking horizontal appressed bracts; (spiral entrance), followed by a series of inflexed   bracts pointing inwards into the syconial cavity; (linear entrance).On the contrary, fig species associated with Tetrapus usually have the ostiolum without distinct superficial interlocking bracts, but a linear tubular entrance only, and the female Tetrapus has one mandibular appendage.All other Agaoninae pollinators have one mandibular appendage.In Hexapus the internal appendage is wide, sub-rectangular, larger than the external one, and provided with lamellae, as in other female agaonines that enter syconia with a spiral ostiole; while the external appendage is narrower, with short lamellae ending in lateral teeth as in Tetrapus.The fossil females of Tetrapus apopnus and T. delclosi differ from extant Hexapus because they have an elongate sharp scale-like antennal process in the first flagellomere with an apical long spine, as depicted by Peñalver et al. (2006), which seems to be a Blastophaginae character sensu Wiebes (1982).Both Tetrapus and Hexapus are exclusively cleptoparasited by New World Critogaster Mayr (Sycoryctinae) (Segar, Lopez-Vaamonde, Rasplus, & Cook, 2012).Hexapus, as well as Tetrapus, are the exclusive pollinators of the New World section Pharmacosycea.Fossilized and extant Hexapus females are uniquely characterized among most extant pollinating Agaoninae groups (taxa) because they have two independent mandibular appendages as depicted by Peñalver et al. (2006) for Tetrapus delclosi and T. apopnus in Early to mid-Miocene., ca. 20-17 Ma (Iturralde-Vinent & MacPhee, 1996).
Extant Hexapus morphotypes seem to represent the most ancestral pollinating agaonines of Ficus, because among other pleisiomorphic characters: 1-the females do not possess a gular bridge composed of carinated sclerite, as assumed by Rasplus et al. (1988) for Agaoninae; 2-the antenna has a terminal bottom (terminal nipple), as found in Pteromalidae (Grahan, 1969), which is considered as a separate 12 th flageromere, homologous to the apical segment of Rotoitidae, and also reported for some Eucharidae (Heraty et al., 2013 and references there in).Furthermore, the female Hexapus is uniquely characterized among other Agaoninae by the possession of two independent mandibular appendages.Due to the fact that Tetrapus and Hexapus morphotypes are passive pollinators (Ramírez, 1978), as well as to their ecology, the author considers that both groups are more ancestral than the fossilized 'Ponera' minuta, described by Compton et al. (2010), and Pegoscapus peritus described by Peñalver et al. (2006), because both species had a general Blastophaginae morphology, sensu Wiebes (1982), and possessed pollen pockets which are associated with active pollination (Ramírez, 1978;Kjellberg et al., 2001;Cook, Bean, Power, & Dixon, 2004).Compton et al. (2010) noted that the pollen grains found in the pollen pockets of 'Ponera' minuta were psilate and oblate as those found in other modern Ficus species; and that, 'P'.minuta was an active pollinator and the host tree had dioecious breeding system.By the contrary, section Pharmacosycea pollen grains are cylindrical with obtuse ends, regulate and with a median constriction; as also illustrated by Ramírez and Malavasi (1997), for pollen grains carried by Pleistodontes plebejus (Wiebes), a passive pollinator of Ficus hesperidiiformis King, of section Malvanthera (Cook et al.,

2004
).According to Wang, Chen, Li, Zhang and Yang (2014) cylindrical and spherical pollen with obtuse end is only found in passively pollinated figs.
The extinct and extant Hexapus seem to be the sister clade of extant Tetrapus, the most ancestral clade of other extant Agaoninae and to represent a living fossil.It is hypothesized that the association, section Pharmacosycea, subsection Petenenses evolved in the Southern Hemisphere as assumed by Murray (1985) for Agaoninae, before the Gondwanan break (Weiblen, 2002) and that the Agaoninae ancestor could had been a Hexapus-like wasp; other way, the author hypothesizes that there had been an unknown ancestral Agaoninae-Ficus association, that originated in Eastern Gondwana, in agreement with Berg and Corner (2005); and that subgenus Pharmacosycea connects with an even earlier stock of Ficus, and suggested by Corner (1967).On the contrary, Cruad et al. ( 2012) stated that their ancestral recognition, suggests that figs, and their pollinators, arose simultaneously in Eurasia and the major lineages of figs, and pollinators, split during the Tertiary; and it appears that, posteriorly, they spread Southward from Eurasia.Furthermore, they noted that their, biogeography analyses indicate that Pharmacosycea and Tetrapus diverged before South America split from Antarctica (74.9-62.1 My); and that both lineages might have reached America across North Atlantic bridges (cf.Corner, 1967;Datwyler & Weiblen, 2004).
It is hypothesized that the ancestral Agaoninae that gave origin to Hexapus or their ancestors, also had two mandibular appendages, as seem to be still found as remnants, in some extant Old World pollinating agaonines e.g., Eupristina (E.) grassi Grandi (1916), and Saunders (1883) for E. masoni (Saunders); furthermore, E. (P.) koninsbergi Grandi, also seems to has two mandibular appendages, as illustrated by Chen and Chou (1997).Nigeriella excavata Compton (an African species) have a wide elongate mandibular appendage, with two lateral long sclerotized areas, each section provided with lamellae and denticles separated by a medial membranous area; the two sclerotized mandibular areas of N. excavata, may be remnants of two mandibular appendages that became fused.Some Pleistodontes females, e.g.P. nitens and P. schizodontus of Australia, as described and illustrated by Lopez-Vaamonde, Dixon, Cook and Rasplus (2002, Fig. 21 and Fig. 44), also have a mandibular appendage that recalls the presence of two fused appendages.All other described Agaoninae females have one mandibular appendage.
It is suggested that the ancestral fig ostiolum had a superficial layer with superficial interlocking bracts followed by an internal linear passage as found in subsection Petenenses (cf.Jousselin et al., 2003).The mandibular appendages of Hexapus and Tetrapus females, coevolved in response to the different ostiolar morphology of the two Pharmacosycea subsections (Petenenses and Bergianae).
In Hexapus the lamellate internal appendage is used to displace the female through the superficial spiral ostiolar passage; while the external toothed appendage, is used to displace it through the internal linear passage.On the contrary, Tetrapus has one mandibular appendage associated with the ostiolar linear passage of subsection Bergianae.It is suggested that section Pharmacosycea and its pollinators may have evolved in submontane or montane humid tropical forest.By the way, most fig species associated with Hexapus are found from Southern Mexico to Ecuador, especially in humid submontane or montane forest up to 3 200 m or more.Berg (2009) noted that Ecuador gives the impression to be a "melting pot" of section Pharmacosycea species; e.g., out the 25 species, 19 are found in Ecuador; furthermore, out of them, 10 have an ostiolar morphology that suggests their association with Hexapus morphotypes (pers.obs.).Based on the morphological, ecological characters and geographical distribution of extant Hexapus and its fig hosts; the author thinks that this group could be the earliest divergent lineage of extant fig pollinating groups.The probable early association of Hexapus-section Pharmacosycea in Gondwana, or even an earlier stock of Ficus that connected with subgenus Pharmacosycea, as suggested by Corner (1967), calls into question the ideas of a trans-Pacific fig route connection (Corner, 1967), North Atlantic land bridges (Cruaud et al., 2012) or long distance trans-oceanic dispersal, proposed for the association Tetrapus-Pharmacosycea in the New World (cf.Corner, 1967;Rønsted et al., 2005;Lopez-Vaamonde et al., 2009;Azuma et al., 2010;Cruaud et al., 2011).Furthermore, it questions the radiation of Ficus during the Tertiary after the break-up of Gondwana proposed by Zerega et al. (2005) and Cruaud et al. (2011).Since the Agaoninae females are short-lived and do not feed as adults, long distance dispersal, or emigration, is intimately subject to ecological factors, e.g., the fig wasps must accompany the fig host in their migration (Corner, 1958;Ramírez et al., 2011).Furthermore, the seeds of Ficus are small 0.5-5mm long (Corner, 1958), and short lived and the seedlings grow slowly.According to Zerega et al. (2005), long distance dispersal over water seems unlikely for Moraceae, owing to the large short-living seeds.Furthermore, long distant transoceanic dispersal for particular pollinating wasps and other sycophylous invertebrates must occur inside the syconia of living fig trees (Ramírez et al., 2011).It is suggested that for migration the suit of a living fig tree or trees and associated invertebrates have to travel together on a floating riparian, or on a coastal raft.Consequently, the author suggest that dispersion of Ficus seeds and its suits of sycophilous wasps and other associated organisms by wind, flying, or aquatic vertebrates displacing over long transoceanic distances, do not seem to have played a historical role in the intercontinental dispersion of the main groups of sycophillous wasps and other invertebrates (cf.Cruaud et al., 2011) for Sycophaginae dispersal.Due to the presence of two mandibular appendages and a membranous un-carinated gular bridge, as pleisiomorphies Agaoninae characters, the author suggests that Hexapus is the most ancestral clade of all extant fig pollinator genera; as well as, the sister clade of extant Tetrapus.This idea is reinforced by the molecular analysis of Cruaud et al. (2009), who placed Tetrapus n. sp.(=Hexapus sp., pers.obs.) as the most basal clade of 101 Agaoninae species representing 20 world-wide pollinating genera.The author suggests that Hexapus may represent the supposed South America extinct stem agaonine lineage proposed by Lopez-Vaamonde et al. (2009). However, Cruad et al. (2012), concluded that neither their molecular study, nor previous ones, have a strong basis for inferring which agaonid group is sister to all other agaonids.
also confirmed that Tetrapus was consistently placed as a sister group of the rest of the extant pollinating fig wasps.Furthemore,Rønsted et al. (2005) obtained confidence intervals of 98-105 Myr for the age of the root node of Ficus, and 66-101 Myr for the age of the root node of the wasps.While Lopez-Vaamonde et al. (2009) estimated that the crown group of Agaonidae could have originated any time between 54 and 216 Myr ago.However, Zerega, Clement, Datwyler and Weiblen (2005) suggested that the figs may have radiated more recently after the break-up of Gondwana, and gave a range of 40-51 Myr for the crown group age of Ficus.Furthermore, Zerega et al. (2005) results do not support the hypothesis of simultaneous diversification between figs and fig wasps and suggested that figs may have radiated more recently, during the Tertiary (cf.Cruaud et al. (2012) for codiversification of figs and fig-pollinating wasps)