1224
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 69(4): 1224-1232, October-December 2021 (Published Nov. 25, 2021)
Trap rebuilding by Myrmeleon brasiliensis larvae (Neuroptera:
Myrmeleontidae) in response to flooding: the effect of body size
Vitor Gabriel de Oliveira Leite¹; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4104-3093
Raquel Braga Aquino Florenciano¹; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9019-5398
Edihanne Gamarra Arguelho¹; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4549-6762
Tatiane do Nascimento Lima¹,²*; http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0656-1170
1. Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campus de Aquidauana, Biodiversity Studies Laboratory, Rua Oscar
Trindade de Barros, Bairro da Serraria, Aquidauana, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil; vg454053@gmail.com, raquell.
aquino12@gmail.com, edihanne.arguelho@ufms.br
2. Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Recursos Naturais, Faculdade de
Engenharias, Arquitetura e Urbanismo e Geografia, Cidade Universitária, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil;
tatianenlima@gmail.com (*Correspondence)
Received 19-V-2021. Corrected 20-X-2021. Accepted 10-XI-2021.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Immature forms of the antlion Myrmeleon brasiliensis (Neuroptera, Myrmeleontidae) build traps
in dry sandy soil to capture prey.
Objective: The aim of the present study was to investigate how the waterlogging of the soil due to rain affects
the trap rebuilding and relocation behavior of M. brasiliensis of different sizes.
Methods: The study was conducted between July and December 2019. Larvae M. brasiliensis were observed
and collected from a forest reserve in the municipality of Aquidauana in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Results: In the natural environment, most larvae rebuilt their traps in the same location seven days after the
simulation of rain, with a smaller diameter than that observed prior to the simulation of rain. In the labora-
tory, the movements of M. brasiliensis larvae and rebuilding of the traps after the waterlogging of the soil was
affected by body size. Larger larvae moved more and were more likely to rebuild their traps.
Conclusions: The saturation of the soil affects the foraging of M. brasiliensis larvae, which are impeded from
rebuilding their traps for a period. In situations of long periods of saturated soil, the mortality rate of the larvae
is high and rebuilding of the traps occurs after the soil dries out, but with a smaller trap size. These data suggest
that changes in the rainfall pattern can affect the population structure of M. brasiliensis larvae, with the selection
of larger individuals in situations of more severe rains. In this process, the smaller larvae are more affected, as
their foraging is impeded.
Key words: antlion; construction behaviour; foraging; Myrmeleontinae; rainfall.
de Oliveira Leite, V. G., Aquino Florenciano, R. B., Gamarra
Arguelho, E., & do Nascimento Lima, T. (2021). Trap
rebuilding by Myrmeleon brasiliensis larvae (Neuroptera:
Myrmeleontidae) in response to flooding: the effect of
body size. Revista de Biología Tropical, 69(4), 1224-1232.
https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v69i4.44478
https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v69i4.44478
ECOLOGY
Many organisms build traps to capture
prey. This foraging strategy evolved indepen-
dently in different groups, such as spiders and
insects (Alcock, 1972; Hansell, 2007; Ruxton
& Hansell, 2007). Sit-and-wait foraging behav-
ior involving trap building diminishes energy
that would otherwise be spent in the active
search for prey. However, energy is spent on
the building and maintenance of the trap (Botz
et al., 2003; Gotelli, 1993). Thus, environmen-
tal disturbances that cause the destruction of
the trap generate greater energy expenditure for
these organisms, which can affect their fitness
(Lima & Silva, 2017; Lucas, 1985).
1225
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 69(4): 1224-1232, October-December 2021 (Published Nov. 25, 2021)
Immature forms of the family Myrmeleon-
tidae (Neuroptera order), which are known as
antlions, have trap-building behavior. Among
species of the sub-family Myrmeleontinae,
traps are built in a funnel shape in dry sandy
soil (Triplehorn & Johnson, 2005; Youthed &
Moran, 1969;). The three-dimensional archi-
tecture of the trap and the granulometry of the
soil cause prey items (arthropods moving along
the ground) to fall into the trap (Devetak et
al., 2020; Humeau et al., 2015;). Larger traps
enable the capture of both large and small prey
items. Upon falling into the trap, the prey is
directed to the bottom of the pit, where the
larva awaits to attack with its long falciform
mandibles (Heinrich & Heinrich, 1984; Nonato
& Lima, 2011).
Trap size is proportional to the body size
of the antlion larva and is positively related
to the successful capture of prey items (Dias
et al., 2006; Missirian et al., 2006). A larger
trap diameter increases the abundance and size
range of the prey, which is the main benefit of
increasing the capturing surface of the trap.
However, a larger pit requires greater energy
expenditure for maintenance and rebuilding
in cases of more severe damage (Burgess,
2009; Griffiths, 1985; Lima & Silva, 2017;
Lucas, 1985)
The destruction of antlion traps can occur
due to the interference of neighboring larvae,
which toss sand out of their funnels during
the building and maintenance of their traps
(Day & Zalucki, 2000; Simberloff, 1978). Trap
destruction can also occur due to environmen-
tal factors, such as wind and rain. In natural
environments, some species, such as Myrmel-
eon brasiliensis, Myrmeleon immaculatus and
Myrmeleon crudelis, build traps in locations
protected from the direct action of rain, such
as under plantlets or fallen tree trunks (Gotelli,
1993; Lima & Faria, 2007), whereas other spe-
cies, such as Cueta lineosa and Morter obscu-
rus, prefer open areas exposed to direct sunlight
and rain (Devetak et al., 2020; Griffiths, 1980).
Independently of the selection of the trap build-
ing location, all traps are destroyed in situations
of strong rains, which can affect development,
as the larvae are impeded from foraging until
the soil dries out again. In the Cerrado biome
(savanna) of Brazil, M. brasiliensis larvae were
found to wait approximately five days before
rebuilding their traps after rainfall (Freire &
Lima, 2019).
Larvae of Myrmeleon brasiliensis (Návas,
1914) pass through three instars before the
formation of the pupa for the emergence of the
adults. The traps built by these larvae range
from 9 to 35 mm in diameter (Missirian et al.,
2006). Given this variation in trap size, cost-
benefit ratios associated with the rebuilding
and relocation of a trap must vary as a func-
tion of body size and trap size. Larger larvae
have a greater energy supply, due to a greater
fat reserve. Thus, the hypothesis raised in this
work is that larger larvae may bear the costs
of relocating and rebuilding the traps (after
disturbing their traps) more efficiently than
smaller larvae. In this case, after a rain event,
the larger larvae would be the first to rebuild
their traps. The aim of the present study was
to investigate how the waterlogging of the soil
due to rain affects the building behavior and
relocation of the traps of M. brasiliensis larvae
of different sizes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This study was conducted in a Permanent
Protection Area (1 600 000 m²) located in the
municipality of Aquidauana in the state of
Mato Gross do Sul, Brazil (20°26’36” S &
55º40’02” W). Mean annual temperature and
rainfall in the area are approximately 26 °C and
1 250 mm, respectively. Rains are concentrated
between October and March and the monthly
precipitation index diminishes considerably
between May and September, reaching zero
(Coutinho, 2000). The present study was con-
ducted between July and December 2019.
In the reserve, ten quadrants measuring 40
x 40 cm were established with a metric tape
and string, separated by a distance of 1 m. In
each quadrant, the position of the antlion traps
was marked with wooden stakes (10 x 1 cm)
and the diameter of the traps was measured.
1226
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 69(4): 1224-1232, October-December 2021 (Published Nov. 25, 2021)
The occurrence of rain was simulated with
the aid of a watering can, to observe the effect
of waterlogging on the rebuilding of the M.
brasiliensis traps. A total of 200 ml of water
were poured on each quadrant. This quantity of
water was chosen for being sufficient to destroy
the traps without forming a puddle. After
the rain simulation, the traps were observed
daily. The presence of traces of the larvae was
observed for the construction of new traps. In
this way, it was possible to follow the move-
ment of the M. brasiliensis larvae. Seven days
after the rain simulation, the rebuilding of the
traps was observed, and the diameters of the
rebuilt traps were measured. There was no
occurrence of natural rain during this period.
In the second part of the study, two experi-
ments were set up in the laboratory. For such,
M. brasiliensis larvae were collected from their
traps through visual searches and transported
to the laboratory. In the first experiment, 60
larvae were measured for body size (from the
head to the end of the abdomen, excluding the
mandible) and individually placed into plastic
recipients (20 cm length x 15 cm width x 10
cm height) containing 195 g of sand removed
from the collection site. After 24 h (time given
for all larvae to build traps), the diameter of
the traps was measured, and the location of
the larvae was marked. To evaluate the effects
of waterlogging, the occurrence of rain was
simulated. A total of 9 ml of water were poured
directly into the trap. Thus, the soil around the
trap remained dry, enabling the movement of
the larva. After seven days, observations were
made of the rebuilding of the traps, trap size
and whether the trap had been relocated within
the plastic recipient.
In a second experiment, another 60 larvae
were measured for body size (head to abdomen)
and placed into plastic recipients (20 cm length
x 15 cm width x 10 cm height) containing 195 g
of sand removed from the collection site. As
in the previous experiment, trap diameter was
measured after 24 h. Next, the effect of water-
logging of the soil after rain was observed. For
such, 30 ml was water were poured directly
onto the trap, forming a puddle so that the larva
became submerged. After seven days, the water
was drained, and the recipients were placed to
dry in a plant nursery. For 15 days, observa-
tions were made of the rebuilding of the traps,
trap size and mortality.
Al measurements were performed with
digital calipers (precision: 0.01 mm). Trap
size before and after the simulation of rain
in the field and in the laboratory, experiment
was compared using the paired t-test. Logistic
regression was performed to determine the
probability of the rebuilding of the trap after
the waterlogging of the soil in relation to body
size of the M. brasiliensis larvae as well as the
probability of the relocation of the trap in rela-
tion to body size.
RESULTS
An average of six M. brasiliensis larvae
(range: two to 11) were found in each quadrant
demarcated in the natural environment prior to
the rain simulation. After the rain simulation,
an average of four larvae were found per quad-
rant. The rebuilding rate at the same site was 61
%. The traps rebuilt after the rain were smaller
(d.f. = 36, T = 2.15, P = 0.03). Mean (± stan-
dard deviation) trap size was 26.11 11.84)
mm prior to the rain simulation and 22.55
10.50) mm after the rain simulation.
In the first laboratory experiment, 75 %
of the M. brasiliensis larvae rebuilt their traps
after the rain simulation, 11 % of which rebuilt
at the same site. Among those that relocated
their traps, the mean distance from the original
site was 55.35 mm. The probability of reloca-
tion increased as a function of body size (d.f. =
1, X² = 24.33, P = 0.01). The probability of trap
reconstruction also increased as a function of
larva size (d.f. = 1, X² = 20.35, P = 0.01) (Fig.
1A, Fig. 1B). Mean trap size was 25.83 ± 8.94
mm prior to rain simulation and 27.51 ± 7.54
mm after rain simulation. This difference was
non-significant (d.f. = 44, T = -1.43, P = 0.15).
In the second laboratory experiment, when
the M. brasiliensis larvae spent seven days in
inundated soil (all the sand was waterlogged),
67 % (considering a total of 60 larvae) did not
1227
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 69(4): 1224-1232, October-December 2021 (Published Nov. 25, 2021)
rebuild their traps in the 15-day observation
period after the draining of the water and dry-
ing of the soil. Among those that rebuilt, a sig-
nificant reduction in trap size was found after
the waterlogging of the soil (d.f. = 19, T = 2.54,
P = 0.01). Mean trap size was 26.33 ± 12.58
mm before waterlogging and 21.88 ± 6.68 mm
after waterlogging.
The probability of reconstruction (d.f. = 1,
X ² = 21.61, P = 0.01) and relocation the trap
(d. f. 1 = X ² = 23.74, P = 0.01) after a period of
seven days in saturated soil increased as a func-
tion of body size (Fig. 2A, Fig. 2B). The mor-
tality rate at the end of the experiment (seven
days in saturated soil + 15 days of observation)
was 52 %. Some larvae were able to rebuild
their traps when the soil dried but died in the
subsequent days. Others died during the water-
logging period.
DISCUSSION
For trap-building insects, variables that
cause the destruction of the trap should be
considered during decisions regarding foraging
behavior (Gotelli, 1993; Lima & Lopes, 2016).
The selection of an adequate site for building a
trap is an important component of the foraging
behavior of sit-and-wait predators, especially
when movements are rare. The relocation and
the rebuilding of a new trap in the absence of
environmental disturbance rarely occur among
antlions, possibility due to the metabolic cost
associated with the rebuilding of the trap and
Fig. 1. A. Probability of displacement of M. brasiliensis larvae as function of body size after waterlogging of soil caused
by simulation of rainfall. B. Probability of reconstruction of traps by M. brasiliensis larvae as function of body size after
waterlogging of soil caused by simulation of rainfall (First Experiment).
1228
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 69(4): 1224-1232, October-December 2021 (Published Nov. 25, 2021)
the risk of cannibalism (Lima, 2016; Lucas,
1985). In the present study, more than half (61
%) of the M. brasiliensis larvae in the natural
environment rebuilt their traps at the same site
seven days after the simulation of rain, reveal-
ing that the larvae remained in the same loca-
tion, waiting for the soil to dry.
Other studies have also demonstrated that
antlion larvae exhibit strong site fidelity for
the construction of their traps (Crowley &
Linton, 1999; Lucas, 1985). One of the rea-
sons for this behavior is the selection of a dry,
warm micro-habitat, as reported by Miler et
al. (2019) for antlions found the tropical forest
of Borneo. Moist soil hinders trap building by
agglutinating the soil particles and reducing
sliding movements between the grains, thereby
restricting the movement of the antlion larvae
(Devetak et al., 2005; Lucas, 1982). These
characteristics lead the trap-building larvae to
select dry locations.
In the natural environment, the determina-
tion of the location for the rebuilding of traps
implies choices regarding the availability of
prey items, intraspecific competition, and abi-
otic factors, such as the granulometry of the
soil (Devetak & Arnett, 2015; Farji-Brener,
2003; Scharf et al., 2008; Scharf & Ovadia,
2006). In the present study, the M. brasiliensis
larvae relocated the traps less in the natu-
ral environment compared to the laboratory.
This may have been due to the fact that the
larvae were alone in the plastic recipients in
the laboratory. As these larvae are cannibals
Fig. 2. A. Probability of displacement of traps by M. brasiliensis larvae as function of body size after waterlogging of soil
caused by simulation of rainfall. B. Probability of reconstruction of traps by M. brasiliensis larvae as function of body size
after waterlogging of soil caused by simulation of rainfall (Second Experiment).
1229
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 69(4): 1224-1232, October-December 2021 (Published Nov. 25, 2021)
(Lima, 2016), avoiding relocation to sites close
to neighboring larvae could help ensure that the
larva does not become prey.
In the study conducted by Lima et al.
(2019), larger larvae were found more distant
from the clusters in which the oviposition of
the adult females occurred, suggesting that lar-
vae of a certain size perform movements with
greater frequency. According to Lucas (1985)
and Fisher (1989), larger larvae are found
more distant from their clusters in response
to temperature, as larger antlion larvae are
less capable of supporting warmer locations.
Studying Myrmeleon uniformis, Faria et al.
(1994) found that average trap size was sig-
nificantly larger in open areas than areas pro-
tected from direct sunlight, whereas Scharf et
al. (2008) found that Myrmeleon hyalinus in
desert environments selected shaded locations
and often moved to shaded areas when exposed
to the sun.
The laboratory experiment showed that
relocation for the rebuilding of new traps
occurs as a function of body size in M. brasil-
iensis, as larger larvae moved their traps more
than smaller larvae. The fact that the reloca-
tion of larvae is affected by body size may be
related to the greater energy storage capability
of larger individuals compared to smaller indi-
viduals. Lucas (1985) found that the metabolic
rates of Myrmeleon carolinus and Myrmeleon
crudelis were approximately 10-fold greater
during trap building than during rest. Bearing
this metabolic cost likely requires a certain
energy reserve, which is more difficult for
smaller larvae due to their lower prey capture
rate (Nonato & Lima, 2011). However, other
researchers found that small antlions relocated
with greater frequency than larger individuals
(e.g., Griffiths, 1993), which may suggest a
specific response for each species.
When the larvae were exposed to seven
days in waterlogged soil with no possibility of
relocating to areas with dry soil, the mortal-
ity rate was high (52 %). Moreover, the prob-
ability of rebuilding the traps after this period
was higher among M. brasiliensis larvae with
a larger body size. Thus, body size was an
important variable to enabling the rebuild-
ing of traps after the waterlogging of the soil.
However, the rebuilt traps were smaller than
those found prior to the disturbance. Varia-
tions in trap size occur in response to success
in capturing prey and the energy expenditure
caused by the disturbance to the trap (Jenkins,
1994; Hauber, 1999; Liang et al., 2010). Thus,
besides the high mortality rate, the foraging of
M. brasiliensis larvae can also be affected in
situations of long periods of waterlogged soil,
as the rebuilt trap is smaller and the success of
capturing prey items is positively related to trap
size (Nonato & Lima, 2011).
Trap maintenance is important to ensuring
antlion larvae access to food. The rebuilding
of traps after a disturbance generally occurs on
the same or following day (Boake et al., 1984;
Eltz, 1997). However, when rain is the disturb-
ing force, the larvae need to wait for the soil to
dry before rebuilding, which can take five days
in the Cerrado biome (Freire & Lima, 2019). In
the present study, trap rebuilding and relocation
was governed by the size of the larvae. Thus,
the waterlogging of the soil due to rainfall
affects the foraging of M. brasiliensis larvae,
which are impeded from rebuilding their traps
for a period. In situations of long periods of
waterlogged soil, the larvae have a high mortal-
ity rate; rebuilding of the traps occurs after the
soil dries out, but the traps are smaller. These
data suggest that changes in the rainfall pat-
tern can affect the population structure of M.
brasiliensis larvae, with the selection of larger
individuals in situations of more severe rains.
Ethical statement: the authors declare
that they all agree with this publication and
made significant contributions; that there is no
conflict of interest of any kind; and that we fol-
lowed all pertinent ethical and legal procedures
and requirements. All financial sources are
fully and clearly stated in the acknowledge-
ments section. A signed document has been
filed in the journal archives.
1230
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 69(4): 1224-1232, October-December 2021 (Published Nov. 25, 2021)
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was developed with the
support of the Universidade Federal de Mato
Grosso do Sul – UFMS/MEC – Brazil and the
Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul
(UEMS) - Aquidauana.
RESUMEN
Reconstrucción de trampas por larvas de
Myrmeleon brasiliensis (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae)
tras las inundaciones: efecto del tamaño corporal
Introducción: Los insectos inmaduros de hormiga león
de la especie Myrmeleon brasiliensis (Neuroptera, Myr-
meleontidae), construyen trampas en el suelo arenoso seco
para capturar a sus presas.
Objetivo: El objetivo de este trabajo fue analizar cómo la
inundación del suelo, como la lluvia, afecta al comporta-
miento de reconstrucción y de desplazamiento de las tram-
pas de M. brasiliensis según las diferentes tallas.
Métodos: El estudio fue conducido entre julio y diciembre
del 2019. Las larvas fueron observadas y recolectadas en
una Reserva Forestal en la ciudad de Aquidauana, Estado
de Mato Grosso del Sur, Brasil.
Resultados: Observamos que, en el ambiente natural,
siete días después de la lluvia simulada, la mayoría de las
larvas reconstruyeron a sus trampas en el mismo sitio y con
diámetro más pequeño que el observado antes de la lluvia
simulada. En el laboratorio fue observado que después de
la inundación del suelo, el desplazamiento de las larvas y
la reconstrucción de las trampas es afectado por el tamaño
de su cuerpo. Así, larvas de M. brasiliensis más grandes se
desplazan más y presentan una probabilidad más grande de
reconstruir a sus trampas.
Conclusión: De esa manera, la inundación del suelo afecta
el forrajeo de las larvas M. brasiliensis, que se quedan
impedidas por un tiempo durante la reconstrucción de
sus trampas. Además, en situaciones de largos periodos
de inundación del suelo, las larvas presentan una alta tasa
de mortalidad y la reconstrucción de sus trampas ocurre
después que se seca el suelo, pero esas trampas suelen
ser más pequeñas. Esos datos sugieren que es posible
que variaciones en el patrón de lluvia pueden afectar la
estructura poblacional de las larvas M. brasiliensis, pues en
situaciones de lluvias más fuertes, las larvas más grandes
suelen tener más éxito. En este proceso, las larvas más
pequeñas se ven más afectadas, ya que se impide su bús-
queda de alimento.
Palabras clave: hormiga-león; comportamiento de cons-
trucción; forrajeo; Myrmeleontinae; lluvia.
REFERENCES
Alcock, J. (1972). The evolution of tools by feeding ani-
mals. Evolution, 26(3), 464–473.
Boake, C. R. E., Andow, D., & Visscher, P. K. (1984).
Spacing of antlions and their pits. American Midland
Naturalist, 111(1), 192–194.
Botz, J. T., Loudon, C., Barger, J. B., Olafssen, J. S., &
Steeples, D. W. (2003). Effects of slope and parti-
cle size on ant locomotion: implications for choice
of substrate. Journal of the Kansas Entomological
Society, 76(3), 426–435.
Burgess, M. G. (2009). Sub-optimal pit construction in
predatory ant lion larvae (Myrmeleon sp.). Journal of
Theoretical Biology, 260(3), 379–385.
Coutinho, L. M. (2000). O bioma do Cerrado. In A. L.
Klein (Ed.), Eugen Warming e o Cerrado brasileiro:
um século depois (pp. 77–92). Editora UNESP.
Crowley, P. H., & Linton, M. C. (1999). Antlion foraging:
tracking prey across space and time. Ecology, 80(7),
2271–2282.
Day, M. D., & Zalucki, M. P. (2000). Effect of density on
spatial distribution, pit formation and pit diameter
of Myrmeleon acer Walker, (Neuroptera: Myrme-
leontidae): patterns and processes. Austral Ecology,
25(1), 58–64.
Devetak, D., & Arnett, A. E. (2015). Preference of antlion
and wormlion larvae (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae;
Diptera: Vermileonidae) for substrates according to
substrate particle sizes. European Journal of Entomo-
logy, 112(3), 500–509.
Devetak, D., Podlesnik, J., Scharf, I., & Klenovšek, T.
(2020). Fine sand particles enable antlions to build
pitfall traps with advanced three-dimensional geome-
try. Journal of Experimental Biology, 223(15).
Devetak, D., Špernjak, A., & Janžekovič, F. (2005). Subs-
trate particle size affects pit building decision and pit
size in the antlion larvae Euroleon nostras (Neurop-
tera: Myrmeleontidae). Physiological Entomology,
30(2), 158–163.
Dias, S. C., Santos, B. A., Werneck, F. P., Lira, P. K.,
Carrasco-Carbadillo, V., & Fernandes, G. W. (2006).
Efficiency of prey subjugation by one species of
Myrmeleon larvae (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae)
in the central Amazonia. Brazilian Journal Biology,
66(2), 441–442.
Eltz, T. (1997). Foraging in the ant-lion Myrmeleon mobilis
Hagen 1888 (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae): behavio-
ral flexibility of a sit-and-wait predator. Journal of
Insect Behavior, 10(1), 1–11.
1231
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 69(4): 1224-1232, October-December 2021 (Published Nov. 25, 2021)
Faria, M. L., Prado, P. I. L., Bede, L. C., & Fernandes,
G. W. (1994). Estrutura e dinâmica de uma popu-
lação de larvas de Myrmeleon uniformis (Neuroptera:
Myrmeleontidae). Brazilian Journal Biology, 54(2),
335–344.
Farji-Brener, A. G. (2003). Microhabitat selection by ant-
lion larvae, Myrmeleon crudelis: effect of soil particle
size on pit-trap design and capture. Journal of Insect
Behavior, 16(3), 783–796.
Fisher, M. (1989). Ant-lion life cycles in Nigeria. Journal
of Tropical Ecology, 5(2), 247–250.
Freire, L. G., & Lima, T. N. (2019). Effect of rain on trap
building by Myrmeleon brasiliensis. Entomologia
Experimentalis et Applicata, 167(6), 561–565.
Gotelli, N. J. (1993). Ant lion zones causes of high-density
predator aggregations. Ecology, 74(1), 226–237.
Griffiths, D. (1980). The feeding biology of ant-lion larvae:
prey capture, handling, and utilization. Journal of
Animal Ecology, 49(1), 99–125.
Griffiths, D. (1985). Phenology and larval-adult size rela-
tions in the antlions Macroleon quinquemaculatus.
Journal of Animal Ecology, 54(2), 573–581.
Griffiths, D. (1993). Intraspecific competition in ant-lion
(Macroleon quinquemaculatus) larvae in the field.
Oecologia, 93(4), 531–537.
Hansell, M. (2007). Built by Animals: The Natural History
of Animal Architecture. Oxford University Press.
Hauber, M. E. (1999). Variation in pit size of antlion (Myr-
meleon carolinus) larvae: the importance of pit cons-
truction. Physiological Entomology, 24(1), 37–40.
Heinrich, B., & Heinrich, M. J. E. (1984). The pit-trapping
foraging strategy of the ant lion, Myrmeleon immacu-
latus DeGeer (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae). Beha-
vioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 14(2), 151–160.
Humeau, A., Rougé, J., & Casas, J. (2015). Optimal range
of prey size for antlions. Ecological Entomology,
40(6), 776–781.
Jenkins, B. A. (1994). The behavioral response of the ant-
lion Myrmeleon pictifrons to a sudden change in prey
capture rate. Acta Oecologica, 15(2), 213–240.
Liang, S. H., Lin, W. Y., Lin, Y. C., Chen, Y. C., & Shieh,
B. S. (2010). Variations in the pit size of Cueta sau-
teri (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae) larvae in response
to past pit-building experience and food limitation.
Zoological Studies, 49(1), 102–107.
Lima, T. N. (2016). Cannibalism among Myrmeleon bra-
siliensis larvae (Návas, 1914) (Neuroptera, Myrme-
leontidae). Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences,
38(4), 447–450.
Lima, T. N., & Faria, R. R. (2007). Seleção de microha-
bitat por larvas de formiga-leão Myrmeleon brasi-
liensis (Návas) (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae), em
uma Reserva Florestal, Aquidauana, MS. Neotropical
Entomology, 36(5), 812–814.
Lima, T. L., & Lopes, F. S. (2016). Effect of density, dis-
turbance and food on displacement of the Myrmeleon
brasiliensis (Navás 1914) (Neuroptera, Myrmeleonti-
dae). Ecologia Austral, 26(1), 166–170.
Lima, T. N., Freire, L. G., & Lima, D. C. A. (2019). Effect
of asymmetric competition on distance among Myr-
meleon brasiliensis (Návas, 1914) (Neuroptera: Myr-
meleontidae) larvae. Acta Scientiarum. Biological
Sciences, 41(1), 1–6.
Lima, T. N., & Silva, D. C. R. (2017). Effect of energetic
cost to maintain the trap for Myrmeleon brasiliensis
(Neuroptera, Myrmeleontidae) in its development
and adult size. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 77(1),
38–42.
Lucas, J. R. (1982). The biophysics of pit construction by
antlion larvae. Animal Behaviour, 30(3), 651–657.
Lucas, J. R. (1985). Metabolic rates and pit-construction
costs of two antlion species. Journal of Animal Eco-
logy, 54(1), 295–309.
Miler, K., Yahya, B. E., & Czarnoleski, M. (2019). Substra-
te moisture, particle size and temperature preferences
of trap-building larvae of sympatric antlions and
wormlions from the rainforest of Borneo. Ecological
Entomology, 44(4), 488–493.
Missirian, G. B., Uchôa-Fernandes, M. A., & Fischer,
E. (2006). Development of Myrmeleon brasiliensis
(Navás) (Neuroptera, Myrmeleontidae), in laboratory,
with different natural diets. Revista Brasileira de
Zoologia, 23(4), 1044–1050.
Nonato, L. M., & Lima, T. N. (2011). Comportamiento de
depredación de los estadios larvales de Myrmeleon
brasiliensis (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae). Revista
Colombiana de Entomología, 37(1), 354–356.
Ruxton, G. D., & Hansell, M. H. (2007). Why are pitfall
traps so rare in the natural world? Evolutionary Eco-
logy, 23(2), 181–186.
Scharf, I., Hollender, Y., Subach, A., & Ovadia, O. (2008).
Effect of spatial pattern and microhabitat on pit
construction and relocation in Myrmeleon hyalinus
1232
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 69(4): 1224-1232, October-December 2021 (Published Nov. 25, 2021)
(Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae) larvae. Ecological
Entomology, 33(3), 337–345.
Scharf, I., & Ovadia, O. (2006). Factors influencing site
abandonment and site selection in a sit-and-wait pre-
dator: A review of pit-building antlion larvae. Journal
of Insect Behavior, 19(2), 197–218.
Simberloff, D., King, L., Dillon, P., Lowries, S., Lorence,
D., & Schilling, E. (1978). Holes in the doughnut
theory: the dispersions of ant-lions. Brenesia, 14(15),
13–46.
Triplehorn, C. A., & Johnson, N. F. (2005). Borror and
delong’s introduction to the study of insects (7th Ed.).
Brooks/Cole Publishing.
Youthed, G. J., & Moran, V. C. (1969). Pit construction by
myrmeleontidae larvae. Journal of Insect Physiology,
15(5), 867–875.