1189

Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 69(4): 1189-1203, October-December 2021 (Published Nov. 17, 2021)

Tree structure and diversity of a Humid Mountain Forest in

the protected natural area La Martinica, Veracruz, Mexico

Rosa Lina López-Álvarez1; https://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-2543-0694

Mario Luna-Cavazos1*; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1672-8154

Juan Ignacio Valdez-Hernández2; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9488-2790

Edmundo García-Moya1; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1100-8553

1. Posgrado en Botánica, Colegio de Postgraduados, Campus Montecillo, México; lopz.lina@gmail.com,

mluna@colpos.mx (*Correspondence), edmundo@colpos.mx

2. Posgrado en Ciencias Forestales, Colegio de Postgraduados, Campus Montecillo, México; ignaciov@colpos.mx

Received 04-V-2021. Corrected 08-X-2021. Accepted 04-XI-2021.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The Humid Mountain Forest (HMF) has the highest number of plants per unit of surface, whose

vegetation grows under heterogeneous environmental conditions and possess a high floristic variation. HMF

conservation is important due to the biodiversity it harbors and the environmental services it provides.

Objective: This work evaluated the effect of the terrain aspect and density of the forest canopy on the structure

and tree diversity in La Martinica Protected Natural Area, Mexico.

Methods: Stratified sampling was performed in four terrain aspects and two canopy density conditions. Twenty

five sampling units of 20 x 25 m were considered, in which the normal diameter (ND), total height and the

largest and smallest diameters of the crown of the individuals with a ND ≥ 10 cm were registered. The diversity

was estimated by rarefaction curves and the structure was analyzed through the importance value index (IVI)

and the forest value index (FVI).

Results: 37 species belonging to 30 genera and 24 families were recorded. Greater diversity was observed in

the north terrain aspect and in the closed canopy. Tree species with the highest structural values were different

between terrain aspect and canopy types; Carpinus tropicalis presented the highest values in the zenithal terrain

aspect, Lippia myriocephala in the east and south terrain aspect, and Liquidambar styraciflua in the north. In

both canopy types Lippia myriocephala obtained the highest IVI values and FVI in the open canopy; Carpinus

tropicalis reached a higher FVI in the closed canopy.

Conclusions: Tree structure was different in the four terrain aspects and two canopy conditions studied. The

greatest difference in species composition and diversity was observed between the north and east terrain aspects;

the north presented the highest richness values, frequent and dominant species.

Key words: canopy opening; effective number of species; NMDS; terrain aspect; tree vegetation.

López-Álvarez, R. L., Luna-Cavazos, M., Valdez-Hernández, J.

I., & García-Moya, E. (2021). Tree structure and diversity

of a Humid Mountain Forest in the protected natural area

La Martinica, Veracruz, Mexico. Revista de Biología

Tropical, 69(4), 1189-1203. https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.

v69i4.46855

https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v69i4.46855

TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY

The Humid Mountain Forest (HMF) is one

of the most important biomes in Mexico, has a

great richness of flora and endemic species, due

to the great variety of habitats and the restricted

to a small geographical area (Cruz-Cárdenas

et al., 2012; González-Espinosa et al., 2011);

its vegetation harbors the largest number of

species per unit area (Gual-Díaz & Rendón-

Correa, 2014; Gual-Díaz & Rendón-Correa,

2017; Villaseñor, 2010). At the national level,

1190

Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 69(4): 1189-1203, October-December 2021 (Published Nov. 17, 2021)

the humid mountain forest is one of the most

threatened ecosystems (González-Espinosa et

al., 2012; Toledo-Aceves et al., 2011), due

to its scarce distribution and the alterations

caused by global climate change, deforesta-

tion, the expansion of human communities to

mountainous areas where this forest persists,

and changes in land use due to conversion to

crop systems (Cayuela et al. 2006; González-

Espinosa, et al., 2011; Gual-Díaz & Rendón-

Correa, 2017).

The Humid Mountain Forest has also

been described as cloud forest and mountain

cloud forest (Rzedowski, 2006). It develops

between 800 and 3 000 m above sea level, in

the mountainous regions of Mexico, on the

slopes where the humid winds that come from

the sea affect, and generally between 1 000 and

3 000 m of altitude (Villaseñor, 2010) to the

windward of mountain massifs, where moisture

condenses and fogs form, as well as in ravines

and humid slopes (Challenger & Soberón,

2008; Rzedowski, 2006; Villaseñor, 2010). The

HMF is characterized by having a very dense

tree canopy, which limits the passage of light

to the lower strata (Challenger & Soberón,

2008; CONAFOR & COLPOS, 2014). Its

vegetation develops in very heterogeneous

climatic, altitudinal and edaphic conditions and

the orographic and local humidity conditions

that characterize it, originate a wide structural

variability in the form of various associations

that differ from each other in height, phenology

and dominant species (Gual-Díaz & Rendón-

Correa, 2014; Rzedowski, 2006). In addition,

HMF contains floristic elements of different

biogeographic affinity whose presence creates

a great opportunity to evaluate the relationships

among factors as climate, microenvironment,

changes in vegetation structure, and its floristic

composition (González-Espinosa et al., 2011;

Guerrero-Hernández et al., 2019).

Slopes facing north, in the northern hemi-

sphere, tend to be more humid, which benefits

different plant species; unlike south-facing

slopes which receive more solar radiation and

tend to be drier and warmer (Holland & Steyn

1975; Mata-González et al., 2002; Renaud et

al., 2011), thus the aspect is a factor that can

modify, at a local level, essential variables of

plant functions, such as the quantity and qual-

ity of incident radiation, temperature or frost

frequency (Torres et al., 2012). The foregoing

affected, for example, the presences of HMF

patches studied by Luna-Vega et al. (2007),

one oriented to the north and the other to the

southwest, in which these authors found differ-

ences in ecological attributes as the number of

individuals per ha, basal area (m2/ha), species

richness, crown cover and normal diameter.

It is important to mention that these ecologi-

cal attributes have a differential impact on the

structure and diversity of the HMF in different

environments. Williams-Linera et al. (2013) in

a study of the HMF (which they call Cloud For-

est) of central Veracruz, they mention that these

types of forests located at low altitudes are

less diverse, and more similar in composition,

unlike forests located at higher elevations, but

not found differences in the structure of vegeta-

tion in forests located at different altitudes.

Santana et al. (2014), analyzed the biodi-

versity and structure in fragments of the HMF

(described as Bosque Mesófilo de Montaña) of

Michoacán, México; the authors mention that

diversity, similarity, and structure demonstrate

significant heterogeneity in HMF fragments.

García-De la Cruz et al. (2013) mention, that

the alpha diversity of one of the studied sites

for a mountain cloud forest of Veracruz, Méxi-

co, was significantly higher than the other two

sites; similarly, the plant structure between sites

was different, which was attributed to the man-

agement history and natural disturbances that

favor the establishment and development of

different species. Luna-Vega et al. (2007) car-

ried out a structural analysis of two fragments

of mountain cloud forest of the Trans-Mexican

Volcanic Belt; the authors refer that the two

sites have densities of 740-1 720 individuals

per hectare, differ in basal area, and foliage

coverage. García-Franco et al. (2008) analyzed

the vegetation of the Mountain Cloud Forest in

three sites in the center of Veracruz, Mexico;

the authors mentioned that there were no sig-

nificant differences for basal area between

1191

Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 69(4): 1189-1203, October-December 2021 (Published Nov. 17, 2021)

sites; in addition, the greatest floristic differ-

ences were found between sites further away

from each other. Based on the aforementioned,

the close relationship that exists between the

ecological attributes mentioned above with the

structural characteristics and diversity of the

HMF can be observed. In the case of the HMF

located at west of Xalapa, Veracruz, Williams-

Linera et al. (2002) pointed out that the best

conserved forests are on very steep slopes, fac-

ing north, while the disturbed forests they are

located mainly to the south facing slopes.

The conservation of the HMF is important

for the biodiversity it encloses and for its con-

tribution to the maintenance of environmental

regulation services (CONAFOR & COLPOS,

2014; Manson, 2017; Williams-Linera, 2007).

Nevertheless, in the central region of Veracruz

this biome is fragmented. The edges of the

remnants experience changes in physical con-

ditions, such as variations in the microclimate

and, they are under pressure from the expan-

sion of urban settlements (Williams-Linera et

al., 2002; Williams-Linera, 2007).

Williams-Linera et al. (2002), report that

the Humid Mountain Forest of the central Vera-

cruz, Mexico, has been considerably reduced

since the 1960s due to the transformation of

the forest for pastures and crops, along with

urban growth. Deforestation processes con-

tinue in this area (Williams-Linera et al., 2007),

so the HMF is at risk. The PNA La Martinica

is located within the aforementioned area, so it

is subject to the same problems already men-

tioned. Among the various actions to reduce

the deterioration of the HMF, it has been pro-

posed to register the conditions and changes in

the environment necessary to prevent negative

impacts on the forest conservation; also, enrich

the knowledge of the identity and distribution

of the region’s biodiversity (Williams-Linera

et al., 2007). The HMF of the central region of

Veracruz is highly fragmented, La Martinica is

one of the few remnants that are under protec-

tion in order to be preserved, its importance

lies in its value as a reserve of biological diver-

sity and it is of great significance to maintain

environmental services such as the regulation of

water resources (Williams-Linera et al., 2007).

We consider that our study contributes to

the knowledge of the current state of the tree

vegetation in this important area of HMF in

the center of Veracruz state, with which we

can generate proposals for the conservation of

the tree diversity of this region. Based on the

above, the aim of this work was to evaluate the

influence of terrain aspect and canopy density

on the structure and diversity of tree vegetation

in the Humid Mountain Forest at the natural

protected area La Martinica, Banderilla, Vera-

cruz. We asked the following questions: (i) do

terrain aspect influence structure, diversity and

tree species composition? (ii) do canopy densi-

ty influence structure, diversity and tree species

composition? As hypotheses, we assumed that:

(i) structure, diversity and tree species compo-

sition is different between terrain aspects and

particularly north aspect has a positive influ-

ence on them (ii) closed canopies have a posi-

tive influence on structure, diversity and tree

species composition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Area: The study area is locat-

ed in the Natural Protected Area (NPA) La

Martinica, Banderilla, Veracruz, Mexico (Fig.

1), between 19°35’01.3’’-19°35’27.9’’ N &

96°56’52.7’’-96°57’30.4’’ W. The site was a

private property where extensive cattle ranch-

ing was developed and was decreed as a state-

owned protected area in 2010. It has an area of

52.36 ha, of which near to 30.5 ha are covered

by forest vegetation (hillsides), and the rest are

remnants of induced grasslands which is par-

tially in restoration process (non-sloping area)

(Herrera-Beltrán, 2010; SEDESMA, 2006).

La Martinica has plateaus and slopes with

angles from 2 to 45°, the area belongs to the

Neovolcanic province and is distributed in

an altitudinal range between 1 570 and 1 620

m.a.s.l., andosol is the predominant soil type,

the average temperature is 18 °C with an oscil-

lation of 5 to 7 °C and the total annual precipi-

tation fluctuates between 1 500 and 2 000 mm

1192

Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 69(4): 1189-1203, October-December 2021 (Published Nov. 17, 2021)

(SEDESMA, 2006). The climate corresponds

to temperate C (fm) b (i’) with an ample cool

summer, abundant rain all year round and little

thermal oscillation (García, 2004). The vegeta-

tion corresponds to a humid mountain forest

and the most typical characteristic species, we

can find Liquidambar styraciflua L., Clethra

mexicana DC, Carpinus tropicalis (Donn. Sm.)

Lundell, Ostrya virginiana (Mill.) Koch, and

Quercus spp. L (Villaseñor, 2010).

Sampling and measuring variables: A

stratified sampling was carried out in four

terrain aspects (sampling unit): zenithal (Z),

east (E), north (N) and south (S). The forest

was classified based on canopy densities in:

closed canopy (C), areas with a smaller open-

ing (21.8 ± 0.79), and open canopy (O), where

the opening percentage was bigger (26.23 ±

0.82), a generalized linear model for a Gauss-

ian distribution was used to determine whether

canopy opening varied significantly between

sites, the test showed that there is a signifi-

cant difference P < 0.0001. The estimation of

the gaps in each sampling subunit was made

through photographs taken at 1.6 m from the

ground (250 in total) at approximately 10:00

in the morning, with a Nikon COOLPIX B500

camera. Images were analyzed with CobCal

software version 1.0 (Ferrari et al., 2006), to

estimate the opening percentage. This method

is based on colorimetry, and the coverage per-

centage is calculated. Positive colors (represent

the vegetative surface to be calculated) and

negative colors (representative of the surface to

be discarded from calculation) were assigned to

Fig. 1. Location of the study area and distribution of the sampling units in the Protected Natural Area “La Martinica”, in the

municipality of Banderilla, Veracruz, Mexico.

1193

Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 69(4): 1189-1203, October-December 2021 (Published Nov. 17, 2021)

the photograph. The West aspect was not con-

sidered because the open canopy condition was

poorly represented in that aspect.

The sampling method of Endara-Agra-

mont et al. (2012) was adapted to each terrain

aspect and canopy type. Six sampling units

(SU) of 20 x 25 (500 ) were arranged in each

aspect. Three SUs were located in each canopy

type (3 in Z-C and 3 in Z-O), with the excep-

tion of north aspect with closed canopy condi-

tion where four SUs were installed, because

it was the most extensive area, for a total of

25 SUs, equivalent to 1.25 ha. Each SU was

divided into 10 subunits 10 x 5 m (50 m2) in

which the trees were numerated to facilitate

counting. Normal diameter (ND) was recorded

at 1.3 m height from the ground. Total height

was estimated, and also upper and lower crown

diameters of every individual with a ND ≥ 10

cm were measured.

Some species were collected, and photo-

graphs taken for later taxonomic identification

with specific available literature, i.e. Barce-

na (1981), Fernández-Nava (1986), Ludlow-

Wiechers (1978), Nash & Nee (1984), Nee

(1981), and Pacheco (1983). The Angiosperm

Phylogeny Group classification was followed

(APG IV, 2016; Stevens, 2017). The nomen-

clature was verified by consulting the Mis-

souri Botanical Garden database (TROPICOS,

2018). Collected specimens were deposited in

the CHAPA herbarium of Colegio de Postgrad-

uados, Mexico.

Structure and diversity: The structure

analysis of tree species on each terrain aspect

and canopy type was based on the estimation

of the importance value index (IVI = relative

dominance + relative density + relative fre-

quency) (Curtis & McIntosh, 1951; Sánchez-

Gutiérrez et al., 2017) and the forest value

index (FVI = relative ND + relative height +

relative cover) (Corella-Justavino et al., 2001;

Ortega-Baranda et al., 2017).

The diversity between terrain aspects and

forest canopy types was compared in units

of effective number of tree species. The pro-

cedure proposed by Chao & Jost (2012) and

Chao et al. (2014) was used, by interpolation

and extrapolation of estimates from diversity

rarefaction curves qD (y-axis) as a function of

sampling coverage

(x-axis), where species richness (q = 0), expo-

nential of Shannon entropy (q = 1), and inverse

of the Simpson concentration (q = 2). There-

fore, 0D = number of species, 1D = effective

number of equally frequent species, and 2D =

effective number of dominant species. f1 is the

number of species of which only one individual

was registered during the sampling, f2 is the

number of species with two individuals, and

n is the total number of registered individuals

(Cultid-Medina & Escobar, 2019). Estimations

were done in R software using “iNEXT” pack-

age (Hsieh et al., 2020; R Core Team, 2019).

Statistical analyses: The effect of the

aspects and types of canopies over plant com-

position were evaluated by a permutational

multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANO-

VA) for a factorial arrangement 4 x 2. Also,

the similarity in species composition among

aspects and type of canopy was evaluated

through non-metric multidimensional scaling

(NMDS), which produces a ranking based on

a dissimilarity matrix. The analyses were based

on 999 permutations using the Bray-Curtis

distance as a measure of similarity, with the

transformation of the data to square root. These

analyses were conducted with R software using

“Vegan” package (Oksanen et al., 2019; R Core

Team, 2019).

The association among tree species and

terrain aspects was based on a correspondence

analysis. A frequency matrix of individuals

from each species in their respective aspect

was elaborated. This analysis was carried out

in R software using “CA” package (Nenadic &

Greenacre, 2007; R Core Team, 2019).

The effect of the aspect and type of canopy,

on the basal area m2 and tree density (ind. x 500

m2), was determined using a generalized linear

model (Crawley, 2012) with a 4 x 2 factorial

1194

Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 69(4): 1189-1203, October-December 2021 (Published Nov. 17, 2021)

arrangement for a Gaussian error distribution

in the case of basal area and quasi-Poisson

for density. When significant differences were

found, they were contrasted in pairs by the

Holm adjustment method, analysis were done

with the program R using the ‘Phia’ package

(R Core Team, 2019; Rosario-Martinez, 2015).

RESULTS

Individuals of 779 trees were recorded

which belong to 37 species, distributed in 30

genera and 24 families. The tree species with

the highest structural values in La Martinica

were the same for both indices (IVI and FVI).

The five species being remarkable abundant

were: Lippia myriocephala (IVI = 17.2 %, FVI

= 16.9 %), Carpinus tropicalis (IVI = 12 %,

FVI = 12.3 %), Myrsine coriacea (IVI = 11.27

%, FVI = 10.74 %), Liquidambar styraciflua

(IVI = 9.14 %, FVI = 9.69 %), and Trema

micrantha (IVI = 8.24 %, 9.63 % FVI) (Appen-

dix 1). The most important species were differ-

ent among terrain aspects. C. tropicalis had the

highest values on Z aspect (IVI = 17.75 %, FVI

= 18.2 %), L. myriocephala on E (IVI = 25.36

%, FVI = 25 %) and S aspects (IVI = 21.11 %,

FVI = 19.4 %), and L. styraciflua on N aspect

(IVI = 18.37 %, 20.2 % = FVI) (Appendix 2).

By contrast, in both types of canopy L. myrio-

cephala had the highest IVI values: at O (22.9

%) and at C (11.84 %), and only FVI in the O

canopy type (22.9 %), due to the fact that C.

tropicalis had a highest FVI in C canopy areas

(12.1 %) (Appendix 3).

All the diversity expressions (0D, 1D and

2D) were significantly higher in the N aspect. In

fact, no significant differences were observed

Fig. 2. Rarefaction curves with 95 % CI, constructed based on the coverage of the trees registered according to terrain aspect.

In the upper part, the order of diversity is shown: 0D = number of species, 1D = effective number of equally frequent species,

and 2D = effective number of dominant species. Curves were extrapolated to the total abundance observed in the zenithal

exposure (N = 222 individuals).

1195

Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 69(4): 1189-1203, October-December 2021 (Published Nov. 17, 2021)

in relation to the effective number of common

species and abundant species between Z, E

and S aspects. Nevertheless, when sampling

areas above 50 % coverage, richness in Z

aspect was significantly higher than in E and S

exposures (Fig. 2). According to canopy types,

the same trend was observed for all diversity

expressions (0D, 1D and 2D), since they were

significantly higher in C canopy (Fig. 3).

Tree structure in terms of composition and

density showed significant differences between

terrain aspects, the post-hoc test indicates that

the main difference was found between the E

and N aspects (Table 1), as it is depicted by

the NMDS (Fig. 4) with a good fit represented

in two dimensions (stress = 0.17). According

to canopy types, no significant differences

were found.

Correspondence analysis explained about

87 % of the total variance of the species in

two dimensions. Species such as O. virginiana,

Quercus germana Schltdl. & Cham., and L.

styraciflua tended to be more frequently associ-

ated with the N aspect; C. tropicalis and Rham-

nus capreifolia Schltdl. with Z aspect; Lippia

myriocephala Schltdl. et Cham., Myrsine cori-

acea (Sw.) R. Br. ex Roem. & Schult., Quercus

xalapensis Bonpl. and Trema micrantha (L.)

Blume, with E and S terrain aspects (Fig. 5).

Basal area of the individuals varied sig-

nificantly between terrain aspects. However, it

was not significantly different between canopy

types, and a significant interaction of factors

was not observed either. Afterwards compari-

sons show that N aspect is the one that differs

from other aspects, obtaining record of the larg-

est basal area (Table 2).

Fig. 3. Rarefaction curves with 95 % CI, constructed based on the coverage of the trees recorded by canopy condition. In the

upper part, the order of diversity is shown: 0D = number of species, 1D = effective number of equally frequent species, and

2D = effective number of dominant species. Curves were extrapolated to the total abundance observed in the open canopy

(N = 394 individuals).

1196

Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 69(4): 1189-1203, October-December 2021 (Published Nov. 17, 2021)

Fig. 4. Non-metric multidimensional scaling of the tree communities recorded in four exposures (Z = zenithal, E = east,

N = north, S = south), and two canopy conditions (O = open and C = closed), in the protected natural area La Martinica,

municipality of Banderilla, Veracruz, Mexico (good fit = 0.17, Bray-Curtis distance index).

TABLE 1

PERMANOVA results for the composition of tree species

Source df Pseudo-F P Post-hoc comparisons

Canopy 1 0.0821 2.1754 0.026** Exposure P

Exposure 3 0.1788 1.5797 0.062* Z-E 0.2

Canopy:Exposure 3 0.0975 0.8612 0.651 Z-N 0.236

Residual 17 0.6415 Z-S 0.842

Total 24 1 E-N 0.017

E-S 0.548

N-S 0.355

Canopy P

O-C 0.448

**Significance at 0.05, *significance at 0.1. the design was factorial 4 x 2 considering the condition of the canopy and the

exposure of the terrain. Z = zenithal, E = east, N = north, S = south, O = open, C = closed.

1197

Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 69(4): 1189-1203, October-December 2021 (Published Nov. 17, 2021)

Tree density did not differ significantly

among terrain aspects; nor between canopy

types, there was no significant interaction

between factors either (Appendix 4).

DISCUSSION

The composition of tree species in the

Natural Protected Area La Martinica is similar

to that found by García-Franco et al. (2008),

Muñiz-Castro et al. (2006), Ruiz-Montiel et al.

(2014), Williams-Linera (2002) in other frag-

ments of humid mountain forests in the region.

The species richness (37 species) registered

was higher than that indicated by García-de la

Cruz et al. (2013) and Williams-Linera et al.

(2005), who recorded 14 species and a rang-

ing from three to 23 taxa in mature forest, and

from nine to 31 in second-growth forest condi-

tion (acahual), respectively. However, there

were less than those 58 species recorded by

Ruiz-Montiel et al. (2014) and also than those

registered in the forests studied by Williams-

Linera and López-Gómez et al. (2008) with a

little more than 50 species. A plausible expla-

nation is that, in our sampling, trees with ND

< 10 cm were not included, as it was the case

in those cited studies. Forest regrowth species

were excluded, in addition to the eventual dif-

ferences in sampling.

The second species with a high importance

value was C. tropicalis, which coincides with

the analysis of Ruiz-Jiménez et al. (2012).

Those authors state that, for the HMFs of the

Gulf of Mexico, it is common for C. tropicalis

to be one of the dominant species. Several spe-

cies that have high importance values, match

results with García-de la Cruz et al. (2013) and

Williams-Linera (2002). Both studies identified

Clethra mexicana, Liquidambar styraciflua,

Quercus germana and Quercus xalapensis as

dominant species in the HMFs of the central

region of Veracruz. However, in our study Lip-

pia myriocephala had higher structural values,

which indicates that it is a secondary forest,

which has been formerly subject to disturbanc-

es (González-Zamora et al., 2016).

The structural patterns observed in the

north aspect would be related to the resilient

responses that have been observed in this ter-

rain aspect after disturbances, since these lands

appear to conserve more species, compared to

the south aspect. Such a resilient process facili-

tates the regeneration of plant communities

TABLE 2

Statistical results of the generalized linear model on basal area of trees, in a 4 x 2 factorial arrangement considering the

canopy opening condition and the direction of sun exposure of the terrain (aspect), and post-hoc comparisons

Condition P Condition P

E Exposure -0.164 0.8694 Post-hoc

comparisons

Canopy O-C 3.469 0.0625*

Z-E 0.226 1

N Exposure 2.790 0.0054** Z-N 16.663 0.00022***

Z-S 0.012 1

S Exposure 0.080 0.9361 Exposure E-N 19.259 0.00006***

E-S 0.316 1

C Canopy 1.028 0.3044 N-S 14.510 0.00055***

E Exposure/C Canopy -0.243 0.8084 Mean

basal area ± EE (m2)

Canopy O 0.0309 ± 0.00324

C0.0390 ± 0.00326

N Exposure/C Canopy 0.156 0.8757 Exposure Z 0.0292 ± 0.0043

E 0.0262 ± 0.0046

S Exposure/C Canopy 0.002 0.9987 N 0.0554 ± 0.0047

S 0.0299 ± 0.0047

*significance at 0.1 **significance at 0.01***significance at 0.001. The highest mean basal area is highlighted.

1198

Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 69(4): 1189-1203, October-December 2021 (Published Nov. 17, 2021)

(Åström et al., 2007). This coincides with

Williams-Linera et al. (2002) who pointed out

that in the case of the HMF located at west of

Xalapa, Veracruz, the best conserved forests are

on very steep slopes, facing further north; while

the disturbed forests are in greater measure

to the south facing slopes and also Williams-

Linera (2007) indicated that those rarest tree

species in the HMFs of Veracruz are restricted

to high altitudes and slopes facing north.

The highest species richness in this study

was found in north-facing sites, which coin-

cides with that recorded by Bale et al. (1998)

who found higher species richness in the Polar

aspect compared to the Equatorial one in Aus-

tralian forests. Santiago-Pérez et al. (2009) in

a study of a HMF (mountain cloud forest) in

western Mexico, they report, in a general way,

a lower richness of arboreal species in a site

with western exposure in relation to others

Fig. 5. Association of tree species and terrain aspect (Z = zenithal, E = east, N = north, S = south); (χ2 = 352.4, P < 0.0001),

based on the correspondence analysis. Aa = Alnus acuminata, Ac = Ardisia compressa, Ct = Carpinus tropicalis, Cm =

Citharexylum mocinnoi, Cme = Clethra mexicana, Cma = Clethra macrophylla, Ca = Conostegia arborea, Cg = Cornutia

grandifolia, Cmex = Clethra mexicana, Em = Erythrina macrophylla, Gl = Gymnanthes longipes, Hm = Hedyosmum

mexicanum, Hd = Heliocarpus donnellsmithii, Ld = Leucaena diversifolia, Lm = Lippia myriocephala, Ls = Liquidambar

styraciflua, Ms = Magnolia schiedeana, Mc = Morella cerifera, Mco = Myrsine coriacea, Oe = Ocotea effusa, Ov =

Ostrya virginiana, Pp = Pinus pseudostrobus, Qc = Quercus corrugata, Qg = Quercus germana, Ql = Quercus leiophylla,

Qx = Quercus xalapensis, Qa = Quercus acutifolia, Qca = Quercus candicans, Qs = Quercus salicifolia, Rc = Rhamnus

capreifolia, Sg = Styrax glabrescens, Sl = Symplocos limoncillo, Tg = Telanthophora grandifolia, Tm = Trema micrantha,

Ti = Turpinia insignis, Vp = Vachellia pennatula, Yg = Yucca guatemalensis.

1199

Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 69(4): 1189-1203, October-December 2021 (Published Nov. 17, 2021)

located to the north and northwest. However,

it should be mentioned that there are results

contrary to ours, as mentioned by Luna-Vega

et al. (2007) who report 12 and 18 tree species

in two mountain cloud forest sites oriented to

the north and southwest, respectively. From

the above, it can be concluded that there is

variation in the richness and plant diversity in

the HMF depending on the aspect. It is per-

tinent to indicate that other researchers have

mentioned that fragments of undisturbed for-

est in Veracruz have an orientation of slopes

further north (Williams-Linera et al., 2002);

also, López-Pérez et al. (2011) indicate that

the HMF, in a region of the State of Mexico,

thrives mainly on north-facing slopes, which is

probably an indication of a greater richness and

diversity in such areas. A plausible explanation

is that mentioned by Holland and Steyn (1975),

Mata-González et al. (2002) and Renaud et al.

(2011), referring that slope facing north in the

northern hemisphere, tend to be more humid

which benefits different plant species; unlike

south-facing slopes which receive more solar

radiation and tend to be drier and warmer.

Tree diversity also differed between cano-

py types, it was greater in the closed canopy. In

accordance with the above, Santiago-Pérez et

al. (2009) compared different sites of the HMF

through a gradient in which the HMF is associ-

ated with the Pine-oak Forest (POF) and sec-

ondary scrub (SS), the authors found that the

richness and diversity were similar in HMF-

POF, but the replacement of species was higher

in SS, in addition to the density, diameters,

basal area and canopy coverage were higher

in HMF-POF than SS. González-Zamora et al.

(2016), analyzed the tree diversity and species

richness between two HMF sites (conserved

and disturbed) and a coffee plantation located

in this type of vegetation; the authors found a

higher species richness in the conserved forest

when comparing it with the disturbed site and

the coffee plantation. Furthermore, the highest

species diversity corresponded to the conserved

site and the lowest to the disturbed site, and the

greatest floristic dissimilarity occurred between

both types of forest.

Basal area and tree density are similar

to the forests studied by Williams-Linera and

López-Gómez et al. (2008). However, the

range of ND of the trees recorded by those

authors was greater than that of our records,

because they considered individuals with ND

≥ 5 cm. The average ND of tree individuals in

La Martinica (17.8 cm) was smaller than that

reported by García-De la Cruz et al. (2013)

who recorded 23.5 cm. This fact indicates

that Humid Mountain Forest in our research

is a young secondary forest. Also, wider trees

than 1 m ND were not found, which coincides

with those observations by Williams-Linera

(2007), who noted that those trees with larger

diameters in Veracruz are scarce, and found in

forests located at higher altitudes, farther away

from large human settlements.

Tree density in north aspect was no greater

than those in other terrain aspects as it was

recorded by Måren et al. (2015). Nevertheless,

individuals with a larger basal area were found,

which coincides with what was observed by

Luna-Vega et al. (2007) when they compared

two HMF sites in central Mexico; the authors

found a greater basal area, canopy coverage

and a general difference in the maximum val-

ues of the stem of the trees of the site with north

aspect in relation to the trees of the southwest

site. These results probably indicate a higher

biomass production in the north aspect, as

it was verified in the studies of Gong et al.

(2008) and Sternberg and Shoshany (2001)

who found greater productivity and species

diversity on slopes facing north compared to

those facing south.

Ethical statement: the authors declare

that they all agree with this publication and

made significant contributions; that there is

no conflict of interest of any kind; and that we

followed all pertinent ethical and legal proce-

dures and requirements. All financial sources

are fully and clearly stated in the acknowled-

gements section. A signed document has been

filed in the journal archives.

See Digital Appendix at: revistas.ucr.ac.cr

1200

Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 69(4): 1189-1203, October-December 2021 (Published Nov. 17, 2021)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by the Consejo

Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT)

through the Postgraduate scholarship (461593)

granted to the first author at Colegio de Post-

graduados. We thank to the Secretaría de Medio

Ambiente of Veracruz State (SEDEMA), for

the authorization of the scientific research in

La Martinica. We thank to Secretaría del Medio

Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT)

for granting the scientific collection license.

We thank to Erik David Murrieta Ruiz for his

support in the field survey.

RESUMEN

Estructura y diversidad arbórea de un bosque húmedo

de montaña en el Área Natural Protegida

La Martinica, Veracruz, México

Introducción: El Bosque Húmedo de Montaña (BHM)

posee el mayor número de especies vegetales por unidad

de superficie, cuya vegetación se desarrolla en condicio-

nes ambientales muy heterogéneas y presenta una alta

variación florística. La conservación del BHM es impor-

tante debido a la biodiversidad que alberga y los servicios

ambientales que proporciona.

Objetivo: Este trabajo evaluó el efecto de la orientación

del terreno y la densidad del dosel del bosque sobre la

estructura y diversidad arbórea en el Área Natural Protegi-

da La Martinica, México.

Métodos: Se efectuó un muestreo estratificado en cuatro

orientaciones del terreno y dos condiciones de densidad

del dosel; se consideraron 25 unidades de muestreo de 20

x 25 m, en las que se registró: el diámetro normal (DN), la

altura total y los diámetros mayor y menor de la copa de los

individuos con un DN ≥10 cm. La diversidad se estimó por

medio de curvas de rarefacción y la estructura se analizó

con el índice de valor de importancia (IVI) y el índice de

valor forestal (IVF).

Resultados: Se registraron 37 especies pertenecientes a 30

géneros y 24 familias. Se observó una mayor diversidad

en la orientación norte y en el dosel cerrado. Las especies

arbóreas con valores estructurales más altos fueron diferen-

tes entre orientaciones y tipos de dosel; Carpinus tropicalis

presentó los valores más elevados en la orientación cenital,

Lippia myriocephala en las orientaciones este y sur, y

Liquidambar styraciflua en la norte. En ambos tipos de

dosel Lippia myriocephala obtuvo los valores más altos del

IVI e IVF en el dosel abierto; Carpinus tropicalis alcanzó

un IVF más elevado en el dosel cerrado.

Conclusiones: La estructura arbórea fue diferente en las

cuatro orientaciones estudiadas y en las dos condiciones

del dosel. La mayor diferencia en composición de especies

y diversidad se observó entre las orientaciones norte y este,

de ellas, la norte presentó los valores más altos de riqueza,

especies frecuentes y dominantes.

Palabras clave: apertura del dosel; número efectivo

de especies; NMDS; orientación del terreno; vegetación

arbórea.

REFERENCES

APG IV. (2016). An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny

Group classification for the order and families of

flowering plants: APG IV. Botanical Journal of

the Linnean Society, 181(1), 1–20. https://dx.doi.

org/10.1111/boj.12385

Åström, M., Dynesius, M., Hylander, K., & Nilsson, C.

(2007). Slope aspect modifies community responses

to clear-cutting in boreal forests. Ecology, 88(3),

749–758. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-0613

Bale, C. L., Williams, J. B., & Charley, J. L. (1998). The

impact of aspect on forest structure and floristics

in some Eastern Australian sites. Forest Ecology

and Management, 110(1-3), 363–377. https://doi.

org/10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00300-4

Barcena, A. (1981). Clethraceae. In A. Gómez-Pompa & V.

Sosa (Eds.), Flora de Veracruz 15. INECOL.

Cayuela, L., Golicher, D. J., & Rey-Benayas, J. M.

(2006). The Extent, Distribution, and Fragmentation

of Vanishing Montane Cloud Forest in the Highlands

of Chiapas, Mexico. Biotropica, 38(4), 544–554.

Challenger, A., & Soberón, J. (2008). Los ecosistemas

terrestres. In J. Soberón, G. Halffter, & J. Llorente-

Bousquets (Comps.), Capital natural de México,

vol. I: Conocimiento actual de la biodiversidad (pp.

87–108). CONABIO.

Chao, A., Gotelli, N. J., Hsieh, T. C., Sander, E. L., Ma,

K. H., Colwell, R. K., & Ellison, A. M. (2014).

Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: a

framework for sampling and estimation in species

diversity studies. Ecological Monographs, 84(1),

45–67. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-0133.1

Chao, A., & Jost, L. (2012). Coverage‐based rarefaction

and extrapolation: standardizing samples by comple-

teness rather than size. Ecology, 93(12), 2533–2547.

https://doi.org/10.1890/11-1952.1

CONAFOR & COLPOS (Comisión Nacional Forestal &

Colegio de Postgraduados). (2014). Foresta Mexica-

na. CONAFOR, México.

Corella-Justavino, F., Valdez-Hernández, J. I., Cetina-Alca-

lá, V. M., González-Cossio, F. V., Trinidad-Santos,

A., & Aguirre-Rivera, J. R. (2001). Estructura fores-

tal de un bosque de mangles en el noreste del estado

1201

Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 69(4): 1189-1203, October-December 2021 (Published Nov. 17, 2021)

de Tabasco, México. Ciencia Forestal en México,

26(90), 73–102.

Crawley, M. J. (2012). The R book. John Wiley & Sons.

Cruz-Cárdenas, G., Villaseñor, J. L., López-Mata, L., &

Ortiz, E. (2012). Potential distribution of humid mou-

ntain forest in Mexico. Botanical Sciences, 90(3),

331–340. https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.394

Cultid-Medina, C. A., & Escobar, F. (2019). Pautas para la

estimación y comparación estadística de la diversidad

biológica (qD). In C. E. Moreno (Ed.), La biodiversi-

dad en un mundo cambiante: Fundamentos teóricos

y metodológicos para su estudio (pp. 175–202). Uni-

versidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo/Libermex,

México.

Curtis, J. T., & McIntosh, R. P. (1951). An upland forest

continuum in the prairie-forest border region of

Wisconsin. Ecology, 32(3), 476–496. https://doi.

org/10.2307/1931725

Endara-Agramont, A. R., Maass, S. F., Bernal, G. N.,

Valdez-Hernández, J. I., & Fredericksen, T. S. (2012).

Effect of human disturbance on the structure and rege-

neration of forests in the Nevado de Toluca National

Park, Mexico. Journal of Forestry Research, 23(1),

39–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-012-0226-8

Fernández-Nava, R. (1986). Rhamnaceae. In A. Gómez-

Pompa, & L. Cabrera-Rodríguez (Eds.), Flora de

Veracruz 50. INECOL

Ferrari, D. M., Pozzolo, O. R., & Ferrari, H. J. (2006).

CobCal v 1.0. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agro-

pecuaria, Uruguay. http://www.cosechaypostcosecha.

org/data/articulos/varios/DesarrolloSoftEstimacion-

CoberturaVegetal.asp

García, E. (2004). Modificaciones al sistema de clasifi-

cación climática de Köppen. Instituto de Geografía-

UNAM, México.

García-de la Cruz, Y., Olivares-López, L. A., & Ramos-

Prado, J. M. (2013). Estructura y composición arbó-

rea de un fragmento de bosque mesófilo de montaña

en el estado de Veracruz. Revista Chapingo Serie

Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente, 19(1), 91–101.

http://dx.doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2012.03.025

García-Franco, J. G., Castillo-Campos, G., Mehltreter, K.,

Martínez, M. L., & Vázquez, G. (2008). Estructura

y composición de un bosque mesófilo del centro de

Veracruz, México. Boletín de la Sociedad Botáni-

ca de México, 83, 37–52. https://doi.org/10.17129/

botsci.1787

Gong, X., Brueck, H., Giese, K. M., Zhang, L., Sattelma-

cher, B., & Lin, S. (2008). Slope aspect has effects

on productivity and species composition of hilly

grassland in the Xilin River Basin, Inner Mongolia,

China. Journal of Arid Environments, 72(4), 483–

493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2007.07.001

González-Espinosa, M., Meave, J. A., Lorea-Hernández,

F. G., Ibarra-Manríquez, G., & Newton, A. C. (Eds.).

(2011). The Red List of Mexican Cloud Forest Trees.

Fauna & Flora International.

González-Espinosa, M., Meave, J. A., Ramírez-Marcial,

N., Toledo-Aceves, T., Lorea-Hernández, F. G., &

Ibarra-Manríquez, G. (2012). Los bosques de niebla

de México: conservación y restauración de su compo-

nente arbóreo. Ecosistemas, 21(1-2), 36–54.

González-Zamora, A., Esperón-Rodríguez, M., & Barradas,

V. L. (2016). Mountain cloud forest and grown-shade

coffee plantations: A comparison of tree biodiversity

in central Veracruz, Mexico. Forest Systems, 25(1),

10. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2016251-07538

Gual-Díaz, M., & Rendón-Correa, A. (comps.). (2014).

Bosques mesófilos de montaña en México: diversi-

dad, ecología y manejo. CONABIO.

Gual-Díaz, M., & Rendón-Correa, A. (2017). Los bosques

mesófilos de montaña de México. Agroproductividad,

10(1), 3–9.

Guerrero-Hernández, R., Muñiz-Castro, M. Á., Vázquez-

García, J. A., & Ruiz-Corral, J. A. (2019). Estructura

del bosque mesófilo de montaña y su reemplazo por

bosque de Abies en dos gradientes altitudinales del

occidente de México. Botanical Sciences, 97(3),

301–322. https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.2206

Herrera-Beltrán, F. (16 de junio de 2010). Decreto por el

que se declara Área Natural Protegida en la catego-

ría de Reserva Ecológica La Martinica, Localizada

en el Municipio de Banderilla, Veracruz. Xalapa,

México. Editora del Gobierno del Estado de Veracruz.

Holland, P. G., & Steyn, D. G. (1975). Vegetational respon-

ses to latitudinal variations in slope angle and aspect.

Journal of Biogeography, 2(3), 179–183. https://doi.

org/10.2307/3037989

Hsieh, T. C., Ma, K. H., & Chao, A. (2020). iNEXT: iNter-

polation and EXTrapolation for species diversity.

(Version 2.0.20, R package). http://chao.stat.nthu.

edu.tw/wordpress/software-download/

López-Gómez, A. M., Williams-Linera, G., & Manson,

R. H. (2008). Tree species diversity and vegetation

structure in shade coffee farms in Veracruz, Mexico.

Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 124(3-4),

160–172.

López-Pérez, Y., Tejero-Díez, J. D., Torres-Díaz, A. N., &

Luna-Vega, I. (2011). Flora del bosque mesófilo de

montaña y vegetación adyacente en Avándaro, Valle

de Bravo, Estado de México, México. Boletín de la

Sociedad Botánica de México, 88, 35–53.

Ludlow-Wiechers, B. (1978). Chloranthaceae. In A.

Gómez-Pompa, & V. Sosa (Eds.), Flora de Veracruz

3. INECOL.

1202

Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 69(4): 1189-1203, October-December 2021 (Published Nov. 17, 2021)

Luna-Vega, I., Alcántara-Ayala, O., Contreras-Medina,

R., & Ruiz-Jiménez, C. A. (2007). Composición y

estructura del bosque mesófilo de montaña de Ocui-

lan, Estado de México-Morelos. In I. Luna-Vega, J.

J. Morrone, & D. Espinosa-Organista (Eds.), Biodi-

versidad de la Faja Volcánica Transmexicana (pp.

173–178). UNAM.

Manson, R. H. (2017). El papel del bosque mesófilo de

montaña en los programas “pagos por servicios

ambientales hidrológicos” en México. Agroproducti-

vidad, 10(1), 44–49.

Måren, I. E., Karki, S., Prajapati, C., Yadav, R. K., &

Shrestha, B. B. (2015). Facing north or south: Does

slope aspect impact forest stand characteristics and

soil properties in a semiarid trans-Himalayan valley?

Journal of Arid Environments, 121, 112–123. https://

doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2015.06.004

Mata-González, R., Pieper, R. D., & Cárdenas, M. M.

(2002). Vegetation patterns as affected by aspect

and elevation in small desert mountains. The

Southwestern Naturalist, 47(3), 440–448. https://doi.

org/10.2307/3672501

Muñiz-Castro, M. A., Williams-Linera, G., & Benayas,

J. M. R. (2006). Distance effect from cloud forest

fragments on plant community structure in abando-

ned pastures in Veracruz, Mexico. Journal of Tropi-

cal Ecology, 22, 431–440. https://doi.org/10.1017/

S0266467406003221

Nash, D. L., & Nee, M. (1984). Verbenaceae. In A. Gómez-

Pompa, & N. P. Moreno (Eds.), Flora de Veracruz

41. INECOL.

Nee, M. (1981). Betulaceae. In A. Gómez-Pompa, & V.

Sosa (Eds.), Flora de Veracruz 20. INECOL.

Nenadic, O., & Greenacre, M. (2007). Correspondence

Analysis in R, with two- and three-dimensional

graphics: The ca package. Journal of Statistical Soft-

ware, 20(3), 1–13. http://hdl.handle.net/10.18637/

jss.v020.i03

Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F. G., Friendly, M., Kindt, R.,

Legendre, P., McGlinn, D., Minchin, P. R., O’Hara,

R. B., Simpson, G. L., Solymos, P., Stevens, M. H.

H., Szoecs, E., & Wagner, H. (2019). Vegan: Com-

munity Ecology Package (version 2.5-6, R package).

https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan

Ortega-Baranda, V., Valdez-Hernández, J. I., García-Moya,

E., & Rodríguez-Trejo, D. A. (2017). Structure and

diversity of tree vegetation in three reliefs on the

Oaxaca coast. Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias

Forestales y del Ambiente, 23(2), 173–184. https://

doi.org/http:/dx.doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa

Pacheco, L. (1983). Styracaceae. In A. Gómez-Pompa & V.

Sosa (Eds.), Flora de Veracruz 20. INECOL.

R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for

statistical computing (Version 3.6.2). R Foundation

for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. https://

www.R-project.org/

Renaud, V., Innes, J. L., Dobbertin, M., & Rebetez, M.

(2011). Comparison between open-site and below-

canopy climatic conditions in Switzerland for diffe-

rent types of forests over 10 years (1998-2007).

Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 105(1-2),

119–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-010-0361-0

Rosario-Martinez, H. (2015). phia: Post-Hoc Interac-

tion Analysis. (version 0.2-1, R package). https://

CRAN.R-project.org/package=phia

Ruiz-Jiménez, C. A., Téllez-Valdés, O., & Luna-Vega, I.

(2012). Clasificación de los bosques mesófilos de

montaña de México: afinidades de la flora. Revista

Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 83(4), 1110–1144. http://

dx.doi.org/10.7550/rmb.29383

Ruiz-Montiel, C., Vázquez-Torres, V., Martínez-Hernán-

dez, M., Murrieta-Pérez, L., & Perea-Hernández, M.

S. (2014). Árboles y arbustos registrados en el parque

ecológico Molino de San Roque, Municipio de Xala-

pa, Veracruz. Madera y Bosques, 20(2), 143–152.

https://doi.org/10.21829/myb.2014.202170

Rzedowski, J. (2006). Vegetación de México (1ra. Edición

digital). CONABIO.

Sánchez-Gutiérrez, F., Valenzuela-Gómez, A., Valdez-Her-

nández, J. I., & González-González, C. A. (2017).

Estructura y diversidad de especies arbóreas en el

sitio arqueológico “El Mirador”, Selva Lacando-

na, Chiapas. Polibotánica, 44, 79–94. http://dx.doi.

org/10.18387/polibotanica.44.6

Santana, G., Mendoza, M., Salinas, V., Pérez-Salicrup, D.,

Martínez., Y., & Aburto, I. (2014). Análisis prelimi-

nar de la diversidad y estructura arbórea-arbustiva del

bosque mesófilo en el Sistema Volcánico Transversal

de Michoacán, México. Revista Mexicana de Bio-

diversidad, 85, 1104–1116. https://doi.org/ 10.7550/

rmb.41519

Santiago-Pérez, A. L., Jardel-Peláez, E. J., Cuevas-Guz-

mán, R., & Huerta-Martínez, F. M. (2009). Vegeta-

ción de bordes en un bosque mesófilo de montaña

del occidente de México. Boletín de la Sociedad

Botánica de México, 85, 31–49.

SEDESMA. (2006). Programa de manejo del área natural

“La Martinica”. Secretaría de Desarrollo Social y

Medio Ambiente de Veracruz (SEDESMA).

Sternberg, M., & Shoshany, M. (2001). Influence of

slope aspect on Mediterranean woody formations:

comparison of a semiarid and an arid site in Israel.

Ecological Research, 16(2), 335–345. https://doi.

org/10.1046/j.1440-1703.2001.00393.x

1203

Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 69(4): 1189-1203, October-December 2021 (Published Nov. 17, 2021)

Stevens, P. F. (2017, Julio). Angiosperm Phylogeny Websi-

te. http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/

Toledo-Aceves, T., Meave, J. A., González-Espinosa, M.,

& Ramírez-Marcial, N. (2011). Tropical montane

cloud forests: Current threats and opportunities for

their conservation and sustainable management in

Mexico. Journal of Environmental Management, 92,

974–981.

Torres, E., Schwarzkopf, T., Fariñas, M. R., & Aranguren,

A. (2012). ¿Es la orientación de la pendiente un fac-

tor modificador de la estructura florística en la alta

montaña tropical andina? Ecotrópicos, 25(2), 61–74.

TROPICOS. (2018). Tropicos.org. Missouri Botanical

Garden. http://www.tropicos.org

Villaseñor, J. L. (2010). El bosque húmedo de montaña en

México y sus plantas vasculares. Catálogo florístico-

taxonómico. CONABIO-UNAM.

Williams-Linera, G. (2002). Tree species richness com-

plementarity, disturbance and fragmentation in a

Mexican tropical montane cloud forest. Biodiversi-

ty & Conservation, 11(10), 1825–1843. https://doi.

org/10.1023/A:1020346519085

Williams-Linera, G. (2007). El bosque de niebla del

centro de Veracruz: ecología, historia y destino

en tiempos de fragmentación y cambio climático.

CONABIO-INECOL.

Williams-Linera, G., Guillén Servent, A., Gómez García,

O., & Lorea Hernández, F. (2007). Conservación en

el centro de Veracruz, México. El bosque de niebla:

¿reserva archipiélago o corredor biológico? In G.

Halffter, S. Guevara, & A. Melic (Eds.), Hacia una

cultura de conservación de la diversidad biológica

(pp. 303–310). Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa,

Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso

de la Biodiversidad, Comisión Nacional de Áreas

Naturales Protegidas, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia

y Tecnología.

Williams-Linera, G., & López-Gómez, A. (2008). Estructu-

ra y diversidad de la vegetación leñosa. In R. H. Man-

son, V. Hernández-Ortíz, S. Gallina, & K. Mehltreter

(Eds.), Agroecosistemas cafetaleros de Veracruz:

biodiversidad, manejo y conservación. (pp. 55–68).

INECOL-SEMARNAT.

Williams-Linera, G., López-Gómez, A. M., & Muñiz-

Castro, M. A. (2005). Complementariedad y patrones

de anidamiento de especies de árboles en el paisaje de

bosque de niebla del centro de Veracruz (México). In

G. Halffter, J. Soberón, P. Koleff, & A. Melic (Eds.),

Sobre Diversidad Biológica: El Significado de las

diversidades alfa, beta y gamma (pp. 153–164).

CONABIO-SEA-CONACyT.

Williams-Linera, G., Manson, R. H., & Vera, E. I. (2002).

La fragmentación del bosque mesófilo de montaña

y patrones de uso del suelo en la región oeste de

Xalapa, Veracruz, México. Madera y Bosques, 8(1),

73–89. https://doi.org/10.21829/myb.2002.811307

Williams-Linera, G., Toledo-Garibaldi, M., & Gallardo

Hernández, C. (2013). How heterogeneous are the

cloud forest communities in the mountains of central

Veracruz, Mexico? Plant Ecology, 214, 685–701.

https://doi.org 10.1007/s11258-013-0199-5