S256
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 69(Suppl. 2): S256-S266, October 2021 (Published Oct. 30, 2021)
The devil is coming: Feeding behavior of juvenile Munk’s devil rays
(Mobula munkiana) in very shallow waters of Punta Descartes, Costa Rica
Nathalie Porsiel1; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3030-8300
Sebastián Hernández2,3; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2908-6050
Damien Cordier4; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4583-3212
Maike Heidemeyer*4,5; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7547-5631
1. University of Hamburg, Institute of Hydrobiology ad Fisheries Sciences, Hamburg, Germany;
Nathalie.Porsiel@posteo.de
2. Sala de Colecciones Biológicas, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar, Universidad Católica del Norte, Antofagasta, Chile;
pintarroja@gmail.com
3. Molecular Biology Lab, Center for International Programs, Universidad Veritas, San José, Costa Rica.
4. Asociación para la Conservación Integral de Recursos Naturales Equipo Tora Carey, El Jobo, La Cruz, Guanacaste,
Costa Rica; tempatalkite@hotmail.ca
5. Centro de Investigación en Ciencias del Mar y Limnología (CIMAR), Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa
Rica; maike.heidemeyer@ucr.ac.cr (*Correspondence)
Received 30-I-2021. Corrected 28-IV-2021. Accepted 15-VI-2021.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Identifying critical habitats for vulnerable elasmobranch species is crucial for effective conser-
vation measures. The Munk’s devil ray (Mobula munkiana) is endemic to the Eastern Pacific, but yet little is
known about its biology, ecology, and habitat use. As filter feeders, it is assumed that this species concentrates
at high-productive upwelling regions, such as the Costa Rican Dome. Like many elasmobranchs, its populations
are highly depleted and require urgent information to inform better conservation measures.
Objective: The study was conducted to gain information on a unique behavior observed in juvenile M. munki-
ana, so further information can be provided on early life stages of this vulnerable species.
Methods: From June to September 2017 and in August 2018, the feeding behavior of juvenile Mobula munki-
ana was observed in two shallow bays located at Punta Descartes, North Pacific Costa Rica. Individuals were
captured using a non-lethal method to obtain data on size, weight, and sex distribution. Plankton samples (n =
100) were taken at both bays throughout the months to infer diet composition.
Results: Munk’s devil rays showed a repetitive swimming movement parallel to the beach, feeding exclusively
in the shallow breaking zone of the low tide waves at depth <50cm. A total of 12 M. munkiana (11 live and
one found dead) indicated a juvenile feeding aggregation ranging from 490 – 610mm in disk width and 1400 –
2300gr in weight. The sex ratio (males to females) was 3:1. Zooplankton of the order Mysidacae was found in
the highest abundance in the breaking zone.
Conclusions: The specific behavior and seasonal occurrence of juvenile Munk’s devil rays in this area seem
to be driven by prey abundance. More research is needed to conclude the presence of reproductive adults at
deeper depths and the year-round habitat use of Punta Descartes. The area is threatened by unsustainable devel-
opment and requires realistic management strategies to guarantee the survival of vulnerable species and their
critical habitats.
Key words: Mobula munkiana; juvenile; Munk’s devil ray; migration; prey abundance; feeding.
Porsiel, N., Hernández, S., Cordier, D., & Heidemeyer, M.
(2021).The devil is coming: Feeding behavior of juvenile
Munk’s devil rays (Mobula munkiana) in very shallow
waters of Punta Descartes, Costa Rica. Revista de
Biología Tropical, 69(Suppl. 2), S256-S266. https://doi.
org/10.15517/rbt.v69iS2.48744
https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v69iS2.48744
S257
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 69(Suppl. 2): S256-S266, October 2021 (Published Oct. 30, 2021)
Mobulids are pelagic planktivorous and
globally distributed in warm subtropical to
tropical waters (Notarbartolo di Sciara et al.,
2017). They belong to the single genus Mobu-
la, that currently recognizes two manta (and a
putative species in the Atlantic) and nine devil
ray species (Hosegood et al., 2020; White et
al., 2018). While manta rays are the largest rays
(and among the largest fishes) in the world,
devil or mobula rays are much smaller but
resemble their larger sister species in both mor-
phology and biology. For instance, all mobulids
exhibit long-term gestation periods and low
annual reproductive output, and are extremely
long-lived (Couturier et al., 2012). However,
while manta rays have been reported to under-
take extensive migrations of several hundred
kilometres both horizontally (Germanov &
Marshall, 2014) and vertically (Braun et al.,
2015), little is known about the movement pat-
terns of devil rays. A study of Croll et al., 2012
showed less vertical migration in a devil ray
species. Tagged individuals of Mobula mobu-
lar (japanica) in the Eastern Tropical Pacific
stayed close to the surface, while their primary
prey shows diel migration of from more than
100 meters to the surface (higher depths at day-
time to surface at night-time).
The occurrence of mobulids at distinct
locations and/or habitats has been attributed
to both an interplay of environmental condi-
tions, such as productivity, temperature, and
food availability (Lezama-Ochoa et al., 2019;
Rohner et al., 2014) and biological require-
ments, like mating and availability of clean-
ing stations (Alves de Mendonça et al., 2020;
Jaine et al. 2012). In the Eastern Pacific, the
occurrence of devil rays is connected to higher
oceanic productivity, such as the upwelling
systems along the coast of Baja California Pen-
insula, Galapagos Islands, and Peru, and the
oceanic upwellings of the Costa Rican Dome
(Lezama-Ochoa et al., 2019). Different dietary
studies from stomach contents and stable iso-
tope analysis suggest that most mobulid species
are predominantly planktivorous and, except
for M. munkiana, overlap in their trophic
preference of euphausiids as principal prey
(Notarbartolo di Sciara, 1988; Sampson et al.,
2010; Stewart et al., 2017).
Mobula munkiana, also known as Munk’s
devil ray, attains the smallest size as mature
adults in the genus Mobula (Notarbartolo
di Sciara, 1987). This species is endemic to
the Eastern Tropical Pacific, distributed from
Baja California Peninsula, Mexico, to Peru,
including the Galapagos Islands of Ecuador
(Marshall et al., 2019). Like some of its sister
species, M. munkiana is often observed in large
schools composed of thousands of individuals,
particularly when mysid (Mysidium sp.) and
euphausiid (Nyctiphanes simplex) shrimps are
most abundant (Notarbartolo di Sciara, 1988;
Palacios et al., 2021). Similarly, their large
aggregations have also been attributed to mat-
ing behaviors (Stewart et al., 2018). In the Gulf
of California, Mexico, females are known to
segregate from males upon reaching sexual
maturity (López, 2009; Notarbartolo-di-Sciara,
1988), and a recent study suggests a further
ontogenetic segregation of neonate, juvenile,
and adult habitats (Palacios et al. 2021). Addi-
tionally, the last study found that juvenile
residence was more related to warmer water
temperatures than zooplankton abundance.
The northwest coast of Costa Rica is
directly influenced by the oceanic upwelling
system described as the Costa Rican Dome
(Fernández-Álamo & Färber-Lorda, 2006;
Fiedler, 2002). Around Punta Descartes, the
countries northernmost peninsula on its Pacific
coast, this phenomenon is particularly evident
during January – April, when sea temperatures
reach as low as 15 degrees (Cortés et al., 2014).
During this period, coastal productivity peaks
and, in consequence, triggers high zooplankton
abundance during most of the year (Fernández-
Álamo & Färber-Lorda, 2006; Fiedler 2002).
Punta Descartes has been classified as an area
of major conservation relevance because of its
extremely high coastal-marine biodiversity and
lack of protected areas (Alvarado et al., 2011).
Nonetheless, to date, there is little informa-
tion available on the abundance of ecologi-
cally important species, especially those that
S258
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 69(Suppl. 2): S256-S266, October 2021 (Published Oct. 30, 2021)
require enhanced conservation measures and
that inhabit this area.
Mobula munkiana, like all species within
this genus, have experienced severe population
declines mainly due to overexploitation and by-
catch (Couturier et al., 2012; Croll et al., 2016;
Stewart et al., 2018) and is currently classified
as vulnerable based on an assessment by IUCN
(Marshall et al., 2019). In the Eastern Pacific
of Costa Rica, by-catch mortalities are mainly
associated to tuna purse-seine fisheries, often
concentrated at the Costa Rican Dome (Croll et
al. 2016; Lezema-Ochoa et al., 2019). Targeted
fisheries of devil rays mainly occur in Mexico,
Peru, and Ecuador, either for local and regional
use and consumption of its meat or to supply
the Asian medicinal market with its gill plates,
where they are traded at high prices (Couturier
et al., 2012; Croll et al., 2016; O’Malley et al.,
2017). As a member state of relevant interna-
tional treaties, such as the Convention on the
Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild
Animals (CMS), Convention on International
Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and
Fauna (CITES), and the Inter-American Tropi-
cal Tuna Commission (IATTC), both manta
and devil rays are protected under international
and national law. Specifically, the national
decree No. 38027-MAG currently prohibits
any fishery, onboard retention, landing, or com-
mercialization of mobulid rays.
Although M. munkiana has been listed in
the Costa Rican elasmobranchs checklist (Espi-
noza et al., 2018), there are no current studies
that specifically address the ecological require-
ments of this species in Costa Rican waters.
Information addressing this species’ biology,
ecology, and population trends, to enhance
effective conservation measures (Lawson et
al., 2017; Marshall et al., 2019) is urgently
needed. Here we report, for the first time, on
the presence, size, and sex distribution, as well
as feeding behavior of juvenile Munk’s devil
rays in northwest Costa Rica. We associate its
presence in extremely shallow waters with the
zonal distribution of Mysis sp. and detail a
non-lethal sampling method for M. munkiana.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study sites: El Jobo (11°02’01.5” N &
85°44’05.4” W) and Rajada (11°01’48.2” N &
85°44’42.6” W) beaches are adjacent bays on
the northernmost peninsula of Punta Descartes,
in Guanacaste province, Northwest Costa Rica
(Fig. 1). Their white sandy bottoms are fringed
by rocky reefs and outcrops that shelter the
bays during most of the year. Both bays are
approximately one kilometre wide. Inside the
bay, at the peak of the rainy season from
June to September, devil rays are commonly
observed in areas of shallow waves close to the
beach, identified by their uniform dark-violet
coloration and surfing fin tips when swimming
close to the surface.
Description of feeding behavior: The
swimming behavior of the devil rays was reg-
istered repeatedly by three observers (authors
NP, DC, and MH) in 13 days (nine at El Jobo
and four at Rajada) between June and Septem-
ber of 2017 and 2018, respectively. Observa-
tions took place either from the beach and
inside the water at variable distances between
one to twenty meters. Videographic evidence
was further collected with a drone at a height
of approximately five meters (DJI Mavic Pro
1). We registered when the rays unfurled their
cephalic lobes, as this behavior characterizes
feeding activity in mobulids (Ari & Correia,
2008; Mulvany & Motta, 2013), as well as their
movements in response to the movements of
the waves.
Devil ray capture: We then used a ten
meter long, 1.2 m high silk nylon minnow
seine net (mesh size ca. one cm), rolled up
and sustained at each end respectively by one
person, to block the rays’ swimming direc-
tion behind the spilling wave break at a depth
of approximately 1 m. Once the rays were in
close proximity, the net was unrolled on the
deeper end to encircle the individual(s) and
closed on both ends. The rays were maintained
inside the net with sufficient swimming ability
and were taken out one by one with a hand net
S259
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 69(Suppl. 2): S256-S266, October 2021 (Published Oct. 30, 2021)
for subsequent manipulation. We manipulated
each ray on a floating platform (Fig. S1), and
because devil rays require the water flow to
breathe, data collection was undertaken in two
to three sequential steps. Between those steps,
the rays were moved inside the hand net in the
water. For the entire procedure, a team of four
to five people was required, and completing the
protocol took about five minutes.
Data collection: Upon successful capture,
individuals were measured, weighed, sexed,
and tagged. All measurements were recorded
with a flexible measuring tape (± 0.5 cm). The
disc width (WD) was recorded from fin tip to
fin tip, total length (TL) from the center of the
superior mouth opening to the tip of the tail,
and the tail length (TaL) from the base of the
tail to the tip. Weight was taken with an elec-
tronic hanging scale (model H.S., brand UWE,
manufactured in Taiwan) with a capacity of 15
kg ± 0.01 kg. The rays were tagged with 3 cm
long T-bar anchor tags (model FD-94, Floytag,
Seattle, USA) on the right anterior side of the
tail base. We also included one fresh individual
found dead on the 30th of June 2017, on Rajada
beach, in which stomach content was inspect-
ed. Males and females were identified accord-
ing to the presence or absence of claspers.
Size at sexual maturity for this species (López,
2009; Notarbartolo di Sciara, 1988) was used
to infer the life history stage. Thus, males with
WD < 870 mm (Notarbartolo di Sciara, 1988)
and females with WD < 970 mm (López, 2009),
respectively, were classified as juveniles.
Zooplankton surveys: Because of the
overwhelming abundance of mysid shrimps
found in the stomach contents of one dead
devil ray, our surveys focused exclusively on
identifying the abundance of crustacean zoo-
plankton at different depths. On five occasions
between July and September 2017, plankton
surveys were conducted at El Jobo and Rajada
beach. Samples were collected with a 12.7 cm
mouth diameter plankton net (153 μm nylon
Fig. 1. Location of the two study sites on the Descartes Peninsula in northwest Costa Rica: A) El Jobo Beach, B) Rajada
Beach. Bathymetry is indicated in meters below sea level.
S260
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 69(Suppl. 2): S256-S266, October 2021 (Published Oct. 30, 2021)
cloth, 10 mesh; brand LaMotte, manufactured
in UK) and a 50 ml tube attached at the cod end
of the net. Samples were taken in the breaking
zone (BZ) of the waves at a depth of 0.5 m and
the shoaling zone (SZ) of 2.5 m depth, respec-
tively, from the surface and the bottom, where
the net was dragged for 10 seconds. On every
sampling day, five plankton tows per zone (BZ
& SZ from surface and bottom) were taken (N
= 100). Samples were inspected under a micro-
scope (10x magnification), morphologically
identified, and individuals counted.
Statistical analysis: Differences between
sexes were evaluated for all morphometric
measurements using conventional t-Student
tests, and the linear relationship of weight and
disk width was assessed with Pearson’s correla-
tion coefficient. Samples taken at Rajada and
El Jobo were grouped into surface, and bottom
plankton samples, respectively, from BZ and
ZZ, and differences in the number of individu-
als counted between zones (BZ/SZ) and depths
(surface/bottom) were assessed using a 2-factor
ANOVA with replications (El Jobo and Rajada
beaches). All analyses were conducted at a sig-
nificance level of P =0.05, using the program R
(R Core Team, 2020).
RESULTS
Feeding behavior: Devil rays were
observed following the breaking waves along
the shallow slopes of El Jobo and Rajada
beaches (Fig. 1A, Fig. 1B). This behavior was
especially conspicuous during low tide and is
generalized as followed (Fig. 2A): Single rays
or small groups of 2 – 10 individuals swim
parallel to the beach in both directions directly
in the surf zone, behind the breaking waves.
They swim in slow to moderate speed close to
the surface often with their pectoral fin tips cut-
ting through the surface of the water. Upon the
surging of a wave, they abruptly turn towards
the beach and follow the wave by rapidly flap-
ping their pectoral fins and notably increasing
Fig. 2. A) Illustration of the generalized swimming behavior of devil rays at shallow depths in response to the movement of
waves at El Jobo and Rajada beaches; B) Close up of unfurled cephalic lobes during the shoaling of the wave, and C) furled
cephalic lobes during non-feeding behavior (see text).
S261
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 69(Suppl. 2): S256-S266, October 2021 (Published Oct. 30, 2021)
speed while following the maximum amplitude
of the shoaling wave. Some individuals addi-
tionally conduct circular up and down move-
ments. Depending on the depth at which a wave
breaks, some individuals enter waters as shal-
low as 20 cm. Just before the wave break, they
abruptly turn around at a sharp angle and con-
tinue swimming at a slower pace into deeper
waters. Individuals unfurl their cephalic lobes
the moment they start following the shoaling
wave and move towards the beach (Fig. 2B),
which were clearly observed as round white
patches from above the water. Immediately
after they redirect back to deeper waters, these
cephalic lobes are furled back to their cephalic
horns (Fig. 2C).
Devil ray sampling: In a total of 9 surveys
carried out between June and September of
2017 (N = 8) and 2018 (N = 1), 11 M. mun-
kiana were captured at El Jobo beach, with
no successful capture at Rajada. Including
the dead individual from Rajada, our data set
contained 12 individuals, nine (75 %) were
identified as males and three (25 %) as females,
with a male to female sex ratio of 3:1. Because
there was no difference (p > 0.2) in WD nor
weight, males and females were pooled for fur-
ther analysis. WD ranged from 490 to 610 mm
(545 ± 35 mm, mean ± SE) and weight from
1400 to 3100 g (2108 ± 434 g, mean ± SE),
which were highly correlated (r(11) = 0.93, P <
0.000; Fig. 3). TL ranged from 460 to 840mm
(572 ± 98 mm), and TaL from 150 to 445mm
(386 ± 80 mm). All individuals were classified
as juveniles.
Zonal distribution of mysids: The num-
ber of individual mysids differed significantly
among zones and depths (F (3, 39) = 66.73, P <
0.0001), with the highest abundance of crusta-
ceans of the order Mysidacae registered at the
bottom of the BZ followed by the surface of the
BZ (Fig. 4). There was no significant difference
among sites nor dates (P > 0.1).
DISCUSSION
This is the first study that characterizes the
size distribution, sex ratio, and feeding behav-
ior of juvenile M. munkiana in Costa Rica and
Central America. Our findings suggest that
Punta Descartes serves as a juvenile feeding
ground for this vulnerable species during sever-
al months of the year. With a mean WD of 545 ±
35 mm, our sample resembles the average WD
of neonates at the recently described nursing
ground at Ensenada Grande, Baja California
Peninsula, suggested as such by the presence
of the umbilical scar (Palacios et al., 2021).
Although we did not intentionally register this
Fig. 3. Linear relationship of female (in red) and male (in blue) Mobula munkiana (N = 12) disk width (WD; mm) and weight
(g) sampled in Punta Descartes, North Pacific Costa Rica. For reference, WD of estimated size at birth range (Broadhurst et al.
2019; Notarbartolo di Sciara, 1988) is indicated in grey, mean ± SD of neonates and juveniles in green and violet, respectively
(Palacios et al. 2021), and male and female maturity sizes, respectively in blue and red (Notarbartolo di Sciara, 1988).
S262
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 69(Suppl. 2): S256-S266, October 2021 (Published Oct. 30, 2021)
scar during our surveys, inspections of photo-
graphs taken from the dead individual suggest
that at least this individual sampled was indeed
a neonate. Size at birth of M. munkiana is yet to
be determined but may range from 350 (Notar-
bartolo di Sciara, 1988) to 423mm WD (Broad-
hurst et al., 2019). Hence, with our smallest
individual captures of 490 mm WD, females
may give birth in the vicinity of these bays.
Pupping season for M. munkiana in Costa Rica
therefore appears similar to reports from Baja
California Peninsula, extending from April to
June (Palacios et al., 2021). Following local
observations and our capture reports, devil rays
are not observed within the bays before May
nor after September, but a more systematized
study is desirable to confirm the boundaries of
the reproductive season for Costa Rica.
Mobula munkiana feeds on zooplanktonic
crustaceans with main food items varying both
spatially and temporally (Coasaca-Céspedes et
al., 2018; Notarbartolo di Sciara, 1988). For
instance, M. munkiana feeds mainly on mysids
that peak during Baja California Peninsula’s
cold upwelling season (Notarbartolo di Sciara,
1988) and in its absence on the euphausiid
Nyctiphanes simplex (Coasaca-Céspedes et al.,
2018). Similar to Baja California Peninsula,
maximum primary productivity along the north
pacific coast of Costa Rica occurs from Decem-
ber to April stimulated by the upwelling Costa
Rican Dome (Fiedler, 2002), but zooplankton
abundance remains high during most months
(Fernández-Álamo & Färber-Lorda, 2006). In
fact, Punta Descartes has the highest zoo-
plankton abundance registered anywhere in the
country (Morales-Ramírez et al., 2018), pro-
viding suitable habitat for mobulids throughout
the year. Although the euphausiid N. simplex
is considered a dominant species in upwelling
areas of the Eastern Tropical Pacific (Brinton,
1979), coastal zooplankton surveys seem to
be dominated by copepods (Morales-Ramírez
et al., 2018; Morales-Ramírez et al., 2021),
raising questions on the feeding habitats of M.
munkiana in this area. Our plankton surveys
conducted at sites where devil rays exhibited
feeding behaviors were exclusively composed
Fig. 4. Mean (± SD) distribution (n individuals / 50 ml)
of mysids collected at the surface (triangles) and bottom
(squares) in the shoaling zone in blue (SZ) and the breaking
zone in yellow (BZ) on five days at El Jobo and Rajada
beaches. Dates with an asterisk (*) indicate days at which
devil rays were observed and/or sampled.
S263
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 69(Suppl. 2): S256-S266, October 2021 (Published Oct. 30, 2021)
of mysids, which, together with the stomach
content of the dead individual indicates that
mysids compose the diet of M. munkiana in
Costa Rica during at least a portion of its life
cycle and at least some months of the year.
However, mysids have not been identified in
any zooplankton survey published to date, and
the general lack of knowledge on Costa Rica’s
mysid fauna (Price et al., 2009) provides fur-
ther significance to our finding of mysids at
El Jobo and Rajada beach. It also urges for
more detailed studies on mysids’ interannual
dynamic in both shallow and deeper waters.
The benthic association and segregation
within shallow depths of mysids are known
to occur within and among species (Clutter,
1967), and we observed a significant zona-
tion of mysid abundance within less than 2.5
m depth, with a gradual increase shoreward.
Highest number of individuals were found on
the bottom in the breaking zone of the beach,
directly where juvenile M. munkiana unfurl
their cephalic lobes to feed. Thus, the feeding
action in depths as shallow as 0.2 m is prob-
ably explained by the higher abundance of prey
when compared to deeper waters. In fact, if a
similar dynamic of zooplankton species abun-
dance driven by upwelling and post-upwelling
events as described for Baja California Pen-
insula is true for Costa Rica, mysids are less
abundant in the only months juvenile devil rays
are observed in Punta Descartes. However, the
waves’ action eventually compensates for their
restricted distribution by dispensing them in
the water column, making them available for
filter feeders capable of entering such shal-
low waters. The fact that only juveniles of M.
munkiana were captured furthermore suggests
that the presence of this principal diet item,
albeit restricted to the breaking zone, might
become significant for the initial development
of juveniles.
Nonetheless, it is possible that larger, even
sexually mature, or reproductive individuals
were present in deeper depths of the bays of El
Jobo and Rajada. Palacios et al. (2021) found
a clear segregation of size classes, where neo-
nates and juveniles were exclusively found in
depths of between two and five meters, with
adults present in the same bay at depths greater
than 5 m. During our surveys, we observed
some individuals leaping out of the water at the
bays’ entrance, but a more rigorous sampling
of M. munkiana at different depths should be
conducted to further conclude on the different
life stages present throughout the year. Surpris-
ingly though was the male to female (M:F)
sex ratio of 3:1 we found in Punta Descartes,
whereas elasmobranch nursery areas, including
Ensenada Grande for M. munkiana (Palacios et
al., 2021), are often characterized by a 1:1 sex
ratio (Salomón-Aguilar et al., 2009). Sex ratios
in adult M. munkiana have been reported to
differ slightly in different time periods, either
in favor of males (López, 2009) or females
(Notarbartolo di Sciara, 1988), which in turn is
common for adult life stages of many elasmo-
branchs (Wearmouth & Sims, 2008). Whether
or not our male-skewed sex ratio indicates
juvenile segregation or is an artifact of low
sample size, this should be investigated in the
future. In any case, both El Jobo and Rajada
bays are likely providing refuge during vulner-
able early-life stages, not only by enhancing
growth through prey availability but also by
providing protection from predators, such as
sharks, which are considerable scarce in the
area (Espinoza et al., 2020).
This study is the first to report on a feed-
ing ground for juvenile Munk’s devil rays,
highlighting the need for local conservation
strategies for this vulnerable species. Although
the area is yet mostly undeveloped, large-scale
development plans focused on resort-like tour-
ism have already been initiated. For instance,
a 450-suite hotel, operates directly on the
beach and may present potential impacts on
the ecological health of the bay, either directly
or indirectly. Immediate plans include the
construction of similar hotels at Rajada Beach.
Because the beaches nor waters of Punta Des-
cartes are included under any protective cat-
egory of the country’s system of conservation
areas, such as national parks or reserves, the
future of this nursing ground is uncertain and
should be highlighted to enforce sustainable
S264
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 69(Suppl. 2): S256-S266, October 2021 (Published Oct. 30, 2021)
management plans according to Costa Rica’s
obligation in the protection of M. munkiana.`
Ethical statement: authors declare that
they all agree with this publication and made
significant contributions; that there is no con-
flict of interest of any kind; and that we fol-
lowed all pertinent ethical and legal procedures
and requirements. All financial sources are
fully and clearly stated in the acknowledge-
ments section. A signed document has been
filed in the journal archives.
See Digital Appendix at: /
Ver Apéndice digital en: revistas.ucr.ac.cr
RESUMEN
El diablo se aproxima: comportamiento de
alimentación de juveniles de mantas diablo
(Mobula munkiana) en aguas poco profundas de
Punta Descartes, Costa Rica
Introducción: La identificación de hábitats críticos para
especies vulnerables de elasmobranquios es crucial para
tomar medidas de conservación efectivas. La manta dia-
blo o raya de Munk (Mobula munkiana) es endémica
del Pacífico Oriental y se sabe poco sobre su biología,
ecología y uso de hábitat. Como filtradores, se asume que
se concentran en regiones de afloramiento con alta produc-
tividad; sus poblaciones se consideran en disminución y
requieren información urgente para fundamentar medidas
de conservación.
Objetivo: El estudio se realizó para obtener información
sobre un comportamiento de alimentación observado en
juveniles de M. munkiana, con el fin de proporcionar más
información sobre las primeras etapas de vida de esta espe-
cie considerada vulnerable a la extinción.
Métodos: De junio a setiembre de 2017 y en agosto de
2018, se observó el comportamiento de alimentación de los
juveniles de M. munkiana en dos bahías poco profundas de
Punta Descartes, en el Pacífico norte de Costa Rica. Los
individuos fueron capturados utilizando un método no letal
para obtener datos sobre el tamaño, peso y sexo. Se toma-
ron 100 muestras de plancton en las bahías para inferir la
composición de la dieta.
Resultados: Las rayas mostraron un comportamiento
de natación repetitivo paralelo a la playa, alimentándose
exclusivamente en la zona de rompimiento de las olas en
marea baja, a menos de 50 cm de profundidad. Un total de
12 rayas M. munkiana (11 vivas y una encontrada muerta)
indicaron una agregación de juveniles para alimentarse.
Los anchos de disco variaron de 490 a 610 mm y el peso
entre 1400 a 2300 g. La proporción sexual (machos:
hembras) fue de 3:1. En la zona donde rompían las olas se
encontró principalmente el orden Mysidaceae.
Conclusiones: El comportamiento específico y la ocu-
rrencia estacional de M. munkiana en la zona de estudio
parecen estar impulsados por la abundancia de presas. Se
necesita más investigación para concluir la presencia de
adultos reproductivos a mayor profundidad y sobre el uso
de hábitat en los alrededores de Punta Descartes durante
todo el año. Esta área se encuentra amenazada por un desa-
rrollo insostenible y requiere estrategias de manejo realis-
tas para garantizar la supervivencia de especies vulnerables
y sus hábitats críticos.
Palabras clave: Mobula munkiana; juveniles; rayas dia-
blo; migración; abundancia de presas; comportamiento de
alimentación.
REFERENCES
Alvarado, J. J., Herrera, B., Corrales, L., Asch, J., & Paaby,
P. (2011). Identificación de las prioridades de conser-
vación de la biodiversidad marina y costera en Costa
Rica. Revista de Biología Tropical, 59(2), 829–842.
Alves de Mendonça, S., Luz Botêlho Macena, B. C., de
Araújo, C. B., Alves Bezerra, N. P., & Vieira Hazin,
F. H. (2020). Dancing with the devil: Courtship
behaviour, mating evidences and population struc-
ture of the Mobula tarapacana (Myliobatiformes:
Mobulidae) in a remote archipelago in the equatorial
mid-atlantic ocean. Neotropical Ichthyology, 18(3),
1–14. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-2020-0008
Ari, C., & Correia, J. P. (2008). Role of sensory cues on
food searching behavior of a captive Manta birostris
(Chondrichtyes, Mobulidae). Zoo Biology, 27(4),
294–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20189
Braun, C. D., Skomal, G. B., Thorrold, S. R., & Berumen,
M. L. (2015). Movements of the reef manta ray
(Manta alfredi) in the Red Sea using satellite and
acoustic telemetry. Marine Biology, 162(12), 2351–
2362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-015-2760-3
Brinton, E. (1979). Parameters relating to the distributions
of planktonic organisms, especially euphausiids in
the eastern tropical Pacific. Progress in oceanogra-
phy, 8(3), 125-189.
Broadhurst, M. K., Laglbauer, B. J. L., & Bennett, M. B.
(2019). Gestation and size at parturition for Mobula
kuhlii cf. eregoodootenkee. Environmental Biology of
Fishes, 102(7), 1009–1014. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s10641-019-00886-3
Clutter, R. I. (1967). Zonation of Nearshore Mysids. 48(2),
200–208.
Coasaca-Céspedes, J. J., Segura-Cobeña, E., Montero-
Taboada, R., Gonzalez-Pestana, A., Alfaro-Córdova,
E., Alfaro-Shigueto, J., & Mangel, J. C. (2018).
S265
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 69(Suppl. 2): S256-S266, October 2021 (Published Oct. 30, 2021)
Preliminary analysis of the feeding habits of batoids
from the genera Mobula and Myliobatis in nor-
thern Peru. Revista de Biologia Marina y Ocea-
nografia, 53(3), 367–374. https://doi.org/10.22370/
rbmo.2018.53.3.1368
Cortés, J., Samper-Villarreal, J., & Bernecker, A. (2014).
Seasonal phenology of Sargassum liebmannii J.
Agardh (Fucales, Heterokontophyta) in an upwelling
area of the Eastern Tropical Pacific. Aquatic Botany,
119(OCTOBER), 105–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
aquabot.2014.08.009
Couturier, L. I. E., Marshall, A. D., Jaine, F. R. A., Kas-
hiwagi, T., Pierce, S. J., Townsend, K. A., Weeks,
S. J., Bennett, M. B., & Richardson, A. J. (2012).
Biology, ecology and conservation of the Mobulidae.
Journal of Fish Biology, 80(5), 1075–1119. https://
doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03264.x
Croll, D. A., Dewar, H., Dulvy, N. K., Fernando, D., Fran-
cis, M. P., Galván-Magaña, F., Hall, M., Heinrichs, S.,
Marshall, A., Mccauley, D., Newton, K. M., Notar-
bartolo-Di-Sciara, G., O’Malley, M., O’Sullivan, J.,
Poortvliet, M., Roman, M., Stevens, G., Tershy, B.
R., & White, W. T. (2016). Vulnerabilities and fishe-
ries impacts: the uncertain future of manta and devil
rays. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater
Ecosystems, 26(3), 562–575. https://doi.org/10.1002/
aqc.2591
Croll, D. A., Newton, K. M., Weng, K., Galván-Magaña,
F., O’Sullivan, J., & Dewar, H. (2012) Movement and
habitat use by the spine-tail devil ray in the Eastern
Pacific. Ocean Marine Ecology Progress Series,
465,193-200. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09900
Espinoza, M., Araya-Arce, T., Chaves-Zamora, I., Chin-
chilla, I., & Cambra, M. (2020). Monitoring elas-
mobranch assemblages in a data-poor country from
the Eastern Tropical Pacific using baited remote
underwater video stations. Scientific Reports, 10(1),
1–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74282-8
Espinoza, M., Díaz, E., Angulo, A., Hernández, S., &
Clarke, T. M. (2018). Chondrichthyan diversity, con-
servation status, and management challenges in Costa
Rica. Frontiers in Marine Science, 5, 85. https://doi.
org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00085
Fernández-Álamo, M. A., & Färber-Lorda, J. (2006).
Zooplankton and the oceanography of the eastern
tropical Pacific: A review. Progress in Oceano-
graphy, 69(2–4), 318–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
pocean.2006.03.003
Fiedler, P. (2002). The annual cycle and biological effects
of the Costa Rica Dome. Deep-Sea Research I, 49,
321–338.
Germanov, E. S., & Marshall, A. D. (2014). Running the
Gauntlet: Regional movement patterns of manta
alfredi through a complex of parks and fisheries.
PLoS ONE, 9(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.
pone.0110071
Hosegood, J., Humble, E., Ogden, R., de Bruyn, M., Creer,
S., Stevens, G. M. W., Abudaya, M., Bassos-Hull, K.,
Bonfil, R., Fernando, D., Foote, A. D., Hipperson, H.,
Jabado, R. W., Kaden, J., Moazzam, M., Peel, L. R.,
Pollett, S., Ponzo, A., Poortvliet, M., … Carvalho,
G. (2020). Phylogenomics and species delimitation
for effective conservation of manta and devil rays.
Molecular Ecology, 29(24), 4783–4796. https://doi.
org/10.1111/mec.15683
Jaine, F. R. A., Couturier, L. I. E., Weeks, S. J., Townsend,
K. A., Bennett, M. B., Fiora, K., & Richardson, A. J.
(2012). When Giants Turn Up: Sighting Trends, Envi-
ronmental Influences and Habitat Use of the Manta
Ray Manta alfredi at a Coral Reef. PLoS ONE, 7(10).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046170
Lawson, J. M., Fordham, S. V., O’Malley, M. P., David-
son, L. N., Walls, R. H., Heupel, M. R., Stevens, G.,
Fernando, D., Budziak, A., Simpfendorfer, C. A.,
Ender, I., Francis, M. P., Notarbartolo-di-Sciara, G.,
& Dulvy, N. K. (2017). Sympathy for the devil: a
conservation strategy for devil and manta rays. PeerJ,
5, e3027. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3027
Lezama-Ochoa, N., Hall, M., Román, M., & Vogel, N.
(2019). Spatial and temporal distribution of mobulid
ray species in the eastern Pacific Ocean ascertained
from observer data from the tropical tuna purse-seine
fishery. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 102(1),
1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-018-0832-1
Lopez, J. N. S. (2009). Estudio Comparativo de la Repro-
duccion de tres Especies del Genero Mobula (Chon-
drichthyes: Mobulidae) en el Suroeaste del Golfo
de California, Mexico (Masters thesis). Instituto
Politécnico Nacional, La Paz, Baja California Sur,
Mexico.
Marshall, A., Barreto, R., Carlson, J., Fernando, D.,
Fordham, S., Francis, M. P., Herman, K., Jaba-
do, R. W., Liu, K. M., Rigby, C. L., & Romanov,
E. (2019). Mobula munkiana. The IUCN Red List
of Threatened Species. https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/
IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T60198A124450956.en
Morales-Ramírez, Á., Corrales-Ugalde, M., Esquivel-
Garrote, O., Carrillo-Baltodano, A., Rodríguez-Sáenz,
K., & Sheridan, C. (2018). Marine zooplankton stu-
dies in Costa Rica: A review and future perspectives.
Revista de Biologia Tropical, 66(Suppl. 1), S24–S41.
https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v66i1.33258
Morales-Ramírez, Á., Till-Pons, I., Alfaro, E. J., Corrales-
Ugalde, M., & Sheridan-Rodríguez, C. (2021). Meso-
zooplankton responses to oceanographic conditions
across different scales in Salinas Bay, Northern Paci-
fic coast of Costa Rica during 2011-2013. Revista de
Biologia Tropical, 69(Suppl. 2), S142-S159.
S266
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 69(Suppl. 2): S256-S266, October 2021 (Published Oct. 30, 2021)
Mulvany, S., & Motta, P. J. (2013). The morphology of
the cephalic lobes and anterior pectoral fins in six
species of batoids. Journal of Morphology, 274(9),
1070–1083. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.20163
Notarbartolo di Sciara, G. (1987). A revisionary study of
the genus Mobula Rafinesque, 1810 (Chondrichthyes:
Mobulidae) with the description of a new species.
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 91(1),
1–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1987.
tb01723.x
Notarbartolo di Sciara, G. (1988). Natural history of the
rays of the genus Mobula in the Gulf of California.
Fishery Bulletin, 86(1), 45–66.
Notarbartolo di Sciara, G., Adnet, S., Bennett, M., Bro-
adhurst, M. K., Fernando, D., Jabado, R. W., Lagl-
bauer, B. J. L., & Stevens, G. (2020). Taxonomic
status, biological notes, and conservation of the
longhorned pygmy devil ray Mobula eregoodoo
(Cantor, 1849). Aquatic Conservation: Marine and
Freshwater Ecosystems, 30(1), 104–122. https://doi.
org/10.1002/aqc.3230
Notarbartolo di Sciara, G., Fernando, D., Adnet, S., Cap-
petta, H., & Jabado, R. W. (2017). Devil rays
(Chondrichthyes: Mobula) of the Arabian Seas, with
a redescription of Mobula kuhlii (Valenciennes in
Müller and Henle, 1841). Aquatic Conservation:
Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 27(1), 197–218.
https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2635
O’Malley, M. P., Townsend, K. A., Hilton, P., Heinrichs,
S., & Stewart, J. D. (2017). Characterization of the
trade in manta and devil ray gill plates in China
and South-east Asia through trader surveys. Aquatic
Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems,
27(2), 394–413. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2670
Palacios, M. D., Hoyos-Padilla, E. M., Trejo-Ramírez, A.,
Croll, D. A., Galván-Magaña, F., Zilliacus, K. M.,
O’Sullivan, J. B., Ketchum, J. T., & González-Armas,
R. (2021). Description of first nursery area for a
pygmy devil ray species (Mobula munkiana) in the
Gulf of California, Mexico. Scientific Reports, 11(1),
1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80506-8
Price, W., Heard, R., & Vargas, R. (2009). Shallow
Water Mysids. In I. Wehrtmann & J. Cortés (Eds.),
Marine Biodiversity of Costa Rica, Central Ameri-
ca (pp. 229–236). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.
org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8278-8_20
R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for
statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical
Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Rohner, C. A., Pierce, S. J., Marshall, A. D., Weeks, S. J.,
Bennett, M. B., & Richardson, A. J. (2013). Trends in
sightings and environmental influences on a coastal
aggregation of manta rays and whale sharks. Marine
Ecology Progress Series, 482, 153–168. https://doi.
org/10.3354/meps10290
Salomón-Aguilar, C. A., Villavicencio-Garayzar, C. J., &
Reyes-Bonilla, H. (2009). Zonas y temporadas de
reproducción y crianza de tiburones en el Golfo de
California: Estrategia para su conservación y manejo
pesquero. Ciencias Marinas, 35(4), 369–388. https://
doi.org/10.7773/cm.v35i4.1435
Sampson, L., Galván-Magaña, F., de Silva-Dávila, R.,
Aguíñiga-García, S., & Ósullivan, J. B. (2010). Diet
and trophic position of the devil rays Mobula thurs-
toni and Mobula japanica as inferred from stable
isotope analysis. Journal of the Marine Biological
Association of the United Kingdom, 90(5), 969–976.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315410000548
Stewart, J. D., Jaine, F. R. A., Armstrong, A. J., Armstrong,
A. O., Bennett, M. B., Burgess, K. B., Couturier, L. I.
E., Croll, D. A., Cronin, M. R., Deakos, M. H., Dud-
geon, C. L., Fernando, D., Froman, N., Germanov,
E. S., Hall, M. A., Hinojosa-Alvarez, S., Hosegood,
J. E., Kashiwagi, T., Laglbauer, B. J. L., … Stevens,
G. M. W. (2018). Research priorities to support effec-
tive Manta and Devil Ray conservation. Frontiers
in Marine Science, 5, 314. https://doi.org/10.3389/
fmars.2018.00314
Stewart, J. D., Rohner, C. A., Araujo, G., Avila, J., Fernan-
do, D., Forsberg, K., Ponzo, A., Rambahiniarison, J.
M., Kurle, C. M., & Semmens, B. X. (2017). Trophic
overlap in mobulid rays: Insights from stable isoto-
pe analysis. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 580,
131–151. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12304
Wearmouth, V. J., & Sims, D. W. (2008). Chapter 2.
Sexual Segregation in Marine Fish, Reptiles, Birds
and Mammals. Behaviour Patterns, Mechanisms
and Conservation Implications. Advances in Marine
Biology, 54(08), 107–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/
S0065-2881(08)00002-3
White, W. T., Corrigan, S., Yang, L., Henderson, A. C.,
Bazinet, A. L., Swofford, D. L., & Naylor, G. J. P.
(2018). Phylogeny of the manta and devilrays (Chon-
drichthyes: Mobulidae), with an updated taxono-
mic arrangement for the family. Zoological Journal
of the Linnean Society, 182(1), 50–75. https://doi.
org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlx018