1
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 71: e51166, enero-diciembre 2023 (Publicado May. 16, 2023)
The characteristics of stingless bee nests (Apidae: Meliponini)
in the Cycloop Mountain Nature Reserve, Indonesia
David Reinhard Jesajas1; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8294-9612
Tri Atmowidi2*; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2179-3914
Berry Juliandi2; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0348-5675
Sih Kahono3; http://orchid.org/0000-0001-7222-3180
1. Student of Animal Bioscience Study Program, Graduate School, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia;
juandaud10@gmail.com
2. Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia;
atmowidi@apps.ipb.ac.id (*Correspondence), bjuliandi@apps.ipb.ac.id
3. Research Center for Applied Zoology-BRIN, Cibinong 16912, Indonesia; sihkahono@gmail.com
Received 29-V-2022. Corrected 06-II-2023. Accepted 02-V-2023.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Stingless bees are widespread in tropical and subtropical regions. In Indonesia, the distribution of
stingless bees are grouped in three regions, namely Indo-Malayan, Wallacea, and Indo-Australian. Ten species
of stingless bees have been recorded in Papua, seven of which are endemic. The Cycloop Mountains Nature
Reserve (CMNR) is one of the conservation area in Papua, Indonesia, for flora and fauna. Unfortunately, the
study of the diversity of stingless bees in Papua has been limited.
Objective: To measure the diversity, nesting sites, nest entrance characteristics and nest architecture of sting-
less bees.
Methods: Observation of the stingless bee nests in the nature reserves and in the residential areas used a road
sampling method and information from local people, respectively. A total of 22 colonies were studied.
Results: Two species of stingless bee were found, namely Tetragonula sapiens (Cockerell, 1911) and
Heterotrigona (Platytrigona) planifrons (Smith, 1865). The current study showed new distribution records for
T. sapiens and H. planifrons in the CMNR. The nesting site of T. sapiens was commonly found in house founda-
tion, while that of H. planifrons was in coconut palm cavities. The nest entrance of T. sapiens varied, i.e., ellipti-
cal, oval, rounded, irregular, horizontally or vertically elongated. Meanwhile, the nest entrance of H. planifrons
was vertically elongated. The brood cells of T. sapiens varied, i.e., vertical, horizontal, or semi-clusters, while
in H. planifrons was layered vertically.
Conclusions: Two species of stingless bees found, T. sapiens and H. planifrons, showed a new distribution
records and T. sapiens was a dominant species in Papua. The nest entrance of the species varied in shape, color,
and texture.
Key words: Cycloop Mountains Nature Reserve; diversity; nest characteristics; stingless bee.
RESUMEN
Ubicación y características de los nidos de abejas sin aguijón (Apidae: Meliponini)
en la Reserva Natural Cycloop Mountain, Indonesia.
Introducción: Las abejas sin aguijón están muy extendidas en las regiones tropicales y subtropicales. En
Indonesia, la distribución de las abejas sin aguijón se agrupa en tres regiones: Indo-Malayan, Wallacea e
https://doi.org/10.15517/rev.biol.trop..v71i1.51166
INVERTEBRATE BIOLOGY
2Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 71: e51166, enero-diciembre 2023 (Publicado May. 16, 2023)
INTRODUCCIÓN
The stingless bees (Apidae: Meliponini)
are a cosmopolitan group of bees in the tropics
and subtropics. Stingless bees are distributed in
tropical regions of the world across the Neo-
tropical, Afrotropical, and Australasian realms
(Michener, 2000) and are the highest diversity
among bees consist of more than 600 species
(Rasmussen, 2008; Rasmussen & Cameron,
2007). Indonesia, as part of the Indo-Malayan
and Australasian ecoregions, has 46 record-
ed stingless bee species across the islands
of Sumatra, Java, Borneo, Timor, Sulawesi,
Ambon, Maluku, and Papua (Kahono et al.,
2018). The species of this group are small to
medium sized with a vestigial stinger and live
in colonies (Michener, 1974). These beehives
can be found under the soil surface, in tree and
wood cavities, house wall cavities, or hollows
of bamboo trees (Dollin et al., 1997; Engel et
al., 2019; Michener, 1974; Sakagami et al.,
1983). Stingless bees have a high prospect
as a pollinator of agricultural crops related
to its small body size, have a high foraging
activity, and high adaptation to environmental
stress (Kahono, 2015). Stingless bees play an
important role in pollinating of various plant
species (Michener, 2007), include in mustard
(Atmowidi et al., 2007), Tetragonula laeviceps
in strawberry (Fragaria x annanassa) and Het-
erotrigona itama in melon (Cucumis melo) in
the greenhouse (Atmowidi et al., 2022). Nest-
ing preference and nest characteristics, such as
the morphology of nest entrance, nest architec-
ture, and nest height from the ground are sup-
porting characters that can be used to identify
stingless bee species. Nest entrances vary in
shape, texture, length, ornamentation, and color
according to each species (Anaktototy et al.,
2021; Kelly et al., 2014). For example, the nest
entrance of Heterotrigona itama (Cockerell,
1918) is funnel-shaped and in Geniotrigona
thoracica (Smith, 1857) is rounded (Kelly et
al., 2014). The internal nest architecture con-
sists of brood cells, honey and pollen pots (Efin
et al., 2019; Franck et al., 2004; Michener,
1974; Sayusti et al., 2021).
The Cycloops Mountains Nature Reserve
(CMNR) located in the Jayapura region of
Papua Province, Indonesia. It is a tropical for-
est area with high biodiversity and ecological
functions that are important for human life.
Human activities in this area have occurred for
a long time that impact the biodiversity, includ-
ing stingless bees. Forest disturbance in CMNR
Indo-Australian. Se han registrado diez especies de abejas sin aguijón en Papua, siete de las cuales son endémi-
cas. La Reserva Natural de las Montañas Cycloop (CMNR) es una de las áreas para la conservación de flora y
la fauna en Papua, Indonesia. Desafortunadamente, el estudio de la diversidad de abejas sin aguijón en Papua
ha sido limitado.
Objetivo: Medir la diversidad, los sitios de anidación y describir la arquitectura y características de entrada al
nido de las abejas sin aguijón.
Métodos: Se observaron los nidos de abejas sin aguijón en reservas naturales y áreas residenciales, mediante el
método de muestreo de caminos e información de la población local, respectivamente. Se estudiaron 22 colonias.
Resultados: Se encontraron dos especies de abejas sin aguijón, Tetragonula sapiens (Cockerell, 1911) y
Heterotrigona (Platytrigona) planifrons (Smith, 1865). Este estudio mostró nuevos registros de distribución de T.
sapiens y H. planifrons en el CMNR. El sitio de anidación de T. sapiens se encontró comúnmente en los cimien-
tos de las casas, mientras que el de H. planifrons estaba en las cavidades de las palmas de coco. La forma de la
entrada al nido de T. sapiens varió: elíptica, ovalada, redondeada, irregular, alargada horizontal o verticalmente.
Mientras tanto, la entrada al de H. planifrons se alarga verticalmente. Las celdas de cría de T. sapiens variaron,
entre verticales, horizontales o semi-racimos, mientras que en H. planifrons eran verticales.
Conclusiones: Se encontraron dos especies de abejas sin aguijón, T. sapiens y H. planifrons, que mostraron nue-
vos registros de distribución y T. sapiens fue una especie dominante en Papúa. La entrada al nido de las especies
varió en forma, color y textura.
Palabras clave: reserva natural montañosa Cycloop; diversidad; características de nido; abejas sin aguijón.
3
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 71: e51166, enero-diciembre 2023 (Publicado May. 16, 2023)
is mainly caused by community socio-econom-
ic activity (Ngutra, 2017). Limited informa-
tion and knowledge are a limiting factor for
the local community. People in Papua haven’t
cultivated yet the stingless bees for producing
honey and propolis. Community knowledge is
key factor affecting stingless bee conservation.
Until now, poor knowledge of taxonomy and
phylogeny of these bees in the studied región
are based for conducting this research. There-
fore, studying the diversity and nests charac-
teristics of stingless bees in the CMNR area
is needed. This study aims to determine the
species richness, characteristics of the nesting
sites, and nest architecture of stingless bees in
the CMNR, Papua, Indoesia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Observation of nest characteristic of
stingless bees: The observations of stingless
bees in the CMNR were conducted at three
locations, namely Maribu village (including
Mount Batu, Dumukribun, Dawari, and Maribu
Kampung), Dosay village (including Kausei
and Dansari), and Kemiri village (including
Kemiri-2 of Forestry Residential) (Table 1).
Nest of stingless bee was documented using a
Nikon D5300 camera. The nest characteristics
at Mount Batu and Dawari were observed by
a road sampling method (Garton et al., 2004).
While in Maribu Kampung, Dosay village, and
Kemiri village, sampling was based on infor-
mation from local people. The nest features
TABLE 1
Study sites and the number of colonies of stingless in Maribu, Dosay, and Kemiri villages of Papua
Maribu Village Coordinate/Altitude (mdpl) Colony
number Species Nesting sites
Gunung Batu
(Dumukribun)
02°27’31.7” S & 140°23’35.8” E/364 1T. sapiens Mountains-coconut tree
Dawari 02°28’47.5” S & 140°21’48.9” E/142 2T. sapiens Local farm-dry wood
02°28’54.1” S & 140°21’43.7” E/126 3Local farm-coconut tree
02°29’05.0” S & 140°21’37.3” E/160 4T. sapiens Local farm-dry wood
02°28’42.1” S & 140°21’47.0” E/133 5T. sapiens Local farm-house foundation
Maribu Kampung 02°29’00.9” S & 140°22’15.8”E/118 6T. sapiens Housing-coconut tree
02°29’06.0” S & 140°22’13.7” E/112 7T. sapiens Housing-coconut tree
02°29’03.6” S & 140°22’16.4” E/122 8T. sapiens Housing-fern tree
02°29’06.5” S & 140°22’12.0” E/109 9T. sapiens Housing-house foundation
02°29’08.5” S & 140°22’09.2” E/112 10 T. sapiens Housing-fern tree
02°29’20.3” S & 140°22’05.1”E/80 11 T. sapiens Housing-house wall
02°29’11.1” S & 140°22’10.6”E/107 12 T. sapiens Housing-house wall
Dosay Village
Kausei 02°30’42.1” S & 140°24’05.8”E/127 1H. planifrons Local farm-coconut tree
02°30’41.9” S & 140°24’07.3”E/128 2T. sapiens Housing-house foundation
02°30’42.2” S & 140°24’07.4” E/128 3T. sapiens Housing-house foundation
02°30’42.3” S & 140°24’07.5”E/129 4T. sapiens Housing-house foundation
02°30’43.6” S & 140°24’07.8”E/125 5T. sapiens Housing-house foundation
Dansari 02°30’24.8” S & 140°24’29.5”E/140 6T. sapiens Housing-soil
Kemiri Village
Kemiri-2
(Forestry Residential)
02°33’17.8” S & 140°29’06.0”E/117 1T. sapiens Housing-house wall
02°33’10.7” S & 140°29’02.8”E/125 2T. sapiens Housing-house foundation
02°33’11.1” S & 140°29’03.0”E/125 3T. sapiens Housing-house foundation
02°33’11.1” S & 140°29’03.4”E/133 4T. sapiens Housing-house foundation
Total colony (%)
22 21 (95 %) 1 (5 %)
4Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 71: e51166, enero-diciembre 2023 (Publicado May. 16, 2023)
observed were nesting site, nest entrance
measurements (length, diameter, height from
ground), shape, and texture (Dollin et al., 1997;
Kelly et al., 2014). The coordinates of nest-
ing sites were determined using GPS (Garmin
etrex 10).
Collection, preservation, and identifica-
tion of stingless bee specimens: Five indi-
viduals of worker bees from each colony were
collected. The samples were then preserved
using the dry preservation method (Borror et
al., 1989). Samples were stored in bottles and
labeled. Identification of stingless bee speci-
mens were based on Sakagami et al. (1990),
Dollin et al. (1997), Rasmussen et al. (2017),
Engel et al. (2019), and Engel (2019). The
identification was carried out at the Labo-
ratory of Animal Biosystematics and Ecol-
ogy, Department of Biology, IPB University,
Bogor, Indonesia. Then, the specimens were
verified and deposited at the Research Cen-
ter for Ecology and Ethnobiology, Research
and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Cibinong,
West Java, Indonesia.
Data analysis: The t-test analysis was
used to compare the nest entrance variation
within species of T. sapiens, consisting of the
width and height of the nest entrance, funnel
length, and the height from the ground using
Paleontological Statistics version 4.09 (Ham-
mer et al. 2001).
RESULTS
Richness of stingless bee: Two species
of stingless bees were found in the three vil-
lages, namely Tetragonula sapiens and Het-
erotrigona (Platytrigona) planifrons (Fig. 1).
A total of twenty-two colonies were found,
i.e., one in Maribu Village including Gunung
Batu (Dumukribun), four in Dawari, seven in
Maribu Kampung, five in Dosay village and
Kausei, one in Dansari, and five in Kemiri
Village includes the Kemiri-2 of forestry resi-
dential (Table 1). Tetragonula sapiens was the
dominant species (21 colonies; 95 %) found
in all observation sites, while, Heterotrigona
planifrons (one colony; 5 %) was only found in
Kausei village.
Nesting sites: The dominant nesting site
of T. sapiens was in house foundations (nine
colonies, 43 %), followed by coconut tree cavi-
ties (four colonies, 19 %), house walls (three
colonies, 14 %), dry wood (two colonies,
10 %), fern tree (two colonies, 10 %), and
in the soil (one colony, 5 %). The nest of H.
planifrons (one colony) was found in a coconut
tree cavity.
Nest entrance characteristics: The nest
entrance tunnel of T. sapiens varied, being
horizontally elongated (4 colonies), oval (6
colonies), round (2 colonies), irregular (2 col-
onies), ellipses (4 colonies), and vertically
Fig. 1. Worker of two species of stingless bees found in Cycloop Mountains Nature Reserve. A. Tetragonula sapiens and
B. Heterotrigona planifrons.
5
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 71: e51166, enero-diciembre 2023 (Publicado May. 16, 2023)
elongated (2 colonies), while in H. planifrons
it was vertically elongated (1 coloni). The color
of T. sapiens entrances was brown, dark brown,
blackish, light brown with grayish on the tube-
end, brownish-gray, dark brown, blackish gray
with blackish on the tube-end, with hard to soft
textures. In H. planifrons, the color of the nest
entrance tunnel was light brown with a hard
texture (Fig. 2). The nest entrance opening of
H. planifrons was 5.5 cm in height and 7.5 cm
in wide, while in T. sapiens ranged 0.6-3 cm
in height and 0-3.5 cm in wide (Table 2). The
differences in the diameter of the nest entrance
opening in T. sapiens and H. planifrons may
be due to differences in body size, colony size,
and nest age. In Dosay-Kausei villages, we
found the vertically elongated nest entrance of
H. planifrons with characteristics was 2.0 cm in
width and 5.5 cm in height, light brown color,
7.5 cm of funnel length, and no ornamenta-
tion (Fig. 2) with a thick and hard-texture in
tube-end, respectively and the nest height from
ground was 162 cm (0-325 cm) (Table 2).
Nest architecture: The brood cells of T.
sapiens in three villages (four colonies) were
a vertically cluster, horizontally cluster, and
semi-cluster. The brood cells were connected
to other cells by lamellate pillar structures (Fig.
3, Table 3). The brood cells were oval in shape
Fig. 2. Types of nesting entrance opening of T. sapiens in Maribu, Dosay, and Kemiri villages. A.-D. elongated horizontal
with dark brown, blackish and slightly blackish gray on tube-end. E.-J. oval with brown, blackish brown, light brown on
tube end, blackish gray, and brownish black. K.-L. round with dark brown. M.-N. irregular with dark brown and brownish
gray. O.-R. ellipses with brown, dark brown, and blackish gray. S. Elongated vertically with dark brown. T. elongated
vertical with light brown hard texture in H. planifrons. Scale = 1 cm).
6Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 71: e51166, enero-diciembre 2023 (Publicado May. 16, 2023)
TABLE 3
Nest architecture of T. sapiens and H. planifrons (Modification of Wille & Michener, 1973; Dollin, et al., 1997).
Atribut T. sapiens H. (P. ) planifrons
Maribu Village Kemiri Village Dosay Village
Nest characteristics Colony 2 Colony 5 Colony 10 Colony 22 Colony 13
Entrance tunnel shape horizontal wide horizontal wide vertical elongated horizontal wide vertical elongated
Entrance width (cm) 1.6 2 0.8 2.1 2
Entrance height (cm) 0.6 1 2.6 1 5.5
Funnel length (cm) 1 0 4.7 3.5 7.5
Funnel texture hard hard hard hard hard
Pollen pot space length (cm) 7.5 11.9 12.3 11.2 73
Pollen pot diameter (cm) 0.6-0.8 0.6-1 0.5-0.9 0.8-1.6 5.2-6.8
Pollen pot shape irregular* irregular* irregular* irregular* irregular*
Pollen pot color black dark brown brown dark brown black brown
Honey pot space length (cm) 15.5 4.8 11.5 11 30
Honey pot diameter (cm) 0.6-0.9 0.7-0.9 0.7-1.1 0.6-1.2 5.1-6.9
Honey pot shape irregular* irregular* irregular* irregular* irregular*
Honey pot color black dark brown blackish brown dark brown black brown
Length of pollen pot space +
honey pot space (cm)
18 12.3 25.9 22.2 103
Nest space length (cm) 44 18.6 50 52 143
Brood cells
Arrangement vertical cluster semi-cluster vertical cluster horizontal cluster layer vertical comb
Room length (cm) 26.6 13.5 23.3 32.2 40
Cell height (cm) 0.31-0.36 0.26-0.31 0.3-0.4 0.39-0.44 1.58-2.22
Cell width (cm) 0.19-0.26 0.17-0.22 0.04-0.05 0.21-0.30 0.55-0.62
Shape oval oval oval oval oval
Color light cream-
blackish brown
light cream-
blackish brown
light cream-
blackish brown
light cream-
blackish brown
cream-
dark brown
Pillar columnar columnar columnar lamellate columnar lamellate
Nesting habitat
Substratum (nesting site) dry wood dry wood fern stem house foundation coconut tree
Height from ground surface (cm) 290 70 91 15 162
* round, oval, and ellipse coincide with each other.
TABLE 2
The average of nest entrance characteristics of stingless bees in Maribu, Dosay, and Kemiri villages of Papua.
Species,
Nest locations
Nest entrance
Width (cm) Height (cm) Tube length (cm) Height from
ground surface (cm)
M R SD M R SD M R SD M R SD
T. sapiens
Maribu (n=11) 1.43a0.6-2.4 0.54 1.54a0.6-2.9 0.75 1.24a0-4.7 1.54 118.6ab 0-325 120
Dosay (n=5) 2.14a1.4-2.8 0.53 1.76a1.1-3 0.74 2.02a0.2-3.4 1.24 9.3a1-25 10.2
Kemiri (n=4) 1.92a0.8-2.9 0.86 1.27a0.7-2.5 0.82 1.9a0.1-3.5 1.75 27a8-63 24.6
H. planifrons
Dosay (n=1) 2 2 0 5.5 5.5 0 7.5 7.5 0 162 162 0
Note: M=Mean; R=Range; SD=Standard deviation; Different letters in the same column indicate a significant difference
between the means based on the t-test.
7
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 71: e51166, enero-diciembre 2023 (Publicado May. 16, 2023)
and light brown in color (brood cells with adult
larvae) and dark brown (brood cells with young
larvae). The pollen pots of T. sapiens were
irregular (0.5-1.1 cm in width and 7.5-12.3 cm
in length) with brown, dark brown, and black
colors. The honey pots had an irregular shape
(0.6-1.2 cm in width) and were dark brown,
blackish, and black. The nest heights of T.
sapiens from ground level ranged from 15 to
290 cm (Table 3).
In Dosay-Kausei village, the brood cells
of H. planifrons had a vertically elongated with
a layered vertical comb with a lamellate pillar
structure that connect it to the tree trunk. The
brood cells of the species was oval in shape,
light brown (old cells) and dark brown (young
cells), with height ranging from 1.58-2.22 cm
and a width of 0.55-0.62 cm (Fig. 3). The pol-
len pots were irregular, while the honey pots
were an irregular shape with blackish (Table 3).
DISCUSSION
Morphologically, stingless bees are dif-
ficult to identify (Sakagami & Inoue, 1985).
The current study identified two species as
Tetragonula sapiens (Australasian stingless
bee) and Heterotrigona (Platytrigona) plani-
frons (Papuasian stingless bee). This study
added a new distribution record for T. sapiens
and H. planifrons in Papua, specifically in the
CMNR area of Jayapura Regency. Previous
studies reported T. sapiens was distributed in
the Solomon islands and Papua New Guinea
(Dollin et al., 1997), while H. planifrons has
been reported from the Central Mamberamo
District, Bovendigul District, Merauke Dis-
trict, Manokwari of Papua, and in the Bulolo
District, Morobe, and Oro Provinces of Papua
New Guinea (Engel, 2019). Previous studies
in Papua reported four species of Tetragonula,
namely T. fuscobalteata (Cameron, 1908), T.
sapiens (Cockerell, 1911) (Dollin et al., 1997),
T. clypearis (Friese, 1908), and T. biroi (Friese,
1898) (The Papua Insect Foundation, 2008),
and four species of Heterotrigona, namely
H. planifrons (Smith, 1865), H. lamingto-
nia (Cockerell, 1929), H. flaviventris (Friese,
1908) and H. keyensis (Friese, 1901) (Engel et
al., 2019; Engel, 2019).
The nesting sites of stingless bee are usu-
ally in a tree cavity, soil, and hollow walls
(Slaa et al., 2000). Some species, such as of the
genera Tetragonula, Tetragonisca, Partamona,
Paratrigona, and Plebeia build nests on tree
trunks or solid substrates (Roubik, 2006). In
this study, we found that the nesting site of
T. sapiens was dominatly in house founda-
tion (9 colonies), followed by coconut trees (4
colonies), house walls (3 colonies), dry wood
(2 colonies), fern trees (2 colonies), and soil
(1 colony). In contrast, the nesting site of H.
planifrons was in a coconut tree cavities. The
limited nesting sites of H. planifrons (1 colony
found) may be a result of burning the nest due
to their aggressive biting.
The nests of aggressive stingless bees
are usually found individually in specific tree
Fig. 3. The internal nest architecture of four colonies of T. sapiens in Maribu, Dosay, and Kemiri villages, Papau: A.-B.
vertical cluster, C. semi-cluster, D. horizontal cluster, and E. layered vertical comb in H. planifrons (insert for detail).
ne=nest entrance, bc=brood cells, pc=pollen cells, hc=honey cells, lp=lamellate pillars. Scale=1cm.
8Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 71: e51166, enero-diciembre 2023 (Publicado May. 16, 2023)
trunks, such as palm trees (Roubik, 2006).
Meanwhile, the nests of non-aggressive sting-
less bee colonies are generally close to other
stingless bee species (Roubik, 1983). The cur-
rent study found more colonies building nests
close-together in sap-producing trees, such
as Psidium or cashew (Anacardium occiden-
tale: Anacardiaceae), merbau (Intsia bijuga:
Fabaceae), mango (Mangifera indica: Anacar-
diaceae), jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus:
Moraceae), and wood milk (Alstonia scholaris:
Apocynaceae). Resin in the nest entrance pro-
tects the colony from predators (Roubik, 2006).
The texture of the nest entrance is related to the
various resins collected from gummy plants.
Variation in the nest entrance is influenced by
nest age, genetics, predators, parasites, sym-
bionts, rain, wind, and light (Sakagami et al.,
1983; Wille & Michener, 1973). This study
found a pronged and a branched nest entrance
of T. sapiens in Maribu village. A branching
nest entrance has also been found in Lepido-
trigona ventralis (Smith, 1857) (in Thailand),
Lepidotrigona, Plebeia, Scaptotrigona, and
Tetragona (Roubik, 2006).
The results showed that the nest entrance
of T. sapiens was a short funnel, whereas in
H. planifrons it was an elongated. Unfortunat-
ley, we only found one colony of the species
and no variation of nest entrance character-
istics was shown. We suppost that there are
variation of the nest entrance characteristics
in the species. So, more exploration in a wide
areas in Papua should be done in the future.
Nest entrances with a short funnel are usu-
ally found in stingless bees of the Neotropics
(T. cilipes) and Asia (T. collina). Similarly, an
elongated nest entrance was also found in two
Asian stingless bees with aggressive behavior,
namely H. canifrons and H. itama (Sakagami
et al., 1983). The color and texture of the nest
entrances of T. sapiens varied, such as brown,
dark brown, blackish, cream (grayish on the
tube-end), brownish, brownish-black, black-
ish gray (blackish on the tube-end), with a
hard and soft texture. In H. planifrons (Smith,
1865), the color of nest entrance is light brown
with a hard texture. The color variation of
the nest entrance may be due to the different
resin sources (Sakagami et al., 1983; Wille &
Michener, 1973). Nest entrance variation in
T. sapiens may be related to polyphenism, in
which two or more phenotypes result from the
same genotype (Mayr, 1963). Polyphenism is
influenced by environmental conditions that
cause phenotypic preferences in neurochemical
and hormonal pathways related to nest-building
behavior (Simpson et al., 2011).
The brood cells of T. sapiens are con-
nected by a columnar lamellate pillar (Fig. 3,
Table 3), oval shape and light- and dark-brown,
while the pollen and honey pots were irregular,
probably an adaptation to substrate types. The
modification of nest architecture in stingless
bees is closely related to the adaptability of a
species to its environment. Species with high
intraspecific and phenotypic variations are usu-
ally more adaptive to environmental changes
than endemic species with low intraspecific
variations and limited distribution in certain
geographic area (Cohet et al., 1980; Lavergne
& Molofsky, 2007). In this study, T. sapiens
found in all sampling sites with various nest
entrance characters and able to live at varying
altitudes (107-364 m.a.s.l). In contrast, H. plan-
ifrons showed a limited distribution, at just one
sampling site at an altitude of 127 m.a.s.l. The
observations and interviews with local com-
munities at West Sentani to Sentani districts
showed H. planifrons had a limited distribution
and was only found in the Dosay village.
Ethical statement: the authors declare
that they all agree with this publication and
made significant contributions; that there is no
conflict of interest of any kind; and that we fol-
lowed all pertinent ethical and legal procedures
and requirements. All financial sources are
fully and clearly stated in the acknowledge-
ments section. A signed document has been
filed in the journal archives.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We acknowledge to PT Freeport Indonesia
for funding this research and head of Cycloops
9
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 71: e51166, enero-diciembre 2023 (Publicado May. 16, 2023)
Mountains Nature Reserve for allowing the
authors to conduct this research. We also thank
Laboratory of Entomology, Research Can-
ter for Ecology and Ethnobiology, National
Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN) for
verified stingless bee specimens.
REFERENCES
Anaktototy, Y., Priawandiputra, W., Sayusti, T., Lamerka-
bel, J. S. A., & Raffiudin, R. (2021). Morphology
and morphometric variation of stingless bees in the
Moluccas, Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Entomo-
logy, 18(1), 10–22.
Atmowidi, T., Buchori, D., Suryobroto, B., & Hidayat,
P. (2007). Diversity of pollinator insect in relation
of seed set of mustard (Brassica rapa L.; Crucife-
rae). Hayati Journal of Bioscience, 14(4), 155–161.
https://doi.org/10.4308/hjb.14.4.155.
Atmowidi, T., Prawasti, T. S., Rianti, P., Prasojo, F. A., &
Pradipta, N. B. (2022). Stingless Bees Pollination
Increases Fruit Formation of Strawberry (Fragaria
x annanassa Duch) and Melon (Cucumis melo L.).
Tropical Life Sciences Research, 33(1), 43–54.
Borror, D. J., Triplehorn, C. A., & Johnson, N. F. (1989). An
introduction to the study of insects (7th Ed). Saunders
College Publishing.
Cohet, Y., Vouidibio, J., & David, J. R. (1980). Thermal
tolerance and geographic distribution: A comparison
of cosmopolitan and tropical endemic Drosophila
species. Journal of Thermal Biology, 5(2), 69–74.
Dollin, A. E., Dollin, L. J., & Sakagami, S. F. (1997). Aus-
tralian stingless bees of the genus Trigona (Hyme-
noptera: Apidae). Invertebrate Taxonomy, 11(1997),
861–896.
Efin, A., Atmowidi, T., & Prawasti, S. T. (2019). Morpho-
logical characteristics and morphometric of stingless
bee (Apidae: Hymenoptera) from Banten Province,
Indonesia. Biodiversitas, 20(6), 1693–1698.
Engel, M. S. (2019). Notes on Papuasian and Male-
sian stingless bees, with the descriptions of new
taxa (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Journal of Melittology,
88(2019), 1–25.
Engel, M. S., Kahono, S., & Peggie, D. (2019). A key to the
genera and subgenera of stingless bees in Indonesia
(Hymenoptera: Apidae). Treubia, 45(2019), 65–84.
Franck, P., Cameron, E. G., Rasplus, Y., & Oldroyd, B. P.
(2004). Nest architecture and genetic differentiation
in a species complex of Australian stingless bees.
Molecular Ecology, 13(8), 2317–2331.
Garton, O. G., Ratti, J. T., & Giudice, J. H. (2004).
Research and experimental design. In C. Braun (Ed.),
Techniques For Wildlife Investigations and Manage-
ment (pp. 1–3). The Wildlife Society, Bethesda MD.
Preprint.
Hammer, O., Harper, D. A. T., & Ryan, P. D. (2001). PAST:
Palaeontological Statistic software package for edu-
cation and data analysis ver 4.09. Palaeontologia
Electronica, 4(1), 9.
Kahono, S. (2015). Pengembangan model perlebahan LIPI
untuk edukasi, ekoturisme, dan produksi yang dapat
diimplementasikan kepada masyarakat. Lembaga
Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia.
Kahono, S., Chantawannakul, P., & Engel, M. S. (2018).
Social bees and the current status of beekeeping in
Indonesia. In P. Chantawannakul, G. Williams, &
P. Neumann (Eds.), Asian beekeeping in the 21st
century (pp. 287–306). Springer Verlag. https://doi.
org/10.1007/978-981-10-8222-1_13.
Kelly, N., Farisya, M. S. N., Kumara, T. K., & Marcela,
P. (2014). Species diversity and external nest cha-
racteristics of stingless bees in Meliponiculture.
Pertanika Journal Tropical Agricultural Science,
37(3), 293–298.
Lavergne, S., & Molofsky, J. (2007). Increased genetic
variation and evolutionary potential drive the success
of an invasive grass. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences, 104(10), 3883–3888.
Mayr, E. (1963). Animal species and evolution. Harvard
University Press.
Michener, C. D. (1974). The social behavior of the bees: A
comparative study. Harvard University Press.
Michener, C. D. (2000). The bees of the world (1st Ed). The
Johns Hopkins University.
Michener, C. D. (2007). The bees of the world, (2nd Ed).
The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Ngutra, N. R. (2017). Model pengembangan ekonomi
lokal masyarakat dalam rangka pelestarian kawasan
Cagar Alam Pegunungan Cycloop Jayapura Papua
(Masters thesis). Institut Pertanian Bogor University,
Bogor. Indonesia.
Rasmussen, C. (2008). Catalog of the Indo-Malayan/
Australasian stingless bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae:
Meliponini). Zootaxa, 1935(1), 1–80. https://doi.
org/10.11646/zootaxa.1935.1.1
Rasmussen, C., & Cameron, S. A. (2007). A molecu-
lar phylogeny of the Old World stingless bees
(Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponini) and the
non-monophyly of the large genus Trigona. Sys-
tematic Entomology, 32(1), 26–39. https://doi.
org/10.1111/j.1365-3113.2006.00362.x
10 Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 71: e51166, enero-diciembre 2023 (Publicado May. 16, 2023)
Rasmussen, C., Thomas, C. J., & Engel, S. M. (2017).
A new genus of eastern hemisphere stingless bees
(Hymenoptera: Apidae), with a key to the supraspeci-
fic groups of Indomalayan and Australasian Melipo-
nini. American Museum Novitates, 3888(3888), 1–33.
Roubik, D. W. (1983). Nest and colony characteristics of
stingless bee from Panama. Journal of the Kansas
Entomological Society, 56(3), 327–355.
Roubik, D. W. (2006). Stingless bee nesting biology. Api-
dologie, 37(2), 124–143.
Sakagami, S. F., Inoue, T., Yamane, S., & Salmah, S.
(1983). Nest architecture and colony composition
of the Sumatran stingless bee Trigona (Tetragonula)
laeviceps. Kontyû, 51(1), 100–111.
Sakagami, S. F., & Inoue, T. (1985). Taxonomic notes
on three bicolorous Tetragonula stingless bees in
Southeast Asia. Kontyû, 53(1), 174–189.
Sakagami, S. F., Inoue, T., & Salmah, S. (1990). Stin-
gless bees of central Sumatra. In S. F. Sakagami, R.
Ohgushi, & D. W. Roubik (Eds.), Natural history of
social wasps and bees in Equatorial Sumatra (pp.
125–137). Hokkaido University Press.
Sayusti, T., Raffiudin, R., & Kahono, S. (2021). Stingless
bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in South and West
Sulawesi, Indonesia: Morphology, nest structure,
and molecular characteristics. Journal of Apicultural
Research, 60(1), 143–156.
Simpson, S. J., Sword, G. A., & Lo, N. (2011). Pholype-
nism in insects. Current Biology, 21(18), 738–749.
Slaa, E. J., Sanchez, L. A., Sandi, M., & Salazar, W. (2000).
A scientific note on the use of stingless bees for
commercial pollination in enclosures. Apidologie,
31(1), 141–142.
The Papua Insects Foundation. (2008). Taxonomic and fau-
nistic overviews on the insect species living in Papua
and West-Papua (Indonesian New Guinea). https://
www.papua-insects.nl
Wille, A., & Michener, C. D. (1973). The nest architecture
of the stingless bee with special reference to those
of Costa Rica. Revista de Biología Tropical, 21(1),
1–278.