3
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 71 (S1): e54882, abril 2023 (Publicado Abr. 30, 2023)
invertebrates graze on algae and reduce its cov-
erage so that the algae do not compete with cor-
als for space and resources (Burkepile & Hay,
2010; Hixon & Bronstoff, 1996; Hughes et al.,
2017; Humphries et al., 2014). Invertebrate-
eating fish protect the colonies from corallivo-
rous invertebrates, and predatory piscivorous
fish maintain healthy balances of reef species
by controlling the populations of coral preda-
tors and bio-eroding herbivores (Hixon, 1997).
One of the most important contributing
factors to supporting cryptofauna is the health
of the coral itself. Live corals have greater
diversity and abundance of fish than dead
corals (Bell & Galzin, 1984). Bleached cor-
als have less abundance and fewer species of
cryptic fauna than healthy corals (Tsuchiya,
1999). On dead coral, there is an initial increase
in biodiversity as boring invertebrates colo-
nize the exposed carbonate skeleton, which
is unprotected by the coral’s stinging polyps
(Enochs, 2012). This diversity is not sustained,
however, as eventually the skeleton is eroded,
and with it, the structural complexity sustains
the biodiversity of a living coral reef (Enochs
& Manzello, 2012a).
Coral restoration is essential to the facili-
tation and acceleration of natural successional
processes through the reintroduction and man-
agement of key species (Horoszowski-Fridman
& Rinkevich, 2017; Horoszowski-Fridman et
al., 2015; Walker, et al., 2007; Young, 2001).
Thus, the best sites for coral reef restoration are
those sites where corals previously flourished
but where they are unlikely to settle and grow
under the current conditions (Rinkevich, 2005).
Likewise, the best candidates for species to
be transplanted are those that might not colo-
nize the restoration area unassisted (Society
for Ecological Restoration International Sci-
ence & Policy Working Group [SER], 2004).
Pocillopora coral is a good candidate for reef
restoration in that their branched skeletons
create conditions that allow other organisms
to colonize an area where they previously
lacked habitat (Clark & Edwards, 1994; Dar-
ling et al., 2012).
Except for a survey of coral borers (Fon-
seca & Cortés, 1998), no published survey
information exists that describes the species
of cryptic fauna associated with Pocillopora
in Golfo Dulce. However, the coral-associ-
ated fauna expected to be present can be
predicted from surveys conducted in other
reefs in the Eastern Tropical Pacific (ETP)
including Bahía Culebra, Costa Rica (Alvarado
& Vargas-Castillo, 2012; Salas-Moya et al.,
2021), Uva Island in Panama (Abele & Pat-
ton, 1976; Glynn, 1980; Glynn, 2013; Gotelli
& Abele, 1983; Gotelli et al., 1985), and the
Pacific coast of Mexico (Hernández et al.,
2009; Hernández et al., 2013). The species
composition of ichthyofauna of Golfo Dulce
is similar to but statistically different from that
of the rest of the Pacific coast of Costa Rica
(Alvarado et al., 2014).
The timing of recruitment of the associated
fauna onto a coral colony appears to also be of
importance for the reef’s survival and health.
For example, it is known that some cryptic
fauna is recruited to corals quickly and begin to
reduce the effects of sedimentation and provide
protection from predation (Glynn, 2013; Stew-
art et al., 2006). This is particularly important
for juvenile corals compared to larger, more
mature corals (Toh et al., 2014). In laboratory
settings, juvenile host corals have higher sur-
vival rates when colonized with juvenile Trape-
zia crabs, which offer the host coral protection
from predation (Rouzé et al., 2014). However,
it is not known when and in what order cryptic
fauna are recruited in coral transplants.
Although non-coral animals such as fish
and invertebrates make up the majority of a
reef’s biomass and diversity (Cortés et al.,
2017; Stella et al., 2011), most studies address-
ing the success of a restoration effort focus on
the growth and survival of the corals them-
selves (Ladd et al., 2019; Stella et al., 2011).
While the corals are critical to forming the
basic structure of coral reefs that allows them
to harbor such great biodiversity, the effect of
reef restoration on the community structure of
coral-associated animals is relatively under-
studied by comparison. Most of the available