1
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 71(S4): e57283, diciembre 2023 (Publicado Nov. 01, 2023)
Migratory destinations of endangered humpback whales,
Megaptera novaeangliae (Cetartiodactyla: Balaenopteridae), from El Salvador
Nicola Ransome1, 2, 3*; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3130-3966
Melvin G. Castaneda1, 2; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7559-1042
Ted Cheeseman4, 5; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5805-2431
John Calambokidis6; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5028-7172
Fred Sharpe7; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6256-5547
1. Proyecto Megaptera El Salvador, Los Cóbanos, Sonsonate, El Salvador; melvingiocastaneda@gmail.com
2. Fundación Naturaleza El Salvador, San Salvador, El Salvador; fundanaturaleza@gmail.com
3. Harry Butler Institute, Environmental and Conservation Sciences, College of Science, Health, Engineering and
Education, Murdoch University, Western Australia, Australia; nicola.ransome@murdoch.edu.au (*Correspondence).
4. Marine Ecology Research Centre, Southern Cross University, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia
5. Happywhale, Santa Cruz, California, US; ted@happywhale.com
6. Cascadia Research Collective, Olympia, Washington, US; calambokidis@cascadiaresearch.org
7. Alaska Whale Foundation, Petersburg, Alaska, US; fsharpe@alaskawhalefoundation.org
Received 31-VII-2022. Corrected 21-III-2023. Accepted 10-IV-2023.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The study of many aspects of cetacean ecology is made possible by identifying individuals through
space and time. Humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) can be easily identified by photographing their
ventral tail flukes’ unique shape and pigmentation patterns. The small and endangered distinct population seg-
ment (DPS) of Central America humpback whales visit El Salvador seasonally each winter; however, dedicated
research has been extremely limited there. Before 2018, only 11 individual whales had been photo-identified, and
the migratory destinations of Salvadoran humpback whales were unknown. In recent years, photo-identification
efforts have increased, and today there are 92 individually identified humpback whales from El Salvador.
Objective: To identify the main high-latitude feeding areas of Salvadoran humpback whales.
Methods: Using the online matching platform Happywhale, Salvadoran whales were matched via automated
image recognition to a global humpback whale fluke photo-identification catalog of 66 043 individuals.
Results: In total, 80 (87.0 %) of the whales photographed in El Salvador were matched to individuals seen in
North Pacific feeding areas. Sighting histories of Salvadoran whales resighted in feeding areas ranged from two
to 29 years (average = 12.1, SD = 5.8). While we note that survey effort was likely very different between regions,
the main feeding area of Salvadoran humpback whales on Happywhale was Central California (n = 70, 76.1 %).
Of these whales, 21 (22.8 %) had also been sighted in Southern California, while just three (3.3 %) individual
whales were registered only in Southern California. Additionally, two whales (2.2 %) were sighted in Southern
British Columbia, Canada, and one whale was matched to a humpback whale from Southeast Alaska. This whale
(of unknown sex) has a sighting history of 27 years but no prior documentation in a breeding area and is the
first published sighting of a Southeast Alaskan humpback whale in the breeding area of the endangered Central
America DPS.
Conclusions: Our study shows that while Salvadoran humpback whales were matched to various feeding areas in
the Eastern North Pacific, their primary migratory destinations are in Southern and Central California.
https://doi.org/10.15517/rev.biol.trop..v71iS4.57283
SUPPLEMENT • WHALES
2Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 71(S4): e57283, diciembre 2023 (Publicado Nov. 01, 2023)
INTRODUCTION
The humpback whale, Megaptera novae-
angliae (Borowski, 1781) is a large migratory
baleen whale with a cosmopolitan distribution,
that typically migrates long distances between
high-latitude summer feeding areas and low-
latitude winter breeding areas (Dawbin, 1966).
Their extensive annual migrations can be over
16 000 km round trips (Rasmussen et al., 2007;
Stone et al., 1990), and therefore humpback
whales of many worldwide populations will
travel through the territorial waters of multiple
countries each year. This creates challenges for
developing management strategies for endan-
gered and recovering populations and means
understanding migratory patterns and connec-
tions is critical for conservation. To aid with
management, in 2016 the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) of
the US government identified 14 main breeding
regions of humpback whales for a worldwide
status review, which they defined as having
distinct population segments (DPSs) that visit
to breed and calve each year; nine of these were
classified as “Not at Risk, one as “Threatened,
and only four as “Endangered” (Bettridge,
2015). The list of endangered DPSs included
the Central America DPS of the North Pacific
humpback whale, which was described as small
and genetically distinct, and considered to be at
moderate risk of extinction (Bettridge, 2015).
Key words: large whale conservation; endangered populations; migratory species; critical habitat protection;
Central America distinct population segment.
RESUMEN
Destinos migratorios de ballenas jorobadas en peligro de extinción, Megaptera novaeangliae
(Cetartiodactyla: Balaenopteridae), del El Salvador
Introducción: El estudio de muchos aspectos de la ecología de los cetáceos es posible gracias a la identificación de
individuos a través del espacio y el tiempo. Las ballenas jorobadas (Megaptera novaeangliae) se pueden identificar
fácilmente al fotografiar la forma única de la aleta caudal y el patrón de pigmentación de su lado ventral. Una parte
del segmento de población distinta (DPS), pequeña y en peligro de extinción de las ballenas jorobadas de América
Central visita estacionalmente cada invierno El Salvador, sin embargo, la investigación ha sido extremadamente
limitada. Antes del 2018, solo existían imágenes de identificación de 11 ballenas individuales, y se desconocía el
destino migratorio de las ballenas jorobadas salvadoreñas. En los últimos años, los esfuerzos de foto-identifica-
ción han aumentado, y hoy en día hay 92 ballenas jorobadas identificadas individualmente en El Salvador.
Objetivo: Identificar las principales áreas de alimentación en latitudes altas de las ballenas jorobadas salvadoreñas.
Métodos: Utilizando la plataforma en línea Happywhale, las aletas caudales de las ballenas de El Salvador fueron
comparadas a través del reconocimiento automático de imágenes con un catálogo global de foto-identificación
de 66 043 individuos.
Resultados: En total, 80 (87.0 %) de las ballenas fotografiadas en El Salvador se compararon con individuos vistos
en las áreas de alimentación del Pacífico Norte. El historial de re-avistamientos de ballenas salvadoreñas en áreas
de alimentación fluctó de dos a 29 años (promedio = 12.1, d.e. = 5.8). La principal zona de alimentación para las
ballenas jorobadas salvadoreñas fue el centro de California (n = 70, 76.1 %). De estas ballenas, 21 (22.8 %) tam-
bién se habían avistado en el sur de California. Solo tres ballenas se habían visto (3.3 %) únicamente en el sur de
California. Dos ballenas jorobadas (2.2 %) fueron avistadas en el sur de la Columbia Británica, Canadá, y lo más
importante, una fue identificada como una ballena jorobada del sureste de Alaska. Esta ballena de sexo descono-
cido tiene un historial de avistamientos de 27 años, pero sin documentación previa en un área de reproducción.
Este es el primer avistamiento publicado de una ballena jorobada del sudeste de Alaska en el DPS en peligro de
extinción de América Central, y tal vez sea particularmente importante por razones de manejo.
Conclusiones: Este estudio encuentra que aunque las ballenas jorobadas que llegan a El Salvador se observan
en varias localidades del Pacifico norte, su migración tiene como destino principal las aguas del Pacifico sur y
central de California.
Palabras clave: conservación de ballenas; poblaciones en peligro; especies migratorias; protección de hábitat
crítico; Segmento Poblacional Distinto de Central America.
3
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 71(S4): e57283, diciembre 2023 (Publicado Nov. 01, 2023)
The study of many aspects of cetacean
ecology is made possible by identifying indi-
viduals through space and time. Humpback
whales can be easily identified by their ventral
tail flukes’ unique shape and pigmentation pat-
terns (Katona & Whitehead, 1981). For the last
five decades, photographic identification (e.g.
photo-identification) of humpback whales and
collaboration between international researchers
has allowed for a growing understanding of the
movements and migrations of humpback whale
populations globally (Calambokidis et al., 2000,
Calambokidis et al., 2001, Calambokidis et
al., 2008; Cheeseman et al., 2021) However,
worldwide there remain a few areas of seasonal
habitat of the species where research has not
been initiated. One such place was the Central
American country of El Salvador, considered
part of the breeding area of the Central Amer-
ica DPS. Whilst cetacean research was growing
worldwide, El Salvador was in the midst of civil
war, and dedicated cetacean surveying was
extremely limited. Prior to 2018, only 11 indi-
vidual humpback whales’ fluke identification
images existed, and therefore the migratory
destinations of Salvadoran humpback whales
were unknown. Increased photo-identification
efforts began in the Pacific waters in 2018, and
dedicated cetacean surveying was initiated in
2020. Here we present, for the first time, migra-
tory connections of a significant number of
Salvadoran humpback whales to North Pacific
feeding areas, to aid in international manage-
ment decisions and planning for the endan-
gered Central America DPS.
Between 1999 and 2006, 11 photo-iden-
tification images of humpback whales were
collected in the Pacific waters of El Salvador as
part of Cascadia Research Collective research
efforts throughout Central America (Calam-
bokidis et al., 2008, Rasmussen et al., 2012). In
2006, a small whale-watching industry began
in Los Cóbanos, Sonsonate, El Salvador (Cas-
taneda et al., 2021). In 2018, these tourism trips
were then used as a research platform. Data
collected included photo-identification images
of humpback whales, Global Positioning Sys-
tem (GPS) tracks, and basic environmental
data (sea state, water temperature, cloud cover
and visibility). In total, over 33 whale watch
trips were conducted which resulted in over
109 hours of surveying, and 10 new photo-
identification images. In 2020, 10 dedicated
cetacean surveys were completed, involving 64
hours of surveying, encountering five groups
of humpback whales and identifying seven
individuals. In 2021, 41 research surveys were
completed, of a total of 129 hours of surveys, 54
humpback whale groups were encountered, and
49 unique photo-identification images were
collected. Since 2019, an additional 15 photo-
identification images have also been collected
on whale watch trips in the region.
All unique photo-identification images of
individual humpback whales were uploaded
to the research collaboration and citizen sci-
ence web platform Happywhale (www.happy-
whale.com). Individual whales were matched
via automated image recognition to a global
humpback whale fluke photo-identification
catalog of 66 043 individuals, of which 27 536
were identified in the North Pacific Ocean
(Cheeseman et al., 2021). Images were matched
with an expected accuracy of 97–99 % of
potential matches found, match results were
manually confirmed, and unmatched individu-
als with fluke identification photos of sufficient
quality were considered new to the dataset and
given an ID number. Great-circle distances
between sighting locations of matched whales
were then calculated using the methodology of
Bowditch (1994).
Overall, 92 individual humpback whales
have been identified in El Salvador between
1999–2021 during the boreal winter months,
December through March. Via Happywhale, 80
(87.0 %) of the humpback whales photographed
in El Salvador were matched to individuals seen
in North Pacific feeding areas. No matches
were made to areas outside of the North Pacif-
ic. Sighting histories of Salvadoran humpback
whales resighted in feeding areas ranged from
two to 29 years (average = 12.1, sd = 5.8).
The main feeding area where whales
were resighted was Central California (n = 70,
76.1 %). Of these whales, 21 (22.8 %) had also
4Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 71(S4): e57283, diciembre 2023 (Publicado Nov. 01, 2023)
been sighted in Southern California. While only
three (3.3 %) individually identified humpback
whales were documented in just Southern Cali-
fornia, and in no other feeding area. In total, 16
whales (17.4 %) had been sighted in Northern
California, of which seven (8.8 %) had also
been sighted in the centre of the state and five
(6.3 %) in both Central California and South-
ern California. Two humpback whales (2.2 %)
were sighted in Southern British Columbia,
Canada, and most significantly, one individual
photographed in El Salvador in 2021, was iden-
tified as a humpback whale that has been docu-
mented feeding in Southeast Alaska (SEAK)
in multiple years (Fig. 1). In fact, this whale of
unknown sex and named SEAK-5011, has been
sighted five times over 27 years in SEAK, span-
ning four decades, being photographed in 1994,
2004 and 2021. Prior to 2021, SEAK–5011 had
not been documented in a breeding area. On
5 February 2021, SEAK–5011 was seen in a
group of two adult whales, near Los Cóbanos,
Sonsonate, El Salvador. That same year but
after 196 days, SEAK– 5011 was photographed
in SEAK on the 20 August 2021, followed by
another nearby sighting on 26 August 2021.
Both feeding area observations were made in
Frederick Sound, SEAK, and a minimum great-
circle distance between the sightings from El
Salvador and SEAK was calculated as approxi-
mately 6 100 km.
Previous studies have shown that hump-
back whales from the Central America DPS
predominantly feed in the coastal waters of
California (Calambokidis et al., 2000, Calam-
bokidis et al., 2008; Rasmussen et al., 2012;
Steiger et al., 1991). Our results support this
finding with 83.7 % (77/92 whales) of whales
photographed in El Salvador being matched to
images taken in the waters of California, and
Fig. 1. Migratory connections of humpback whales from El Salvador. Numbers in arrows represent the number of individual
whales matched between locations. Photo inset is of humpback whale SEAK–5011. CA= California, WA= Washington state
(US), BC= British Columbia (Canada), SEAK = Southeast Alaska.
5
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 71(S4): e57283, diciembre 2023 (Publicado Nov. 01, 2023)
suggest that Southern and Central California
are likely the most important feeding areas of
humpback whales that winter in El Salvador.
Our analysis found that nearly all Salvadorian
humpback whales registered in Southern Cali-
fornia (87.5 %, 21/24 whales) were also seen
feeding in Central California. These results
could be interpreted as implying the Southern
California region is a transitory area to pre-
ferred feeding areas further north, rather than
the terminal end of migration. However, we
note that Happywhale effort is far greater in
Central California (Author, Ted Cheeseman,
Unpublished data), and also the possible source
of these results.
The presence of humpback whales of the
Central America DPS throughout the Califor-
nia feeding areas has particular significance to
regional fishing regulations and management.
Entanglement of humpback whales in gear of
the California Dungeness crab pot fishery has
increased at an alarming rate since 2014 (Lebon
& Kelly, 2019), and has been demonstrated to
reduce survivorship, particularly for juvenile
humpback whales (Tackaberry et al., 2022).
Large whales may travel thousands of kilome-
ters carrying fishing gear and be entangled for
many months, even years (Cassoff et al., 2011),
and mulitple entangled humpback whales have
been encountered in El Salvador (Castaneda et
al., 2022). In the US, the species is protected
under the Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA) and Endangered Species Act (ESA).
The continued documentation of the seasonal
presence of the endangered Central America
DPS in coastal California, an area where entan-
glement rates are high and increasing (Lebon &
Kelly, 2019), should be a critical consideration
for the future management of regional fisheries.
Our results also support previous findings
(Calambokidis et al., 2000, Calambokidis et
al., 2008), that a small number of humpback
whales from the Central America DPS may
be present in the more northern North Pacific
feeding areas of Washington State (US) and
British Columbia (Canada). Although match-
ing attempts of humpback whale catalogs
between North Pacific feeding areas and the
Central America DPS has been occurring since
the 1990s (Calambokidis et al., 2000, Calam-
bokidis et al., 2008; Rasmussen et al., 2012; Stei-
ger et al., 1991), this is the first published report
of a humpback whale photographed between
Central America and SEAK. This has relevance
for the management and protection of the
SEAK feeding region of humpback whales. As
part of the final rule of the Endangered Species
Act published in April 2021, the United States
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)
recently delisted SEAK for humpback whales,
stating that it was not ‘Critical Habitat’ for any
of the endangered or threatened North Pacific
DPSs. SEAK humpback whales are most com-
monly matched to the Hawaiian Archipelago
(Calambokidis et al., 2008), a breeding region
of a DPS classified as “Not at Risk” (Bet-
tridge et al., 2015). The recapture of just one
whale between SEAK to the endangered Cen-
tral America DPS does not negate NMFSs “Not
Critical” designation. However, the documen-
tation of a whale in SEAK from a previously
unsurveyed breeding region, combined with
the fact that ~38 % of humpback whales that
feed in SEAK are yet to be matched to breeding
areas (Happywhale, unpublished data), lends
to the possibility of more, as-of-yet undiscov-
ered migratory connections between the two
regions. If more matches are found between
Central America and SEAK, it could have
repercussions for future regional conservation
and management planning in Alaska.
Lastly, our study shows the importance of
initiating research efforts in unsurveyed areas
of humpback whale habitat. This is especially
true in breeding areas of the at risk (threatened
and endangered) DPSs. Although SEAK–5011
has a sighting history of 27 years in the SEAK
feeding areas, this adult whale had never before
been documented in a breeding area. This
is despite several decades of intensive pho-
to-identification and matching efforts in the
neighbouring Mexico DPS (Calambokidis et
al., 2008, Cheeseman et al., 2021, Urbán et al.,
2000) and predominantly the southern region
of the Central America DPS (Steiger et al.,
1991; Calambokidis et al., 2000, Calambokidis
6Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 71(S4): e57283, diciembre 2023 (Publicado Nov. 01, 2023)
et al., 2008; Rasmussen et al. 2012). Humpback
whales have been shown to exhibit strong
site-fidelity to seasonal breeding habitat in the
North Pacific (Acebes et al., 2021; Herman et
al., 2011). Therefore, this sighting of a SEAK
humpback whale in a previously unsurveyed
region of the breeding area of the endangered
Central America DPS, highlights the need for
expansion of research efforts to include all
known humpback whale habitat. It also exem-
plifies the merit of the new research efforts that
have been initiated in El Salvador, and the value
of continued surveying and cetacean studies in
the Pacific waters of this country.
Ethical statement: the authors declare that
they all agree with this publication and made
significant contributions; that there is no con-
flict of interest of any kind; and that we fol-
lowed all pertinent ethical and legal procedures
and requirements. All financial sources are fully
and clearly stated in the acknowledgments sec-
tion. A signed document has been filed in the
journal archives.
Author Contribution: NR conceptualized
this study, collected field data, analyzed the
data, and drafted early and revised versions
of this manuscript. MGC collected field data
and edited the manuscript, TC curated photo-
graphic data and edited the manuscript, JC and
FS collected and curated photographic data,
and edited various versions of this manuscript.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Firstly, we would like to honor the work
of the late Marlenne Vázquez Cuevas for her
contribution to initiating humpback whale
research in El Salvador, and for her dedication
and enthusiasm in the field in 2020. Marlenne
worked tirelessly for countless hours, plan-
ning and organizing this research initiative in
El Salvador, and without her this study would
not have been possible. We would also like to
thank volunteers, students and fishermen of
the community of Los Cóbanos for all the effort
and support that made this study possible. We
would like to express our gratitude for the sup-
port of the Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y
Recursos Naturales (MARN) de EL Salvador
and the Programa Nacional de Conservación
de Cetáceos. We also thank Dr. Jeff Moore for
his work in ensuring funding for research in
Central America in 2021, and Dr. Joshua Smith
of Murdoch University for his advice and sup-
port. We would like to also thank Happywhale
and all who collaborate with them, especially
Alaska Sea Adventure for a sighting of SEAK–
5011 in 2004, and David Alfaro and Jose Baires
for sightings in El Salvador in 2018 and 2019.
Research in El Salvador was conducted under
permission GVS–AIMA–041–2020. Research
in SE Alaska was conducted under NOAA/
NMFS Research Permit No. 19703.
Funding in El Salvador was kindly gifted
by the Society of Marine Mammalogy, the Ruf-
ford Foundation, NOAA, MARN, and Cascadia
Research Collective. Equipment was also gifted
by Idea Wild. We would like to take this oppor-
tunity to thank you all for supporting this new
research initiative in El Salvador. The planning,
research and completion of this paper was
supported by the Post-graduate Internation-
al Scholarship of Murdoch University, Perth,
Western Australia granted to Nicola Ransome.
REFERENCES
Acebes, J. M. V., Okabe, H., Kobayashi, N., Nakagun,
S., Sakamoto, T., Hirney, B., & Uchida, S. (2021).
Interchange and movements of humpback whales
(Megaptera novaeangliae) between western North
pacific winter breeding grounds in Northern Luzon,
Philippines and Okinawa, Japan. Journal of Cetacean
Research and Management, 22, 39–53. https://doi.
org/10.47536/JCRM.V22I1.201
Bettridge, S., Olivia, M., Baker, C. S., Barlow, J.,Clapham,
P., Ford, M. J., Gouveia, D., Mattila, D. K., Pace, R.
M., Rosel, P. E., Silber, G. K., & Wade, P. R. (2015).
NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS Status Review
of the Humpback Whale (Megaptera novaeangliae)
Under the Endangered Species Act. NOAA technical
memorandum NMFS; NOAA–TM–NMFS–SWFSC.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/4883
Bowditch, N. (1994). American practical navigator: an epi-
tome of navigation. Defense Mapping Agency Hydro-
graphic Center. Defense Mapping Agency, Office of
7
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 71(S4): e57283, diciembre 2023 (Publicado Nov. 01, 2023)
Distribution Services. https://msi.nga.mil/api/publi-
cations/download?key=16693975/SFH00000/Bow-
ditch_Vol_2_LoRes.pdf&type=view
Calambokidis, J., Steiger, G. H., Rasmussen, K., Urbán, J.
R., Balcomb, K. C., Ladrón De Guevara, P. P., Sali-
nas Z., M., Jacobsen, J. K., Baker, C. S., Herman, L.
M., Cerchio, S., & Darling, J. D. (2000). Migratory
destinations of humpback whales that feed off Cali-
fornia, Oregon and Washington. Marine Ecology
Progress Series, 192, 295–304. https://doi.org/10.3354/
meps192295
Calambokidis, J., Steiger, G. H., Straley, J. M., Herman, L.
M., Cerchio, S., Salden, D. R., Urban R., J., Jacobsen,
J. K., Von Ziegesar, O., Balcomb, K. C., Gabriele, C.
M., Dahlheim, M. E., Uchida, S., Ellis, G., Mlyamura,
Y., de guevara Paloma Ladrón, P., Yamaguchi, M.,
Sato, F., Mizroch, ... Quinn, T. J. (2001). Movements
and population structure of humpback whales in the
North Pacific. Marine Mammal Science, 17, 769–794.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2001.tb01298.x
Calambokidis, J., Falcone, E. A., Quinn, T. J., Burdin, A. M.,
Clapham, P. J., Ford, J. K. B., Gabriele, C. M., LeDuc,
R., Matilla, D., Rojas-Bracho, L., Straley, J. M., Taylor,
B. L., Urbán R, J., Weller, D., Witteveen, B., Yamagu-
chi, M., Bendlin, A., Camacho, D., Flynn, K., … Wade,
P. R. (2008). SPLASH: Structure of populations, levels
of abundance and status of humpback whales in the
North Pacific. Final report for Contract AB133F–03–
RP–00078. https://hawaiihumpbackwhale.noaa.gov/
science/archive.html
Cassoff, R. M., Moore, K. M., McLellan, W. A., Barco, S. G.,
Rotstein, D. S., & Moore, M. J. (2011). Lethal entan-
glement in baleen whales. Diseases of Aquatic Orga-
nisms, 96, 175–185. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao02385
Castaneda, M. G., Cuevas, M. V., Escalante, Á. H. F., &
López, J. D. S. (2021). Turismo de avistamiento de
cetáceos en Los Cóbanos, El Salvador: un primer
acercamiento a la actividad. Realidad y Reflexión,
54, 123–139. https://doi.org/10.5377/ryr.v54i54.12071
Castaneda, M. G., Martínez de Navas, E., Ransome, N. L.,
Benito, P. C., Pineda, L., & Aguilar Villalta, L. M.,
(2022). Eventos de cetáceos enmallados en El Salva-
dor. Revista Minerva, 5. https://minerva.sic.ues.edu.
sv/index.php/Minerva/issue/view/11/14
Cheeseman, T., Southerland, K., Park, J., Olio, M., Flynn, K.,
Calambokidis, J., Jones, L., Garrigue, C., Frish-Jordán,
A., Howards, A., Reade, W., Neilsen, J., Gabriele, C.,
& Clapham, P. (2021). Advanced image recognition: a
fully automated, high-accuracy photo-identification
matching system for humpback whales. Mammalian
Biology, 102, 915–929. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s42991-021-00180-9
Dawbin, W. H. (1966). The seasonal migratory cycle of
humpback whales. In Whales, dolphins and porpoises
(pp. 145-169). University of California Press.
Herman, L. M., Pack, A. A., Rose, K., Craig, A., Her-
man, E. Y. K., Hakala, S., & Milette, A. (2011).
Resightings of humpback whales in Hawaiian waters
over spans of 10-32 years: Site fidelity, sex ratios,
calving rates, female demographics, and the dyna-
mics of social and behavioral roles of individuals.
Marine Mammal Science, 27, 736–768. https://doi.
org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2010.00441.x
Katona, S. K., & Whitehead, H. P. (1981). Identifying
humpback whales using their natural markings.
Polar Record, 20, 439–444. https://doi.org/10.1017/
S003224740000365X
Lebon, K. M., & Kelly, R. P. (2019). Evaluating alternati-
ves to reduce whale entanglements in commercial
Dungeness Crab fishing gear. Global Ecology and
Conservation, 18, e00608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
gecco.2019.e00608
Rasmussen, K., J. Calambokidis, & Steiger, G. (2012).
Distribution and migratory destinations of hum-
pback whales off the Pacific coast of Central
America during the boreal winters of 1996–2003.
Marine Mammal Science, 28, 267–279. https://
doi/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2011.00529.x
Stone, G. S., Florez-Gonzalez, L., Katona, S. (1990). Whale
migration record. Nature, 346, 705. https://doi.
org/10.1038/346705a0
Steiger, G. H., Calambokidis, J., Sears, R., Balcomb, K.
C., & Cubbage, J. C. (1991). Movement of hum-
pback whales between California and Costa Rica.
Marine Mammal Science, 7, 306–310. https://doi.
org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.1991.tb00105.x
Urbán R., J., Jaramillo L., A., Aguayo L., A., Ladrón de
Guevara P., P., Salinas Z., M., Alvarez F., C., Medrano
G., L., Jacobsen, J. K., Balcomb, K. C., Claridge, D.
E., Calambokidis, J., Steiger, G. H., Straley, J. M., von
Ziegesar, O., Waite, J. M., Mizroch, S., Dahlheim, M.
E., Darling, J. D., & Baker, C. S. (2000). Migratory
destinations of humpback whales wintering in the
Mexican Pacific (Megaptera novaeangliae). Journal
of Cetacean Research and Management, 2, 100–110.
https://doi.org/10.47536/jcrm.v2i2.493