Abstract
Egg shape is difficult to quantify due to the lack of an exact formula to describe its geometry. Here I described a simple algorithm to characterize and compare egg shapes using Fourier functions. These functions can delineate any closed contour and had been previously applied to describe several biological objects. I described, step by step, the process of data acquisition, processing and the use of the SHAPE software to extract function coefficients in a study case. I compared egg shapes in three birds’ species representing different reproductive strategies: Cuban Parakeet (Aratinga euops), Royal Tern (Thalasseus maximus) and Cuban Blackbird (Dives atroviolaceus). Using 73 digital pictures of eggs kept in Cuban scientific collections, I calculated Fourier descriptors with 4, 6, 8, 16 and 20 harmonics. Descriptors were reduced by a Principal Component Analysis and the scores of the eigenvalues that account for 90% of variance were used in a Lineal Discriminant Function to analyze the possibility to differentiate eggs according to its shapes. Using four harmonics, the first five component accounted for 97% of shape variances; more harmonics diluted the variance increasing to eight the number of components needed to explain most of the variation. Convex polygons in the discriminant space showed a clear separation between species, allowing trustful discrimination (classification errors between 7-15%). Misclassifications were related to specific egg shape variability between species. In the study case, A. euops eggs were perfectly classified, but for the other species, errors ranged from 5 to 29% of misclassifications, in relation to the numbers or harmonics and components used. The proposed algorithm, despite its apparent mathematical complexity, showed many advantages to describe eggs shape allowing a deeper understanding of factors related to this variable.References
Andrade, I. M., Mayo, S. J., Kirkup, D., & Van den Berg, C. (2010). Elliptic Fourier analysis of leaf outline shape in forest fragment populations of Anthurium sinuatum and A. pentaphyllum (Araceae) from northeast Brazil. Kew Bulletin, 65, 1-18.
Adams, D. C., Rohlf, F. J., & Slice, D. E. (2004). Geometric morphometrics: ten years of progress following the ‘revolution’. Italian Journal of Zoology, 71, 5-16.
Barta, Z. & Székely, T. (1997). The optimal shape of avian eggs. Functional Ecology, 11, 656-662.
Briskie, J. V. & Sealy, S. G. (1990). Variation in size and shape of least flycatcher eggs. Journal of Field Ornithology, 61(2), 180-191.
Carey, C. (1996). Avian energetic and nutritional ecology. New York: Ed. Chapman & Hall.
Coulson, J. C., Potts, G. R., & Horobin, J. (1969). Variation in the eggs of the Shag (Phalacrocorax aristotelis). Auk, 86(2), 232-245.
Denis, D. (2002). Ecología reproductiva de siete especies de garzas (Aves: Ardeidae) en la ciénaga de Birma, Cuba. (Tesis de Doctorado). Universidad de La Habana, Cuba.
Denis, D. & Olavarrieta, U. (2011). ¿Existe isomorfía en los huevos de las garzas (Aves: Ardeidae)? Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 34.1, 35-45.
Ferson, S., Rohlf, F. J., & Koehn, R. K. (1985). Measuring shape variation of twodimensional outlines. Systematic Zoology, 34, 59-68.
Freeman, H. (1974). Computer processing of line drawing images. Computing. Surveys, 6, 57-97.
Furuta, N., Ninomiya, S., Takahashi, S., Ohmori, H., & Ukai, Y. (1995). Quantitative evaluation of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) leaflet shape by principal component scores based on elliptic Fourier descriptor. Breeding Science, 45, 315-320.
Gemperle, M. E. & Preston, F. W. (1955). Variation of shape in the eggs of the common tern in the clutch-sequence. Auk, 72, 184-198.
Gill, F. B. (1998). Ornithology. Nueva York: Ed. Freeman & Co.
Grant, P. R. (1982). Variation in the size and shape of darwin's finch eggs. Auk, 99, 15-23.
Hoyt, D. F. (1976). The effect of shape on the surface-volume relationships of birds’ eggs. Condor, 78, 343-349.
Iwata, H., Nesumi, H., Ninomiya, S., Takano, Y., & Ukai, Y. (2002) Diallel Analysis of Leaf Shape Variations of Citrus Varieties Based on Elliptic Fourier Descriptors. Breeding Science, 52, 89-94
Iwata, H. & Ukai, Y. (2002). SHAPE: A computer program package for quantitative evaluation of biological shapes based on elliptic Fourier descriptors. Journal of Heredity, 93, 384-385.
Janiga, M. (1997). Effects of geographic variation and hatching asynchrony on size and shape of eggs of the feral pigeon (Columbia livia). Folia Zoológica, 46(1), 23-32.
Jover, L., Ruiz, X., & González-Martín, M. (1993). Significance of intraclutch egg size variation in the Purple Heron. Ornis Scandinavica, 24(2), 127-134.
Kendall, D. (1977). The diffusion of shape. Advances in Applied Probability, 9, 428-430.
Kendeigh, S. C. (1975). Effects of parentage on egg characteristics. Auk, 92, 163-164.
Kincaid, D. T. & Schneider, R. B. (1983). Quantification of leaf shape with a microcomputer and Fourier transformation. Canadian Journal of Botany, 61, 2333-2342.
Kim, S. J., Kim, B. W., & Kim, D. P. (2011). Tree recognition for landscape using by combination of features of its leaf, flower and bark. Proceedings of SICE Annual Conference (SICE), 1147-1151.
Kuhl, F. P. & Giardina, C. R. (1982). Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour. Computer Graphics and Image Processing, 18, 236-258.
Lack, D. (1947). Darwin's finches. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Lonn, M. & Prentice, H. C. (1995). The structure of allozyme and leaf shape variation in isolated, range-margin populations of the shrub Hippocrepis emerus (Leguminosae). Ecography, 18, 276-285.
Mand, R., Nigul, A., & Sein, E. (1986). Oomorphologya: new method. Auk, 103, 613-617.
Martin, T. E., Bassar, R. D., Bassar, S. K., Fontaine, J. J., Lloyd, P., Mathewson, H. A., Niklison, A. M., & Chalfoun, A. (2006). Life-history and ecological correlates of geographic variation in egg and clutch mass among passerine species. Evolution, 60(2), 390-398.
McLellan, T. & Endler, J. A. (1998). The relative success of some methods for measuring and describing the shape of complex objects. Systematic Biology, 47, 264-281.
Neto, J. C., Meyer, G. E., Jones, D. D., & Samal, A. K. (2006). Plant species identification using Elliptic Fourier leaf shape analysis. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 50, 121-134.
Ojanen, M., Orell, M., & Vaisinen, R. A. (1979). Role of heredity in egg size variation in the Great Tit Parus major and the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Ornis Scandinavica, 10, 22-28.
Orr, R. T. (1945). A study of captive Galapagos finches of the genus Geospiza. Condor, 47, 177-201.
Otto, C. (1979). Environmental factors affecting egg weight within and between colonies of Fieldfare Turdus pilaris. Ornis Scandinavica, 10, 111-116.
Petersen, M. R. (1992). Intraspecific variation in egg shape among individual emperor geese. Journal of Field Ornithology, 63(3), 344-354.
Preston, F. W. (1968). The shapes of birds' eggs: mathematical aspects. Auk, 85, 454-463.
Preston, F. W. (1969). Shapes of birds' eggs: extant North American families. Auk, 86, 246-264.
Preston, F. W. (1974). The volume of an egg. Auk, 91,132-138.
Preston, F. W. & Preston, E. J. (1953). Variation of birds' eggs within the clutch. Annals of Carnegie Museum, 33, 129-139.
Preston, F. W. (1953). The shapes of birds' eggs. Auk, 70, 160-182.
Ricklefs, R. E. (1984). Variation in the size and composition of eggs of the European Starling. Condor, 86, 1-6.
Rohlf, F. J. & Archie, J. W. (1984). A comparison of Fourier methods for the description of wing shape in mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). Systematic Zoology, 33, 302-317.
Singh, K., Gupta, I., & Gupta, S. (2013). Classification of Bamboo Species by Fourier and Legendre Moment. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 50, 61-70.
Svensson, B. W. (1978). Clutch dimensions and aspects of the breeding strategy of the Chaffinch Fringilla coelebs in northern Europe: a study based on egg collections. Ornis Scandinavica, 9, 66-83.
Vaisinen, R. A., Hilden, O., Soikkeli, M., & Vuolanto, S. (1972). Egg dimension variation in five wader species: the role of heredity. Ornis Fennica, 49, 25-44.
Van Noordwijk, A. J., Keizer, L. C. P., Van Balen, J. H., & Scharloo, W. (1981). Genetic variation in egg dimensions in natural populations of the Great Tit. Genetica, 55, 221-232.
White, R. J. & Prentice, H. C. (1988). Comparison of shape description methods for biological outlines. In H. H. Bock (Ed.), Classification and Related Methods of Data Analysis (pp. 395-402). Amsterdam: Elsevier Sci. Pub.
Wiebe, K. L. (2007). Hypoxia probably does not explain short incubation periods of woodpeckers. Condor, 109(4), 976-979.
Zhan, Q. B. & Wang, X. L. (2012). Elliptic Fourier Analysis of the Wing Outline Shape of Five Species of Antlion (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae: Myrmeleontini). Zoological Studies, 51(3), 399-405.
Comments
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2014 Revista de Biología Tropical