Revista de Biología Tropical ISSN Impreso: 0034-7744 ISSN electrónico: 2215-2075

OAI: https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/rbt/oai
Density-dependent reproductive and vegetative allocation in the aquatic plant <i>Pistia stratiotes</i> (Araceae)
PDF

Keywords

clonal growth
density-dependence
pantanal
pistia stratiotes
reproductive allocation
trade-offs
pistias strariotes
pantanal
crecimiento clonal
densidad
reparto reproductivo
intercambio

How to Cite

Freitas Coelho, F., Deboni, L., & Santos Lopes, F. (2005). Density-dependent reproductive and vegetative allocation in the aquatic plant <i>Pistia stratiotes</i> (Araceae). Revista De Biología Tropical, 53(3-4), 369–376. https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v53i3-4.14599

Abstract

Pistia stratiotes is an aquatic macrophyte that grows in temporary-ponds in the southern Pantanal, Brazil. It reproduces both sexually and asexually and is usually observed forming dense mats on the water surface, a condition favored by the plant’s vegetative reproduction coupled with an ability for rapid growth. In this study we examined the effect of densely crowded conditions on the production of reproductive and vegetative structures. In addition, we verified whether there is a trade-off between clonal growth and investment in sexual reproductive structures, and whether there is an allocation pattern with plant size. Individual plant biomass and the number of the rosettes producing sexual reproductive structures and vegetative growth structures both increased with density. Increase in plant size resulted in increased proportional allocation to sexual reproductive structures and vegetative growth structures. Allocation of biomass to reproduction did not occur at the expense of clonal growth. Thus, the density response appears as a increase of rosettes producing sexual reproductive structures and vegetative growth structures. Therefore, long leaves and stolons may be adaptive under densely crowded conditions where competition for light is intense. An important aspect in the study of trade-offs is the size-dependency of the allocation patterns .Usually, larger plants produce more biomass. Therefore, larger plants can allocate more biomass to both vegetative and sexual reproduction than smaller plants and thus show a positive correlation between both traits rather than the expected negative one.
https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v53i3-4.14599
PDF

References

Abrahamson, W.G. 1975. Reproductive strategies in dewberries. Ecology 56: 721-726.

Abrahamson, W.G. & H. Caswell. 1982. On the comparative allocation of biomass, energy and nutrients in plants. Ecology 63: 982-991.

Adámoli, J.1982. O Pantanal e suas relações fitogeográficas com os cerrados; discussão sobre o conceito de “Complexo do Pantanal”. Congr. Nac. Bot. 32: 109-119.

Amaral Filho, Z.P. 1986. Solos do pantanal matogrossense, p. 91-103. In Anais do Simpósio De Recursos Naturais e Sócio-econômicos do Pantanal, Corumbá. Embrapa, Brasília.

Coelho, F.F., F.S. Lopes & C.F. Sperber. 2000. Densitydependent morphological plasticity in Salvinia auriculata Aublet. Aquat. Bot. 66: 273-280.

Cook, R.E. 1979. Asexual reproduction: a further consideration. Am. Nat. 113: 769-772.

De Kroon, H. & F. Shieving. 1991. Resource allocation patterns as a function of clonal morphology: a general model applied to a foraging clonal plant. J. Ecol. 79: 519-530.

De Kroon, H. & M.J. Hutchings. 1995. Morphological plasticity in clonal plants: the foraging concept reconsidered. Ecology 83: 532-538.

Dewalds, L.B. & L.P. Lounibos. 1990. Seasonal growth of Pistia stratiotes in South Florida. Aquat. Bot. 36: 263-275.

Eriksson, O. 1989. Seedling dynamics and life histories in clonal plants. Oikos 55: 231-238.

Fahrig, L., D.P. Coffin, W.K. Lauenroth & H.H. Shugart. 1994. The advantage of long-distance clonal spreading in highly disturbed habitat. Evol. Ecol. 8: 172-187.

Gopal , B. & U. Goel. 1993. Competition and allelopathy in aquatic plant communities. Bot. Rev. 59: 155 208.

Grace, J.B. 1993. The adaptive significance of clonal reproduction in angiosperms: an aquatic perspective. Aquat. Bot. 44: 159-180.

Harper, J.L. 1977. Population Biology of Plants. Academic, London.

Hartnett, D.C. 1990. Size-dependent allocation to sexual and vegetative reproduction in four clonal composites. Oecologia 84: 254-259.

Holler, L.C. & W.G. Abrahamson. 1977. Seed and vegetative reproduction in relation to density in Fragaria virginiana (Rosaceae). Am. J. Bot. 64: 1003-1007.

Hollander, N.G., I.W. Shenk, S. Diouf, M.J. Kropff & A. H. Pieterse. 1999. Survival strategy of Pistia stratiotes L. in the Djoudj National Park Senegal. Hydrobiologia 415: 21-27.

Hutchings, M. J. & I. K. Bradbury. 1986. Ecological perspective on clonal perennial herbs. BioScience 36: 178-182.

Lallana, V.H.. 1989. Aspectos reproductivos del repolito de agua (Pistia stratiotes L.) en ambientes leníticos del río Paraná medio. Iheringia 39: 37-54.

Lemon, G.D. & U. Posluszny. 2000. Shoot development and evolution in Pistia stratiotes (Araceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 161: 721-732.

Loehle, C. 1987. Partitioning of reproductive effort in clonal plants: a benefit-cost model. Oikos 49: 199-208.

Lovett Doust, L. 1981. Population dynamics and local specialization in a clonal perennial (Ranunculus repens). 1 The dynamics of ramets in contrasting habitats. J. Ecol. 69: 743-755.

Madsen, J.D. 1991. Resource allocation at the individual plant level. Aquat. Bot. 41: 67-86.

Méndez, M.& J.R. Obeso. 1993. Size-dependent reproductive and vegetative allocation in Arum italicum (Araceae). Can. J. Bot. 71: 309-314.

Por, E.D. 1995. The Pantanal of Mato Grosso (Brazil). World’s Largest Wetlands, p.1-122. In Dumont, H.J. & M.J.A. Werger (eds.) Monographiae Biologicae. Kluwer Academic, London.

Reekie, E.G. & F.A. Bazzaz, 1987. Reproductive effort in plants. 1. Carbon allocation to reproduction. Am. Nat. 129: 876-896.

Sakai, S. 1995. Optimal resource allocation to vegetative and sexual reproduction of a plant growing in a spatially varying environment. J. Theor. Biol. 175: 271-282.

Samson, D.A. & K.S. Werk. 1986. Size-dependent effects in the analysis of reproductive effort in plants. Am. Nat. 127: 667-680.

Sato, T. 2002. Size-dependent resource allocation among vegetative propagules and male and female functions in the forest herb Laportea bulbifera. Oikos 96: 453-462.

Sculthorpe, C.D. 1967. The Biology of Aquatic Vascular Plants. Edward Arnold, London. 610p.

Sokal, R.R. & F.J. Rohlf. 1981. Biometry. Freeman, San Francisco.

Stearns, S.C. 1989. Trade-offs in life-history evolution. Funct. Ecol. 3: 259-268.

Thompson, D.A. & A.J. Beattie. 1981. Density-mediated seed and stolon production in Viola (Violaceae). Am. J. Bot. 68: 383-388.

Van Kleunen, M., M. Fischer & B. Schimid. 2000. Costs of plasticity in foraging characteristics of the clonal plant Ranunculus reptans. Evolution 54: 1947-1955.

Weiner, J. 1988. The influence of competition on plant reproduction, p. 228-245. In Lovett-Doust, J. & L.

Lovett-Doust (eds.). Plant reproductive ecology: patterns and strategies. Oxford University, Oxford.

Comments

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2005 Revista de Biología Tropical

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.