Revista de Biología Tropical ISSN Impreso: 0034-7744 ISSN electrónico: 2215-2075

OAI: https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/rbt/oai
Production of monovalent anti-<i>Bothrops asper</i> antivenom: development oí immune response in horses and neutralizing ability
PDF

How to Cite

Gutiérrez, J. M., Chaves, F., Rojas, E., Elizondo, J., Ávila, C., & Cerdas, L. (1988). Production of monovalent anti-<i>Bothrops asper</i> antivenom: development oí immune response in horses and neutralizing ability. Revista De Biología Tropical, 36(2B), 511–517. Retrieved from https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/rbt/article/view/23889

Abstract

A monovalent antivenom was produced by immunizing two horses with venom of the pit viper Bothrops asper (Ophidia: VipeIidae). Although development of the immune response against four toxic and enzymatic activities of the venom was similar in both horses during the the two thirds of the immunization schedule, antibody response in one of the horses reached much higher levels in the last part of the immunization. Immunoelectrophoretic analysis indicates that there were precipitating antibodies in the sera of these horses during all the stages of immunization. However, immunoprecipitation did not correlate with the ability of sera to neutralize toxic activities of B. asper venom. Monovalent antivenom was more effective than the commercially available polyvalent antivenom in the neutralization of Bothrops asper venom. On the other hand, despite the fact that it neutralizes lethal and hemorrhagic activities of the venoms of Lachesia muta and Crotalus durissus durissus, it was less effective than polyvalent antivenom in these neutralizations. Moreover, it does not neutralize defibrinating activity induced by these two venoms, whereas it neutralizes this effect in the case of B. asper venom. It is proposed that monovalent antivenom may be highly effective in the case of envenomations induced by Bothrops asper venom; its use in treating accidents by L. muta and C. durissus would be indicated only if polyvalent antivenom is not available. Results also demonstrate that it is important to monitor antibody response individually in horses being immunized for antivenom production, due to the conspicuous variability in the response of different animals.

PDF

References

Bolaños, R. 1982. Las serpientes venenosas de Centroamérica y el problema de ofidismo. Primera parte. Aspectos zoológicos, epidemiológicos y biomédicos. Rev. Cost. Cienc. Med. 3: 165-184.

Bolaños, R. & L. Cerdas. 1980. Producción y control de sueros antiofídicos en Costa Rica. Bol. Of. Sanit. Panam. 88: 189-196.

Chippaux, J. P. & M. Goyffon. 1983. Producers of antivenomous sera. Toxicon 21: 739-752.

Gené, J. A., M. Gómez, J. M. Gutiérrez & L. Cerdas. 1985. Neutralization of hyaluronidase and indirect hemolytic activities of Costa Rican snake venoms by a polyvalent antivenom. Toxicon 23: 1015-1018.

Gutiérrez, J. M., F. Chaves, R. Bolaños, L. Cerdas, E. Rojas, O. Arroyo & E. Portilla. 1981. Neutralización de los efectos locales del veneno de Bothrops asper por un antiveneno polivalente. Toxicon 19: 493-500.

Gutiérrez, J. M., J. A. Gené, G. Rojas & L. Cerdas. 1985. Neutralization of proteolytic and hemorrhagic activities of Costa Rican snake venoms by a polyvalent antivenom. Toxicon 23: 887-893.

Gutiérrez, J. M., G. Rojas, B. Lomonte, J. A. Gené & L. Cerdas. 1986. Comparative study of the edema-forming activity of Costa Rican snake venoms and its neutralization by a polyvalent antivenom. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 85C: 171-175.

Gutiérrez, J. M., G. Rojas & L. Cerdas, 1987. Ability of a polyvalent antivenom to neutralize the venom of Lachesis muta melanocephala, a new Costa Rican subspecies of the bushmaster. Toxicon 25: 713-720.

Gutiérrez, J. M., C. Avila, E. Rojas & L. Cerdas. 1988. An alternative in vitro method for testing the potency of the polyvalent antivenom produced in Costa Rica. Toxicon (in press).

Lomonte, B. 1985. Edema-forming activity of bushmaster (Lachesis muta stenophrys) and Central American rattlesnake (Crotalus durissus durissus) venoms and neutraiization by a polyvalent antivenom. Toxicon 23: 173-176.

Ouchterlony, O. & L. A. Nilsson. 1978. Immunodiffusion and immunoelectrophoresis, p. 191. In D. M. Weir (ed.). Handbook of Experimental

Immunology, Vol. 1. Immunochemistry. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.

Rojas, G., J. M. Gutiérrez, J. A. Gené, M. Gómez & L. Cerdas. 1987. Neutralización de las actividades tóxicas y enzimáticas de cuatro venenos de serpientes de Guatemala y Honduras por el antiveneno polivalente producido en Costa Rica. Rev. Biol. Trop. 35: 59-67.

Siles, M., R. Rolin, F. Zelante & R. Guidolin. 1978/79. Evidenciaçao em camundongos da soroneutralizaçao para especifica entre venenos e antivenenos botrópicos. Mem. Inst. Butantan 42/43: 337-344.

Theakston, R. D. G. & H. A. Reid. 1978. Development of simple standard assay procedures for the characterization of snake venoms. Bull. World Health Org. 61: 949-956.

Tu, A. T. 1977. Venoms: Chemistry and Molecular Biology. Wiley, New York. World Health Organization. 1981. Progress in the characterization of venoms and standardization of antivenoms. WHO Offset Publication No. 58.

Yamakawa, M., M. Nozaki & Z. Hokama 1976. Fractionation of sakishima-habu (Trimeresurus elegans) venom and lethal, hemorrhagic and edema-forming activities of the fractions, p. 97-109 In A. Ohsaka, K. Haysahi & Y. Sawai (eds.). Animal, Plant and Microbial Toxins. Vol 1. Plenum Press, New York.

Comments

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 1988 Revista de Biología Tropical

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.