Revista de Biología Tropical ISSN Impreso: 0034-7744 ISSN electrónico: 2215-2075

OAI: https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/rbt/oai
Estructura de las asociaciones de las estrellas de mar (Asteroidea) en arrecifes rocosos del Golfo de California, México
PDF (Español (España))

Keywords

Asteroidea
Rocky reefs
Gulf of California
Diversity and abundance indices
Asteroidea
arrecifes rocosos
Golfo de California
índices de diversidad y abundancia

How to Cite

Reyes Bonilla, H., González Azcárraga, A., & Rojas Sierra, A. (2005). Estructura de las asociaciones de las estrellas de mar (Asteroidea) en arrecifes rocosos del Golfo de California, México. Revista De Biología Tropical, 53(S3), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v53i3.26779

Abstract

Sea Star (Asteroidea) assemblage structures on the rocky reefs of the Gulf of California, Mexico. Sea stars are invertebrates that play relevant roles in rocky and coral reefs: they occupy different levels in food webs and may act as top predators. There are numerous studies on taxonomy and biogeography of the class in the eastern tropical Pacific, but information about the attributes and composition of its assemblages is scant. The objectives of this study were the examination and comparison of asteroid community structure from four regions of the Gulf of California, México, characterized by the presence of rocky reefs, and the search for possible associations between pairs of species. In August 2004 we visited four locations in the western gulf: Bahía de Los Angeles (29º N), Santa Rosalía (27º N), Loreto (26º N) and La Paz (24º N), and censuses sea stars using 50 m2 belt transects (N=93). Abundance and species richness was estimated, as well as diversity (H’), evenness (J’) and taxonomic distinctness (Δ*); then, all variables were compared among regions with analysis of variance. In addition, an ordination analysis was run looking for groups of locations with similar faunistic composition. Our results showed that Loreto Bay had the highest richness and abundance of asteroids, probably because it presents a large number of habitats and multiple food sources; these conditions seem to favor the occurrence of rare species and of detritivores. However, there were no significant interregional differences among ecological indices, nor we detected groups of locations singled out because of its species composition. Thus, community structure of sea stars in rocky areas of the Gulf of California is quite homogeneous and do not change with latitude. This is a consequence of the fact that all regions under analysis had the species Phataria unifascialis and Pharia pyramidatus as dominant in number. There were significant positive associations between three pairs of species: apparently, competition is not particularly relevant to control sea star community structure in the gulf. Rev. Biol. Trop. 53(Suppl. 3): 233-244. Epub 2006 Jan 30.
https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v53i3.26779
PDF (Español (España))

References

Bautista-Romero, J.J., H. Reyes-Bonilla, D. Lluch-Cota & S. Lluch-Cota. 1994. Aspectos generales de la fauna marina, p. 247-275. In A. Ortega-Rubio & A. Castellanos-Vera (eds.). La Isla Socorro, Reserva de la Biosfera Archipiélago de Revillagigedo. CIBNOR, La Paz.

Begon, M., J.L. Harper & C.R. Townsend. 1999. Ecology. 4th ed. Blackwell, Cambridge. 1068 p.

Birkeland, C. 1989. The influence of echinoderms on coral reef communities, p. 1-79. In M. Jangoux & J.M. Lawrence (eds.). Echinoderm studies 3. Balkema, Amsterdam.

Benítez-Villalobos, F. 2001. Comparación de la comunidad de equinodermos asociados a dos arrecifes, en dos localidades de las Bahías de Huatulco, Oaxaca, México. Ciencia y Mar 5: 19-24.

Blake, D.B. 1990. Adaptive zones of the Class Asteroidea (Echinodermata). Bull. Mar. Sci. 46: 701-718. Brusca, R.C. 1980. Common intertidal invertebrates of the Gulf of California. 2nd ed. University of Arizona Press, Tucson. 513 p.

Brusca, R.C. E. Kimrey & W. Moore. 2004. A seashore guide to the northern Gulf of California. Arizona- Sonora Desert Museum, Tucson. 203 p.

Caso, M.E. 1944. Estudios sobre asteridos de México. Algunas especies interesantes de asteridos litorales. An. Inst. Biol. UNAM 15: 237-259.

Caso, M.E. 1992. Los equinodermos (asteroideos, ofiuroideos y equinoideos) de la Bahía de Mazatlán, Sinaloa. An. Inst. Cienc. Mar Limnol. UNAM, Publ. Esp. 11: 1-124.

Caso, M.E. 1994. Estudio morfológico, taxonómico, ecológico y distruibución geográfica de los asteroideos colectados durante las campañas oceanográficas CORTES 1, 2 y 3. An. Inst. Cienc. Mar Limnol. UNAM, Publ. Esp. 12: 1-111.

Caso, M.E., A. Laguarda-Figueras, F.A. Solís-Marín, A. Ortega-Salas & A. de la Luz Durán-González. 1996. Contribución al conocimiento de la ecología de las comunidades de equinodermos de la Bahía de Mazatlán, Sinaloa, México. An. Inst. Cienc. Mar Limnol. UNAM 22: 101-119.

Chávez-Dagostino R.M., A.C. Nepote-González, P. Medina- Rosas & F. Solís-Marín. 2000. Listado preliminar de echinoideos (sic) y asteroideos (Echinodermata: Echinoidea y Asteroidea) de las Islas Marietas, Nayarit, México. Mexicoa 2: 69-72.

Cintra-Buenrostro, C.E. 2001. Los asteroideos (Echinodermata: Asteroidea) de aguas someras del Golfo de California, México. Oceánides 16: 49-90.

Cintra-Buenrostro, C.E., H. Reyes-Bonilla & O. Arizpe-Covarrubias. 1998. Los equinodermos (Echinodermata) del arrecife de Cabo Pulmo, Pacífico de México. Rev. Biol. Trop. 46: 341-344.

Clarke, K.R. & R.M. Warwick. 2000. Change in marine communities. 2nd ed. Primer E-Ltd. Plymouth. 176 p.

Clarke, K.R. & R.H. Green. 1988. Statistical design and analysis for a “biological effects” study. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 46: 213-226.

Dungan, M.L. 1982. Catastrophic decline of a top carnivore in the Gulf of California rocky intertidal zone. Science 216: 989-991.

English, S., C. Wilkinson & V. Baker. 1997. Survey manual for tropical marine resources. 2nd ed. Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville. 378 p.

Glynn, P.W. 1974. The impact of Acanthaster on corals and coral reefs in the eastern Pacific. Environ. Conserv. 1: 295-304.

Glynn, P.W. 1985. El Niño-associated disturbance to coral reefs and post disturbance mortality by Acanthaster planci. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 26: 295-300.

Glynn, P.W. & G.E. Leyte-Morales. 1997. Coral reefs of Huatulco, west México. Reef development in upwelling Gulf of Tehuantepec. Rev. Biol. Trop. 45: 1033-1047.

Gotshall, D.W. 1987. Marine animals of Baja California. Sea Challengers, Monterey. 104 p.

Hickman, C.P. 1998. A field guide to sea stars and other echinoderms of Galápagos. Sugar Spring, Lexington. 83 p.

Holguín-Quiñones, O., H. Wright-López & F.A. Solís-Marín. 2000. Asteroidea, Echinoidea y Holothuroidea en fondos someros de la Bahía de Loreto, Baja California Sur, México. Rev. Biol. Trop. 48: 749-757.

Jangoux, M. 1982. Food and feeding mechanisms: Asteroidea, p. 117-159. In M. Jangoux & J.M. Lawrence (eds.). Echinoderm nutrition. Balkema, Amsterdam.

Jangoux, M. & J.M. Lawrence (eds.). 1982. Echinoderm nutrition. Balkema, Amsterdam. 254 p.

Kerstitch, A. 1989. Sea of Cortez marine invertebrates. Sea Challengers, Monterey. 106 p.

Krebs, C.J. 1999. Ecological methodology. 2nd ed. Harper and Row, New York. 620 p.

Lawrence, J.M. 1987. A functional biology of echinoderms. Croom Helm, London. 340 p.

Maluf, L.Y. 1988. Composition and distrribution of the central eastern Pacific echinoderms. Nat. Hist. Mus. L.A. Co. Techn. Rep. 2: 1-242.

McCune, B., J.B. Grace & D.L. Urban. 2002. Analysis of ecological communities. MJM Software Design, Gleneden Beach. 300 p.

Menge, B.A. 1982. Effects of feeding on the environment, p. 521-551. In M. Jangoux & J.M. Lawrence (eds.). Echinoderm nutrition. Balkema, Amsterdam.

Millán-Núñez, R. & J.R. Lara-Lara. 1995. Productividad primaria del fitoplancton del Pacífico mexicano: un diagnóstico, pp. 31-60. In F. González-Farías & J. de la Rosa-Vélez (eds.). Temas de Oceanografía Biológica en México. UABC, Ensenada.

Morgan, M.B. & D.L. Cowles. 1996. The effects of temperature on the behaviour and physiology of Phataria unifascialis (Gray) (Echinodermata, Asteroidea). Implications for the species’ distribution in the Gulf of California, México. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 208: 13-27.

Paine, R.T. 1966. Food web complexity and species diversity. Amer. Nat. 100: 65-75.

Price, A.R.G., M.J. Keeling & C.J. O’Callaghan. 1999. Ocean-scale patterns of “biodiversity” of Atlantic asteroids determined from taxonomic distinctness and other measures. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 66: 187-203.

Reyes-Bonilla, H. 1995. Asteroidea and Echinoidea (Echinodermata) from Isla San Benedicto, Revillagigedo Archipelago, Mexico. Rev. Inv. Cient. UABCS, ser. C. Mar 6: 29-38.

Reyes-Bonilla, H. 2003. Coral reefs of the Pacific coast of México, pp. 331-349. In J. Cortés (ed.). Latin American Coral reefs. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

Reyes-Bonilla, H. 2004. Biogeography and diversity of reef corals in the eastern Pacific and western Atlantic. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Miami, Coral Gables. 456 p.

Reyes-Bonilla, H. & L.E. Calderón-Aguilera. 1999. Population density, distribution and consumption rates of three corallivores at Cabo Pulmo reef, Gulf of California, México. PSNZI Mar. Ecol. 20: 347-357.

Salazar, A. & H.Reyes Bonilla. 1998. Parasitismo de Thyca callista (Gastropoda: Capulidae) sobre Phataria unifascialis (Asteroidea: Ophidiasteridae) en el Golfo de California, México. Rev. Biol. Trop. 46: 833-836. Sloan, N.A. 1980. Aspects of the feeding biology of asteroids. Ocean. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev. 18: 57-124.

Solís-Marín, F.A., M.D. Herrero-Pérezrul, A. Laguarda- Figueras & J. Torres-Vega. 1993. Asteroideos y equinoideos de México (Echinodermata), pp. 91-105. In S.I. Salazar-Vallejo & N.E. González (eds.). Biodiversidad marina y costera de México. CONABIO/CIQRO, Chetumal.

Solís-Marín, F.A., H. Reyes-Bonilla, M.D. Herrero-Pérezrul, O. Arizpe-Covarrubias y A. Laguarda-Figueras. 1997. Sistemática y distribución de los equinodermos de la Bahía de La Paz. Ciencias Marinas 23: 249-263.

Steinbeck, J. & E.F. Ricketts. 1941. Sea of Cortez. Viking, New York. 598 p.

Verrill, A.E. 1867. Notes on the echinoderms of Panama and the west coast of America, with descriptions of new genera and species. Trans. Conn. Acad. Arts Sci. 1: 328-338.

Warwick, R.M. & K.R. Clarke. 2001. Practical measures of marine biodiversity based on relatedness of species. Ocean. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev. 39: 207-231.

Zar, J.H. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. 4th ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River. 1046 p.

Comments

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2005 Revista de Biología Tropical

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.