Abstract
Introduction
Urban mobility is one of the most relevant social phenomena from the last few decades, mainly after the automobile has become the focal axis for city planning, which has caused important transformations in urbanity on a global scale.
Objective
The objective of this work is to perform a close revision of some particularities for the study of the social implications found in the creation of infrastructure for the urban mobility. It pretends to show some of the characteristics in which western cities have been planned in the modern era, and how this logic has promoted particular models of mass transportation and the triumph of the automobile. In addition, we address the impact that the city planning has had over non-motorized mobility, as well as the problems and opportunities that appear when mobility-designed infrastructure fails or becomes obsolete.
Method
The paper is a conceptual and theoretical approximation to the mobility phenomenon, and it intends to help position future empirical researches from the perspective of social sciences.
Results
As the main finding we have how sensitive it is to plan large-scale urban projects without taking in consideration the differentiated impacts they might have in the societies in which these projects are executed.
Conclusion
In the conclusions section the paper invites to think from an interdisciplinary and participatory focus the way in which mobility infrastructures are designed for the Costar Rican case.
References
Anand, Nikhil. 2011. «PRESSURE: The PoliTechnics of Water Supply in Mumbai». Cultural Anthropology 26 (4): 542-64. DOI 10.1111/j.1548-1360.2011.01111.x
Andreu, Pujol. 1998. Tunneling. En C. Davidson (ed.), Anyhow, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
Berman, Marshall. 2001. Todo lo sólido se desvanece en el aire: la experiencia de la modernidad. México: Siglo XXI.
Bess, Michael K. 2014. «Routes of Conflict: Building Roads and Shaping the Nation in Mexico, 1941-1952». The Journal of Transport History 35 (1): 78-96. DOI 10.7227/tjth.35.1.6
Braudel, Fernand. 1992. Civilization and Capitalism, 15th-18th Century, Vol. II: The Wheels of Commerce. California: Univ of California Press.
Brenner, Neil, and Nik Theodore. 2005. «Neoliberalism and the Urban Condition». City 9 (1): 101-7. DOI 10.1080/13604810500092106
Calonge, Fernando. 2014. «La empleabilidad de los sujetos desde las infraestructuras de transporte». Revista de Estudios Urbanos y Ciencias Sociales 8 (1): 49-60. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6416872
———, ed. 2017. La sustentabilidad urbana en vía muerta: gobernanza y participación ciudadana ante la construcción de infraestructura de transporte masivo. Buenos Aires: Estudios Sociológicos Editora.
Davis, Mike. 2014. Planeta de ciudades miseria. Madrid: Ediciones AKAL.
Durán Segura, Luis Armando. 2018. «Viaje, Experiencia y Paisaje. La Ruta Limón-San José En Los
Relatos de Extranjeros (Costa Rica, 1880-1940)» Ería 3 (3): 345-65. DOI 10.17811/er.3.2018.345-365
Elliott, Anthony., y John Urry. 2010. Mobile Lives. Londres: Routledge.
Flonneau, Mathieu. 2006. «City Infrastructures and City Dwellers: Accommodating the Automobile in Twentieth-Century Paris». The Journal of Transport History 27 (1): 93-114. DOI 10.7227/TJTH.27.1.7
Graham, Stephen. 2000. «Introduction: Cities and Infrastructure». International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 24 (1): 114-19. DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.00238
———. 2010. Disrupted Cities: When Infrastructure Fails. Londres: Routledge.
Kaufmann, Vincent, Manfred Max Bergman y Dominique Joye. 2004. «Motility: Mobility as Capital» International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 28 (4): 745-56. DOI 10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00549.x
Kooy, Michelle., y Karen Bakker . 2008. «Technologies of Government: Constituting Subjectivities, Spaces, and Infrastructures in Colonial and Contemporary Jakarta». International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32 (2): 375-91. DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00791.x
Logan, John R., y Harvey L. Molotch. 2013. «The City as a Growth Machine». En The Gentrification Debates. DOI 10.4324/9781315881096
McFarlane, Colin. 2009. «Infrastructure, Interruption, and Inequality: Urban Life in the Global South». En Disrupted Cities: When Infrastructure Fails. DOI 10.4324/9780203894484
Ortiz, Renato. 2000. Modernidad y espacio: Benjamin en París. Buenos Aires: Editorial Norma.
Richardson, Tim., y Ole B Jensen. 2008. «How Mobility Systems Produce Inequality: Making Mobile Subject Types on the Bangkok Sky Train». Built Environment 34 (2): 218-31. DOI 10.2148/benv.34.2.218
Sennett, Richard. 1997. Carne y piedra: el cuerpo y la ciudad en la civilización occidental. España: Anaya.
———. 2004. «Las Ciudades Norteamericanas: Planta Ortogonal y Ética Protestante». Bifurcaciones 1.
Siemiatycki, Matti. 2006. «Message in a Metro: Building Urban Rail Infrastructure and Image in Delhi, India». International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 30 (2): 277-92. DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2006.00664.x
Zunino Singh, Dhan. 2013. «El Subte Como Artefacto Cultural (Buenos Aires, 1886-1944): La Historia Cultural Como Aporte a Los Estudios de Las Movilidades Urbanas». Revista Transporte y Territorio. DOI 10.34096/rtt.i9.310.