Palabras clave
instrucción por tareas, formato comunicativo, metodología, involucramiento, autonomía
Cómo citar
Resumen
La enseñanza del inglés necesita ser transformada para proveer a los estudiantes con un ambiente apropiado que les permita interactuar en situaciones de la vida real. Debido a esto, la instrucción por tareas (Task-based Instruction) ha sido incluida en la metodología comunicativa para ofrecer oportunidades a los estudiantes de utilizar el lenguaje sin sentir temor por los errores inevitables que cometan, motivándolos a involucrarse en el proceso (Willis y Willis, 2007). Inspirado en la instrucción por tareas, el formato llamado STAR fue creado para intensificar la comunicación en cada etapa de la lección. Con esto en mente, el propósito del siguiente estudio cualitativo es demostrar el alcance del formato de clase STAR para desarrollar un ambiente más comunicativo en la enseñanza del inglés. Esta investigación fue llevada a cabo en un programa de inglés de una universidad pública en Costa Rica, donde veinticinco profesores de inglés fueron consultados sobre la efectividad del formato por medio de un cuestionario. Además, las investigadoras realizaron observaciones de clase, obteniendo bitácoras para una mejor comprensión del rol del formato. Los resultados de este estudio evidencian la efectividad de actividades comunicativas bajo el formato propuesto para fomentar el uso espontáneo del lenguaje, la participación, las habilidades para tomar riesgos, la autonomía y la colaboración en el aula.
Citas
Benson, P. (2011). Teaching and researching autonomy. Harlow, UK: Pearson.
Biggs, J. (2003). Changing university teaching for quality learning at University London. England: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
Brandl, K. (2008). Principles of communicative language teaching and task-based instruction. Qommunicative Language Teaching in Action: Putting Principles to Work. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Carter, R., & Nunan, D. (2001). The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Council of Chief State School Officers (CSSO). (2012). Distinguishing formative assessment from other educational assessment labels. Washington: Council of Chief State School Officers.
Dancer, D., & Kamvounias, P. (2005). Student involvement in assessment: A project designed to assess class participation fairly and reliably. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 445–454.
Ellis, R. (2010). The methodology of task-based teaching. In P. Robertson & R. Nunn (Eds.), The Asian EFL Journal Cebu Conference Proceedings August 2009. Australia: Asian EFL Journal A Division of Time Taylor International Ltd. Retrieved from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/PDF/The_Asian_EFL_JournalCEBU_conf.pdf
Fritschner, LM. (2000). Inside the undergraduate college classroom: Faculty and students differ on the meaning of student participation. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(3), 342–62.
Gedera, D., Williams, J., & Wright, N. (2015). Motivation, Leadership and Curriculum Design. In C. Koh (ed.) Identifying factors influencing students’ motivation and engagement in online courses (pp.13-22). Singapore: Springer Science and Business Media.
Gilmore, A. (2007). Authentic materials and authenticity in foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 40(2), 97-118.
Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching. London, UK: Longman.
Hernández, R., Fernández, C. & Baptista, P. (2006). Metodología de la investigación. Mexico, D.F.: McGraw-Hill Interamericana.
Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy in foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
Howatt, A.P.R. (1984). A History of English Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Johnson, K. & Morrow, K. (1981). Communication in the classroom: Applications and methods for a communicative approach. London: Longman.
Kilickaya, F. (2004). Authentic materials and cultural content in EFL classrooms. The Internet TESL Journal, 10(7). Retrieved on January 20th from http//www.metu.edu.tr.kilickay/
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Anderson, M. (2011). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy: Definitions, issues and problems. Dublin: Authentik.
Little, D. (2004). Democracy, discourse and learner autonomy in the foreign language classroom. Utbildning & Demokrati, 13(3), 105-126.
Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative language teaching: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lee W. (1995). Authenticity revisited: Text authenticity and learner authenticity. ELT Journal 49 (4), 323-328.
Long, M. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition. In K. Hyltenstam and M. Pienemann (eds.). Modelling and Assessing Second Language Acquisition. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.
Marks, H. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 31.
Mattioli, G. (2004). On native language intrusions and making do with words: Linguistically homogeneous classes and native language use. English Teaching Forum, 42(4), 20-25.
Merriam, S.B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey–Bass.
Newton, J. (2001). Options for vocabulary learning through communication tasks. ELT Journal, 55,30-37.
Nunan, D. (2004). Task-Based language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Richards, J.C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.
Sánchez, A. (2004). The task-based approach in language teaching. University of Murcia, Spain: International Journal of English Studies. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1072205.pdf
Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: SAGE.
Simons, H. (2009). Case study research in practice. London: SAGE.
Thornbury, S. (1999). How to teach grammar. England: Pearson Educated Limited.
Tomlinson, B. (2003). Humanizing the course-book. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Developing materials for language teaching. London: Continuum Press.
Tulu, G. (2014). ELF classroom assessment: Teachers’ practice and teachers’ techniques adjustment in Ethiopia. Educational Research and Reviews. Vol. (9) 20. pp 1029-1071. 23 de Octubre, 2014.
Weaver, RR, & Qi, J. (2005). Classroom organisation and participation: College students’ perceptions. Journal of Higher Education, 76(5), 570–601.
Zhuang, J. (2010). The Changing Role of Teachers in the Development of Learner Autonomy— Based on a Survey of “English Dorm Activity”. Journal of Language Teaching and Research.