1
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 73: e20253577, enero-diciembre 2025 (Publicado Dic. 02, 2025)
Frequencies and factors associated with pirA, pirB
and Vibrio parahaemolyticus (Vibrionales: Vibrionaceae)
in shrimps and farm waters of Costa Rica
Andrea García-Quesada1*; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7280-8146
Marianita Chavarría-Alvarado1; https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7676-2046
1. Laboratorio de Biotecnología, Recinto de Grecia, Sede de Occidente, Universidad de Costa Rica, Grecia, Alajuela,
Costa Rica; andrea.garcia@ucr.ac.cr (*Correspondencia), marianita.chavarria_a@ucr.ac.cr
Received 10-IX-2024. Corrected 20-III-2025. Accepted 24-XI-2025.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Acute Hepatopancreatic Necrosis Disease (AHPND) has been reported in cultured shrimp in
recent years and is associated with the bacterium Vibrio parahaemolyticus, containing a plasmid with the pirA
and pirB genes that confer pathogenicity.
Objective: To establish the presence of pirA, pirB and V. parahaemolyticus genes in postlarvae, juvenile shrimp,
and water from farms in the dry and rainy seasons in Costa Rica, as well as to determine associated factors such
as season of the year, farm, organ, pond water with the pirA gene, with the pirB gene or with the tlh gene, pond
site, and time of shrimp collection.
Methods: Two shrimp farms in Costa Rica were studied in 2021. A total of 72 juvenile shrimp samples, four
groups of postlarvae, and 16 water samples were analyzed. The genes of pirA, pirB and V. parahaemolitycus (tlh
+) were identified by qPCR, and associated factors were determined.
Results: V. parahaemolitycus was identified in 33.3 % of the juvenile shrimp samples, in a group of postlarvae,
and in 50 % of the water samples. In the shrimp samples 43 and 45 % were positive for the pirA and pirB gene
amplicon, respectively. Of the water samples, 31.2 and 37.5 % were positive for the pirA and pirB gene ampli-
con, respectively. Two factors associated with V. parahaemolitycus bacteria (rainy season and tlh-positive water),
and five factors associated with pirA and pirB genes (rainy season, presence of the tlh gene in water, pirA gene in
water, pirB gene in water, and time of collection) were found. Differences in salinity values were found between
dry and rainy season in water samples.
Conclusions: The studied genes were successfully detected in shrimp and pond water samples collected during
both seasons in Costa Rica. However, detection was more frequent during the rainy season.
Key words: AHNPD; pirA gene; Vibrio spp; diseases in shrimp; tlh gene.
RESUMEN
Frecuencias y factores asociados con pirA pirB y Vibrio parahaemolyticus
(Vibrionales: Vibrionaceae) en camarones y aguas de granjas en Costa Rica
Introducción: En los últimos años se ha reportado la Enfermedad de la Necrosis Aguda del Hepatopáncreas
(AHPND) en camarones de cultivo y se asocia a la bacteria Vibrio parahaemolyticus que contiene un plásmido
con los genes pirA y pirB que le confieren la patogenicidad.
Objetivo: Establecer la presencia de los genes pirA, pirB y de V. parahaemolyticus en postlarvas, en camarones
juveniles y agua de granjas en la estación seca y lluviosa en Costa Rica, así como determinar factores asociados
https://doi.org/10.15517/ac8dr232
GENETICS
2Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 73: e20253577, enero-diciembre 2025 (Publicado Dic. 02, 2025)
INTRODUCTION
The increase in demand for food, as well
as the search for more nutritious, healthy and
sustainable diets by the wider public, have led
to the expansion of marine product consump-
tion in recent years. Seafood, being an excel-
lent source of minerals and vitamins, opens the
opportunity for the production of food under
the modality of aquaculture, as is the case of
shrimp farming. This activity has shown great
potential and growth both in the American con-
tinent, as well as in the rest of the world (Varela
& Varela-Moraga, 2019).
However, these farms reach a high density
of animals to obtain higher productive yields,
which causes a stressful environment for the
shrimp, providing ideal circumstances for dis-
ease outbreaks. As a result, this industry has
been impacted by the consequences of infec-
tious diseases of viral and bacterial origin,
effecting significant economic losses (Flegel,
2019; Martínez-Chávez et al., 2022).
On the other hand, environmental factors,
both biotic and abiotic, affect the immune
system of shrimp, with these effects being
more pronounced due to the use of high animal
densities. Abiotic factors include temperature,
salinity, concentration of nitrogen compounds,
pH and dissolved oxygen. However, in recent
years, there has been a growing interest in the
study of biotic factors such as the composition
of the intestinal microbiota, the presence of
biological production compounds by aquatic
microorganisms, the use of probiotics, prebiot-
ics and sustainable technologies such as biofloc
(Martín-Ríos et al., 2022).
In recent years, a disease affecting farmed
shrimp called Acute Hepatopancreatic Necrosis
Disease (AHPND) has been presented, which
was initially associated with a strain of the
bacterium Vibrio parahaemolyticus (Tran et
al., 2013). V. parahaemolyticus is a Gram-neg-
ative, halophytic bacterium that is widespread
in estuarine, marine and coastal environments
(Broberg et al., 2011; Ceccarelli et al., 2013;
Letchumanan et al., 2014), this bacterium pos-
sesses a plasmid containing two genes coding
for the synthesis of PirA and PirB toxins, which
confer pathogenicity (Han, Tang & Lightner,
2015). It is now known that other species of
the genus Vibrio have also been identified as
responsible for AHPND (Dong et al., 2017;
Kondo et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2018; Restrepo
et al., 2018).
In Costa Rica, there is a molecular study
whose objective was to investigate the presence
of Vibrio spp. and the plasmid genes encoding
PirA and PirB toxins in shrimp farms. The
study detected pirA and pirB genes in 33.3 %
(5 / 15) and Vibrio spp. in 40.0 % (6 / 15) of
the farms. In two of the six farms where Vibrio
como estación del año, finca, órgano, agua de estanque con el gen pirA, con el gen pirB o con el gen tlh, sitio del
estanque y tiempo de recolecta de los camarones.
Métodos: Se estudiaron dos fincas camaroneras en Costa Rica en el 2021. En total se analizaron 72 muestras de
camarones juveniles, cuatro grupos de postlarvas y 16 muestras de agua. Se identificaron los genes de pirA, pirB
y V. parahaemolitycus (tlh +) mediante qPCR y se determinaron factores asociados.
Resultados: Se identificó V. parahaemolitycus en el 33.3 % de las muestras de camarones juveniles, en un grupo
de postlarvas y en el 50.0 % de las muestras de aguas. En las muestras de camarones 43.0 y 45.0 % fueron posi-
tivas para el amplicón del gen pirA y pirB, respectivamente. Con respecto a las muestras de agua 31.2 y 37.5 %
resultaron positivas para el amplicón del gen pirA y pirB, respectivamente. Se encontraron dos factores asociados
a la bacteria V. parahaemolitycus (época lluviosa y agua positiva al gen tlh) y cinco factores asociados a los genes
pirA y pirB (época lluviosa, presencia del gen tlh en agua, gen pirA en agua, gen pirB en agua y tiempo de reco-
lecta). Se encontraron diferencias en los valores de salinidad entre la época seca y lluviosa en muestras de agua.
Conclusiones: Los genes estudiados fueron detectados con éxito en muestras de camarones y aguas de estanques
durante ambas estaciones del año. Sin embargo, la detección fue más frecuente durante el invierno.
Palabras clave: AHNPD; gen pirA; Vibrio spp.; enfermedades en camarón; gen tlh.
3
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 73: e20253577, enero-diciembre 2025 (Publicado Dic. 02, 2025)
spp. was found, the species V. parahaemolyti-
cus was identified (Peña-Navarro et al., 2020).
However, in Costa Rica there are no peri-
odic studies that evaluate the analyzed genes
through sampling at different points in time,
nor are there investigations that determine the
influence of the two seasons of the year on the
prevalence of the disease.
The objective of the present study was to
investigate the presence of pirA, pirB genes
and V. parahaemolyticus species in postlarvae
and juvenile shrimp of the species Litopeneaus
vannamei and in pond water samples, in two
farms located in the Gulf of Nicoya, Costa
Rica, in both dry and rainy seasons, as well as
to establish factors associated with pirA, pirB
genes and V. parahaemolyticus bacteria.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study design, origin and sample size: A
longitudinal non-experimental research design
of trend was carried out, given that the indepen-
dent variables were not intentionally altered,
but rather the phenomena were observed as they
occurred in the natural context. In addition, the
studies collected data at different points in time,
using a series of samples that covered different
participants at each moment, which were part
of the same population (Hernández-Sampieri et
al., 2014). Two private shrimp farms (Farm A
and Farm B) using the conventional production
method, located in the Gulf of Nicoya on the
Pacific coast of Costa Rica, were studied.
In Costa Rica, the aquaculture of white
shrimp of the genus Litopenaeus is primarily
developed in the Gulf of Nicoya, and the Cen-
tral and South Pacific areas (Instituto Costarri-
cense de Pesca y Acuicultura 2020). However,
the Gulf of Nicoya is the area of Costa Rica
with the greatest potential for the cultivation of
aquaculture species (Quesada-Céspedes et al.,
2019). It is characterized by a rainy period from
May to November (rainy season) and a period
where rainfall is scarce between December and
April (dry season) (Herrera, 2016).
During the harvest months, both farms
sampling was carried out approximately every
three to four weeks, starting with sampling one
(time 0, day of stocking), sampling two (three
to four weeks after stocking), sampling three
(six to seven weeks after stocking) and sam-
pling four (nine to ten weeks after stocking).
Dry season samples were collected between
February and April and rainy season samples
between July and September 2021. On each
farm, a pond of approximately four hectares
was sampled.
Both shrimp of the species Litopenaeus
vannamei (postlarvae and juveniles), and pond
water were studied. The postlarvae studied
were of national origin and came from a labora-
tory near the area, supplier of the two farms. A
total of 72 samples (36 hepatopancreas and 36
intestines) from 36 groups of juvenile shrimps
and four groups of postlarvae were analyzed.
Sampling of juvenile shrimp was done at three
points in the pond using cast nets: inlet, center
and outlet of the water, five shrimp were sam-
pled at each point, for a total of three groups
per farm per sampling, the three groups were
placed in different sterile containers with water
from the same pond.
Water sampling in the ponds was done at
only one point in the pond; in the central part,
one sample was taken per farm per sampling,
for a total of 16 water samples from the two
farms and from the two seasons of the year.
Approximately 250 ml of water were sampled
at 10 cm from the surface in sterile bags.
In each sampling, in situ physical chemical
parameters of the water were measured in the
center of the pond: temperature, pH, dissolved
oxygen and salinity, using a LabQuest 2 inter-
face and temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen
and salinity probes.
All samples were placed in a cooler and
transported to the Biotechnology Laboratory of
the Greece Campus of the University of Costa
Rica, where they were stored at 4 °C until anal-
ysis, no more than 24 hours after collection.
Bacterial strains and culture condi-
tions: The following strains were used as
positive controls: V. parahaemolyticus (pirA+
and pirB+, donated by the Universidad Técnica
4Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 73: e20253577, enero-diciembre 2025 (Publicado Dic. 02, 2025)
Nacional, Sede Regional de Guanacaste, Costa
Rica) and V. parahaemolyticus ATCC 17802
(tlh+). Nuclease-free water was used as a
control without template and commercially
acquired Escherichia coli K-12 and a strain of
Vibrio alginolyticus, donated by the Faculty
of Microbiology of the University of Costa
Rica, were used as negative controls for the
genes studied.
The shrimp groups collected at each sam-
pling point were necropsied aseptically, the
hepatopancreas and intestine were extracted,
and then these organs were macerated separate-
ly. In the case of postlarvae, hundreds of them
were macerated. The macerates were enriched
in APW (alkaline peptonized water) with 2 %
sodium chloride.
The water samples were homogenized, and
25 ml of each sample was taken and enriched
separately in 225 ml of APW with 2 % sodium
chloride (Kaysner et al., 2004). The water
and shrimp samples in APW were then incu-
bated for six hours at 37 °C. Then they were
inoculated on TCBS agar (thiosulfate citrate
bile sucrose agar) with 1 µl, 10 µl and 100 µl
of each of the enriched samples, using sterile
micropipettes and Drigalsky loops. The inocu-
lated plates were placed in the incubator at a
temperature of 37 °C for 24 hours.
Extraction and verification of DNA
quality and quantity: DNA was extracted
from colonies grown on TCBS plates, com-
patible with morphological characteristics
reported for the species V. parahaemolyticus:
round, blue-green, opaque colonies, 2 to 3 mm
in diameter (Kaysner et al., 2004; Nelapati
et al., 2012). The extraction kit used was
Pure Link Genomic DNA Mini Kit Invitrogen
(K1820-01), the manufacturers protocol was
followed, with some modifications. Once the
DNA was extracted from the samples, it was
stored at -20 °C.
The quantity and quality of DNA in the
samples was verified by measuring absorbance
at 260 nm in a microvolume spectrophotometer
(NanoDrop One Thermo Fisher Scientific) and
by fluorescence (Qubit® 4 fluorimeter, Thermo
Fisher Scientific-Invitrogen). All samples had
the required amount of total DNA (on average
23 ng/µl) to be analyzed by qPCR. Samples
were run on 2 % agarose gels to confirm
their integrity.
Molecular identification: Identification
of V. parahaemolyticus bacteria species was
carried out by qPCR amplification of a partial
sequence of approximately 248 bp of the tlh
(thermolysin thermolabile hemolysin) gene fol-
lowing the protocol described by Micky et al.
(2014), with the following modifications: each
25 µL reaction was carried out with a final
concentration of 1X Maxima SYBR Green/
ROX qPCR Master Mix (2X) Thermo Scien-
tific and, as for the qPCR conditions an initial
denaturation for 7 min at 95 °C was used,
and a final extension of 72 °C for 7 min was
added (Table 1).
Identification of the amplicons of the pirA
and pirB genes was carried out by implement-
ing two different qPCR protocols, the primers
used were designed by Han, Tang, Pantoja et al.
(2015); Han, Tang, Tran et al. (2015), respec-
tively. A partial sequence of approximately 135
bp of the pirA gene was amplified, a reaction
was prepared with 10 µl of Maxima SYBR
Green/ROX qPCR Master Mix (2X) Thermo
Scientific, 2 µl of each primer (15 µM), 2 µl of
the extracted DNA and 4 µl molecular biology
grade water (Thermo Scientific), for a final
volume of 20 µl. The qPCR conditions used are
specified in Table 1.
For the partial sequence of the pirB gene, a
fragment of approximately 102 bp was ampli-
fied, a reaction was prepared with 10 µl of
Maxima SYBR Green/ROX qPCR Master Mix
(2X) Thermo Scientific, 2 µl of each primer
(3 000 nM), 1 µl of the extracted DNA and
5 µl of molecular biology grade water (Ther-
mo Scientific), for a final volume of 20 µl.
The qPCR conditions were the same as those
used for the amplification of the pirA gene
amplicon (Table 1).
The efficiency of the three protocols imple-
mented in qPCR was determined by standard
curves of 5 dilutions, each dilution in triplicate.
5
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 73: e20253577, enero-diciembre 2025 (Publicado Dic. 02, 2025)
The curves showed efficiencies of 100, 110 and
106 % for the partial sequence of the tlh, pirA
and pirB genes, respectively. The specificity
of the protocols was evaluated in two ways: 1)
qPCR products from the three standard curves
were run on a 1.5 % agarose gel to corrobo-
rate the existence of a single product with the
expected size, 2) dissociation curve analyses
were performed at the end of each PCR run,
which always showed a single amplified prod-
uct. Samples with Ct (threshold cycle) values
between 14 and 35 were considered positive.
Positive samples for pirA, pirB genes
were subjected to conventional PCR protocols
for confirmation and the protocol and primers
designed by Sirikharin et al. (2015) were used.
Samples that were successfully amplified by
conventional PCR for the pirA genes and some
samples amplified by qPCR for the tlh gene
were sent for sequencing to CIBCM (Centro de
Investigación en Biología Celular y Molecular)
at the University of Costa Rica. The sequences
of the samples were aligned with the BioEdit
Sequence Alligment Editor®2.2.28 program
and compared using the BLASTn® 2.2.28
algorithm with the NCBI database.
Statistical analysis: Factors associ-
ated with the pirA, pirB and tlh genes of
qPCR-positive shrimp were studied using a
non-conditional logistic regression model. The
risk was estimated using the odds ratio (OR)
and those factors with a p < 0.05 were consid-
ered associated factors. The factors analyzed
were season of the year, farm, organ, water
with the pirA gene, water with the pirB gene,
water with the tlh gene, pond site and time of
shrimp collection.
Depending on the distribution of the data,
an independent sample t-test was performed for
pH and dissolved oxygen and a nonparametric
Mann Whitney U test for temperature and
salinity to compare the averages or medians of
the physicochemical parameters between the
positive and negative water samples for the tlh,
pirA and pirB genes, in order to determine if
there are differences between the two groups.
Likewise, the averages or medians of the
physicochemical parameters obtained during
dry season and rainy season were obtained
and compared between them to determine
any existing differences. The Mann Whitney
U-test was used for samples with non-normal
distribution (temperature and oxygen) and the
T-test for samples with normal distribution
(salinity and pH).
Statistically significant differences were
considered for those values with a p < 0.05. All
Tab l e 1
Conditions used in the qPCR protocols for molecular identification of tlh, pirA and pirB genes.
qPCR
Protocol PCR Stages Temp (°C) Cycles Time Primer Sequence Amplicon
size
tlh Initial denaturation 95 1 7 min Forward
MV2B-TLF
5’-GTT GCA CTC
GGT GAC AGC TTG-3’
248 bp
Denaturation 95 50 5 s
Annealing 60 50 10 s Reverse
MV2B-TLR
5’- AGT TTT GCG TAG
GTT AAG TAC-3’
Extending 72 50 25 s
Final extending 72 1 7 min
pirA Initial denaturation 95 1 3 min Forward
VpPirA-F
5’-TTG GAC TGT
CGA ACC AAA CG-3’
135 bp
Denaturation 95 40 5 s Reverse
VpPirA-R
5’-GCA CCC CAT
TGG TAT TGA ATG3’
Annealing and extending 60 40 30 s
pirB Initial denaturation 95 1 3 min Forward
VpPirB-F
5´-ACT AGG CAA GGC
TCA TAA ATA TGA CG-3´
102 bp
Denaturation 95 40 5 s Reverse
VpPirB-R
5´-ATT GCT CAG GTC
CAT TGG CA ATA A-3´
Annealing and extending 60 40 30 s
Temp: temperature, bp: base pair.
6Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 73: e20253577, enero-diciembre 2025 (Publicado Dic. 02, 2025)
statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS
Statistics version 25 (IBM Corp., 2017).
RESULTS
Molecular analysis in shrimp: Of the
shrimp groups studied, 44.4 % (16 / 36) were
positive for the presence of V. parahaemo-
litycus, in five of them the bacterium was
detected only in the hepatopancreas, in three
exclusively in the intestine, and in eight in both
intestine and hepatopancreas. Fig. 1 shows
the results of the frequencies of detection of
V. parahaemolitycus in individual samples of
juvenile shrimp organs and postlarvae groups.
Of the groups of juvenile shrimps ana-
lyzed, 55.5 % (20 / 36) were determined to be
positive for the pirA gene amplicon, of which
six groups presented the amplicon only in the
hepatopancreas, three only in the intestine, and
11 in both the intestine and hepatopancreas.
The results of the detection frequencies of
the pirA gene amplicon in individual samples of
juvenile shrimp organs and postlarvae groups
are shown in Fig. 2. Of the 31 samples positive
for this gene in juvenile shrimp organs, 30 were
also positive for the pirB gene amplicon and
18 were identified as V. parahaemolyticus, the
latter suggesting that other species of the genus
Vibrio present the pirA gene amplicon.
Of the groups of juvenile shrimps ana-
lyzed, 55.5 % (20 / 36) were determined to be
positive for the pirB gene amplicon, of which,
four showed the amplicon only in the hepato-
pancreas, three only in the intestine, and 13 in
both the intestine and hepatopancreas.
The results of the detection frequencies of
the pirB gene amplicon in individual samples of
juvenile shrimp organs and postlarvae groups
are represented in Fig. 3. Of the 33 pirB-
positive samples in juvenile shrimp organs, 30
were also positive for the pirA gene amplicon
and 19 were identified as V. parahaemolyticus,
the latter suggesting that other Vibrio species
have the pirB gene amplicon.
Molecular analysis in waters: The fre-
quencies of detection of V. parahaemolyticus
and the pirA and pirB gene amplicon in the
pond water samples are presented in Fig. 1,
Fig. 2 and Fig. 3. Of the five water samples
that were positive for the pirA gene amplicon,
Fig. 1. Presence of the tlh amplicon in individual organ samples from juvenile shrimp, postlarvae groups and pond water.
N: total number of samples analyzed.
7
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 73: e20253577, enero-diciembre 2025 (Publicado Dic. 02, 2025)
three were identified as V. parahaemolyticus
and all five were also positive for the pirB gene
amplicon. Of the six water samples that were
positive for the pirB gene amplicon, four were
identified as V. parahaemolyticus and five were
positive for the pirA gene amplicon.
Sequencing: Sequencing of three PCR
products from hepatopancreas (248 / 248 bp),
intestine (247 / 247 bp) and water (248 / 248
bp) samples amplified with the qPCR pro-
tocol for the tlh gene [GenBank PP591942,
PP591943 and PP591944, respectively]
Fig. 3. Presence of the pirB amplicon in individual organ samples from juvenile shrimp, postlarvae groups and pond water.
N: total number of samples analyzed.
Fig. 2. Presence of the pirA amplicon in individual organ samples from juvenile shrimp, postlarvae groups and pond water.
N: total number of samples analyzed.
8Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 73: e20253577, enero-diciembre 2025 (Publicado Dic. 02, 2025)
confirmed the presence of V. parahaemolyticus
species and were found to be 100 % identical
to other sequences of this same species depos-
ited in GenBank. Of all the samples positive
for the pirA gene in conventional PCR, we
were able to sequence a product from a 322
/ 323 bp hepatopancreas sample, [PP795453],
this sequence was 99.7 % identical to other
sequences of the pirA gene of the genus Vibrio
deposited in GenBank. With the conventional
PCR protocol used for the pirB gene, positive
control was amplified, but no sample from the
present study.
Factors associated with the pirA, pirB
and tlh genes of positive shrimp in qPCR:
Five factors were found to be associated with
the presence of the pirA and pirB gene in
shrimp (p < 0.05): rainy season (pirA: OR =
3.64, 95 % CI (confidence interval) = 1.36-
9.75; pirB: OR = 2.8, 95 % CI = 1.07-7.30),
presence of pirA in water (pirA: OR = 4.32, 95
% CI = 1.59-11.74; pirB: OR = 3.45, 95 % CI
= 1.29-9.22), presence of pirB in water (pirA:
OR = 11.36, 95 % CI = 3.68-35.09; pirB: OR =
7.95, 95 % CI = 2.76-22.92), presence of tlh in
water (pirA: OR = 3.34, 95 % CI = 1.25-8.92;
pirB: OR = 3.45, 95 % CI = 1.29-9.21) and col-
lection time: 42-49 days after stocking (pirA:
OR = 4.20, 95 % CI = 1.23-14.36; pirB: OR =
3.4, 95 % CI = 1.03-11.26). Two factors were
found to be associated with the presence of V.
parahaemolyticus bacteria: rainy season (OR
= 15.40, 95 % CI = 3.97-59.70) and presence
of the tlh gene in water (OR = 9.00, 95 % CI =
2.90-27.90) (SMT1, SMT2, SMT3).
Physicochemical parameters of the
water in the ponds studied: No significant
differences were found in terms of the values
of physicochemical parameters between the
groups of positive and negative waters for the
amplicons of the pirA, pirB, and tlh genes.
Table 2 shows the physicochemical parameters
of the water in the ponds of the two farms
studied; the averages of each parameter were
calculated according to the season of the year.
Significant differences (p < 0.05) were only
found in the salinity parameter of pond water
between the dry and rainy seasons.
The qPCR protocols implemented in the
present investigation proved to be efficient
and economical and allowed the identification
of V. parahaemolyticus and the pathogenic
genes pirA and pirB in shrimp and pond water
samples, as well as in samples that had not been
analyzed (shrimp intestines) in Costa Rica. In
addition, factors associated with the presence of
V. parahaemolyticus bacteria (rainy season and
water positive for the tlh gene) and pathogenic
genes (rainy season, water positive for the tlh,
pirA and pirB genes and time of collection: 42
to 49 days after stocking) were identified.
DISCUSSION
The three protocols implemented present-
ed good efficiencies and specificity, which
agrees with what has been reported by other
authors (Han, Tang, Pantoja et al., 2015; Han,
Tang, Tran et al., 2015; Micky et al., 2014). It
is important to mention that the primers used
in the amplification protocol of the partial
sequence of the pirA gene were previously used
with TaqMan probes (Han, Tang, Pantoja et al.,
2015), however, in the present work a much
more economical technique, the SYBR Green
I, was used. Our study shows this technique
provides reliable results.
The presence of plasmidic genes pirA, pirB
and V. parahaemolyticus in shrimp samples and
pond waters is reporte high frequencies. It was
also possible to determine the genes in the
intestines of juvenile shrimp, an organ that had
not been studied for genes in the country so far.
In relation to the groups of shrimp ana-
lyzed, high frequencies of the pirA and pirB
genes (55.5 %) and V. parahemolyticus (44.4
%) were determined; these data are consistent
with those reported by other authors when
finding high prevalences of AHNPD in shrimp
(Morales-Covarrubias et al., 2019; Peña-
Navarro et al., 2020).
Sirikharin et al. (2015) point out that when
working with field samples, including shrimp
tissues such as hepatopancreas and stomach,
9
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 73: e20253577, enero-diciembre 2025 (Publicado Dic. 02, 2025)
whole postlarvae and environmental samples
such as pond water in which the levels of
AHPND bacteria are low, a preliminary enrich-
ment step should be conducted. This is why all
the samples in this study were pre-enriched in
APW with NaCl. This culture medium is rec-
ommended as enrichment broth for Vibrio, so
perhaps this contributed to the high detection
of the genes of interest in addition to the fact
that the qPCR technique has a high detection
sensitivity when compared to conventional
PCR (Valasek & Repa, 2005).
The difference observed in the number of
cases identified as positive for the pirA gene
with respect to pirB could be explained by
one of the amplicon detection methods being
more sensitive than the other or by the pres-
ence of strains having only one of the genes
(Aranguren-Caro et al., 2020), however, further
studies are recommended to corroborate this.
With respect to the bacterial species iso-
lated from shrimp and water samples, not
all were identified as V. parahaemolyticus.
Although V. parahaemolyticus was initially
identified as the causative agent of AHPND in
shrimp, more recent studies have reported the
plasmid with the genes of interest in other Vib-
rio species, which caused AHPND in shrimp,
these species include Vibrio harveyi (Kondo
et al., 2015), Vibrio owensii (Liu et al., 2018),
Tab l e 2
Physicochemical parameters of the water quality of two ponds belonging to two shrimp farms (farm A and farm B) producing
L. vannamei shrimp in the Gulf of Nicoya, Costa Rica, during the year 2021.
Parameters Temperature (°C) pH Dissolved oxygen (mg/L) Salinity (ppt)
Optimal growth V. parahaemolyticus135-37 7.5-8.6 Facultative anaerobic 5-25
Optimal from shrimp farming228-30 7.5-8.5 5.0-10.0 15-25
Farm Sampling time Temperature (°C) pH Dissolved oxygen (mg/L) Salinity (ppt)
ASampling one 28.50 7.05 10.90 27.00
ASampling two 34.20 8.65 8.80 28.90
ASampling three 33.10 8.38 10.30 30.30
ASampling four 33.50 8.52 6.84 29.40
BSampling one 26.00 8.15 8.00 25.50
BSampling two 31.60 8.07 7.40 32.00
BSampling three 33.40 7.86 10.00 30.70
BSampling four 33.90 8.09 8.92 31.60
Average dry season 31.80 8.09 8.89 29.42
Max. 34.20 8.65 10.90 32.00
Min. 26.00 7.05 6.84 25.50
ASampling one 32.10 8.42 7.80 17.00
ASampling two 21.60 8.93 11.75 19.60
ASampling three 32.20 8.34 8.36 17.30
ASampling four 33.40 7.63 8.50 19.70
BSampling one 32.10 8.50 9.71 17.90
BSampling two 34.10 9.07 11.80 16.40
BSampling three 26.00 8.78 8.53 16.60
BSampling four 32.00 8.43 7.83 17.50
Average rainy season 30.44 8.51 9.28 17.75
Max. 34.10 9.07 11.80 19.70
Min. 21.60 7.63 7.80 16.40
Sampling one: day of stocking, sampling two: three to four weeks after stocking, sampling three: six to seven weeks after
stocking, and sampling four: nine to ten weeks after stocking. Values of parameters found to be outside the optimal range
for shrimp culture are highlighted in bold. / 1 Source taken from Urquhart etal. (2016) and Zamora-Pantoja etal. (2005). /
2 Source taken from Valverde (2020).
10 Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 73: e20253577, enero-diciembre 2025 (Publicado Dic. 02, 2025)
Vibrio campbellii (Dong et al., 2017) and
Vibrio punensis (Restrepo et al., 2018). Lee et
al. (2015) indicate that the pVA1 plasmid pos-
sessed by V. parahaemolyticus strains contain a
group of genes related to conjunctival transfer,
so it can potentially transfer not only between
V. parahaemolyticus strains but also to different
Vibrio species. Therefore, it is recommended in
future research to determine which species the
strains carrying the pirA and pirB genes that
are negative for V. parahaemolyticus belong to.
Thus, determining which other species in Costa
Rica present the pathogenic genes.
The detection of V. parahaemolyticus bac-
teria in a group of shrimp postlarvae is consis-
tent with reports by other authors that indicate
that infection of postlarvae with V. parahae-
molyticus bacteria is possible in the laboratory,
when they are in the last stage of metamor-
phosis (Aguirre-Guzmán et al., 2001). On the
contrary, the non-detection of the pirA and pirB
genes in the shrimp postlarvae indicates that
they were seeded free of pathogenicity genes,
which tends to think that the bacteria with
pathogenic genes could have been acquired
from water, food or sediments in the ponds and
not from the seed (Alonzo et al., 2017; Chonsin
et al., 2016; Thitamadee et al., 2016).
Alonzo et al. (2017) found in their study
that V. parahaemolyticus in shrimp rearing
water adhered to added feed, which facilitated
its entry into the shrimp gut; thereby, showing
that the oral cavity serves as an important por-
tal of entry for pathogens from the shrimp rear-
ing environment. In the farms studied, feed was
provided to the shrimp in troughs located at
different points in the ponds, at scheduled times
so that the shrimp in the water had access to it,
which could also provide a possible explana-
tion for the presence of this bacterium and the
genes of interest in the shrimp studied.
Another source of AHNPD infection could
also be sediments, as pathogenic V. parahae-
molyticus has been detected in shrimp pond
sediments (Thitamadee et al., 2016). It is for
this reason that it is recommended to always
implement proper preparation of the culture
area before stocking and properly manage the
pond during culture to exclude pathogenic V.
parahaemolyticus strains from the shrimp cul-
ture system. Because of the above, it is recom-
mended in future research to also analyze other
types of samples such as sediments or feed in
search, for the bacteria and pathogenic genes
(de Souza-Valente & Wan, 2021; Thitamadee
et al., 2016).
Zamora-Pantoja et al. (2005) indicate that
V. parahaemolyticus grows at temperatures
between 10 and 44 °C, but with an optimum
growth temperature of 35 °C and 37 °C.
Therefore, in this study, a higher probability
of finding qPCR-positive shrimp in summer,
when temperatures are higher, was expected.
In contrast, qPCR positive shrimp samples for
pirA, pirB and tlh were 4 (OR = 3.64), 3 (OR
= 2.8) and 15 (OR = 15.4) times more likely to
occur in the rainy season than qPCR negative
samples, respectively.
However, when comparing the water tem-
perature in the ponds during the dry and
rainy seasons, no significant differences were
observed; moreover, the water temperatures
recorded in both seasons were within the val-
ues considered optimal for the growth of V.
parahaemolyticus. Therefore, temperature in
this study was not a determining factor in the
probability of finding qPCR-positive shrimp
for the genes studied. The only factor analyzed
that was significantly different between the two
seasons was salinity, which could be related
to a higher probability of the presence of the
genes studied in the rainy season.
Studies have shown that in tropical zones,
salinity is an important factor that regulates
the dynamics of Vibrio and that a moderate
decrease in this parameter can promote the
abundance of Vibrio spp. On the other hand,
in some research works, a negative correla-
tion between salinity and V. parahaemolyticus
abundance has been observed (Machado &
Bordalo, 2016; Reyes-Velásquez et al., 2010).
In our study, it was determined that during
rainy season salinity presented on average a
significantly lower value (17.75 ppt) compared
to those from dry season (29.43 ppt), probably
due to the amount of rainfall that occurs during
11
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 73: e20253577, enero-diciembre 2025 (Publicado Dic. 02, 2025)
rainy season in Costa Rica, which produces
an increase in the water levels of the shrimp
ponds and thus a decrease in the concentration
of salinity.
If the optimal environmental range of V.
parahaemolyticus is considered, it generally
increases in abundance with salinity between 5
and 25 ppt (Urquhart et al., 2016). According
to this, the average salinity that was presented
during rainy season was more favorable for the
growth of V. parahaemolyticus than that deter-
mined during dry season, which was presented
above the optimal range for this bacterium,
which could explain the higher probability that
the samples of shrimp positive for pirA, pirB
and V. parahaemolyticus were presented in the
rainy season than the negative ones.
Shrimp qPCR positive for pirA, pirB and
tlh were identified to be 3 (OR = 3.35), 3 (OR
= 3.45) and 9 (OR = 9.00) times more likely
to occur in tlh gene positive pond water than
qPCR negative for these genes, respectively.
On the other hand, qPCR positive shrimp for
pirA and pirB were identified to be 4 (OR =
4.32) and 3 (OR = 3.45) times more likely to
occur in pond water positive for the pirA gene
than qPCR negative shrimp, respectively. In
addition, they were 11 (OR = 11.36) and 8
(OR = 7.95) times more likely to occur in pond
water positive for the pirB gene than negative
qPCRs, respectively. V. parahaemolyticus is
known to be a ubiquitous bacterial pathogen
naturally found in marine environments (Bak-
er-Austin et al., 2010; World Organization for
Animal Health, 2023). Therefore, this patho-
genic bacterium could be expected to enter
through the seawater used to fill and replace
the water in the ponds. Under favorable envi-
ronmental conditions, the bacteria would have
proliferated, thus facilitating its detection.
Such results are in agreement with those
found in a previous study that reported an asso-
ciation of the presence of Vibrio spp bacteria
with high replacement rates and water volume
in the ponds (Peña-Navarro et al., 2020), which
could lead to an imbalance in the abundance of
the different bacterial communities and a pro-
liferation of pathogenic Vibrio. Accordingly,
it has been reported that AHNPD can cause a
dysbiosis in the microbiota of the hepatopan-
creas of shrimp Litopenaus vannamei (Ávila-
Villa et al., 2023).
On the other hand, in our study, the pirA
and pirB genes began to be detected in both
shrimp and pond water between sampling two
and three, which corresponds to the period
between 21 and 49 days after restocking the
ponds. Authors such as Ananda-Raja et al.
(2017), Han, Tang, Tran et al. (2015), and Zor-
riehzahra and Banaederakhshan (2015), note
that V. parahaemolyticus appears between 20
and 30 days after stocking ponds with post-
larvae. Thitamadee et al. (2016) point out that
mortalities occur between 35 and 45 days after
postlarvae stocking. These studies support our
results by presenting the first detection in the
second sampling (21 and 30 days). However,
it was not until the third sampling (42-49 days)
when an association with the presence of the
genes was observed.
It was not possible to find differences
between the averages or medians of the salinity,
temperature, dissolved oxygen and pH factors
between positive and negative detection of the
gene of interest in the water. This could be due
to the fact that the samples came from a single
point in each sampling. Therefore, it is recom-
mended that more pond water sampling, which
better represents the distribution of the data, be
conducted in future research.
With respect to the optimal values of the
pond water for shrimp culture, the averages
of two variables were found to be above the
optimal values during dry season: tempera-
ture and salinity. Higher temperature values
could generate stress conditions in shrimp and
higher salinity values could represent a higher
energy expenditure in osmoregulation and thus
a lower growth rate. These alterations can be
exploited by opportunistic pathogens such as V.
parahaemolyticus, increasing their population
and colonizing their hosts (Carbajal-Hernández
& Sánchez-Fernández, 2013; Lazur, 2007).
Therefore, adequate management of the physi-
cochemical parameters of the water in shrimp
culture ponds is recommended.
12 Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 73: e20253577, enero-diciembre 2025 (Publicado Dic. 02, 2025)
Our results showed that Vibrio parahaemo-
lyticus bacteria and the pathogenic genes pirA
and pirB were successfully detected in shrimp
and pond water samples collected during both
seasons of the year in Costa Rica. However,
detection was more frequent during the rainy
season, probably due to a significantly lower
concentration of dissolved salts in pond water
compared to the concentrations found during
the summer season. This suggests that salinity
could be an important environmental variable
to consider in the ecology of pathogenic Vibrio
parahaemolyticus bacteria and the incidence
of AHNPD. In addition, high frequencies of
the genes studied were found, so it is recom-
mended that animal health authorities in Costa
Rica pay special attention to AHNPD, which
has been declared notifiable by the World
Organization for Animal Health (WOAH).
Ethical statement: The authors declare
that they all agree with this publication and
made significant contributions; that there is no
conflict of interest of any kind; and that we fol-
lowed all pertinent ethical and legal procedures
and requirements. All financial sources are
fully and clearly stated in the acknowledgments
section. A signed document has been filed in
the journal archives.
See supplementary material
a70v73n1-suppl. 1
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was supported by the Fondo
Especial de Estímulo a la Investigación 2019
of the Vicerrectoría de Investigación of the
Universidad de Costa Rica. Thanks are due to
the shrimp producers who participated in the
research. Also, to Donald Arguedas Cortés for
suggesting the initiation of this project and for
his support with the endpoint PCR protocols
and to José Pablo Mora Quesada for providing
advice on the statistical analyses.
REFERENCES
Aguirre-Guzmán, G., Vázquez-Juárez, R., & Ascencio, F.
(2001). Differences in the susceptibility of American
white shrimp larval substages (Litopenaeus vanna-
mei) to four Vibrio species. Journal of Invertebrate
Pathology, 78(4), 215–219. https://doi.org/10.1006/
jipa.2001.5073
Alonzo, K. H. F., Cadiz, R. E., Traifalgar, R. F. M., & Corre
Jr., V. L. (2017). Immune responses and susceptibility
to Vibrio parahaemolyticus colonization of juvenile
Penaeus vannamei at increased water temperature.
AACL Bioflux, 10(5), 1238–1247.
Ananda-Raja, R., Sridhar, R., Balachandran, C., Palani-
sammi, A., Ramesh, S., & Nagarajan, K. (2017).
Pathogenicity profile of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in
farmed Pacific white shrimp, Penaeus vannamei.
Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 67, 368–381. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2017.06.020
Aranguren-Caro, L. F., Mai, H. N., Kanrar, S., Cruz-
Flores, R., & Dhar, A. K. (2020). A mutant of Vibrio
parahaemolyticus pirABvp (+) that carries binary
toxin genes but does not cause Acute Hepatopancrea-
tic Necrosis Disease. Microorganisms, 8(10), 1549.
https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8101549
Ávila-Villa, L. A., Barco-Mendoza, G. A., Rodríguez-
Ramírez, R., Villanueva-Zayas, J. D., Martínez-Por-
chas, M., Villa-Lerma, A. G., Vallejo-Córdoba, B., &
Delgado-Domínguez, J. (2023). Screening the micro-
biota of hepatopancreas associated with toxin genes
pirABVP in Penaeus vannamei. Biotecnia, 26(1),
59–67. https://doi.org/10.18633/biotecnia.v26i1.2181
Baker-Austin, C., Stockley, L., Rangdale, R., & Martinez-
Urtaza, J. (2010). Environmental occurrence and
clinical impact of Vibrio vulnificus and Vibrio para-
haemolyticus: A European perspective. Environmen-
tal Microbiology Reports, 2(1), 7–18. https://doi.
org/10.1111/j.1758-2229.2009.00096.x
Broberg, C. A., Calder, T. J., & Orth, K. (2011). Vibrio para-
haemolyticus cell biology and pathogenicity determi-
nants. Microbes and Infection, 13(12–13), 992–1001.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2011.06.013
Carbajal-Hernández, J. J., & Sánchez-Fernández, L. P.
(2013). Diagnóstico y predicción del hábitat en la
camaronicultura. Computación y Sistemas, 17(3),
435–455.
Ceccarelli, D., Hasan, N. A., Huq, A., & Colwell, R. R.
(2013). Distribution and dynamics of epidemic and
pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus virulence factors.
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 3,
97. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2013.00097
13
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 73: e20253577, enero-diciembre 2025 (Publicado Dic. 02, 2025)
Chonsin, K., Matsuda, S., Theethakaew, C., Kodama, T.,
Junjhon, J., Suzuki, Y., Suthienkul, O., & Iida, T.
(2016). Genetic diversity of Vibrio parahaemolyticus
strains isolated from farmed pacific white shrimp and
ambient pond water affected by acute hepatopan-
creatic necrosis disease outbreak in Thailand. FEMS
Microbiology Letters, 363(2), fnv222. https://doi.
org/10.1093/femsle/fnv222
de Souza-Valente, C., & Wan, A. H. L. (2021). Vibrio
and major commercially important vibriosis disea-
ses in decapod crustaceans. Journal of Invertebrate
Pathology, 181, 107527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jip.2020.107527
Dong, X., Wang, H., Xie, G., Zou, P., Guo, C., Liang, Y.,
& Huang, J. (2017). An isolate of Vibrio campbellii
carrying the pirVP gene causes acute hepatopancrea-
tic necrosis disease. Emerging Microbes and Infec-
tions, 6(1), e2. https://doi.org/10.1038/emi.2016.131
Flegel, T. W. (2019). A future vision for disease control in
shrimp aquaculture. Journal of the World Aquacultu-
re Society, 50(2), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/
jwas.12589
Han, J. E., Tang, K. F. J., & Lightner, D. V. (2015). Genoty-
ping of virulence plasmid from Vibrio parahaemolyti-
cus isolates causing acute hepatopancreatic necrosis
disease in shrimp. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms,
115(3), 245–251. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao02906
Han, J. E., Tang, K. F. J., Pantoja, C. R., White, B. L., &
Lightner, D. V. (2015). QPCR assay for detecting and
quantifying a virulence plasmid in acute hepatopan-
creatic necrosis disease (AHPND) due to pathogenic
Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Aquaculture, 442, 12–15.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.02.024
Han, J. E., Tang, K. F. J., Tran, L. H., & Lightner, D. V.
(2015). Photorhabdus insect-related (Pir) toxin-like
genes in a plasmid of Vibrio parahaemolyticus, the
causative agent of acute hepatopancreatic necrosis
disease (AHPND) of shrimp. Diseases of Aquatic
Organisms, 113(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.3354/
dao02830
Hernández-Sampieri, R., Fernández-Collado, C., & Baptis-
ta-Lucio, M. del P. (2014). Metodología de la Inves-
tigación (6th ed.). McGRAW-HILL/Interamericana
Editores, S.A.
Herrera, W. (2016). Climate of Costa Rica. En M. Kappelle
(Ed.), Costa Rican ecosystems (pp. 19–29). Universi-
ty of Chicago Press.
IBM Corp. (2017). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Ver-
sion 25.0) [Software]. Armonk, IBM Corp.
Instituto Costarricense de Pesca y Acuicultura. (2020).
Acuicultura. INCOPESCA. https://www.incopesca.
go.cr/acuicultura/index.aspx
Kaysner, C. A., de Paola Jr., A., & Jones, J. (2004).
Chapter 9: Vibrio. En R. I. Merker (Ed.), Bacterio-
logical Analytical Manual (8th ed., pp. 1–45). FDA.
https://www.fda.gov/food/laboratory-methods-food/
bam-chapter-9-vibrio
Kondo, H., Van, P. T., Dang, L. T., & Hirono, I. (2015).
Draft genome sequence of non-Vibrio parahaemo-
lyticus acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease stra-
in KC13.17.5, isolated from diseased shrimp in
Vietnam. Genome Announcements, 3(5), e00978-15.
https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00978-15
Lazur, A. (2007). Growout pond and water quality mana-
gement. Join Institute for Food Safety and Applied
Nutrition, University of Maryland. https://www.
jifsan.umd.edu/files/pdf/GAqP%20Manuals/06%20
GAqPs%20Manual%20Ponds.pdf
Lee, C. T., Chen, I. T., Yang, Y. T., Ko, T. P., Huang, Y. T.,
Huang, J. Y., Huang, M. F., Lin, S. J., Chen, C. Y.,
Lin, S. S., Lightner, D. V., Wang, H. C., Wang, A. H.
J., Wang, H. C., Hor, L. I., & Lo, C. F. (2015). The
opportunistic marine pathogen Vibrio parahaemo-
lyticus becomes virulent by acquiring a plasmid that
expresses a deadly toxin. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences of the United States of Ameri-
ca, 112(34), 10798–10803. https://doi.org/10.1073/
pnas.1503129112
Letchumanan, V., Chan, K. G., & Lee, L. H. (2014). Vibrio
parahaemolyticus: A review on the pathogenesis,
prevalence, and advance molecular identification
techniques. Frontiers in Microbiology, 5, 705. https://
doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00705
Liu, L., Xiao, J., Zhang, M., Zhu, W., Xia, X., Dai,
X., Pan, Y., Yan, S., & Wang, Y. (2018). A Vibrio
owensii strain as the causative agent of AHPND in
cultured shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. Journal of
Invertebrate Pathology, 153, 156–164. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.jip.2018.02.005
Machado, A., & Bordalo, A. A. (2016). Detection and
quantification of Vibrio cholerae, Vibrio parahae-
molyticus, and Vibrio vulnificus in coastal waters
of Guinea-Bissau (West Africa). EcoHealth, 13(2),
339–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-016-1104-1
Martín-Ríos, L. D., Corrales-Barrios, Y., González-Salotén,
M., Carrillo-Farnés, O., Cabrera-Alarcón, H., &
Arenal-Cruz, A. (2022). Principales factores que
modifican el sistema inmune en camarones peneidos
estrategias para un cultivo sostenible. Revista de
Producción Animal, 34(1), 103–126. http://scielo.
sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2224-
79202022000100103&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=
es
Martínez-Chávez, C. C., Navarrete-Ramírez, P., Raggi-
Hoyos, L., Ríos-Durán, M. G., Fonseca-Madrigal, J.,
Chávez-Sánchez, M. C., Amillano-Cisneros, J. M., &
Martínez-Palacios, C. A. (2022). Retos y perspectivas
14 Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 73: e20253577, enero-diciembre 2025 (Publicado Dic. 02, 2025)
del sector acuícola rumbo al 2050. Ciencia Nicolaita,
83, 153–182. https://doi.org/10.35830/cn.vi83.572
Micky, V., Nur Quraitu’-Aini, T., Velnetti, L., Patricia-
Rowena, M. B., Christy, C., & Lesley-Maurice, B.
(2014). Development of a SYBR green based real-
time polymerase chain reaction assay for specific
detection and quantification of Vibrio parahaemolyti-
cus from food and environmental samples. Interna-
tional Food Research Journal, 21(3), 921–927.
Morales-Covarrubias, M. S., García-Aguilar, N., Bolan-
Mejía, M. del C., & Zamora-García, O. G. (2019).
Prevalence of the major diseases in Penaeus van-
namei farmed of Sinaloa México. Revista Científica
de la Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, 29(3),
198–206. https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.
php/cientifica/article/view/32298
Nelapati, S., Nelapati, K., & Chinnam, B. K. (2012).
Vibrio parahaemolyticus- An emerging foodborne
pathogen-A Review. Veterinary World, 5(1), 48–63.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/vetworld.2012.48-63
Peña-Navarro, N., Castro-Vásquez, R., Vargas-Leitón,
B., & Dolz, G. (2020). Molecular detection of
acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease (AHPND)
in Penaeus vannamei shrimps in Costa Rica. Aqua-
culture, 523, 735190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
aquaculture.2020.735190
Quesada-Céspedes, R., Arias-Valverde, S., Pacheco-Urpí,
O., Zúñiga-Calero, G., Pacheco-Prieto, O., Vega-
Bolaños, H., Calvo-Vargas, E., & Berrocal-Artavia,
K. (2019). Retos de la acuicultura marina litoral:
Caso cultivo de ostras en el Golfo de Nicoya, Costa
Rica. En Y. Morales-López (Ed.), Memorias del I
Congreso Internacional de Ciencias Exactas y Natu-
rales de la Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica, 2019
(e212, pp. 1–9). Universidad Nacional Costa Rica.
Restrepo, L., Bayot, B., Arciniegas, S., Bajaña, L., Betan-
court, I., Panchana, F., & Reyes-Muñoz, A. (2018).
PirVP genes causing AHPND identified in a new
Vibrio species (Vibrio punensis) within the commen-
sal Orientalis clade. Scientific Reports, 8, 13080.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30903-x
Reyes-Velásquez, C., Castañeda-Chávez, M. del R., Lan-
deros-Sánchez, C., Galaviz-Villa, I., Lango-Reynoso,
F., Minguez-Rodríguez, M. M., & Nikolskii-Gavri-
lov, I. (2010). Pathogenic vibrios in the oyster Cras-
sostrea virginica in the lagoon system of Mandinga,
Veracruz, Mexico. Hidrobiológica, 20(3), 238–245.
Sirikharin, R., Taengchaiyaphum, S., Sanguanrut, P., Chi,
T. D., Mavichak, R., Proespraiwong, P., Nuangsaeng,
B., Thitamadee, S., Flegel, T. W., & Sritunyalucksa-
na, K. (2015). Characterization and PCR detection
of binary, pir-like toxins from Vibrio parahaemo-
lyticus isolates that cause Acute Hepatopancreatic
Necrosis Disease (AHPND) in shrimp. PLoS ONE,
10(5), e0126987. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.
pone.0126987
Thitamadee, S., Prachumwat, A., Srisala, J., Jaroenlak,
P., Salachan, P. V., Sritunyalucksana, K., Flegel, T.
W., & Itsathitphaisarn, O. (2016). Review of current
disease threats for cultivated penaeid shrimp in Asia.
Aquaculture, 452, 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
aquaculture.2015.10.028
Tran, L., Nunan, L., Redman, R. M., Mohney, L. L., Panto-
ja, C. R., Fitzsimmons, K., & Lightner, D. V. (2013).
Determination of the infectious nature of the agent of
acute hepatopancreatic necrosis syndrome affecting
penaeid shrimp. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms,
105(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao02621
Urquhart, E. A., Jones, S. H., Yu, J. W., Schuster, B. M.,
Marcinkiewicz, A. L., Whistler, C. A., & Cooper, V.
S. (2016). Environmental conditions associated with
elevated Vibrio parahaemolyticus concentrations in
Great Bay estuary, New Hampshire. PLoS ONE,
11(5), e0155018. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.
pone.0155018
Valasek, M. A., & Repa, J. J. (2005). The power of real-
time PCR. Advances in Physiology Education, 29(3),
151–159. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00019.2005
Valverde, J. (2020). Manejo de la calidad del agua en el
cultivo de camarones: Análisis de un caso. AGEAR-
TH Ecuador. https://www.agearthecuador.org/
wp2020/2021/02/10/manejo-de-la-calidad-del-agua-
en-el-cultivo-de-camarones-analisis-de-un-caso/
Varela, A., & Varela-Moraga, T. (2019). La camaronicul-
tura como fuente sustentable de alimentos de origen
animal. Logros, retos y oportunidades. Ecología y
Desarrollo Sostenible, 1, 1–12. https://revistas.ulati-
na.ac.cr/index.php/ecologia/article/view/306
World Organization for Animal Health. (2023). Acute
hepatopancreatic necrosis disease. In Manual of
Diagnostic Tests for Aquatic Animals (11th ed., pp.
1–12). WOAH
Zamora-Pantoja, D. R., Quiróz-Santiago, C., & Quiñónez-
Ramírez, E. I. (2005). Un enemigo marino silencioso
Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Revista Digital Universita-
ria, 6(4), 1–9.
Zorriehzahra, M. J., & Banaederakhshan, R. (2015). Early
Mortality Syndrome (EMS) as new emerging threat
in shrimp industry. Advances in Animal and Veteri-
nary Sciences, 3(2), 64–72. https://doi.org/10.14737/
journal.aavs/2015/3.2s.64.72