1
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 74 (S1): e20266883, marzo 2026 (Publicado Abr. 22, 2026)
Historical analysis of the recovery of physical functionality in a coral reef
community following the implementation of active restoration practices
Adahara Muñoz-Alfaro1, 2; https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1736-4670
Alma Paola Rodríguez-Troncoso3; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6243-7679
Amílcar Levi Cupul-Magaña3; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6455-1253
José de Jesús Adolfo Tortolero-Langarica4; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8857-5789
Rafael Andrés Cabral-Tena5*; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2836-2834
1. Posgrado en Ecología Marina, Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada, Baja
California. Carretera Ensenada – Tijuana, No. 3918, Zona Playitas, 22860, Ensenada, B.C., México; adaharam_24@
alu.uabcs.mx
2. Doctorado en Ciencias Marinas y Costeras, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur. Boulevard Forjadores S/N,
Col. Universitario, La Paz, Baja California Sur, México.
3. Laboratorio de Ecología Marina, Centro Universitario de la Costa, Universidad de Guadalajara. Avenida Universidad
203, Delegación Ixtapa, Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco, 48280. México; alma.rtroncoso@academicos.udg.mx, levi.cupul@
academicos.udg.mx
4. Tecnológico Nacional de México, Instituto Tecnológico de Bahía de Banderas, Nayarit, México. Crucero a Punta de
Mita S/N, col. La Cruz de Huanacaxtle, Nayarit, 63734. México; adolfo.tl@bahia.tecnm.mx
5. Laboratorio de Arrecifes y Biodiversidad/Departamento de Ecología Marina, Centro de Investigación Científica y
de Educación Superior de Ensenada, Baja California. Carretera Ensenada – Tijuana, No. 3918, Zona Playitas, 22860,
Ensenada, B.C. México; rcabral@cicese.mx (*Correspondence)
Received 04-VII-2025. Corrected 09-XII-2025. Accepted 10-II-2026.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The Reef Functional Index (RFI) is a tool used to analyze the physical functionality of coral assem-
blages based on morpho-functional traits that support their geo-ecological roles. This tool has been applied to
assess the effects of active restoration on coral reefs under varying levels of stress. However, to date, it has not
been used to analyze long-term assisted recovery through restoration activities.
Objective: This study evaluated the historical trajectory of physical functionality over the long term (2012–2023)
in six coral reef communities within the Islas Marietas National Park (PNIM), considering that active restoration
efforts have been in place since 2014, using the RFI as a metric.
Methods: The RFI was used as an indicator of physical functionality to assess temporal changes in reef condi-
tion throughout the analysis period. The percentage of natural change and change subsidized by restoration was
calculated for both RFI and live coral cover (LCC).
Results: RFI values revealed that although coral communities in the PNIM had, by 2023, regained LCC levels
exceeding those recorded in 1997, physical functionality had not yet been fully restored. Restoration activities
have contributed to approaching historical functional values, even under the impact of various natural stressors;
however, spatial analysis at the island and site level indicated that recovery has not been uniform.
Conclusions: The findings highlight the need to review and adapt restoration strategies, emphasizing greater
efforts in sites where coral functionality remains below pre-disturbance levels. Additionally, the results dem-
onstrate that the RFI is a valuable tool for evaluating the long-term success of coral restoration and identifying
potential areas of opportunity in degraded reef sites.
https://doi.org/10.15517/3s8sp047
SUPPLEMENT
2Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 74 (S1): e20266883, abril 2026 (Publicado Abr. 22, 2026)
INTRODUCTION
Coral reefs are highly productive and bio-
diverse ecosystems (Burke et al., 2011), with
an estimated value of USD $352 000 ha-¹ yr-¹,
stemming from the social, economic, and eco-
logical functions they provide (Allemand &
Osborn, 2019; Woodhead et al., 2019). They
also fulfill essential geo-ecological functions
such as reef structure formation, the generation
of microhabitats, and sediment production (de
Groot et al., 2012; Perry & Álvarez-Filip, 2018).
Currently, coral reefs face both local and
global threats that are driving their degradation
(Souter et al., 2021), leading to declines in the
abundance of reef-building corals and causing
shifts in the composition and structure of asso-
ciated communities (Norström et al., 2009). To
mitigate reef degradation, restoration strategies
have been implemented over the past three
decades, aiming to support the recovery of both
foundational species and the ecosystems func-
tional capacity (Hein et al., 2021). However,
most interventions have focused on short-term
recovery (1–2 years), prioritizing indicators
such as coral survival and growth (Vaughan,
2021). As a result, it is now recommended to
implement long-term interventions (>5 years)
that allow for the evaluation of restoration
outcomes from both functional and geological
perspectives in a synergistic manner (Goergen
et al., 2020; Rinkevich, 2019).
Key words: physical functionality; Reef Functional Index (RFI); coral reef restoration, long-term recovery;
Marietas Islands National Park reefs.
RESUMEN
Análisis histórico de la recuperación de la funcionalidad física en una comunidad coralina
tras la implementación de prácticas de restauración activa
Introducción: El Índice de Función Arrecifal (RFI) es una herramienta que sirve para analizar la funcionalidad
física de los ensambles coralinos con base en rasgos morfofuncionales que sustentan sus roles geo-ecológicos. Esta
herramienta se ha aplicado para evaluar los efectos de la restauración activa en arrecifes coralinos bajo diferentes
niveles de estrés. Sin embargo, hasta la fecha, no se ha utilizado para analizar la recuperación asistida a largo plazo
mediante actividades de restauración.
Objetivo: Este estudio evaluó la trayectoria histórica de la funcionalidad física a largo plazo (2012-2023) en seis
comunidades arrecifales dentro del Parque Nacional Islas Marietas (PNIM), considerando que se han realizado
esfuerzos de restauración activa desde 2014, utilizando el RFI como métrica.
Métodos: El RFI se utilizó como un indicador de la funcionalidad física para evaluar cambios temporales en la
condición del arrecife a lo largo del período de análisis. El porcentaje de cambio natural y cambio subsidiado por
la restauración se calculó tanto para el RFI como para la cobertura de coral vivo (LCC).
Resultados: Los valores del RFI revelaron que, si bien las comunidades coralinas del PNIM habían recuperado,
para 2023, niveles de LCC superiores a los registrados en 1997, la funcionalidad física aún no se había restaurado
por completo. Las actividades de restauración han contribuido a aproximarse a los valores funcionales históricos,
incluso bajo el impacto de diversos estresores naturales; sin embargo, el análisis espacial a nivel de isla y de sitio
indicó que la recuperación no ha sido uniforme.
Conclusiones: Los hallazgos resaltan la necesidad de revisar y adaptar las estrategias de restauración, enfatizando
mayores esfuerzos en sitios donde la funcionalidad coralina se mantiene por debajo de los niveles previos a la
perturbación. Adicionalmente, los resultados demuestran que el RFI es una herramienta valiosa para evaluar el
éxito a largo plazo de la restauración coralina e identificar áreas de oportunidad potenciales en sitios arrecifales
degradados.
Palabras clave: funcionalidad física; Índice de Función Arrecifal (RFI); restauración de arrecifes de coral, recupe-
ración a largo plazo; arrecifes del Parque Nacional Islas Marietas.
3
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 74 (S1): e20266883, marzo 2026 (Publicado Abr. 22, 2026)
One approach to functionally assess coral
reefs is the Reef Functional Index (RFI), which
evaluates the status of physical functionality
in coral communities based on morpho-func-
tional traits that underpin their geo-ecological
roles (González-Barrios & Álvarez-Filip, 2018).
In the Eastern Tropical Pacific (ETP), the RFI
has been applied to understand the role of coral
species in reef functioning, particularly in the
Mexican Pacific, and to assess the effects of
active restoration from a functional perspec-
tive across areas with varying anthropogenic
impacts (Cabral-Tena et al., 2020; Muñoz-Alfa-
ro et al., 2023; Navarrete-Torices et al., 2023). It
also enables the characterization of natural reef
recovery following exposure to both natural
and anthropogenic stressors (González-Barrios
et al., 2021; McWilliam et al., 2018), showing
that the physical functionality of coral reefs
is not restored solely by increasing live coral
cover (LCC). However, to date, no long-term
(>1 year) analysis of assisted recovery through
restoration activities has been conducted using
the physical functionality approach.
Coral reefs in the Mexican Pacific (MP)
are characterized by patchy distributions and
are composed of assemblages dominated by
the genera Pocillopora, Porites, Psammocora,
and Pavona (Reyes-Bonilla et al., 2005). In this
region, average RFI values vary among locali-
ties, with the southern MP showing the highest
values (0.71 ± 0.1; Cabral-Tena et al., 2020),
followed by northern communities (0.65 ± 0.15;
Navarrete-Torices et al., 2023), while the Cen-
tral Mexican Pacific (CMP) exhibits the lowest
values, ranging from 0.28 to 0.71 (Muñoz-Alfa-
ro et al., 2023). However, these values do not
reflect the current condition, as the recent
2023–2024 El Niño event (López-Pérez et al.,
2024) resulted in accumulated coral losses of
over 70 % in several MP localities. Further-
more, the CMP region is particularly affected by
local stressors such as coastal development and
increased tourism (Burroughs & Rodríguez-
Troncoso, 2024). In response to these adverse
conditions, passive restoration strategies—such
as the implementation of tourist load regula-
tions (Cupul-Magaña & Rodríguez-Troncoso,
2017)—and active coral reef restoration pro-
grams have been promoted. One such program
has been ongoing in the Islas Marietas National
Park (IMNP) since 2014 (Tortolero-Langarica
et al., 2014) and continues to this day. Within
this context, the present study assessed the
historical trajectory of physical functionality
over the long term (2012–2023) in the coral
communities of PNIM, under the influence of
active restoration, using the RFI as a tool for
functional analysis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study area. The evaluation of physical func-
tionality was carried out at six sites within Islas
Marietas National Park (IMNP) (20°40’35”–
20°41’45” N, 105°33’30”–105°38’10” W). IMNP
comprises two volcanic islands, Isla Larga and
Isla Redonda, located approximately 7 km off
the coast of the Central Mexican Pacific (CMP).
Coral communities in this area are mainly dis-
tributed between 1 and 15 m in depth, with Isla
Larga harboring the highest coral species rich-
ness (Hernández-Zulueta et al., 2017) (Fig. 1).
This region is an oceanographic conver-
gence zone influenced by three major currents:
the California Current, which brings cold,
nutrient-rich waters; the Mexican Coastal Cur-
rent, which carries warm, nutrient-poor waters;
and the Gulf of California Current, character-
ized by warm, high-salinity waters. Sea surface
temperature in the region shows interannual
variation ranging from 23.3 to 30 °C (Kessler,
2006; Palacios-Hernández et al., 2010). The
area is also subject to decadal and interannual
thermal anomalies, including El Niño–South-
ern Oscillation (ENSO) events, with positive
phases reaching anomalies ≥ 3 °C and negative
phases (La Niña) ≤ –4 °C (Palacios-Hernández
et al., 2010).
Fieldwork. Six study sites were selected,
and starting in 2012, annual monitoring of live
coral cover (LCC, %) was conducted. At each
site, five semi-permanent 25 m transects were
laid parallel to the shoreline. LCC was assessed
using six 1 m² quadrats per transect, spaced
4Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 74 (S1): e20266883, abril 2026 (Publicado Abr. 22, 2026)
approximately 4 m apart. Historical data from
1996–1997 were also incorporated, based on
previous monitoring by Rodríguez-Zaragoza
(2001), which used three 10 m permanent
transects parallel to the shore. The transect
average was used as the experimental unit
in this study. Coral species at each site were
identified based on morphological traits fol-
lowing taxonomic descriptions (Veron et al.,
2016). Between 2014 and 2023, active restora-
tion activities were implemented, involving
direct transplantation of opportunity fragments
from the genus Pocillopora, as described by
Tortolero-Langarica et al. (2019).
To calculate the RFI, in addition to LCC
data (%), 15 coral colonies per species (7 spp.)
were randomly selected along the transects at
each site. For each colony, the maximum and
minimum diameters, height, and linear length
along the colony’s major axis were measured.
The perimeter was also measured using a No.
9 bead chain (2–3 mm) from one end of the
colony to the other.
Data analysis. The Reef Functional Index
(RFI) was calculated based on LCC. To esti-
mate the calcification rate (kg m-² yr-¹), the
morphology of each coral species was con-
sidered, following the method proposed by
González-Barrios & Álvarez-Filip (2018).
Extension rate (cm yr-¹) and skeletal density (g
cm-³) were based on local values reported by
Tortolero-Langarica et al. (2016) and Tortolero-
Langarica et al. (2017). Structural complexity
was estimated using the rugosity index (RI)
at the colony level, calculated as the ratio
between the perimeter, linear length of the
major axis, and the maximum colony height
(Alvarez-Filip et al., 2009).
Calcification rate, rugosity, and colo-
ny height were standardized to values rang-
ing from 0 to 1 using the following formula
(González-Barrios & Álvarez-Filip, 2018):
where x is the observed value of each growth
parameter.
To compute the RFI (González-Barrios &
Álvarez-Filip, 2018), the Functional Coefficient
(FC) was first calculated for each species by
averaging the standardized values of calcifica-
tion, rugosity, and height. Then, the RFI for
each site and year was calculated by summing
Fig. 1. Map of the study area and sampling sites: Isla Larga (IL); Zona de Restauración (ZR); Zona de restauración Sur (ZRS);
Cueva del Muerto (CM); Isla Redonda (IR); Playa del Amor (PA); Pavonas Platform (PP); and Túnel Amarradero (TA).
5
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 74 (S1): e20266883, marzo 2026 (Publicado Abr. 22, 2026)
the product of the LCC of each species present
at the site (expressed as a percentage), by its
respective CF value for each site and year.
To aid interpretation, a fourth root trans-
formation was applied to the RFI values, result-
ing in scores between 0 and 1, where values
closer to 0 represent low reef functionality
and values near 1 indicate high functional-
ity (González-Barrios & Álvarez-Filip, 2018)
(Table 1).
LCC and RFI were evaluated for each
transect. Both datasets were averaged annu-
ally at three spatial scales: park-wide (IMNP),
island-level (Isla Larga and Isla Redonda), and
site-level (Zona de Restauración: ZR, Zona de
Restauración Sur: ZRS, Cueva del Muerto: CM,
Playa del Amor: PA, Plataforma Pavonas: PP,
and Túnel Amarradero: TA). The percentage of
natural change and change supported by resto-
ration were calculated for both RFI and LCC.
Statistical analysis. To evaluate temporal
(2012-2023) and spatial patterns in coral cover
(LCC) and Reef Functional Index (RFI) across
the PNIM, Generalized Linear Mixed Models
(GLMM) were fitted. LCC was modeled using
beta-binomial distributions with a logit link.
This family was used because LCC data cor-
responded to proportions derived from counts
and exhibited over-dispersion. RFI was mod-
eled using beta-regression with a logit link.
This was selected because RFI is a continuous
variable bounded between 0 and 1. For each
metric, we first fitted a global model includ-
ing centered year as a fixed effect, followed by
models incorporating site or island as fixed
factors, and full interaction structures (Year
× Site, Year × Island) to test for spatial differ-
ences in temporal trends. Additionally, we fit-
ted independent models for each site and each
island to assess localized trajectories. Model fit
was evaluated using AIC and likelihood-based
diagnostics, and significance of fixed effects
was assessed using Type III Wald χ² tests. All
analyses were performed in R 4.2.2 using the
glmmTMB function of the glmmTMB package
for model fitting and Anova function from the
car package for inference. The models assump-
tions were validated through the generation of
residual plots using the simulateResiduals func-
tion in the DHARMa package.
RESULTS
The historical analysis of live coral cover
(LCC) in the Islas Marietas National Park
(IMNP) began with a baseline established in
1997, showing a park-wide LCC of 19.85 %,
with 18.1 % at Isla Larga and 21.6 % at Isla
Redonda (Fig. 2A, Fig. 2B, Fig. 2C). The aver-
age baseline for the Reef Functional Index
(RFI) at the PNIM scale was 0.6, with values
of 0.59 for Isla Larga and 0.61 for Isla Redonda
(Fig. 2D, Fig. 2E, Fig. 2F).
In 2012, at the start of the current monitor-
ing effort, the data showed a park-level LCC
decrease of -34.87 % (LCC = 12.93 ± 12.50 %),
Tabl e 1
Calcification rate, rugosity index, mean colony height, and functional coefficient for each coral species recorded in PNIM.
Species Calcification Rate (kg CaCO₃ m-² yr-¹) Rugosity Index SD Height (cm) SD FC
Porites panamensis 3.66 1.59 0.29 9 5 0.01
Pocillopora damicornis 24.97 3.43 0.24 23 0 0.57
Pocillopora verrucosa 25.70 5.13 2.00 17 9 0.67
Pocillopora capitata 23.28 5.41 0.93 21 7 0.68
Pocillopora grandis 25.44 5.75 0.95 21 7 0.74
Pavona clavus 12.79 1.88 0.47 25 10 0.28
SD = Standard deviation; FC = Functional coefficient.
6Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 74 (S1): e20266883, abril 2026 (Publicado Abr. 22, 2026)
with a reduction of -3.87 % at Isla Larga (LCC =
17.40 ± 14.57 %) and -60.85 % at Isla Redonda
(LCC = 8.46 ± 8.28 %) (Appendix 1). This trend
was also reflected in the RFI, which showed a
park-level decline of -30.37 % (RFI = 0.42 ±
0.19), with decreases of -15.27 % at Isla Larga
(RFI = 0.50 ± 0.17) and -44.90 % at Isla Redon-
da (RFI = 0.34 ± 0.18) (Fig. 2; Appendix 1).
At the site level, the highest LCC values
in 2012 were recorded at all three sites on Isla
Larga, with the highest in Zona de Restauración
(32.40 ± 14.10 %), while the lowest values were
recorded at Isla Redonda, particularly at Túnel
Amarradero (7.00 ± 7.39%) (Table 2). For RFI,
no clear spatial pattern was observed, with the
highest value at Cueva del Muerto (0.48 ± 0.09)
and the lowest at Playa del Amor (0.30 ± 0.22)
(Table 2).
In 2014, the year restoration activities
began, LCC at the park scale was 12.57 ± 11.51
%, with an average of 18 ± 13.29 % at Isla Larga
and 7.14 ± 5.86 % at Isla Redonda (Fig. 2c).
These patterns were also reflected in RFI, with
a park-wide value of 0.44 ± 0.17, and values
of 0.53 ± 0.13 at Isla Larga and 0.34 ± 0.14 at
Isla Redonda (Fig. 2d, Fig. 2e, Fig. 2f). In gen-
eral, sites located on Isla Larga exhibited higher
average LCC and RFI values compared to those
on Isla Redonda (Table 2).
Temporal analysis showed an increase in
both LCC and RFI from 2014 to 2015, followed
by a decline associated with the 2016 El Niño
Fig. 2. Historical trends in live coral cover (LCC; A, B, C) and reef function index (RFI; D, E, F) across different spatial scales
(a and d: PNIM; b, c, e, f: Islands). RP = start of the restoration program.
7
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 74 (S1): e20266883, marzo 2026 (Publicado Abr. 22, 2026)
event and Hurricane Roslyn in 2022 (Fig. 2,
Appendix 2, 3). In 2023, LCC increased to 20.69
± 14.24 % across PNIM, with 29.2 ± 13.73 % at
Isla Larga and 12.18 ± 8.75 % at Isla Redonda.
The site with the greatest increase was Cueva
del Muerto, while the lowest was Túnel Amar-
radero (Table 2; Appendix 1).
RFI also increased in 2023 compared to
values at the start of the restoration program,
reaching 0.54 ± 0.15 at the park scale (+22.59
%), 0.63 ± 0.12 at Isla Larga (+17.82 %), and
0.44 ± 0.13 at Isla Redonda (+30 %). At the site
level, the highest RFI increase was recorded at
Playa del Amor (+43.78 %), and the lowest at
Túnel Amarradero (RFI = 0.35) (Fig. 2, Table 2;
Appendix 1).
Over a period of more than 20 years, LCC
and RFI values surpassed the 1997 baseline
in 67 % and 44.44 % of the cases, respective-
ly. Zona de Restauración showed the highest
increase in both metrics (LCC +100.55 %, RFI
+15.40 %), followed by Isla Larga (LCC +61.36
%, RFI +6.64 %). The lowest increases were
observed at the park scale for LCC (+4.23 %)
and at Zona de Restauración Sur for RFI (+0.12
%). Notably, the sites located on Isla Redonda
did not surpass the historical LCC baseline
from 1997 (Table 2), a pattern that was also evi-
dent for RFI. On the island scale, Isla Redonda
showed a -27.24 % decrease in LCC relative to
the baseline, while IMNP showed a -10.62 %
decrease (Appendix 2–3).
When analyzing the GLMM models, we
found that the LCC showed a pattern of sus-
tained recovery in the PNIM between 2012 and
2023. The model (Appendix 4–5) indicated a
significant increase over time (β = 0.061, p <
0.001; χ² = 20.29, df = 1, p < 0.001), equivalent
to an average positive trend of approximately
6% per year. This result suggests that, on a
regional scale, the coral communities of the
PNIM have experienced continuous recovery
during the analyzed period. At the island scale,
the model (Appendix 6–7) showed a signifi-
cant increase over time (β = 0.084, p < 0.001,
χ² = 30.39, df = 1, p < 0.001) and differences
between Isla Larga and Isla Redonda (χ² =
146.14, df = 1, p < 0.001). Isla Larga exhibited a
significant positive slope (β = 0.084, p < 0.001),
while Isla Redonda maintained significantly
lower initial LCC values (β = −1.03, p < 0.001)
and a weaker trend that did not differ statisti-
cally from that observed on Isla Larga (Year
× Island interaction: p = 0.171). Overall, both
islands show signs of recovery, but Isla Larga
has higher values and greater rates of increase.
When analyzing site-level patterns, the models
(Appendix 8–10) revealed marked heterogene-
ity in recovery, showing differences between
sites (χ² = 243.82, df = 5, p < 0.001) and years
(χ² = 12.70, df = 1, p < 0.001). Four sites
showed positive and statistically significant
trends: Zona de Restauración (β = 0.104, p <
0.001), Cueva del Muerto (β = 0.090, p < 0.001),
Tabl e 2
Average live coral cover (LCC) and Reef Functional Index (RFI) values at the site level for the years 2012 (start of monitoring),
2014 (beginning of active restoration activities), and 2023 (end of the present study’s analysis).
Site 2012 2014 2023
LCC (%) RFI LCC (%) RFI LCC (%) RFI
ZR 32.40 ± 14.10 0.65 ± 0.10 27.70 ± 17.14 0.61 ± 0.11 36.30 ± 11.90 0.68 ± 0.07
ZRS 8.67 ± 8.31 0.38 ± 0.19 12.93 ± 7.63 0.50 ± 0.13 24.37 ± 13.20 0.59 ± 0.15
CM 11.13 ± 7.03 0.48 ± 0.09 13.37 ± 9.49 0.50 ± 0.13 26.93 ± 15.66 0.62 ± 0.12
PP 10.37 ± 8.37 0.41 ± 0.13 8.40 ± 5.57 0.37 ± 0.15 16.07 ± 4.67 0.52 ± 0.04
TA 7.00 ± 7.39 0.31 ± 0.20 6.20 ± 4.94 0.34 ± 0.14 7.20 ± 4.33 0.35 ± 0.18
PA 8.00 ± 10.39 0.30 ± 0.22 6.83 ± 7.85 0.32 ± 0.17 13.27 ± 13.26 0.47 ± 0.17
ZR = Zona de Restauración, ZRS = Zona de Restauración Sur, CM = Cueva del Muerto, PP = Plataforma Pavonas, TA = Túnel
Amarradero, PA = Playa del Amor.
8Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 74 (S1): e20266883, abril 2026 (Publicado Abr. 22, 2026)
Plataforma Pavonas (β = 0.092, p < 0.001),
and Zona de Restauración Sur (β = 0.059, p =
0.042). These sites represent the areas with the
clearest recovery, with annual increases ranging
from 6% to 10% of the LCC. In contrast, Playa
del Amor showed a positive but not statisti-
cally significant trend (p = 0.109), while Túnel
Amarradero showed no evidence of recovery (p
= 0.625) during the analyzed period. The year
× site interaction model confirmed this spatial
pattern. Most sites presented significantly dif-
ferent intercepts (Appendix 8), reflecting the
contrast in initial conditions.
On the other hand, the GLMM models
performed with the RFI as the response variable
indicate that there is a general pattern of sig-
nificant increase in functionality in the PNIM
between 2012 and 2023. The global model
(Appendix 11–12) indicated a positive and sig-
nificant effect of the year on the change in RFI
(β = 0.058, p = 0.005; χ² = 7.89, df = 1, p < 0.01),
revealing a sustained improvement in reef func-
tioning at a regional scale during the study peri-
od. At the island scale, as with the LCC case, the
model (Appendix 13–14) showed a significant
temporal increase (β = 0.0548, p < 0.001, χ² =
18.09, df = 1, p < 0.01) and differences between
Isla Larga and Isla Redonda (χ² = 176.29, df = 1,
p < 0.01). Isla Redonda (β = −0.839, p < 0.001)
presented significantly lower initial values than
Isla Larga (β = 0.055, p < 0.001), reflecting more
degraded baseline conditions. However, both
islands showed positive trends that did not dif-
fer statistically between islands (Year × Island
interaction: p = 0.841), indicating that, despite
differences in initial state, the rate of reef func-
tion recovery is similar between the two islands.
Site-specific models (Appendix 11–12) revealed
marked spatial heterogeneity (χ² = 251.37, df =
5, p < 0.001) in the RFI trajectory. Five of the
six monitored sites showed significant increases
over time (Appendix 15): Zona de Restauración
(β = 0.062, p < 0.001), Cueva del Muerto (β
= 0.060, p < 0.001), Plataforma Pavonas (β =
0.075, p < 0.001), Playa del Amor (β = 0.085,
p = 0.004), and Zona de Restauración Sur (β
= 0.050, p = 0.016). In contrast, Túnel Amar-
radero did not show a significant temporal
effect (p = 0.577), suggesting the absence of a
clear recovery trajectory at this site during the
study period. The year × site interaction model
(Appendix 12) confirmed spatial differences in
initial RFI values but did not detect significant
differences in the rates of change between sites
(Year × Site: p = 0.166). Thus, although the
sites differ in their starting state (Appendix 15),
most follow parallel recovery trajectories, with
Túnel Amarradero being the only exception.
Overall, the LCC and RFI trajectory results
indicate that, from 2012 to 2023, the coral com-
munities in the PNIM were steadily recovering
their ecological functionality, although with
significant spatial variation. Zona de Restau-
ración, Zona de Restauración Sur and several
sites on Isla Larga show the clearest signs of
improvement, while the trend is lagging in
Túnel Amarradero. This suggests that local
factors—including restoration efforts, specific
environmental conditions, and historical dis-
turbances—play a decisive role in the dynamics
of reef function recovery within the PNIM.
DISCUSSION
Data showed that over a decade (2012–
2023), both live coral cover (LCC) and the
Reef Functional Index (RFI) increased in most
years and sites, indicating a trend of coral com-
munity recovery in the IMNP. Previous studies
have documented that coral communities in
the Eastern Tropical Pacific (ETP) exhibit high
resistance and recovery capacity in response to
positive thermal anomalies caused by El Niño
events, which can reach up to +3.5 °C mo–1,
as well as to other natural and anthropogenic
stressors (Martínez-Castillo et al., 2022; Rome-
ro-Torres et al., 2020). Therefore, the observed
increases in both indices reflect not only the
efforts of the restoration program (Hein et al.,
2019) but also the natural recovery capacity
developed by corals in the region (Martínez-
Castillo et al., 2022; Romero-Torres et al., 2020).
Considering historical data, the highest
LCC and RFI values were recorded in 1997,
prior to the 1997–98 El Niño event (Rodrí-
guez-Zaragoza, 2001), which caused one of
9
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 74 (S1): e20266883, marzo 2026 (Publicado Abr. 22, 2026)
the greatest coral mortalities reported in the
last four decades, resulting in a 96 % loss of
coral cover in the Central Mexican Pacific
(Carriquiry et al., 2001). From that point until
2012, values continued to decline, driven by
the synergistic effects of subsequent thermal
anomalies such as the 2011 La Niña event
(Cruz-García et al., 2020) and the impacts of
coastal urbanization (Martínez-Castillo et al.,
2022). Notably, while the coral community has
recovered, its composition has changed. Earlier
studies reported that Redonda Island harbored
the highest live coral cover, primarily dominat-
ed by Porites panamensis (Rodríguez-Zaragoza,
2001). However, currently the highest coral
abundance is recorded at Larga Island, and as
in the rest of the ETP region, is dominated by
Pocillopora (Hernández-Zulueta et al., 2017;
Sotelo-Casas et al., 2016; Tortolero-Langarica
et al., 2014; Tortolero-Langarica et al., 2019).
In the Eastern Pacific, Pocillopora is the genus
with the lowest thermal stress resistance but
shows higher recovery capacity compared to
massive and sub-massive morphologies such as
Porites and Pavona (Cruz-García et al., 2020).
As a result, recovery has largely been driven
by the proliferation of Pocillopora, leading to
monospecific communities, similar to those in
the rest of the ETP (Romero-Torres et al., 2018;
Romero-Torres et al., 2020), with slower recov-
ery at Redonda Island and greater heterogeneity
in the system (Hernández-Zulueta et al., 2017;
Sotelo-Casas et al., 2016; Tortolero-Langarica et
al., 2014; Tortolero-Langarica et al., 2019).
Given that the restoration program began
in 2014, the declines observed at Redonda
Island and some sites at Larga Island from
2012 to 2014 reflect the natural dynamics of
the area and may be linked to increasing tour-
ism pressure. Since 2010, IMNP has grown
in popularity, with tourist influx increasing
from ~50 000 individuals in 2013 to 322 535
in 2015 (Burroughs & Rodríguez-Troncoso,
2024). This led to the implementation of regu-
lations and passive restoration actions such
as carrying capacity limits (Cupul-Magaña &
Rodríguez-Troncoso, 2017) to mitigate coral
cover loss. The negative impact of uncontrolled
tourism on coral cover and biodiversity loss has
been extensively documented (Cupul-Magaña
& Rodríguez-Troncoso, 2017; Harriott, 2004).
In contrast, data indicate that in sites classified
as restricted use areas, particularly in Zona de
Restauración Sur (Comisión Nacional de Áreas
Naturales Protegidas [CONANP], 2007), live
coral cover was maintained or even increased.
In our study, active restoration actions gen-
erated a gradual positive effect on the trajectory
of both LCC and RFI. Following implementa-
tion and over a decade, a sustained increase
was observed, though it was negatively affected
by the 2015–2016 El Niño event, considered
the first extreme ENSO of the 21st century
(Santoso et al., 2017). This event negatively
impacted both LCC and RFI not only at resto-
ration sites but throughout the entire Central
Mexican Pacific (Rodríguez-Troncoso et al.,
2023a). However, given that restoration efforts
continued, both indicators recovered on both
islands, demonstrating that restoration inter-
ventions can contribute to coral reef resilience
in the face of extreme climatic disturbances.
This pattern suggests that active restoration
favors the long-term recovery of physical func-
tionality, thereby reinstating key processes such
as habitat provision for multiple species.
Meteorological events such as hurricanes
have also been described as negative stressors
for coral reefs due to the mechanical damage
they can cause (Heron et al., 2008). Nonethe-
less, in the study area, Pocillopora spp. uses
asexual reproduction via fragmentation as a
primary strategy. Therefore, hurricane-induced
fragmentation may benefit coral communities
(Chávez-Romo et al., 2007; Rodríguez-Tron-
coso et al., 2023b). Nonetheless, considering
that after the impact of Hurricane Roslyn in
IMNP, a sharper decrease in LCC and RFI
was observed compared to the 2015–2016 El
Niño event, continued monitoring is essential
to identify recovery trajectories following such
meteorological events.
Although restoration consistently promot-
ed an increase in both LCC and RFI across all
cases, the magnitude of this increase was not
spatially homogeneous. Unlike the 2012–2014
10 Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 74 (S1): e20266883, abril 2026 (Publicado Abr. 22, 2026)
period, when LCC and RFI were unaffected
by restoration efforts, a greater increase was
recorded at Redonda Island compared to Larga
Island. The larger increase at Redonda Island is
noteworthy, as Larga Island is generally consid-
ered more suitable for reef development due to
its broader continental shelf, greater distance
from the coast, and shallower depth (CONANP,
2007; Hernández-Zulueta et al., 2017; Sotelo-
Casas et al., 2016). In fact, the Túnel Amarrade-
ro site showed the lowest increase in both LCC
and RFI regardless of restoration efforts. This
underscores the importance of considering
site-specific characteristics when implementing
restoration programs. Túnel Amarradero has
limited available substrate compared to other
sites, which not only restricts active restoration
actions but also natural processes such as coral
recruitment (Hernández-Zulueta et al., 2017),
thereby limiting restoration success (Burroughs
& Rodríguez-Troncoso, 2024).
In 2023, RFI values in IMNP indicated
that the average physical functionality remains
lower than that of other Mexican Pacific reefs.
Moreover, reef sites to the north and south
of the study area, dominated mainly by Pocil-
lopora, show nearly twice the live coral cover
(Cabral-Tena et al., 2020; Navarrete-Torices et
al., 2023), suggesting that they likely have high-
er RFI values, given the strong contribution of
branching species to reef physical functionality.
The observed increases in LCC and RFI
from 1997 to 2023 support the notion of a
recovery trend for coral communities within
the park, partially driven by active restoration
efforts. The greater increase at Redonda Island,
despite Larga Island previously showing greater
natural gains without intervention, suggests that
restoration actions are supporting the recovery
of both coral cover and physical functionality.
Overall, RFI analysis in this study followed
a similar trend to LCC across spatial scales.
However, the main difference between LCC
and RFI emerged when comparing baseline
data with values observed after nine years of
active restoration. Starting from the concept
that restoration is an intervention that seeks
to recover a degraded, damaged or destroyed
ecosystem (Bayraktarov et al., 2020; Boström-
Einarsson et al., 2020), this distinction is rel-
evant because, based solely on LCC, one might
conclude that by 2023, restoration had fully
recovered the ecosystem to pre-disturbance
levels. However, physical functionality had not
been fully restored. Similar patterns have been
observed in the Mexican Caribbean, where
functional recovery progresses more slowly
than LCC due to continuous exposure to natu-
ral and anthropogenic stressors (González-
Barrios et al., 2021).
Based on the results of this study, it can
be inferred that a historical analysis of coral
reef recovery using functional metrics like RFI
provides a more comprehensive and accurate
perspective. This approach allows us to track
LCC trends and the recovery of key reef func-
tions, such as habitat provision, and assess the
effectiveness and long-term sustainability of
restoration interventions. However, it is impor-
tant to note that RFI focuses solely on physical
functionality, and future studies should explore
complementary ecosystem-level functional
indices. Historical analysis further revealed
that restoration efforts in PNIM have aided in
restoring coral reef physical functionality to
levels approaching pre-disturbance conditions.
Nevertheless, as recovery has not been spatially
uniform, we recommend reviewing and adjust-
ing strategies for sites that have not yet regained
their physical functionality.
Ethical statement: The authors declare
that they all agree with this publication and
made significant contributions; that there is no
conflict of interest of any kind; and that we fol-
lowed all pertinent ethical and legal procedures
and requirements. All financial sources are fully
and clearly stated in the acknowledgments sec-
tion. A signed document has been filed in the
journal archives.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
To the Postgraduate Program in Marine
Ecology at CICESE, to the LEMAC at UDG.
AMA received a Masters scholarship from
11
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 74 (S1): e20266883, marzo 2026 (Publicado Abr. 22, 2026)
Secretaría de Ciencia, Humanidades, Tec-
nología e Innovación (Secihti) while conduct-
ing the study and writing the manuscript (CVU
135762). The present research was funded
by National Geographic Society Grant NGS-
55349R-19 and NGS-100354 C-23 to APRT,
Ciencia de Frontera CONAHCYT CF 2019–
86397 “Evaluación de la función geo-ecológica
de los arrecifes coralinas del Pacífico mexicano
to RACT, and by the project CONANP (PRO-
CER/CCER/DROPC/09/2016) and P0014-
DCB-2020 to ALCM.
REFERENCES
Allemand, D., & Osborn, D. (2019). Ocean acidifica-
tion impacts on coral reefs: From sciences to solu-
tions. Regional Studies in Marine Science, 28, 100558.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2019.100558
Alvarez-Filip, L., Dulvy, N. K., Gill, J. A., Côté, I. M., & Wat-
kinson, A. R. (2009). Flattening of Caribbean coral
reefs: region-wide declines in architectural complexi-
ty. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Scien-
ces, 276(1669), 3019–3025. https://doi.org/10.1098/
rspb.2009.0339
Bayraktarov, E., Banaszak, A. T., Montoya-Maya, P., Kle-
ypas, J., Arias-González, J. E., Blanco, M., Calle-
Triviño, J., Charuvi, N., Cortés-Useche, C., Galván, V.,
García-Salgado, M. A., Gnecco, M., Guendulain-Gar-
cía, S. D., Hernández-Delgado, E. A., Marín-Moraga,
J. A., Maya, M. F., Mendoza-Quiroz, S., Cervantes, S.,
Morikawa, M., … Frías-Torres, S. (2020). Coral reef
restoration efforts in Latin American countries and
territories. PloS One, 15(8), e0228477. https://doi.
org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228477
Boström-Einarsson, L., Babcock, R. C., Bayraktarov, E.,
Ceccarelli, D., Cook, N., Ferse, S. C. A., Hancock, B.,
Harrison, P., Hein, M., Shaver, E., Smith, A., Suggett,
D., Stewart-Sinclair, P. J., Vardi, T., & McLeod, I.
M. (2020). Coral restoration-A systematic review
of current methods, successes, failures and future
directions. PloS One, 15(1), e0226631. https://doi.
org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226631
Burke, L., Reytar, K., Spalding, M., & Perry, A. (2011). Reefs
at Risk Revisited. World Resources Institute.
Burroughs, C., & Rodríguez-Troncoso, A. P. (2024). Con-
trasts in ecological assessment and tourism sector
perceptions of coral reefs: a case study at Islas Marie-
tas National Park. Discover Oceans, 1(1), 10. https://
doi.org/10.1007/s44289-024-00014-9
de Groot, R., Brander, L., van der Ploeg, S., Costanza, R.,
Bernard, F., Braat, L., Christie, M., Crossman, N.,
Ghermandi, A., Hein, L., Hussain, S., Kumar, P.,
McVittie, A., Portela, R., Rodriguez, L. C., ten Brink,
P., & van Beukering, P. (2012). Global estimates of the
value of ecosystems and their services in monetary
units. Ecosystem Services, 1(1), 50–61. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.005
Cabral-Tena, R. A., López-Pérez, A., Alvarez-Filip, L.,
González-Barrios, F. J., Calderon-Aguilera, L. E., &
Aparicio-Cid, C. (2020). Functional potential of coral
assemblages along a typical Eastern Tropical Pacific
reef tract. Ecological Indicators, 119, 106795, 726–734.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106795
Carriquiry, J. D., Cupul-Magaña, A., Rodríguez-Zaragoza,
F., & Medina-Rosas, P. (2001). Coral bleaching and
mortality in the Mexican Pacific during the 1997–
98 El Niño and Prediction from a remote sensing
approach. Bulletin of Marine Science, 69 (1), 237–249.
Chávez-Romo, H., & Reyes-Bonilla, H. (2007). Sexual
reproduction of the coral Pocillopora damicornis in
the southern Gulf of California, Mexico. Ciencias
Marinas, 33(4), 495–501. https://doi.org/10.7773/
cm.v33i4.1141
Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas (2007).
Programa de Conservación y Manejo Parque Nacional
Islas Marietas. Secretaria de Medio Ambiente y Recur-
sos Naturales.
Cruz-García, R., Rodríguez-Troncoso, A., Rodriguez Zara-
goza, F., Mayfield, A., & Cupul-Magaña, A. (2020).
Ephemeral effects of El Niño–Southern Oscillation
events on an eastern tropical Pacific coral community.
Marine and Freshwater Research, 71(10), 1259–1268.
https://doi.org/10.1071/MF18481
Cupul-Magaña, A. L., & Rodríguez-Troncoso, A. P. (2017).
Tourist carrying capacity at Islas Marietas National
Park: An essential tool to protect the coral communi-
ty. Applied Geography (Sevenoaks), 88, 15–23. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.08.021
Goergen, E. A., Schopmeyer, S., Moulding, A. L., Moura,
A., Kramer, P., & Viehman, T. S. (2020). Coral reef res-
toration monitoring guide: Methods to evaluate restora-
tion success from local to ecosystem scales [Technical
memorandum]. National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration. https://doi.org/10.25923/xndz-h538
González-Barrios, F. J., & Álvarez-Filip, L. (2018). A fra-
mework for measuring coral species-specific con-
tribution to reef functioning in the Caribbean.
Ecological Indicators, 95, 877–886. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.08.038
González-Barrios, F. J., Cabral-Tena, R. A., & Alvarez-Filip,
L. (2021). Recovery disparity between coral cover and
the physical functionality of reefs with impaired coral
assemblages. Global Change Biology, 27(3), 640–651.
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15431
12 Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 74 (S1): e20266883, abril 2026 (Publicado Abr. 22, 2026)
Harriott, V. J. (2004). Marine tourism impacts on the Great
Barrier Reef. Tourism in Marine Environments, 1(1),
29–40. https://doi.org/10.3727/154427304774865850
Hein, M. Y., Birtles, A., Willis, B. L., Gardiner, N., Bee-
den, R., & Marshall, N. A. (2019). Coral restoration:
Socio-ecological perspectives of benefits and limita-
tions. Biological Conservation, 229, 14–25. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.11.014
Hein, M. Y., Vardi, T., Shaver, E. C., Pioch, S., Boström-
Einarsson, L., Ahmed, M., Grimsditch, G., & McLeod,
I. M. (2021). Perspectives on the use of coral reef
restoration as a strategy to support and improve reef
ecosystem services. Frontiers in Marine Science, 8,
618303. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.618303
Hernández-Zulueta, J., Rodríguez-Zaragoza, F. A., Araya,
R., Vargas-Ponce, O., Rodríguez-Troncoso, A. P.,
Cupul-Magaña, A. L., Díaz-Pérez, L., Ríos-Jara, E., &
Ortiz, M. (2017). Multi-scale analysis of hermatypic
coral assemblages at Mexican Central Pacific. Scien-
tia Marina, 81(1), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.3989/
scimar.04371.12A
Heron, S., Morgan, J., Eakin, M., & Skirving, W. (2008).
Hurricanes and their Effects on Coral Reefs. In C.
Wilkinson & D. Souter (Eds.), Status of Caribbean
coral reefs after bleaching and hurricanes in 2005 (pp.
31–36). Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network, and
Reef and Rainforest Research Centre.
Kessler, W. S. (2006). The circulation of the eastern
tropical Pacific: A review. Progress in Oceanogra-
phy, 69(2), 181–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
pocean.2006.03.009
López-Pérez, A., Granja-Fernández, R., Ramírez-Chávez,
E., Valencia-Méndez, O., Rodríguez-Zaragoza, F. A.,
González-Mendoza, T., & Martínez-Castro, A. (2024).
Widespread coral bleaching and mass mortality of
reef-building corals in Southern Mexican Pacific
reefs due to 2023 El Niño warming. Oceans (Basel,
Switzerland), 5(2), 196–209. https://doi.org/10.3390/
oceans5020012
Martínez-Castillo, V., Rodríguez-Troncoso, A. P., Mayfield,
A. B., Rodríguez-Zaragoza, F. A., & Cupul-Magaña,
A. L. (2022). Coral recovery in the Central Mexican
Pacific 20 years after the 1997–1998 El Niño event.
Oceans (Basel, Switzerland), 3(1), 48–59. https://doi.
org/10.3390/oceans3010005
McWilliam, M., Hoogenboom, M. O., Baird, A. H., Kuo,
C.-Y., Madin, J. S., & Hughes, T. P. (2018). Biogeogra-
phical disparity in the functional diversity and redun-
dancy of corals. Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences - PNAS, 115(12), 3084–3089. https://doi.
org/10.1073/pnas.1716643115
Muñoz-Alfaro, A., Rodríguez-Troncoso, A. P., Cupul-Maga-
ña, A. L., Tortolero-Langarica, J. J. A., & Cabral-Tena,
R. A. (2023). Evaluación de la restauración activa
mediante el índice de función arrecifal en arrecifes del
Parque Nacional Islas Marietas. Hidrobiológica, 33(2),
127–137. https://doi.org/10.24275/qdkw4636
Navarrete-Torices, C., Reyes-Bonilla, H., & Cabral-Tena,
R. (2023). Descripción de la funcionalidad física en
los arrecifes de coral de Isla Espíritu Santo, La Paz,
Baja California Sur. Hidrobiológica, 33(2), 191–200.
https://doi.org/10.24275/rhdh7182
https://doi.org/10.24275/rhdh7182
Norström, A. V., Nyström, M., Lokrantz, J., & Folke, C.
(2009). Alternative states on coral reefs: beyond
coral-macroalgal phase shifts. Marine Ecology Pro-
gress Series, 376, 295–306. https://doi.org/10.3354/
meps07815
Palacios-Hernández, E., Carrillo, L. E., Filonov, A., Brito-
Castillo, L., & Cabrera-Ramos, C. E. (2010). Seaso-
nality and anomalies of sea surface temperature off
the coast of Nayarit, Mexico. Ocean Dynamics, 60(1),
81–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-009-0244-z
Perry, C. T., & Alvarez-Filip, L. (2018). Changing geo-
ecological functions of coral reefs in the Anthropo-
cene. Functional Ecology, 33(6), 976–988. https://doi.
org/10.1111/1365-2435.13247
Reyes-Bonilla, H., Calderon-Aguilera, L., Cruz-Piñón, G.,
Medina-Rosas, P., Pérez, R. A., Herrero, M., Leyte-
Morales, G., Cupul-Magaña, A., & Carriquiry, J.
(2005). Atlas de Corales Pétreos (Anthozoa: Scleracti-
nia) del Pacífico Mexicano. Centro de Investigación
Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada.
Rinkevich, B. (2019). The active reef restoration toolbox is
a vehicle for coral resilience and adaptation in a chan-
ging world. Journal of Marine Science and Enginee-
ring, 7(7), 201. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7070201
Rodríguez-Troncoso, A. P., Tortolero-Langarica, J. J. A.,
Medellín-López, P., Canizales-Flores, H., Godínez-
Domínguez, E., & Cupul-Magaña, A. (2023). Evalua-
ción de los indicadores demográficos de Pocillopora
(Scleractinia: Pocilloporidae) en sitios insulares vs.
costeros: implicaciones para un programa de restau-
ración regional. Revista de Biología Tropical, 71(S1),
e54790. http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/rev.biol.trop..
v71is1.54790
Rodríguez-Troncoso, A. P., Tortolero-Langarica, J. J. A.,
Padilla-Guzmán, R., Kelly-Gutiérrez, L. D., & Cupul-
Magaña, A. L. (2023). Spatio-temporal variation in
the growth of coral fragments of opportunity in
the Eastern Tropical Pacific: implications for coral
reef restoration. Revista de Biología Tropical, 71(S1),
e54850. http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/rev.biol.trop..
v71is1.54850
Rodríguez-Zaragoza, F. A. (2001). Estructura de las comu-
nidades de coral hermatípico del Pacífico Nortropical
Mexicano [Master Thesis]. Universidad Autónoma de
Baja California. Baja California, México.
13
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 74 (S1): e20266883, marzo 2026 (Publicado Abr. 22, 2026)
Romero-Torres, M., Acosta, A., Palacio-Castro, A. M.,
Treml, E. A., Zapata, F. A., Paz-García, D. A., & Porter,
J. W. (2020). Coral reef resilience to thermal stress in
the Eastern Tropical Pacific. Global Change Biology,
26(7), 3880–3890. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15126
Romero-Torres, M., Treml, E. A., Acosta, A., & Paz-Gara,
D. A. (2018). The Eastern Tropical Pacific coral
population connectivity and the role of the Eastern
Pacific Barrier. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 9354. https://
doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27644-2
Santoso, A., Mcphaden, M. J., & Cai, W. (2017). The defi-
ning characteristics of ENSO extremes and the strong
2015/2016 El Niño. Reviews of Geophysics, 55(4),
1079–1129. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017RG000560
Sotelo-Casas, R. C., Cupul-Magaña, A. L., Rodríguez-Zara-
goza, F. A., Solís-Marín, F. A., & Rodríguez-Troncoso,
A. P. (2016). Structural and environmental effects on
an assemblage of echinoderms associated with a coral
community. Marine Biodiversity, 48(3), 1401–1411.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-016-0622-y
Souter, D., Planes, S., Wicquart, J., Logan, M., Obura, D., &
Staub, F. (2021). Status of coral reefs of the world: 2020
report [Technical report]. Global Coral Reef Moni-
toring Network (GCRMN) and International Coral
Reef Initiative (ICRI).
Tortolero-Langarica, J. J. A., Cupul-Magaña, A. L., Carri-
cart-Ganivet, J. P., Mayfield, A. B., & Rodríguez-
Troncoso, A. P. (2016). Differences in growth and
calcification rates in the reef-building coral Porites
lobata: the implications of morphotype and gender
on coral growth. Frontiers in Marine Science, 3, 179.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2016.00179
Tortolero-Langarica, J. J. A., Carricart-Ganivet, J. P.,
Cupul-Magaña, A. L., & Rodríguez-Troncoso, A.
P. (2017). Historical insights on growth rates of
the reef-building corals Pavona gigantea and Porites
panamensis from the Northeastern tropical Pacific.
Marine Environmental Research, 132, 23–32. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2017.10.004
Tortolero-Langarica, J. J. A., Cupul-Magaña, A. L., & Rodrí-
guez-Troncoso, A. P. (2014). Restoration of a degra-
ded coral reef using a natural remediation process:
A case study from a Central Mexican Pacific Natio-
nal Park. Ocean & Coastal Management, 96, 12–19.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.04.020
Tortolero-Langarica, J. J. A., Rodríguez-Troncoso, A.
P., Cupul-Magaña, A. L., Alarcón-Ortega, L. C., &
Santiago-Valentín, J. D. (2019). Accelerated reco-
very of calcium carbonate production in coral reefs
using low-tech ecological restoration. Ecological
Engineering, 128, 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
ecoleng.2019.01.002
Vaughan, D. (2021). Active coral restoration: Techniques for
a changing planet. J. Ross Publishing.
Veron, J. E. N., Stafford-Smith, M. G., Turak, E., & DeVan-
tier, L. M. (2016). Corals of the World [web page].
https://www.coralsoftheworld.org/page/home/
Woodhead, A., Hicks, C., Norström, A., Williams, G.,
& Graham, N. (2019). Coral reef ecosystem servi-
ces in the Anthropocene. Functional Ecology, 33(6),
1023–1034. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13331