Listening the Costa Rican diversity: status of the bioacoustics collection of the Museum of Zoology, University of Costa Rica

Authors

  • Montserrat Alvarado-Deckwart Laboratorio de Ecología Urbana y Comunicación Animal, Escuela de Biología, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica. / Colección de Ornitología, Museo de Zoología, CIBET, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica. / Sistema de Estudios de Posgrado, Escuela de Biología, Universidad de Costa Rica, San Pedro, San José, Costa Rica, 11501-2060. Author
  • Luis Sandoval Laboratorio de Ecología Urbana y Comunicación Animal, Escuela de Biología, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica. / Colección de Ornitología, Museo de Zoología, CIBET, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica. Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0793-6747

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/rev.biol.trop..v73iS2.64539

Keywords:

zoology; repository; ecology; acoustics; vocalizations.

Abstract

Introduction: Bioacoustic collections maintain, curate, and preserve animal sounds gathered by biologists and naturalists, serving as valuable archives of the planet's acoustic biodiversity. These collections facilitate the study of species behavior, distribution, and ecology. These collections provide valuable information for the conservation of endangered species and habitats.

Objective: This study describes the current status of the Bioacoustics Collection at the Museum of Zoology, CIBET, University of Costa Rica.

Methods: We reviewed the 4,366 recordings cataloged in the collection, and provided information on their distribution across taxonomic groups, and on the specific geographic locations within Costa Rica where they were obtained. We also discuss the importance of this collection as a key repository for bioacoustics research both nationally and internationally.

Results: The collection predominantly comprises bird recordings, representing approximately 58.15% of Costa Rica's avian species. Additionally, the collection includes recordings of other groups, such as amphibians and mammals.

Conclusions: The analysis revealed the importance of the collection for scientific research, conservation, and environmental education. This collection outstands as a vital resource for future bioacoustic research in Costa Rica and beyond. It also highlights the need to enhance the representation of other taxonomic groups and invites researchers to contribute to this repository, as a source for a better understanding the acoustic diversity and support conservation efforts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Araya-Ajoy, Y., Chaves-Campos, J., Kalko, E. K. V., & DeWoody, J. A. (2009). High-pitched notes during vocal contests signal genetic diversity in ocellated antbirds. PLoS ONE, 4(12), e8137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008137

Bardeli, R., Wolff, D., Kurth, F., Koch, M., Tauchert, K.-H., & Frommolt, K.-H. (2010). Detecting bird sounds in a complex acoustic environment and application to bioacoustic monitoring. Pattern Recognition Letters, 31(12), 1524–1534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2009.09.014

Barrantes, G., Sánchez, C., Hilje, B., & Jaffé, R. (2008). Male song variation of Green Violetear (Colibri thalassinus) in the Talamanca Mountain Range, Costa Rica. The Wilson Journal of Ornithology, 120(3), 519–524. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1676/07-024.1

Bartonička, T., Miketová, N., & Hulva, P. (2019). High throughput bioacoustic monitoring and phenology of the Greater Noctule Bat (Nyctalus lasiopterus) compared to other migratory species. Acta Chiropterologica, 21(1), 75–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3161/15081109ACC2019.21.1.006

Blumstein, D. T., Mennill, D. J., Clemins, P., Girod, L., Yao, K., Patricelli, G., Deppe, J. L., Krakauer, A. H., Clark, C., Cortopassi, K. A., Hanser, S. F., McCowan, B., Ali, A. M., & Kirschel, A. N. G. (2011). Acoustic monitoring in terrestrial environments using microphone arrays: applications, technological considerations and prospectus. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48(3), 758–767. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01993.x

Browning, E., Gibb, R., Glover-Kapfer, P., & Jones, K. E. (2017). Passive acoustic monitoring in ecology and conservation. En WWF Conservation Technology Series, 1(2).

Camacho-Alpízar, A., Fuchs, E. J., & Barrantes, G. (2018). Effect of barriers and distance on song, genetic, and morphological divergence in the highland endemic Timberline Wren (Thryorchilus browni, Troglodytidae). PLOS ONE, 13(12), e0209508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209508

Campos-Cerqueira, M., & Aide, T. M. (2016). Improving distribution data of threatened species by combining acoustic monitoring and occupancy modelling. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(11), 1340–1348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12599

Dena, S., Zornosa-Torres, C., Bovolon, J. P., Paiva, F., Mendes-Machado, T., Do Prado, J. S., Ernetti, J. R., Carrasco-Medina, A. S., de Assis, C. L., de Mello Marinho, R. V., Lingnau, R., Hammen-Llanos, F., Toledo, L. F., & Augusto-Alves, G. (2024). Audiovisual collections safeguard undescribed calls: description of anuran vocalisations based on recordings from a public sound library. Bioacoustics, 33(5), 401–432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2024.2382793

Fitzpatrick, J. W., Lammertink, M., Luneau, M. D., Gallagher, T. W., Harrison, B. R., Sparling, G. M., Rosenberg, K. V., Rohrbaugh, R. W., Swarthout, E. C. H., Wrege, P. H., Swarthout, S. B., Dantzker, M. S., Charif, R. A., Barksdale, T. R., Remsen, J. V., Simon, S. D., & Zollner, D. (2005). Ivory-billed Woodpecker (Campephilus principalis) persists in continental North America. Science, 308(5727), 1460–1462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1114103

Gaunt, S. L. L., Nelson, D. A., Dantzker, M. S., Budney, G. F., & Bradbury, J. W. (2005). New directions for bioacoustics collections. The Auk, 122(3), 984–987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/122.3.984

Gutiérrez-Vannucchi, A. -C. (2021). Efectos de la contaminación antropogénica sobre la comunicación acústica de anfibios en ambientes urbanos. [Tesis de maestría]. Repositorio Kerwa – Universidad de Costa Rica.

Gutiérrez-Vannucchi, A.-C., Rodríguez-Umaña, P., Sandoval, L., & García-Rodríguez, A. (2019). Variación en la actividad acústica de Hyalinobatrachium fleischmanni (Anura: Centrolenidae) en un ambiente urbano con diferentes niveles de ruido antropogénico. Revista de Biología Tropical, 67, 249–258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v67i2SUPL.37237

Holmes, S. B., McIlwrick, K. A., & Venier, L. A. (2014). Using automated sound recording and analysis to detect bird species-at-risk in southwestern Ontario woodlands. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 38(3), 591–598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.421

Horne, J. K. (2000). Acoustic approaches to remote species identification: a review. Fisheries Oceanography, 9(4), 356–371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2419.2000.00143.x

Hume, J. P. (2017). Extinct birds (2a ed.). Christopher Helm.

Jacobson, S. K., & Vandenberg, J. J. (1991). Reproductive ecology of the endangered Golden Toad (Bufo periglenes). Journal of Herpetology, 25(3), 321–327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1564591

Janik, V. M. (2005). Underwater acoustic communication networks in marine mammals. En P. K. McGregor (Ed.), Animal Communication Networks (pp. 390–415). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610363.022

Juárez, R., Araya-Ajoy, Y. G., Barrantes, G., & Sandoval, L. (2021). House Wrens (Troglodytes aedon) reduce repertoire size and change song element frequencies in response to anthropogenic noise. Ibis, 163(1), 52–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12844

Karapostoli, A., & Votsi, N.-E. (2018). Urban soundscapes in the historic centre of Thessaloniki: sonic architecture and sonic identity. Sound Studies, 4(2), 162–177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20551940.2019.1582744

Krause, B. L. (2002). Wild Soundscapes in the National Parks: An Educational Program Guide to Listening and Recording. US Department of the Interior, National Park Service.

Lambert, K. T. A., & McDonald, P. G. (2014). A low-cost, yet simple and highly repeatable system for acoustically surveying cryptic species. Austral Ecology, 39(7), 779–785. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.12143

Leenders, T. (2016). Amphibians of Costa Rica. Zona Tropical. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501706165

Lostanlen, V., Salamon, J., Farnsworth, A., Kelling, S., & Bello, J. P. (2019). Robust sound event detection in bioacoustic sensor networks. PLOS ONE, 14(10), e0214168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214168

Measey, G. J., Stevenson, B. C., Scott, T., Altwegg, R., & Borchers, D. L. (2017). Counting chirps: acoustic monitoring of cryptic frogs. Journal of Applied Ecology, 54(3), 894–902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12810

Méndez, C., Barrantes, G., & Sandoval, L. (2021). The effect of noise variation over time and between populations on the fine spectrotemporal characteristics of different vocalization types. Behavioural Processes, 182, 104282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104282

Molina-Mora, I., Ruíz-Gutiérrez, V., Vega-Hidalgo, Á., & Sandoval, L. (2024). The utility of passive acoustic monitoring for using birds as indicators of sustainable agricultural management practices. Frontiers in Bird Science, 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbirs.2024.1386759

Oliver, R. Y., Ellis, D. P. W., Chmura, H. E., Krause, J. S., Pérez, J. H., Sweet, S. K., Gough, L., Wingfield, J. C., & Boelman, N. T. (2018). Eavesdropping on the Arctic: Automated bioacoustics reveal dynamics in songbird breeding phenology. Science Advances, 4(6), eaaq1084. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaq1084

Oswald, J. N., Van Cise, A. M., Dassow, A., Elliott, T., Johnson, M. T., Ravignani, A., & Podos, J. (2022). A Collection of Best Practices for the Collection and Analysis of Bioacoustic Data. Applied Sciences, 12(23), 12046. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app122312046

Penar, W., Magiera, A., & Klocek, C. (2020). Applications of bioacoustics in animal ecology. Ecological Complexity, 43, 100847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2020.100847

Picciulin, M., Kéver, L., Parmentier, E., & Bolgan, M. (2019). Listening to the unseen: Passive acoustic monitoring reveals the presence of a cryptic fish species. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 29(2), 202–210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2973

Pijanowski, B. C., Villanueva-Rivera, L. J., Dumyahn, S. L., Farina, A., Krause, B. L., Napoletano, B. M., Gage, S. H., & Pieretti, N. (2011). Soundscape ecology: the science of sound in the landscape. BioScience, 61(3), 203–216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2011.61.3.6

Protti-Sánchez, F., García-Rodríguez, A., Barrantes, G., & Sandoval, L. (2023). Does variation in call rate affect the response of territorial males in the Strawberry Poison Frog (Oophaga pumilio)? Ichthyology & Herpetology, 111(2), 248–253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1643/h2021052

Quammen, D. (1996). The song of the Dodo: island biogeography in an age of extinctions. Scribner.

Ramírez-Fernández, J. D., Sánchez, R., May-Collado, L. J., González-Maya, J. F., & Rodríguez-Herrera, B. (2023). Revised checklist and conservation status of the mammals of Costa Rica. Therya, 14(2), 233–244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12933/therya-23-2142

Ranft, R. (2004). Natural sound archives: past, present and future. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 76(2), 456–460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0001-37652004000200041

Ribeiro, J. W., Harmon, K., Leite, G. A., de Melo, T. N., LeBien, J., & Campos-Cerqueira, M. (2022). Passive acoustic monitoring as a tool to investigate the spatial distribution of invasive alien species. Remote Sensing, 14(18), 4565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14184565

Ross, S. R. P.-J., O’Connell, D. P., Deichmann, J. L., Desjonquères, C., Gasc, A., Phillips, J. N., Sethi, S. S., Wood, C. M., & Burivalova, Z. (2023). Passive acoustic monitoring provides a fresh perspective on fundamental ecological questions. Functional Ecology, 37(4), 959–975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.14275

Salamon, J., Bello, J. P., Farnsworth, A., Robbins, M., Keen, S., Klinck, H., & Kelling, S. (2016). Towards the automatic classification of avian flight calls for bioacoustic monitoring. PLOS ONE, 11(11), e0166866. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166866

Sánchez, N. V., Sandoval, L., Hedley, R. W., St. Clair, C. C., & Bayne, E. M. (2022). Relative importance for Lincoln’s Sparrow (Melospiza lincolnii) occupancy of vegetation type versus noise caused by industrial development. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 10, 810087. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.810087

Sandoval, L. (2011). Male-male vocal interactions in a territorial neotropical quail: which song characteristics predict a territorial male’s response? Behaviour, 148(9/10), 1103–1120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/000579511X596570

Sandoval, L., Juárez, R., & Villarreal, M. (2018). Different messages are transmitted by individual duet contributions and complete duets in a species with highly overlapped duets. The Open Ornithology Journal, 11, 56-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1874453201811010056

Sandoval, L., Bitton, P.-P., Doucet, S. M., & Mennill, D. J. (2014). Analysis of plumage, morphology, and voice reveals species-level differences between two subspecies of Prevost’s Ground-sparrow Melozone biarcuata (Prévost and Des Murs) (Aves: Emberizidae). Zootaxa, 3895(1), 103–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3895.1.6

Sandoval, L., & Escalante, I. (2011). Song description and individual variation in males of the Common Pauraque (Nyctidromus albicollis). Ornitología Neotropical, 22(2), 173–185.

Sandoval, L., Méndez, C., & Mennill, D. J. (2016). Vocal behaviour of White-eared Ground-sparrows (Melozone leucotis) during the breeding season: Repertoires, diel variation, behavioural contexts, and individual distinctiveness. Journal of Ornithology, 157(1), 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-015-1237-y

Sandoval, L., & Nishida, K. (2015). The first record of an audible sound produced by a Ghost Moth, Phassus (Hepialidae) from Costa Rica. The Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera, 48, 45–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/p.266471

Solow, A., Smith, W., Burgman, M., Rout, T., Wintle, B., & Roberts, D. (2012). Uncertain sightings and the extinction of the Ivory-Billed Woodpecker. Conservation Biology, 26(1), 180–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01743.x

Sueur, J., Aubin, T., & Simonis, C. (2008). Seewave, a free modular tool for sound analysis and synthesis. Bioacoustics, 18(2), 213–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2008.9753600

Sugai, L. S. M., & Llusia, D. (2019). Bioacoustic time capsules: Using acoustic monitoring to document biodiversity. Ecological Indicators, 99, 149–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.12.021

Trejos, C., & Barrantes, G. (2014). Natural history and acoustic repertoire of the Large-footed Finch (Pezopetes capitalis), an endemic, highland bird of Costa Rica and Western Panama. Ornitología Neotropical, 25, 261–271.

Vargas-Castro, L. E., Sánchez, N. V., & Barrantes, G. (2012). Repertoire size and syllable sharing in the song of the Clay-colored Thrush (Turdus grayi). The Wilson Journal of Ornithology, 124(3), 446–453. https://doi.org/10.1676/11-044.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1676/11-044.1

Webster, M. S., & Budney, G. F. (2017). Sound archives and media specimens in the 21st Century. En C. Brown & T. Riede (Eds.), Comparative Bioacoustics: An Overview (pp. 462–485). Bentham Science Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/9781681083179117010014

Wrege, P. H., Rowland, E. D., Keen, S., & Shiu, Y. (2017). Acoustic monitoring for conservation in tropical forests: examples from forest elephants. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 8(10), 1292–1301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12730

Published

2025-03-26