Top predator feces: behavioral consequences for coexisting species
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/m5j8t121Keywords:
scent marks, feces detection, animal behavior, top carnivoresAbstract
Introduction: Deposition of feces in the environment is a key behavior in the ecology of predator carnivores, which promotes behavioral changes in animals, influencing the ecology, abundance, and distribution of the species with which they coexist. Objective: To analyze whether jaguar feces are detected by other jaguars and mammal species and if they have behavioral effects. Methods: We recorded the behavior of jaguar (Panthera onca), puma (Puma concolor), mesocarnivores (Leopardus pardalis, Leopardus wiedii, Herpailurus yagouaroundi), and prey species using camera traps, at marked sites (with jaguar feces; n = 28) and control sites (without jaguar feces; n = 10). Using the records, we analyzed, for rainy and dry seasons: (1) the detection of jaguar feces by animals and (2) whether animals modify their exploration, remarking, vigilance and foraging behavior after detecting jaguar feces. Results: The detection of jaguar feces by jaguars and pumas was similar and the detection was higher in dry season. Regarding the behaviors analyzed, jaguars explored 15 times more and remarked 13 more times, marked sites than control sites. Pumas explored eight times more marked sites than control sites. Mesocarnivores explored marked sites 17 times more than control sites. Prey explored 41 times more and increased their vigilance 24 times more at marked sites compared to control sites times. Conclusions: Jaguar feces are detected by conspecifics and other mammal species, and they have behavioral effects on them. This can trigger changes in the abundance and distribution of populations and may be one of the ways that large predators shape ecosystems.
Downloads
References
Allen, M. L., Avrin, A. C., Wittmer, H. U., Wang, Y., & Wilmers, C. C. (2024). Mesocarnivores vary in their spatiotemporal avoidance strategies at communications hubs of an apex carnivore. Oecologia, 204(4), 805-813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-024-05541-y
Allen, M. L., Gunther, M. S., & Wilmers, C. C. (2017). The scent of your enemy is my friend? The acquisition of large carnivore scent by a smaller carnivore. Journal of Ethology, 35, 13-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-016-0492-6
Allen, M. L., Rovero, F., Oberosler, V., Augugliaro, C., & Krofel, M. (2023). Effects of snow leopards (Panthera uncia) on olfactory communication of Pallas’s cats (Otocolobus manul) in the Altai Mountains, Mongolia. Behaviour, 1(aop), 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539X-bja10229
Allen, M. L., Wittmer, H. U., Houghtaling, P., Smith, J., Elbroch, L. M., & Wilmers, C. C. (2015). The role of scent marking in mate selection by female pumas (Puma concolor). PLoS One, 10(10), e0139087. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139087
Allen, M. L., Wittmer, H. U., Setiawan, E., Jaffe, S., & Marshall, A. J. (2016). Scent marking in Sunda clouded leopards (Neofelis diardi): novel observations close a key gap in understanding felid communication behaviours. Scientific reports, 6(1), 35433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35433
Altendorf, K. B., Laundré, J. W., López González, C. A., & Brown, J. S. (2001). Assessing effects of predation risk on foraging behavior of mule deer. Journal of mammalogy, 82(2), 430-439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1644/1545-1542(2001)082<0430:AEOPRO>2.0.CO;2
Apfelbach, R., Blanchard, C. D., Blanchard, R. J., Hayes, R. A., & McGregor, I. S. (2005). The effects of predator odors in mammalian prey species: a review of field and laboratory studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 29(8), 1123-1144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.05.005
Ávila–Nájera, D. M., Palomares, F., Chávez, C., Tigar, B., & Mendoza, G. D. (2018). Jaguar (Panthera onca) and puma (Puma concolor) diets in Quintana Roo, Mexico. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 41(2), 257-266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32800/abc.2018.41.0257
Bai, D., Kang, Y., Ruan, S., & Wang, L. (2021). Dynamics of an intraguild predation food web model with strong Allee effect in the basal prey. Nonlinear analysis: real world applications, 58, 103206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2020.103206
Berger, J. (2010). Fear-mediated food webs. Trophic cascades: predators, prey, and the changing dynamics of nature, 241-253.
Buesching, C. D., & Jordan, N. R. (2022). The function of carnivore latrines: review, case studies, and a research framework for hypothesis testing. Small carnivores: Evolution, ecology, behaviour, and conservation, 131-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118943274.ch7
Ceballos, G., Zarza, H., Chávez, C., & González-Maya, J. F. (2016). Ecology and conservation of jaguars in Mexico. Tropical conservation: Perspectives on local and global priorities, 13, 273.
Chávez, C. (2010). Ecology and conservation of jaguar (Panthera onca) and puma (Puma concolor) in the Calakmul region and its implications for the conservation of the Yucatán Peninsula. Departamento de Biología Animal. Universidad de Granada, Granada, España, 111.
Cornhill, K. L., & Kerley, G. I. (2020). Cheetah communication at scent-marking sites can be inhibited or delayed by predators. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 74, 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-020-2802-9
Davis, R. S., Yarnell, R. W., Gentle, L. K., Uzal, A., Mgoola, W. O., & Stone, E. L. (2021). Prey availability and intraguild competition regulate the spatiotemporal dynamics of a modified large carnivore guild. Ecology and Evolution, 11(12), 7890-7904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7620
Dugatkin, L. A. (2020). Principles of animal behavior. University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226448411.001.0001
Elbroch, L. M., & Quigley, H. (2017). Social interactions in a solitary carnivore. Current Zoology, 63(4), 357-362.
Elbroch, L. M., & Kusler, A. (2018). Are pumas subordinate carnivores, and does it matter?. PeerJ, 6, e4293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4293
Edwards, S., Mueller, R., Roeder, R., Melzheimer, J., & Wachter, B. (2022). Cheetah marking sites are also used by other species for communication: evidence from photographic data in a comparative setup. Mammalian Biology, 102(4), 1345-1356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42991-022-00284-w
Epperly, H. K., Clinchy, M., Zanette, L. Y., & McCleery, R. A. (2021). Fear of large carnivores is tied to ungulate habitat use: evidence from a bifactorial experiment. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 12979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92469-5
Estes, J. A., Terborgh, J., Brashares, J. S., Power, M. E., Berger, J., Bond, W. J., & Wardle, D. A. (2011). Trophic downgrading of planet Earth. science, 333(6040), 301-306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1205106
Frantz, A. C., Pope, L. C., Carpenter, P. J., Roper, T. J., Wilson, G. J., Delahay, R. J., & Burke, T (2003). Reliable microsatellite genotyping of the Eurasian badger (Meles meles) using faecal DNA. Molecular Ecology, 12(6), 1649-1661. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01848.x
Harmsen, B. J., Foster, R. J., Silver, S. C., Ostro, L. E., & Doncaster, C. P. (2009). Spatial and temporal interactions of sympatric jaguars (Panthera onca) and pumas (Puma concolor) in a neotropical forest. Journal of mammalogy, 90(3), 612-620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1644/08-MAMM-A-140R.1
Hansen, K. W., Ranc, N., Morgan, J., Jordan, N. R., McNutt, J. W., Wilson, A., & Wilmers, C. C. (2024). How territoriality and sociality influence the habitat selection and movements of a large carnivore. Ecology and Evolution, 14(4), e11217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.11217
Haswell, P. M., Jones, K. A., Kusak, J., & Hayward, M. W. (2018). Fear, foraging and olfaction: how mesopredators avoid costly interactions with apex predators. Oecologia, 187, 573-583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-018-4133-3
Hoeks, S., Huijbregts, M. A., Busana, M., Harfoot, M. B., Svenning, J. C., & Santini, L. (2020). Mechanistic insights into the role of large carnivores for ecosystem structure and functioning. Ecography, 43(12), 1752-1763. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.05191
Janssen, A., Sabelis, M. W., Magalhães, S., Montserrat, M., & Van Der Hammen, T. (2007). Habitat structure affects intraguild predation. Ecology, 88(11), 2713-2719. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1408.1
Karanth, K. U., Srivathsa, A., Vasudev, D., Puri, M., Parameshwaran, R., & Kumar, N. S. (2017). Spatio-temporal interactions facilitate large carnivore sympatry across a resource gradient. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 284(1848), 20161860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.1860
Kemna, C. J., Nagy-Reis, M. B., & Scrafford, M. A. (2020). Temporal segregation among sympatric boreal predators. Mammal research, 65(3), 565-572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-020-00504-z
Laundré, J. W., Hernández, L., & Altendorf, K. B. (2001). Wolves, elk, and bison: reestablishing the" landscape of fear" in Yellowstone National Park, USA. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 79(8), 1401-1409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/z01-094
Lu, Q., Cheng, C., Xiao, L., Li, J., Li, X., Zhao, X., & Yao, M. (2023). Food webs reveal coexistence mechanisms and community organization in carnivores. Current Biology, 33(4), 647-659. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2022.12.049
Martins, M. A. T. (2023). Mesocarnivore reactive behaviour to large carnivore cues (Doctoral dissertation).
Medellín, R. A., De la Torre, J. A., Zarza, H., Chávez, C., & Ceballos, G. (2016). El jaguar en el siglo XXI: la perspectiva continental. fondo de cultura económica.
Miaretsoa, L., Cascella, A., Vadàla, L., Valente, D., De Gregorio, C., Torti, V., & Gamba, M. (2022). Marking versus overmarking: spatial and behavioral patterns of scent marking in wild Diademed Sifaka (Propithecus diadema). International Journal of Primatology, 43(4), 611-635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-022-00292-0
Morehouse, A. T., Loosen, A. E., Graves, T. A., & Boyce, M. S. (2021). The smell of success: reproductive success related to rub behavior in brown bears. PLoS One, 16(3), e0247964. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247964
Mpemba, H., Yang, F., & Jiang, G. (2019). The implications of fear ecology for interactions among predators, prey and mesopredators. JAPS: Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 29(6).
Müller, L., Briers‐Louw, W. D., Amin, R., Lochner, C. S., & Leslie, A. J. (2022). Carnivore coexistence facilitated by spatial and dietary partitioning and fine‐scale behavioural avoidance in a semi‐arid ecosystem. Journal of Zoology, 317(2), 114-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12964
Murphy, L. B. (1978). The practical problems of recognizing and measuring fear and exploration behaviour in the domestic fowl. Animal Behaviour, 26, 422-431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(78)90059-3
Palomares, F., Fernández, N., Roques, S., Chávez, C., Silveira, L., Keller, C., & Adrados, B. (2016). Fine-scale habitat segregation between two ecologically similar top predators. PloS one, 11(5), e0155626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155626
Palomares, F., González-Borrajo, N., Chávez, C., Rubio, Y., Verdade, L. M., Monsa, R., & Zanin, M. (2018). Scraping marking behaviour of the largest Neotropical felids. PeerJ, 6, e4983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4983
Pilgrim, K. L., McKelvey, K. S., Riddle, A. E., & Schwartz, M. K (2005). Felid sex identification based on noninvasive genetic samples. Molecular Ecology Notes, 5(1), 60-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00831.x
Ploger, B. J., & Yasukawa, K. (Eds.). (2003). Exploring animal behavior in laboratory and field: an hypothesis-testing approach to the development, causation, function, and evolution of animal behavior. Academic Press.
Prugh, L. R., & Sivy, K. J. (2020). Enemies with benefits: integrating positive and negative interactions among terrestrial carnivores. Ecology Letters, 23(5), 902-918. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13489
Rafiq, K., Jordan, N. R., Meloro, C., Wilson, A. M., Hayward, M. W., Wich, S. A., & McNutt, J. W. (2020). Scent-marking strategies of a solitary carnivore: boundary and road scent marking in the leopard. Animal behaviour, 161, 115-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.12.016
Ripple, W. J., Estes, J. A., Beschta, R. L., Wilmers, C. C., Ritchie, E. G., Hebblewhite, M., & Wirsing, A. J. (2014). Status and ecological effects of the world’s largest carnivores. Science, 343(6167), 1241484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1241484
Roques, S., Adrados, B., Chávez, C., Keller, C., Magnusson, W. E., Palomares, F., & Godoy, J. A (2011). Identification of Neotropical felid faeces using RCP‐PCR. Molecular Ecology Resources, 11(1), 171-175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02878.x
Ruprecht, J., Eriksson, C. E., Forrester, T. D., Spitz, D. B., Clark, D. A., Wisdom, M. J., & Levi, T. (2021). Variable strategies to solve risk–reward tradeoffs in carnivore communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(35), e2101614118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2101614118
Russell, J. C., Lecomte, V., Dumont, Y., & Le Corre, M. (2009). Intraguild predation and mesopredator release effect on long-lived prey. Ecological modelling, 220(8), 1098-1104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.01.017
Samuel, L., Arnesen, C., Zedrosser, A., & Rosell, F. (2020). Fears from the past? The innate ability of dogs to detect predator scents. Animal cognition, 23, 721-729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-020-01379-y
Schmitz, O. J., Beckerman, A. P., & O’Brien, K. M. (1997). Behaviorally mediated trophic cascades: effects of predation risk on food web interactions. Ecology, 78(5), 1388-1399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1388:BMTCEO]2.0.CO;2
Schmitz, O. J., Grabowski, J. H., Peckarsky, B. L., Preisser, E. L., Trussell, G. C., & Vonesh, J. R. (2008). From individuals to ecosystem function: toward an integration of evolutionary and ecosystem ecology. Ecology, 89(9), 2436-2445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/07-1030.1
Sheriff, M. J., Peacor, S. D., Hawlena, D., & Thaker, M. (2020). Non‐consumptive predator effects on prey population size: A dearth of evidence. Journal of Animal Ecology, 89(6), 1302-1316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13213
Smith, J. L. D., Mc Dougal, S., & Miquelle, D. (1989). Scent marking in free-ranging tigers, Panthera tigris. Animal Behaviour, 37, 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(89)90001-8
Sunde, P., Böcker, F., Rauset, G. R., Kjellander, P., Chrenkova, M., Skovdal, T. M., & Heurich, M. (2022). Mammal responses to predator scents across multiple study areas. Ecosphere, 13(8), e4215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4215
Suraci, J. P., Clinchy, M., Dill, L. M., Roberts, D., & Zanette, L. Y. (2016). Fear of large carnivores causes a trophic cascade. Nature communications, 7(1), 10698. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10698
Srivathsa, A., Ramachandran, V., Saravanan, P., Sureshbabu, A., Ganguly, D., & Ramakrishnan, U. (2023). Topcats and underdogs: Intraguild interactions among three apex carnivores across Asia's forestscapes. Biological Reviews, 98(6), 2114-2135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12998
Tallian, A., Ordiz, A., Zimmermann, B., Sand, H., Wikenros, C., Wabakken, P., & Kindberg, J. (2021). The return of large carnivores: Using hunter observation data to understand the role of predators on ungulate populations. Global Ecology and Conservation, 27, e01587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01587
Taylor, R. J. (2013). Predation. Springer Science & Business Media.
Van Beeck Calkoen, S. T., Kreikenbohm, R., Kuijper, D. P., & Heurich, M. (2021). Olfactory cues of large carnivores modify red deer behavior and browsing intensity. Behavioral Ecology, 32(5), 982-992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arab071
Wang, Y., Allen, M. L., & Wilmers, C. C. (2020). Mesopredators display behaviourally plastic responses to dominant competitors when scavenging and communicating. bioRxiv, 2020-01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.20.913335
Wooldridge, R. L., Foster, R. J., & Harmsen, B. J. (2019). The functional role of scent marking in the social organization of large sympatric neotropical felids. Journal of Mammalogy, 100(2), 445-453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyz055
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista de Biología Tropical
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (CC BY 4.0)
Attribution (BY) • (BY) You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
