logo

Scientific Papers

Vol. 9 No. 18 (2007): Journal 18

Empirical-mechanistic evaluation of flexible pavement structures through a comparison of computational tools and laboratory fatigue test data

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/53np8w90
Submitted
October 21, 2025
Published
2025-10-21

Abstract

The main target of this paper is to evaluate the mechanical performance of asphalt concrete pavement structures designed using the method adopted by the Brazilian National Department of Transportation Infrastructure (DNIT). This method adopts the conversion principle of traffic volumes generated from different intensities of load spectra to those related to an equivalent single axle load (ESAL) of 8.2tf. The traffic volume data used to design the relevant pavement structures was taken from research studies conduced by the Brazilian Military Institute of Engineering. These studies were concerned with a highway project, called BR-163, located in the Amazon Region. This highway would constitute an important route to transport the Brazilian soy production for international exportation from Brazil's northern ports. From the traffic data, it was possible to obtain the strain levels generated in every layer of the various pavement structures, using computerized pavement design tools, such as ELSYM 5 and EVERSTRESS 5.0. Special analyses were developed for the bottom of the surface layers to compare traffic damage effect calculated by the DNIT empirical method and that provided by a laboratory fatigue equation. The fatigue equation comprised tensile microstrains generated by the 8.2tf ESAL and by a series of tandem axle loads ranging from 17.0 to 26.0tf. 

References

  1. AFNOR NF P 98-261-1, Essais Relatifs aux Chaussées: Détermination de la Résistance en Fatigue des Mélanges Hydrocarbonés - Partie 1: Essai par Flexion à Flèche Constante, Association Française de Normalisation. France, 1993.
  2. De La Roche C., Module de Rigidité et Comportement en Fatigue des Enrobés Bitumineux. Thèse de Doctorat. École Central de Paris, 1996.
  3. DNIT, Pesos Máximos Admitidos: Resoluções CONTRAN 12/98 e 104/98; Lei 7.408/85. Departamento Nacional de Infraestrutura de Transportes. Ministério dos Transportes, Brasil, 2005.
  4. DNIT, Manual de Pavimentação. Departamento Nacional de Infraestrutura de Transportes. 2ª Edição. Editado pelo Instituto de Pesquisas Rodoviárias (IPR). Ministério dos Transportes, Brasil, 1996.
  5. Huang Y. H., Pavement Analysis and Design. Published by University of Kentucky, USA, 1993.
  6. Medina J. and L.MG. Motta, Mecânica dos Pavimentos. Editado pela Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (COPPE/UFRJ). 2ª Edição. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 2005.
  7. Momm L., Estudo dos Efeitos da Granulometria Sobre a Macrotextura Superficial do Concreto Asfáltico e Seu Comportamento Mecânico. Tese de Doutorado, Escola Politécnica da Universidade de São Paulo (EPUSP). São Paulo, SP, 1998.
  8. NCHRP, Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Design of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures 1-37A. Final Report, Part 2: Design Inputs. Prepared for National Cooperative Highway Research Program/ Transportation Research Board/National Research Council. Published by ARA, Inc., ERES Consultant Division. Champaign, Illinois, 2004.
  9. U.C. Berkeley, ELSYM 5: Layered Elastic Pavement System. University of California at Berkeley. Berkeley, CA, 1986.
  10. USACE, Pavement Design for Roads, Streets, Walks, and Open Storage Areas. TM 5-822-5/AFM 88-7. Chapter 8: Flexible Pavement Design. Published by United States Army Corps of Engineers. USA, 1992.
  11. WSDOT, EVERSTRESS 5.0: A Layered Elastic Analysis Program. Washington State Department of Transportation. Washington, D.C., 1999.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.