Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences ISSN Impreso: 1659-1046 ISSN electrónico: 2215-3411

OAI: https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/Odontos/oai
Effect of Different Silane-Containing Solutions on Glass-Ceramic/ Cement Bonding Interacting with Dual-Cure Resin Cements
PDF
HTML

Keywords

Adhesive bond
microshear test
resin cements
silane solutions
adhesión
prueba de microcisallamiento
cementos resinosos
soluciones silanizadoras

How to Cite

Murillo Gómez DDS, MSc, F., & De Góes DDS, MSc, PhD, M. F. (2015). Effect of Different Silane-Containing Solutions on Glass-Ceramic/ Cement Bonding Interacting with Dual-Cure Resin Cements. Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences, (16), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.v0i16.20330

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the effect of different silane-containing solutions on ceramic-cement bonding and their interaction with different dual-cure resin cements. Forty five glass- ceramic plaques (IPS e.max CAD®) were sandblasted with aluminum oxide for 5s, etched with 10% hydrofluoric acid gel (HF) for 20s and then divided in three groups of 15 each to be treated with different silane-containing solutions: RelyX Ceramic Primer® (AS), Scotchbond Universal® (SU), Clearfil Ceramic Primer® (CP). Then each group was divided in five groups of three plaques to receive the following dual-cure resin cements: Conventional: RelyX Ultimate (RU), RelyX ARC (AR), VarioLink II (VL); and two self-adhesive: RelyX UNICEM 2 (U2), and BiFix (BF). Eight cement cylinders of each cement were distributed on each plaque and polymerized, summarizing 24 cylinders per group. After 24 h storage in relative humidity at 37°C, each cylinder was subjected to a microshear testing. Failure mode was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data were statistically analyzed with two-way ANOVA (resin cement and silane ) and Tukey test (p≤0.05). Both factors significantly influenced the results and also interaction between them was detected (p=0.0001). μSBS was significantly higher when ceramic was treated with AS for all cements. Most of cements showed no statistically different means when treated with SU and CP, except BF-SU and AR-CP that showed significantly lower means within their treatment groups. Some incomplete polymerization areas were observed in SEM images for those cases. Cohesive failure in resin cement type was predominant with higher results while adhesive with lower results. The sole silane solution improved better bonding than the universal adhesive and the ceramic primer. In general, universal adhesive and ceramic primer produced acceptable mean values and they were statistically comparable. Compatibility between silane solutions and dual-cure resin cements may be material dependent. 

https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.v0i16.20330
PDF
HTML

References

Anagnostopoulos T, Eliades G, Palaghias G. Composition, reactivity and surface interaction of three dental silane primers. Dent Mater 1993;9(3):182–190.

Berg J, Jones FR. The role of sizing resins, coupling agents and their blends on the formation of the interphase in glass fibre composites. Composite 1998;Part A(29A):1261-1272.

Blatz MB, Dent M, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89(3):268-274.

Blatz MB, Sadan A, Martin J, Lang B. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strengths of resin to densely sintered high-purity zirconium-oxide ceramic after long-term storage and thermal cycling. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91(4):356–362.

Borges GA, Spohr AM, De Goes MF, Sobrinho LC, Chan DC. Effect of etching and airborne particle abrasion on the microstructure of different dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89(5):479-488.

Brentel SA, Özcan M, Valandro LF, Guimarães Alarça L, Amaral R, Bottino MA. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to feldpathic ceramic after different etching and silanization regimens in dry and aged conditions. Dent Mater 2007;23(11): 1323-1331.

Chen L, Suh BI. Effect of hydrophilicity on the compatibility between a dual-curing resin cement and one-bottle simplified adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2013;15(4):325-331.

De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2005;84(2):118–132.

Dehoff PH, Anusavice KJ, Wang Z. Three- Dimensional finite-element analysis of the shear bond test. Dent Mater 1995;11(2):126–131.

Della Bona A, Anusavice KJ, Mecholsky Jr JJ. Failure analysis of resin composite bonded to ceramic. Dent Mater 2003;19(8):693–699.

Della Bona A, Anusavice KJ, Shen C. Microtensile strength of composite bonded to hot-pressed ceramics. J AdhesDent 2000;2(4):305–313.

Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater 2008;24(3):299-307. Eames WB, Rogers LB, Feller PR, Price WR. Bonding agents for repairing porcelain and gold: an evaluation. Oper Dent 1977;2(3):118–124.

Edelhoff D, Özcan M. To what extent does the longevity of fixed dental prostheses depend on the function of the cement? Working group 4 materials: cementation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18(3):193–204.

Ferracane JL, Stansbury JW, Burke FJT. Self- adhesive resin cements-chemistry, properties and clinical considerations. J Oral Rehabil 2011;38(4):295-314.

Filho AM, Vieira LC, Araujo E, Monteiro Junior S. Effect of different ceramic surface treatments on resin microtensilebond strength. J Prosthodont 2004;13(1):28–35.

Ikemura K, Tanaka H, Fujii T, Deguchi M, Negoro N, Endo T, Kadoma Y. Design of a new, multi- purpose, light-curing adhesive comprising a silane coupling agent, acidic adhesive monomers and dithiooctanoate monomers for bonding to varied metal and dental ceramic materials. Dent Mater 2011;30(4):493-500.

Ishida H, Koenig JL. A Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopic study of the hydrolytic stability of silane coupling agents on E-glass fibers. J Polymer Sci, Polymer Physics 1980;18(9):1931-1943.

Kelly JR, Denry I. Stabilized zirconia as a structural ceramic: an overview. Dent Mater 2008;24(3):289-298.

Kern M, Wegner SM. Bonding to zirconia ceramic: adhesion methods and their durability. Dent Mater 1998;14(1):64–71.

Kitayama S, Nikaido T, Takahashi R, Zhu L, Masaomi I, Foxton R, Sadr A, Tagami J. Effect of primer treatment on bonding of resin cements to zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater 2010;26(5):426-432.

Kramer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. Am J Dent 2000;13:60D–76D.

Lung CY, Matinlinna JP. Aspects of silane coupling agents and surface conditioning in dentistry: An overview. Dent Mater 2012;28(5):467-477.

Matinlinna JP, Lassila LV, Ozcan M, Yli-Urpo A, Vallittu PK. An introduction to silanes and their clinical applications in dentistry. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17(2):155–164.

Meng X, Yoshida K, Taira Y, Kamada K, Luo X. Effect of siloxane quantity and ph of silane coupling agents and contact angle of resin bonding agent on bond durability of resin cements to machinable ceramic. J Adhes Dent 2011;13(1):71–78.

Moharamzadeh K, Hooshmand T, Keshvad A, Van Noort R. Fracture toughness of a ceramic–resin interface. Dent Mater 2008;24(2):172–177.

Monticelli F, Toledano M, Osorio R, Ferrari M. Effect of temperature on the silane coupling agents when bonding core resin to quartz fiber posts. Dent Mater 2006;22(11):1024–1028.

Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Eight- year clinical evaluation of a 2-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel etching. Dent Mater 2010;26(2):1176-1184.

PeumansM,VanMeerbeekB,YoshidaY,Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Porcelain veneers bonded to tooth structure: an ultra-morphological FE- SEM examination of the adhesive interface. Dent Mater 1999;15(2):105–119.

Pisani-Proenca J, Erhardt MC, Valandro LF, Gutierrez-AcevesG, Bolanos-Carmona MV, Del Castillo-Salmeron R, Bottino MA. Influence of ceramic surface conditioning and resin cements on microtensile bond strength to a glass ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96(6):412–417.

Pollington S, Fabianelli A, Van Noort R. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to a novel fluorcanasite glass-ceramic following different surface treatments. Dent Mater 2010;26(9):864-872.

Roulet JF, Soderholm KJ, Longmate J. Effects of treatment and storage conditions on ceramic/ composite bond strength. Journal of Dental Research 1995;74(1):381–387.

Sadowsky SJ. An overview of treatment considerations for esthetic restorations: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96(6):433–442.

Schittly E, Bouter D, Le Goff S, Degrange M, Attal JP. Compatibility of five self-etching adhesive systems with two resin luting cements. J Adhes Dent 2010:12(2):137-142.

Shen C, Oh WS, Williams JR. Effect of post- silanization drying on the bond strength of composite to ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91(5):453–458.

Shimada Y, Yamaguchi S, Tagami J. Micro-shear bond strength of dual-cured resin cement to glass ceramics. Dent Mater 2002;18(5):380-388.

Suh BI, Feng L, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and self-cured or dual- cured composites. Part III. Effect of acidic resin monomers. J Adhes Dent 2003:5(4):267-282.

Tanaka R, Fujishima A, Shibata Y, Manabe A, Miyazaki T. Cooperation of phosphate monomer and silica modification on zirconia. J Dent Res 2008;87(7):666–670.

Tian T, Tsoi JK, Matinlinna JP, Burrow MF. Aspects of bonding between resin luting cements and glass ceramic materials. Dent Mater 2014;30(7):e147-e162.

Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P et al. Buonocore memorial lectura. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003;28(3):215-235.

Van Meerbeek B., Yoshihara K., Yoshida Y., Mine A., De Munck J., Van Landuyt K.L. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2011;27(1):17–28.

Wegner SM, Kern M. Long-term resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic. J Adhes Dent 2000;2(2):139–147.

Comments

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.