Impact of Three Cementation Materials on the Fracture Strength of All-Ceramic CAD/CAM Overlay Restorations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/vf5aw414Keywords:
Fracture strength; Resin cement; Lithium disilicate; CAD/CAM; Brilliant Crios; CAD/CAM.Abstract
To compare and assess the fracture strength of indirect overlay restorations bonded using various bonding techniques: sonically activated composite materials, preheated composite materials, and adhesive resin cement. The restorations were fabricated utilizing two distinct categories of all-ceramic CAD/CAM materials: reinforced resin composite blocks and lithium disilicate blocks. Depending on the CAD/CAM block type utilized for constructing the indirect overlay restorations, two main groups of 24 teeth each were created from the 48 human maxillary first premolar teeth that were ready for restorations. Group A consisted of indirect overlays made of lithium disilicate (IPS e.max CAD) blocks, whereas Group B used reinforced resin blocks (BRILLIANT Crios) for indirect overlays. subsequently according to the type of cement utilized in cementation. After the prepared teeth were scanned using the CEREC Omnicam digital intraoral scanner, indirect overlay restorations were designed utilizing CEREC Premium programme (version 4.4.4), and additional milling was carried out using the CEREC MC XL milling device. A computer-controlled universal testing machine (LARYEE, China) was then used to apply compressive axial loads to all cemented indirect overlay restorations at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min till occurrence of fracture. A Student's t-test, LSD test, and one-way ANOVA test were utilized to analyze the data at a significance level of 0.05. This in vitro investigation revealed the greatest fracture strength mean value in the indirect overlays cemented with resin cement compared to other types of cement, regardless of the CAD/CAM block type. Depending on the findings of this research, regardless of the cement type, the mean fracture strength values of the indirect overlays made from both CAD/CAM blocks exceed the maximum biting force in the premolar area, indicating that both block types may be utilized clinically as overlay restorations in the premolar area.
References
Veneziani M.J.I.J.E.D. Posterior indirect adhesive restorations: updated indications and the Morphology Driven Preparation Technique. 2017; 12 (2): 204-30.
Opdam N., Frankenberger R., Magne P.J.O.d. From ‘Direct Versus Indirect'Toward an Integrated Restorative Concept in the Posterior Dentition. 2016; 41 (S7): S27-S34.
Thaper S., Sengottaiyan V., Ganapathy DJIJoRiPS. A review on the prevalence of marginal discrepancy between lithium disilicate and zirconia crowns manufactured using dental cad cam. 2019; 10 (1): 590-5.
Wendler M., Belli R., Petschelt A., Mevec D., Harrer W., Lube T., et al. Chairside CAD/CAM materials. Part 2: flexural strength testing. 2017; 33 (1): 99-109.
Zahran M.H.I. Factors Affecting the Fracture Strength and Fatigue Resistance of Molar Crowns Produced Using a Zirconia-based System 2013.
Vaiani L., Boccaccio A., Uva A.E., Palumbo G., Piccininni A., Guglielmi P., et al. Ceramic materials for biomedical applications: an overview on properties and fabrication processes. 2023; 14 (3): 146.
Turkaslan S., Bagis B., Akan E., Mutluay M., Vallittu PJNjocp. Fracture strengths of chair‑side‑generated veneers cemented with glass fibers. 2015; 18 (2): 240-6.
Daryakenari G., Alaghehmand H., Bijani A.J.O.d. Effect of simulated mastication on the surface roughness and wear of machinable ceramics and opposing dental enamel. 2019; 44 (1): 88-95.
Choi B.-J., Yoon S., Im Y.-W., Lee J.-H., Jung H.-J., Lee H.-H.J.D.M. Uniaxial/biaxial flexure strengths and elastic properties of resin-composite block materials for CAD/CAM. 2019; 35 (2): 389-401.
Ramos J.C., Marinho A., Messias A., Almeida G., Vinagre A., Dias R.J.O. Mechanical properties of direct composite resins and CAD/CAM composite blocks. 2024; 4 (2): 206-16.
Reymus M., Roos M., Eichberger M., Edelhoff D., Hickel R., Stawarczyk BJCoi. Bonding to new CAD/CAM resin composites: influence of air abrasion and conditioning agents as pretreatment strategy. 2019; 23 (2): 529-38.
Mohammed Z.H., Majeed MAJJoRiM, Science D. Effect of cementation protocol on the marginal adaptation of indirect overlay restorations fabricated from two different all-ceramic CAD/CAM materials. 2020; 8 (7): 518-25.
Rickman L., Padipatvuthikul P., Chee B.J.B.d.j. Clinical applications of preheated hybrid resin composite. 2011;211 (2): 63.
Burke F.T.J.D.M. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with dentin-bonded crowns constructed in a leucite-reinforced ceramic. 1999;15 (5): 359-62.
Jotkowitz A., Samet N.J.B.dj. Rethinking ferrule-a new approach to an old dilemma. 2010; 209 (1): 25.
Saridag S., Sevimay M., Pekkan G.J.O.d. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with all-ceramic inlays and onlays: an in vitro study. 2013; 38 (6): 626-34.
Ferraris F.J.I.J.E.D. Posterior indirect adhesive restorations (PIAR): preparation designs and adhesthetics clinical protocol. 2017; 12 (4): 482-502.
Luekiatpaisarn J. Fracture Resistance of Occlusal Ceramic and Composite Molar Onlay Comparing to Lithium Disilicate Molar Crown: Chulalongkorn University; 2018.
Abou-Madina M.M., Özcan M., Abdalaziz K.M.J.I.J.o.P. Influence of resin cements and aging on the fracture resistance of IPS e. max press posterior crowns. 2012; 25 (1).
Powers J.M., Sakaguchi R.L., Craig R.G. Craig's restorative dental materials/edited by Ronald L. Sakaguchi, John M. Powers: Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier/Mosby; 2012.
Hafez S., Hafez A., Amr H., Aboudorra H.A.J.D.J. Effect of Different Filler Loading on Fractures Resistance of CAD/CAM Resin Composite Restoration in Premolar Teeth: An In Vitro Study. 2019; 65: 1.
Jassim Z.M., Majeed M.A.J.B., Journal P. Comparative Evaluation of the Fracture Strength of Monolithic Crowns Fabricated from Different all-ceramic CAD/CAM Materials (an in vitro study). 2018; 11 (3): 1689-97.
Gracis S., Thompson V.P., Ferencz J.L., Silva N.R., Bonfante E.A.J.I.J.o.p. A new classification system for all-ceramic and ceramic-like restorative materials. 2015; 28 (3).
Taha D., Spintzyk S., Sabet A., Wahsh M., Salah T.J.J.o.E., Dentistry R. Assessment of marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of endocrown restorations utilizing different machinable blocks subjected to thermomechanical aging. 2018; 30 (4): 319-28.
Luciano M., Francesca Z., Michela S., Tommaso M., Massimo A.J.C.o.i. Lithium disilicate posterior overlays: clinical and biomechanical features. 2020; 24: 841-8.
Goujat A., Abouelleil H., Colon P., Jeannin C., Pradelle N., Seux D., et al. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM inlay/onlay restorations: A systematic review of in vitro studies. 2019; 121 (4): 590-7. e3.
Proos K.A., Swain M.V., Ironside J., Steven G.P.J.I.J.o.P. Influence of cement on a restored crown of a first premolar using finite element analysis. 2003; 16 (1).
Kavut I., Külünk S.J.D., Research M. Evaluation of the core thickness and resin cement on the fracture strength of zirconia-based multilayer computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing ceramic crowns. 2019; 7 (1): 16.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Zaidoon Hasan Mohammed, Manhal A. Majeed.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
ODOVTOS - Int. J. Dent. Sc. endorses CC BY-NC-SA
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms. CC BY-NC-SA includes the following elements:
BY: credit must be given to the creator.
NC: Only noncommercial uses of the work are permitted.
SA: Adaptations must be shared under the same terms.
