Evaluation of Colonization and Biofilm Formation of E. faecalis over G-MTA, W-MTA and Biodentine. In vitro study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/v30z1132

Keywords:

Apicectomy, Root-End Filling Material, Biodentine, Gray-MTA, White-MTA.

Abstract

Apicectomy is a procedure indicated for the treatment of non-healing apical periodontitis after non-surgical Root Canal Treatment or certain clinical conditions; the procedure consists in the elimination of the last 3 mm of the RCS and creation of an apical preparation to finally seal it with a root-end filling material, like bioceramics. It has been reported that bioceramic materials (Gray-MTA, White-MTA and Biodentine) have adequate antibacterial properties. The aim of the study is to evaluate the colonization capacity and biofilm formation of E. faecalis over the surface of bioceramic materials In vitro. 180 dentin disks were employed and distributed in 3 experimental groups (G-MTA+E. faecalis, W-MTA E. faecalis and Biodentine+E. faecalis) and 3 control groups (G-MTA, W-MTA and Biodentine), the surface area covered by biofilm and microorganisms were evaluated by SEM. All samples of experimental groups showed a rough and irregular surface due to microorganism colonization and biofilm formation. G-MTA group showed better antimicrobial properties than W-MTA and Biodentine. The complete elimination and removal of damaged and contaminated periapical tissues during the surgical treatment is critical for long-term success.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alghamdi F., Alhaddad A.J., Abuzinadah S. Healing of Periapical Lesions After Surgical Endodontic Retreatment: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2020; 12 (2): 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6916

Kim S., Kratchman S. Modern Endodontic Surgery Concepts and Practice: A Review. J Endod. 2006; 32 (7): 601-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.12.010

Serrano-Giménez M., Sánchez-Torres A., Gay-Escoda C. Prognostic factors on periapical surgery: A systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015; 20 (6): e715-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.20613

Kohli M.R., Berenji H., Setzer F.C., Lee S.M., Karabucak B. Outcome of Endodontic Surgery: A Meta-analysis of the Literature-Part 3: Comparison of Endodontic Microsurgical Techniques with 2 Different Root-end Filling Materials. J Endod. 2018; 44 (6): 923-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.02.021

Tsesis I., Elbahary S., Venezia N.B., Rosen E. Bacterial colonization in the apical part of extracted human teeth following root-end resection and filling: a confocal laser scanning microscopy study. Clin Oral Investig. 2018; 22 (1): 267-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2107-1

Chércoles-Ruiz A., Sánchez-Torres A., Gay-Escoda C. Endodontics, Endodontic Retreatment, and Apical Surgery Versus Tooth Extraction and Implant Placement: A Systematic Review. J Endod. 2017; 43 (5): 679-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.01.004

Malkondu Ö., Kazandaǧ M.K., Kazazoǧlu E. A review on biodentine, a contemporary dentine replacement and repair material. Biomed Res Int. 2014; 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/160951

Zanza A., Reda R., Vannettelli E., Donfrancesco O., Relucenti M., Bhandi S., et al. The Influence of Thermomechanical Compaction on the Marginal Adaptation of 4 Different Hydraulic Sealers: A Comparative Ex Vivo Study. J Compos Sci. 2023; 7 (1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7010010

Haapasalo M., Ørstavik D. In vitro Infection and Disinfection of Dentinal Tubules. J Dent Res. 1987; 66 (8): 1375-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660081801

Ordinola-Zapata R., Bramante C.M., Aprecio R.M., Handysides R., Jaramillo D.E. Biofilm removal by 6% sodium hypochlorite activated by different irrigation techniques. Int Endod J. 2014; 47 (7): 659-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12202

Parolia A., Kumar H., Ramamurthy S., Madheswaran T., Davamani F., Pichika M.R., et al. Effect of propolis nanoparticles against enterococcus faecalis biofilm in the root canal. Molecules. 2021; 26 (3): 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26030715

Torabinejad M., Pitt Ford T.R. Root end filling materials: A review. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1996; 12 (4): 161-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1996.tb00510.x

Trujillo-hernández M., Flores-ventura R.E., Suárez-Porras A., García-González L., Hernández-Torres J., Zamora-Peredo L. Estudio comparativo de la bioactividad de dos materiales biocerámicos Comparative Study of the Bioactivity of Two Bioceramic Materials. ODOVTOS-International J Dent Sci. 2019; 2 (21): 73-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.v21i2.37061

Bhavana V., Chaitanya K.P., Gandi P., Patil J., Dola B., Reddy R.B. Evaluation of antibacterial and antifungal activity of new calcium-based cement (Biodentine) compared to MTA and glass ionomer cement. J Conserv Dent. 2015; 18 (1): 44-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.148892

Hiremath G.S., Kulkarni R.D., Naik B.D. Evaluation of minimal inhibitory concentration of two new materials using tube dilution method: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2015;18 (2): 159-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.153056

Abusrewil S.M., McLean W, Scott J.A. The use of Bioceramics as root-end filling materials in periradicular surgery: A literature review. Saudi Dent J. 2018; 30 (4): 273-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2018.07.004

Song M., Kim S.G., Lee S.J., Kim B., Kim E. Prognostic factors of clinical outcomes in endodontic microsurgery: A prospective study. J Endod. 2013; 39 (12): 1491-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.08.026

Beltran-Leal A., Muñoz-Ruiz A., Esparza-Villalpando V., Castro Y., Pozos-Guillen A., Flores H. 5-Aminolevulinic acid photoactivated over planktonic and biofilm forms of Enterococcus faecalis as a pharmacological therapy alternative. Brazilian J Pharm Sci. 2020; 56: 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s2175-97902019000318544

Kim R.J.Y., Kim M.O., Lee K.S., Lee D.Y., Shin JH. An in vitro evaluation of the antibacterial properties of three mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) against five oral bacteria. Arch Oral Biol. 2015; 60 (10): 1497-502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2015.07.014

Al-Hezaimi K., Al-Shalan T.A., Naghshbandi J., Oglesby S., Simon J.H.S., Rotstein I. Antibacterial Effect of Two Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) Preparations Against Enterococcus faecalis and Streptococcus sanguis In Vitro. J Endod. 2006; 32 (11): 1053-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.06.004

Chopra M.S., Gulve M.N. Evaluation of the Antibacterial and Antifungal Activity of Three Retrograde Filling Materials : An In Vitro Study. Int J Contemp Med Res. 2016; 3 (8): 2286-8.

Khedmat S., Aminipor M., Pourhajibagher M., Kharazifar M.J., Bahador A. Comparison of Antibacterial Activities of ProRoot MTA, OrthoMTA, and RetroMTA Against Three Anaerobic Endodontic Bacteria. J Dent. 2018; 15 (5): 294-9.

Demiryürek E.Ö., Özyürek T., Gülhan T. Evaluation of antibacterial and antifungal activity of calcium silicate based retrograde filling materials. Int J Appl Dent Sci. 2016; 2 (2): 85-8.

George S., Kishen A., Song K.P. The role of environmental changes on monospecies biofilm formation on root canal wall by Enterococcus faecalis. J Endod. 2005; 31 (12): 867-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000164855.98346.fc

Al-Hezaimi K., Naghshbandi J., Oglesby S., Simon J.H.S., Rotstein I. Comparison of antifungal activity of white-colored and gray-colored mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) at similar concentrations against Candida albicans. J Endod. 2006; 32 (4): 365-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.08.014

Published

2025-12-10