Effect of Preheating and Glycerin Barrier on Surface Characteristics of Composite Resins

Authors

  • Zurab Khabadze Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University), Moscow, Russia. Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7257-5503
  • Oleg Mordanov Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University), Moscow, Russia. Department of Dental Research Cell, Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College & Hospital, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pimpri, Pune 411018, India. Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9878-7045
  • Vini Mehta Department of Dental Research Cell, Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College & Hospital, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pimpri, Pune 411018, India. Odonto-Stomatology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Salamanca, 37008 Salamanca, Spain. Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4174-907X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/m20fwq39

Keywords:

Resin composite; Preheating; Glycerin barrier; Oxygen-inhibited layer; Surface roughness; Polishing.

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the influence of preheating, glycerin barrier application, and polishing protocols on the surface roughness of microhybrid and submicron-filled composite resins. Eighty extracted human third molars were prepared with standardized Class I cavities and restored using Enamel Plus HRi (microhybrid) or Estelite Sigma Quick (submicron-filled). Specimens were divided into preheated (55 °C) and non-preheated groups, and further allocated to four subgroups: (1) polishing only, (2) polishing + glycerin, (3) glycerin only, and (4) control. All restorations were light-cured with an LED unit. Surface morphology was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and Ra values were determined. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test (p<0.05). SEM showed that glycerin-shielded specimens were cleaner, with reduced OIL-related debris. Preheating consistently yielded smoother, less porous surfaces across protocols. Polishing significantly reduced Ra in all groups, with the lowest values for “polishing + glycerin” (0.83±0.01 µm in preheated Enamel Plus HRi; 1.09±0.02 µm in non-preheated Estelite Sigma Quick). Glycerin without polishing improved polymerization but did not significantly reduce Ra. Controls exhibited the highest roughness (up to 5.20±0.61 µm). Overall, the combination of preheating, glycerin barrier application, and polishing produced the smoothest composite surfaces. Glycerin improved surface chemistry by reducing OIL, while polishing was essential for levelling filler protrusions and irregularities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alharbi G., Al Nahedh H.N., Al-Saud L.M., Shono N., Maawadh A. Effect of different finishing and polishing systems on surface properties of universal single shade resin-based composites. BMC Oral Health. 2024 Feb 7; 24 (1): 197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-03958-8

Erturk-Avunduk A.T., Atılan-Yavuz S., Filiz H., Cengiz-Yanardag E. A comparative study of polishing systems on optical properties and surface roughness of additively manufactured and conventional resin based composites. Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 27; 14 (1): 25658. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-77449-9

Pawar P., Gulve M., Aher G., Kolhe S., Pramaod J. Spectrophotometric evaluation of staining of different types of light-cure composite resins after exposure with different light-cure intensities: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2022; 25 (5): 510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_214_22

Lopes L.C.P., Terada R.S.S., Tsuzuki F.M., Giannini M, Hirata R. Heating and preheating of dental restorative materials—a systematic review. Clin Oral Invest. 2020 Dec; 24 (12): 4225-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03637-2

Bhopatkar J., Ikhar A., Nikhade P., Chandak M., Agrawal P. An In-depth Analysis of the Effects of Preheating Three Different Composite Resin Systems at Two Different Temperatures on Their Microhardness. Journal of Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences University. 2023 Oct; 18 (4): 727-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jdmimsu.jdmimsu_376_23

Elkaffass A., Eltoukhy R., Elnegoly S., Mahmoud S. Influence of preheating on mechanical and surface properties of nanofilled resin composites. J Clin Exp Dent. 2020; e494-500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.56469

Marigo L., Nocca G., Fiorenzano G., Callà C., Castagnola R., Cordaro M., et al. Influences of Different Air-Inhibition Coatings on Monomer Release, Microhardness, and Color Stability of Two Composite Materials. BioMed Research International. 2019 May 9; 2019: 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4240264

Lim J.H., Lee S.Y., Gu H., Jin G., Kim J.E. Evaluating oxygen shielding effect using glycerin or vacuum with varying temperature on 3D printed photopolymer in post-polymerization. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 2022 June; 130: 105170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105170

Gaviria-Martinez A., Castro-Ramirez L., Ladera-Castañeda M., Cervantes-Ganoza L., Cachay-Criado H., Alvino-Vales M., et al. Surface roughness and oxygen inhibited layer control in bulk-fill and conventional nanohybrid resin composites with and without polishing: in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2022 Dec; 22 (1): 258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02297-w

Jaramillo-Cartagena R., López-Galeano E.J., Latorre-Correa F., Agudelo-Suárez A.A. Effect of Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness of Nano-Hybrid and Nano-Filling Composite Resins: A Systematic Review. Dentistry Journal. 2021 Aug 12; 9 (8): 95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/dj9080095

Chowdhury D., Mukherjee S., Maity I., Mazumdar P. Surface roughness and microhardness evaluation of composite resin restorations subjected to three different polishing systems immediately and after 24 h: An in vitro study. Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics. 2023 Nov; 26 (6): 639-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_106_23

Altınışık H., Özyurt E. Effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss values of single-shade resin composites. BMC Oral Health. 2024 Nov 15; 24 (1): 1391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-05163-z

Aktu A., Ulusoy N. Effect of Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness and Color Stability of Aged and Stained Bulk-Fill Resin Composites. Materials. 2024 July 19; 17 (14): 3576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17143576

Augusto M.G., De Andrade G.S., Mathias-Santamaria I.F., Dal Piva A.M.D.O., Tribst J.P.M. Comparison of Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness of Resin Based Composites Containing Different Monomers. J Compos Sci. 2022 May 17; 6 (5): 146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs6050146

Kaminedi R., Penumatsa N., Priya T., Baroudi K. The influence of finishing/polishing time and cooling system on surface roughness and microhardness of two different types of composite resin restorations. J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent. 2014; 4 (5): 99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.146211

Poubel D.L.D.N., Da Silva R.C., Ribeiro A.P.D., Garcia F.C.P. Effect of preheating on the viscosity of composite resins. Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics. 2024 Apr; 27 (4): 360-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_75_23

Daronch M., Rueggeberg F.A., De Goes M.F. Monomer Conversion of Pre-heated Composite. J Dent Res. 2005 July; 84 (7): 663-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400716

Lucey S., Lynch C.D., Ray N.J., Burke F.M., Hannigan A. Effect of pre-heating on the viscosity and microhardness of a resin composite. J of Oral Rehabilitation. 2010 Apr; 37 (4): 278-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02045.x

Ayub KV, Santos GC, Rizkalla AS, Bohay R, Pegoraro LF, Rubo JH, et al. Effect of preheating on microhardness and viscosity of 4 resin composites. J Can Dent Assoc. 2014; 80: e12.

Patussi A.F.C., Ramacciato J.C., Da Silva J.G.R., Nascimento V.R.P., Campos D.E.S., De Araújo Ferreira Munizz I., et al. Preheating of dental composite resins: A scoping review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023 June; 35 (4): 646-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12991

Mitra A., Sharma S., Bhattacharyya A., Majumder G., Bhattacharyya S., Mazumdar R. Comparative evaluation of interfacial adaptation of the fiber posts using different adhesive systems: An scanning electron microscope study. Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics. 2025 Oct; 28 (10): 1045-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_608_25

Bollenl C.M.L., Lambrechts P., Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: A review of the literature. Dental Materials. 1997 July;13 (4): 258-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80038-3

Erdemir U., Sancakli H.S., Yildiz E. The effect of one-step and multi-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of novel resin composites. Eur J Dent. 2012 Apr; 6 (2): 198-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1698951

Hassan A., Nabih S., Mossa H., Baroudi K. The effect of three polishing systems on surface roughness of flowable, microhybrid, and packable resin composites. J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent. 2015; 5 (3): 242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.159965

Park H.H., Lee I.B. Effect of glycerin on the surface hardness of composites after curing. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2011; 36 (6): 483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2011.36.6.483

Carrillo-Marcos A., Salazar-Correa G., Castro-Ramirez L., Ladera-Castañeda M., López-Gurreonero C., Cachay-Criado H., et al. The Microhardness and Surface Roughness Assessment of Bulk-Fill Resin Composites Treated with and without the Application of an Oxygen-Inhibited Layer and a Polishing System: An In Vitro Study. Polymers. 2022 July 28; 14 (15): 3053. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14153053

Ciocan L.T., Biru E.I., Vasilescu V.G., Ghitman J., Stefan A.R., Iovu H., et al. Influence of Air-Barrier and Curing Light Distance on Conversion and Micro-Hardness of Dental Polymeric Materials. Polymers. 2022 Dec 7; 14 (24): 5346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14245346

Khabadze Z.S., Abdulkerimova S.M., Drobyshev S.V., Borlakova M.M., Magomedova KhM. Investigation of the surface of light-curing dental materials after pre-polymerization heating. Èndodontiâ today. 2024 Jan 17; 21 (4): 252-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36377/1683-2981-2023-21-4-252-262

Kameyama A., Nakazawa T., Haruyama A., Haruyama C., Hosaka M., Hirai Y. Influence of Finishing/Polishing Procedures on the Surface Texture of Two Resin Composites. TODENTJ. 2008 Mar 12; 02 (1): 56-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210600802010056

Tepe H., Erdılek A., Sahın M., Efes B., Yaman B. Effect of different polishing systems and speeds on the surface roughness of resin composites. J Conserv Dent. 2023; 26 (1): 36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_395_22

Lippert VF, Bresciani E, Mota EG, Bittencourt HR, Kramer PF, Spohr AM. In vitro comparison of one-step, two-step, and three-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and gloss of different resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2024 May; 36 (5): 785-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13189

Khabadze Z.S., Dashtieva M.Y., Borlakova M.M., Urazgulov A.K., Smirnov D.P., Kozlova Z.V., et al. Comparison of the clinical parameters of restorations performed with total-etch and self-etch adhesive techniques. Èndodontiâ today. 2024 Apr 4; 22 (1): 39-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36377/ET-0009

Ruivo M.A., Pacheco R.R., Sebold M., Giannini M. Surface roughness and filler particles characterization of resin-based composites. Microscopy Res & Technique. 2019 Oct; 82 (10): 1756-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23342

Mandal P., Laha A., Roy P.K. Effect of different concentrations of community water fluoride on composite resin: Field emission scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray analysis. Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics. 2025 Oct; 28 (10): 1027-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_486_25

Oliveira G.U.D., Mondelli R.F.L., Charantola Rodrigues M., Franco E.B., Ishikiriama S.K., Wang L. Impact of filler size and distribution on roughness and wear of composite resin after simulated toothbrushing. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012 Oct; 20 (5): 510-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000500003

Marghalani H.Y. Effect of filler particles on surface roughness of experimental composite series. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010 Feb; 18 (1): 59-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000100011

Karaaslan G., Fidan M., Ayar M.K. Effect of Caps Warmer and VisCalor Dispenser preheating on the color stability and surface roughness of resin composites after coffee immersion: an in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2025 July 5; 25 (1): 1110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06237-2

Published

2026-03-13