Biocompatibility and Elemental Characterization of Bioceramic Root Canal Sealers vs Resin Sealer AH Plus

Authors

  • Eduardo Adrián Sánchez Barajas Posgrado de Endodoncia, División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, Ciudad de México 04510, México. Author https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0626-0647
  • Alejandra Rodríguez Hidalgo Posgrado de Endodoncia, División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, Ciudad de México 04510, México. Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8046-9604
  • Marine Ortiz Magdaleno Laboratorio de Ciencias Básicas, Facultad de Estomatología, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, Av. Dr. Manuel Nava No. 2, San Luis Potosí 78290, México. Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9615-5565
  • Rafael Álvarez-Chimal Laboratorio de Investigación en Materiales Dentales y Biomateriales, División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, Ciudad de México 04510, México. Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7022-5959
  • Amaury Pozos-Guillén Laboratorio de Ciencias Básicas, Facultad de Estomatología, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, Av. Dr. Manuel Nava No. 2, San Luis Potosí 78290, México. Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2314-8465
  • Febe Carolina Vázquez Vázquez Laboratorio de Investigación en Materiales Dentales y Biomateriales, División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, Ciudad de México 04510, México. Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2113-174X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/y9jph839

Keywords:

Root canal sealers; Biocompatibility; Human gingival fibroblasts; Characterization.

Abstract

Root canal sealers must be biocompatible with periapical tissues and exhibit adequate physicochemical properties. This study aimed to characterize and evaluate the biocompatibility of two commercially available bioceramic root canal sealers (NeoSEALER Flo and AH Plus Bioceramic Sealer) and one epoxy-amine resin–based sealer (AH Plus). Surface morphology was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), chemical composition by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), and radiopacity according to ISO 6876 specifications. Biocompatibility was assessed using human gingival fibroblasts (hGFs) through WST-1 cell proliferation assay after 24 and 48 h. All sealers demonstrated adequate cytocompatibility, with no cytotoxic effects observed. AH Plus showed significantly higher cell proliferation at 24 h, while AH Plus Bioceramic exhibited increased proliferation at 48 h. SEM analysis revealed distinct surface topographies among materials, with AH Plus presenting a more homogeneous surface and bioceramic sealers showing granular and porous structures. FTIR confirmed the characteristic chemical composition of each material. All sealers met ISO radiopacity requirements, with AH Plus exhibiting the highest radiopacity. All evaluated sealers demonstrated suitable biological and physicochemical properties.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Özdemir O., Kopac T. Cytotoxicity and biocompatibility of root canal sealers: A review on recent studies. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2022; 20: 22808000221076325. doi:10.1177/22808000221076325

Camargo C.H.R., Oliveira T.R., Silva G.O., Rabelo S.B., Valera M.C., Cavalcanti B.N. Setting time affects in vitro biological properties of root canal sealers. J Endod. 2014; 40 (4): 530-533. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2013.08.009

Yang X., Zheng T., Yang N., Yin Z., Wang W., Bai Y. A review of the research methods and progress of biocompatibility evaluation of root canal sealers. Aust Endod J. 2023; 49 (3): 508-514. doi:10.1111/aej.12725

de Almeida-Junior L.A., de Campos Chaves Lamarque G., Herrera H., Arnez M.F.M., Lorencetti-Silva F., Silva R.A.B., et al. Analysis of the cytotoxicity and bioactivity of CeraSeal, BioRoot and AH Plus sealers in pre-osteoblast lineage cells. BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24: 262. doi:10.1186/s12903-024-04021-2

Nabavizadeh M.R., Moazzami F., Gholami A., Mehrabi V., Ghahramani Y. Cytotoxic effect of nano fast cement and ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate on L-929 fibroblast cells: An in vitro study. J Dent (Shiraz). 2022; 23 (1): 13-19. doi:10.30476/DENTJODS.2021.87208.1239

Szczurko G., Pawińska M., Łuczaj-Cepowicz E., Kierklo A., Marczuk-Kolada G., Hołownia A. Effect of root canal sealers on human periodontal ligament fibroblast viability: Ex vivo study. Odontology. 2018; 106 (2): 245-256. doi:10.1007/s10266-017-0329-y

Álvarez-Vásquez J.L., Erazo-Guijarro M.J., Domínguez-Ordoñez G.S., Ortiz-Garay É.M. Epoxy resin-based root canal sealers: An integrative literature review. Dent Med Probl. 2024; 61 (2): 279-291. doi:10.17219/dmp/156654

Singbal K., Pradeep P., Mangat A.K. Comparative evaluation of physicochemical properties of various root canal sealers: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025; 28 (3): 325-330. doi:10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_866_24

Hauman C.H.J., Love R.M. Biocompatibility of dental materials used in contemporary endodontic therapy: A review. Part 2: Root-canal-filling materials. Int Endod J. 2003; 36 (3): 147-160. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00637.x

dos Santos Costa F.M., Fernandes M.H., Batistuzzo de Medeiros S.R. Genotoxicity of root canal sealers: A literature review. Clin Oral Investig. 2020; 24 (10): 3347-3362. doi:10.1007/s00784-020-03478-z

Zamparini F., Lenzi J., Duncan H.F., Spinelli A., Gandolfi M.G., Prati C. The efficacy of premixed bioceramic sealers versus standard sealers on root canal treatment outcome, extrusion rate and post-obturation pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J. 2024; 57 (8): 1021-1042. doi:10.1111/iej.14069

Komabayashi T., Colmenar D., Cvach N., Bhat A., Primus C., Imai Y. Comprehensive review of current endodontic sealers. Dent Mater J. 2020; 39 (5): 703-720. doi:10.4012/dmj.2019-288

Oncu A., Aras Tosun D., Celikten B., Buyuksungur A. Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity evaluation of AH Plus, Well-Root ST, and AH Plus Bioceramic sealer. BMC Oral Health. 2025; 25: 867. doi:10.1186/s12903-025-06231-8

Teramoto-Iida A., Álvarez-Chimal R., Reyes-Carmona L., Álvarez-Pérez M.A., Pozos-Guillén A., Vázquez-Vázquez F.C. 3D printing of shape memory resin for orthodontic aligners with green synthesized antimicrobial ZnO nanoparticles coatings: Toward bioactive devices. Bioengineering (Basel). 2025; 12 (11): 1193. doi:10.3390/bioengineering12111193

Khan M.T., Moeen F., Safi S.Z., Said F., Mansoor A., Khan A. The structural, physical, and in vitro biological performance of freshly mixed and set endodontic sealers. Eur Endod J. 2021; 6 (1): 98-109. doi:10.14744/eej.2020.36349

Vinola S.M., Mahalaxmi S. Characterization and evaluation of physical properties of AH-Plus sealer with and without the incorporation of petasin, pachymic acid, curcumin and shilajit: An in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24: 352. doi:10.1186/s12903-024-04108-w

Almaimouni Y.K., Hamid S.K., Ilyas K., Shah A.T., Majeed A., Khan A.S. Structural, fluoride release, and 3D interfacial adhesion analysis of bioactive endodontic sealers. Dent Mater J. 2020; 39 (3): 483-489. doi:10.4012/dmj.2019-064

Guha P., Solete P., Antony D., Arun N., Karobari M.I., Ramamoorthi S. Microstructural and elemental characterization of novel bioactive glass bioceramic sealer using Fourier transform infrared and X-ray diffraction analysis. J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025; 28 (4): 412-419. doi:10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_4_25

Abu Zeid S., Edrees H.Y., Mokeem Saleh A.A., Alothmani O.S. Physicochemical properties of two generations of MTA-based root canal sealers. Materials (Basel). 2021; 14 (20): 5911. doi:10.3390/ma14205911

International Organization for Standardization. ISO 6876: Dental root canal sealing materials. Geneva: ISO; 2012.

Souza L.C., Neves G.S.T., Kirkpatrick T., Letra A., Silva R. Physicochemical and biological properties of AH Plus Bioceramic. J Endod. 2023; 49 (1): 69-76. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2022.10.009

Schwarze T., Fiedler I., Leyhausen G., Geurtsen W. The cellular compatibility of five endodontic sealers during the setting period. J Endod. 2002; 28 (11): 784-786. doi:10.1097/00004770-200211000-00009

Bakir E.P., Yildirim Z.S., Bakir S., Ketani A. Are resin-containing pulp capping materials as reliable as traditional ones in terms of local and systemic biological effects? Dent Mater J. 2022; 41: 2021-2065. doi:10.4012/dmj.2021-065

Correia A.M. de O., Tribst J.P.M., Matos F de S., Platt J.A., Caneppele T.M.F., Borges A.L.S. Polymerization shrinkage stresses in different restorative techniques for non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent. 2018; 76: 68-74. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2018.06.010

Guo X, Yu Y, Gao S, Zhang Z, Zhao H. Biodegradation of dental resin-based composite—A potential factor affecting the bonding effect: A narrative review. Biomedicines. 2022;10:2313. doi:10.3390/biomedicines10092313.

Sanz J.L., López-García S., Lozano A., Pecci-Lloret M.P., Llena C,. Guerrero-Gironés J., et al. Microstructural composition, ion release, and bioactive potential of new premixed calcium silicate–based endodontic sealers indicated for warm vertical compaction technique. Clin Oral Investig. 2021; 25 (3): 1451-1462. doi:10.1007/s00784-020-03453-8

Silva E.J.N.L., Rosa T.P., Herrera D.R., Jacinto R.C., Gomes B.P.F.A., Zaia A.A. Evaluation of cytotoxicity and physicochemical properties of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealer MTA Fillapex. J Endod. 2013; 39 (2): 274-277. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2012.06.030

Bryan T.E., Khechen K., Brackett M.G., Messer R.L.W., El-Awady A., Primus C.M., et al. In vitro osteogenic potential of an experimental calcium silicate–based root canal sealer. J Endod. 2010; 36 (7): 1163-1169. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.034

Sebastian S., El-Sayed W., Adtani P., Zaarour R.F., Nandakumar A., Elemam R.F., et al. Evaluation of the antibacterial and cytotoxic properties of TotalFill and NeoSEALER Flo bioceramic sealers. J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024; 27 (5): 491-497. doi:10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_103_24

Saygili G., Saygili S., Tuglu I., Davut Capar I. In vitro cytotoxicity of GuttaFlow Bioseal, GuttaFlow 2, AH-Plus and MTA Fillapex. Iran Endod J. 2017; 12 (3): 354-9. doi:10.22037/iej.v12i3.15415

Rodríguez-Lozano F.J., Collado-González M., Tomás-Catalá C.J., García-Bernal D., López S., Oñate-Sánchez R.E., et al. GuttaFlow Bioseal promotes spontaneous differentiation of human periodontal ligament stem cells into cementoblast-like cells. Dent Mater. 2019; 35 (1):114-124. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2018.11.003

Al-Haddad A., Che Ab Aziz Z.A. Bioceramic-based root canal sealers: A review. Int J Biomater. 2016; 2016: 1-10. doi:10.1155/2016/9753210

Ortega M.A., Ríos L., Fraile-Martinez O., Liviu Boaru D., De Leon-Oliva D., Barrena-Blázquez S., et al. Bioceramic versus traditional biomaterials for endodontic sealers according to the ideal properties. Histol Histopathol. 2024; 39: 279-292. doi:10.14670/HH-18-664

Inada R.N.H., Silva E.C.A., Lopes C.S., Queiroz M.B., Torres F.F.E., da Silva G.F., et al. Biocompatibility, bioactivity, porosity, and sealer/dentin interface of bioceramic ready-to-use sealers using a dentin-tube model. Sci Rep. 2024; 14: 16768. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-66616-7

Lim M., Jung C., Shin D.H., Cho Y.bum, Song M. Calcium silicate-based root canal sealers: a literature review. Restor Dent Endod. 2020;45(3). doi:10.5395/rde.2020.45.e35.

Sfeir G., Zogheib C., Patel S., Giraud T., Nagendrababu V., Bukiet F. Calcium silicate-based root canal sealers: A narrative review and clinical perspectives. Materials. 2021; 14 (14): 3965. doi:10.3390/ma14143965

de Vasconcelos B.C., Bernardes R.A., Cruz S.M.L., Duarte M.A.H., de Magalhães Padilha P., Bernardineli N., et al. Evaluation of pH and calcium ion release of new root-end filling materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Jul; 108 (1): 135-9. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.02.026

Katakidis A., Nikolaidis A.K., Ioannidis K., Koulaouzidou E.A., Gogos C., Economides N. Determination of surface characteristics, solubility and ion release of a calcium silicate root canal sealer. Aust Endod J. 2025; 51 (2): 369-381. doi:10.1111/aej.12950

Khalil I., Naaman A., Camilleri J. Properties of tricalcium silicate sealers. J Endod. 2016; 42 (10): 1529-1535. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2016.06.002

Vallejo Lara S.V., Freitas-Aznar A.R., Aznar F.D.C. Estudio de la radiopacidad de los cementos de obturación endodóntica realizado con un sistema digital. J Multidiscip Dent. 2024; 11 (3): 9-14. doi:10.46875/jmd.v11i3.874

Rasimick B.J., Shah R.P., Musikant B.L., Deutsch A.S. Radiopacity of endodontic materials on film and a digital sensor. J Endod. 2007; 33 (9): 1098-101. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2007.05.005

Tagger M., Katz A. Radiopacity of endodontic sealers: development of a new method for direct measurement. J Endod. 2003; 29 (11): 751-5. doi:10.1097/00004770-200311000-00016

Tanomaru-Filho M., Silva G.F. da, Duarte M.A.H., Gonçalves M., Tanomaru J.M.G. Radiopacity evaluation of root-end filling materials by digitization of images. J Appl Oral Sci. 2008; 16 (6): 376-9. doi:10.1590/S1678-77572008000600004

Balci M., Turkun L., Boyacıoglu H., Guneri P., Ergucu Z. Radiopacity of Posterior restorative materials: A comparative in vitro study. Oper Dent. 2023; 48 (3): 337-46. doi:10.2341/22-042-L

Salzedas L.M.P., Louzada M.J.Q., Oliveira Filho A.B. de. Radiopacity of restorative materials using digital images. J Appl Oral Sci. 2006; 14 (2): 147-52. doi:10.1590/S1678-77572006000200015

Gorduysus M., Avcu N. Evaluation of the radiopacity of different root canal sealers. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2009; 108 (3): e135-40. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.04.016

Published

2026-06-26