Nasal Wall Oriented Implants for All-on-4 Fix-Detachable Maxillary Reconstruction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.2021.43916Keywords:
Dental implant; Dental materials; Dental Prosthesis; Immediate dental implant loading; Tooth loss; Torque.Abstract
Immediate loading of full-arch prostheses on dental implants in the upper arch is challenging, as the bone is of low quality and obtaining sufficient torque may be difficult. The purpose of this case report is to describe the rehabilitation of a full-arch by means of placement of four internal tapered connection tilted implants and immediate loading. A 65-year-old man sought dental care with a partially edentulous upper arch. The teeth presented mobility and were extracted. In a second step, two conventional-length implants were placed in the anterior region and two tilted and nasal wall–directed extra-long implants in the posterior region. The insertion torques of 60 N.cm allowed the installation of an immediate prosthesis (hybrid). The clinical case report suggests that the placement of tilted and extra-long implants in the paranasal bone and immediate loading may be a viable option for rehabilitation of the edentulous upper arch.
Downloads
References
Sharan A., Madjar D. Maxillary sinus pneumatization following extractions: a radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008; 23 (1): 48-56.
Ozan O., Orhan K., Aksoy S., Icen M., Bilecenoglu B., Sakul B. U. The effect of removable partial dentures on alveolar bone resorption: a retrospective study with cone-beam computed tomography. J Prosthodont. 2012; 22 (1): 42-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00877.x
Cha H. S., Kim J. W., Hwang J. H., Ahn K. M. Frequency of bone graft in implant surgery. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016; 38 (1): 19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-016-0064-2
Gonzalez S., Tuan M. C., Ahn K. M., Nowzari H. Crestal approach for maxillary sinus augmentation in patients with ≤ 4 mm of residual alveolar bone. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014; 16 (6): 827-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12067
Garg R., Mishra N., Alexander M., Gupta S. K. Implant survival between endo-osseous dental implants in immediate loading, delayed loading, and basal immediate loading dental implants a 3-Year Follow-up. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2017; 7 (2): 237-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_87_17
Agliardi E. L., Romeo D., Panigatti S., de Araújo Nobre M., Maló P. Immediate full-arch rehabilitation of the severely atrophic maxilla supported by zygomatic implants: a prospective clinical study with minimum follow-up of 6 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017; 46 (12): 1592-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2017.05.023
Hsu A., Seong W. J., Wolff R., Zhang L., Hodges J., Olin P. S., et al. Comparison of initial implant stability of implants placed using bicortical fixation, indirect sinus elevation, and unicortical fixation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016; 31 (2): 459-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.4142
Maló P., de Araújo Nobre M., Lopes A., Rodriguez R. Preliminary report on the outcome of tilted implants with longer lengths (20-25 mm) in low-density bone: one-year follow-up of a prospective cohort study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015; 17; Suppl 1: 134-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12144
Castro D. S., Araujo M. A., Benfatti C. A., Araujo Cdos R., Piatelli A., Perrotti V., et al. Comparative histological and histomorphometrical evaluation of marginal bone resorption around external hexagon and Morse cone implants: an experimental study in dogs. Implant Dent. 2014; 23 (3): 270-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000089
de Moura M. B., Rodrigues R. B., Pinto L. M., de Araújo C. A., Novais V. R., Júnior P. C. S. Influence of screw surface treatment on retention of implant-supported fixed partial dentures. J Oral Implantol. 2017; 43 (4): 254-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00145
Able F. B., de Mattias Sartori I. A., Thomé G., Moreira Melo A. C. Retrospective, cross-sectional study on immediately loaded implant-supported mandibular fixed complete-arch prostheses fabricated with the passive fit cementation technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 119 (1): 60-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.02.006
Berejuk H. M., Shimizu R. H., de Mattias Sartori I. A., Valgas L., Tiossi R. Vertical microgap and passivity off fit of three-unit implant-supported frameworks fabricated using different techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29 (5): 1064-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3421
Balshi T. J., Wolfinger G. J., Slauch R. W., Balshi S. F. A retrospective comparison of implants in the pterygomaxillary region: implant placement with two-stage, single-stage, and guided surgery protocols. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013; 28 (1): 184-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2693
Thomé G., Cartelli C. A., Vianna C. P., Trojan L. C. Retrospective clinical study of 453 novel tapered implants placed in all bone types: Survival rate analysis up to 2 years of follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020; 35 (4): 757-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.8083
Martin C., Thomé G., Melo A. C., Fontão F. N. Peri-implant bone response following immediate implants placed in the esthetic zone and with immediate provisionalization--a case series study. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015; 19 (2): 157-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-014-0470-5
Kinsel R. P., Liss M. Retrospective analysis of 56 edentulous dental arches restored with 344 single-stage implants using an immediate loading fixed provisional protocol: statistical predictors of implant failure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007; 22 (5): 823-30.
van Steenberghe D., Jacobs R., Desnyder M., Maffei G., Quirynen M. The relative impact of local and endogenous patient-related factors on implant failure up to the abutment stage. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002; 13 (6): 617-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130607.x
Jensen O. T, Cottam J, Ringeman J, Adams M. Trans-sinus dental implants, bone morphogenetic protein 2, and immediate function for all-on-4 treatment of severe maxillary atrophy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 70 (1): 141-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.03.045
Nicoli G., Piva S., Ferraris P., Nicoli F., Jensen O. T. Extra-long nasal wall-directed dental implants for maxillary complete arch immediate function: A pilot study. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2019; 31 (2): 349-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2019.01.004
Jensen O. T., Adams M. W., Butura C., Galindo D. F. Maxillary V-4: Four implant treatment for maxillary atrophy with dental implants fixed apically at the vomer-nasal crest, lateral pyriform rim, and zygoma for immediate function. Report on 44 patients followed from 1 to 3 years. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 114 (6): 810-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.11.018
Brunski J. B. Biomechanical aspects of the optimal number of implants to carry a cross-arch full restoration. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014; 7 Suppl 2: S111-31.
Benic G. L., Mir-Mari J., Hämmerle C. H. Loading protocols for single-implant crowns: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29 (Suppl.): 222-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g4.1
Han C. H., Mangano F., Mortellaro C., Park K. B. Immediate loading of tapered implants placed in postextraction sockets and healed sites. J Craniofac Surg. 2016; 27 (5): 1220-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002756
Maló P., Lopes A., Araújo Nobre M., Ferro A. Immediate function dental implants inserted with less than 30 N.cm of torque in full-arch maxillary rehabilitations using the All-on-4 concept: Retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018; 47 (8): 1079-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2018.04.008
Thomé E., Lee H. J., Sartori I. A., Trevisan R. L., Luiz J., Tiossi R. A randomized controlled trial comparing interim acrylic prostheses with and without cast metal base for immediate loading of dental implants in the edentulous mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26 (12): 1414-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12470
Jain A. R., Nallaswamy D., Ariga P., Philip J. M. Full mouth rehabilitation of a patient with mandibular implant screw retained Fp-3 prosthesis opposing maxillary acrylic removable over-denture. Contemp Clin Dent. 2013; 4 (2): 231-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.114862
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
ODOVTOS - Int. J. Dent. Sc. endorses CC BY-NC-SA
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms. CC BY-NC-SA includes the following elements:
BY: credit must be given to the creator.
NC: Only noncommercial uses of the work are permitted.
SA: Adaptations must be shared under the same terms.
