Implantes nasales orientados a la pared para una reconstrucción maxilar desmontable fija All-on-4

Autores/as

  • Jean Uhlendorf Department of Implantology, ILAPEO College, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil. Autor/a
  • Carolina A. Cartelli Department of Implantology, ILAPEO College, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil. Autor/a
  • Larissa C. Trojan Department of Implantology, ILAPEO College, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil. Autor/a
  • Geninho Thomé Department of Implantology, ILAPEO College, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil. Autor/a
  • Marcos B. Moura Department of Implantology, ILAPEO College, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil. Autor/a

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.2021.43916

Palabras clave:

Implante dental; Materiales dentales; Prótesis dental; Carga inmediata de implantes dentales; Pérdida de dientes; Esfuerzo de torsión.

Resumen

La carga inmediata de prótesis de arco completo en implantes dentales en el arco superior es un desafío, ya que el hueso es de baja calidad y puede ser difícil obtener un par suficiente. El propósito de este reporte de un caso es describir la rehabilitación de un arco completo mediante la colocación de cuatro implantes inclinados de conexión cónica interna y carga inmediata. Un hombre de 65 años buscó atención dental con un arco superior parcial sin dientes. Los dientes presentaron movilidad y fueron extraídos. En un segundo paso, se colocaron dos implantes de longitud convencional en la región anterior y dos implantes extralargos inclinados y dirigidos a la pared nasal en la región posterior. Los pares de inserción de 60 N.cm permitieron la instalación de una prótesis inmediata (híbrida). El informe del caso clínico sugiere que la colocación de implantes inclinados y extralargos en el hueso paranasal y la carga inmediata pueden ser una opción viable para la rehabilitación del arco superior desdentado.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Referencias

Sharan A., Madjar D. Maxillary sinus pneumatization following extractions: a radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008; 23 (1): 48-56.

Ozan O., Orhan K., Aksoy S., Icen M., Bilecenoglu B., Sakul B. U. The effect of removable partial dentures on alveolar bone resorption: a retrospective study with cone-beam computed tomography. J Prosthodont. 2012; 22 (1): 42-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00877.x

Cha H. S., Kim J. W., Hwang J. H., Ahn K. M. Frequency of bone graft in implant surgery. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016; 38 (1): 19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-016-0064-2

Gonzalez S., Tuan M. C., Ahn K. M., Nowzari H. Crestal approach for maxillary sinus augmentation in patients with ≤ 4 mm of residual alveolar bone. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014; 16 (6): 827-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12067

Garg R., Mishra N., Alexander M., Gupta S. K. Implant survival between endo-osseous dental implants in immediate loading, delayed loading, and basal immediate loading dental implants a 3-Year Follow-up. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2017; 7 (2): 237-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_87_17

Agliardi E. L., Romeo D., Panigatti S., de Araújo Nobre M., Maló P. Immediate full-arch rehabilitation of the severely atrophic maxilla supported by zygomatic implants: a prospective clinical study with minimum follow-up of 6 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017; 46 (12): 1592-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2017.05.023

Hsu A., Seong W. J., Wolff R., Zhang L., Hodges J., Olin P. S., et al. Comparison of initial implant stability of implants placed using bicortical fixation, indirect sinus elevation, and unicortical fixation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016; 31 (2): 459-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.4142

Maló P., de Araújo Nobre M., Lopes A., Rodriguez R. Preliminary report on the outcome of tilted implants with longer lengths (20-25 mm) in low-density bone: one-year follow-up of a prospective cohort study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015; 17; Suppl 1: 134-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12144

Castro D. S., Araujo M. A., Benfatti C. A., Araujo Cdos R., Piatelli A., Perrotti V., et al. Comparative histological and histomorphometrical evaluation of marginal bone resorption around external hexagon and Morse cone implants: an experimental study in dogs. Implant Dent. 2014; 23 (3): 270-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000089

de Moura M. B., Rodrigues R. B., Pinto L. M., de Araújo C. A., Novais V. R., Júnior P. C. S. Influence of screw surface treatment on retention of implant-supported fixed partial dentures. J Oral Implantol. 2017; 43 (4): 254-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00145

Able F. B., de Mattias Sartori I. A., Thomé G., Moreira Melo A. C. Retrospective, cross-sectional study on immediately loaded implant-supported mandibular fixed complete-arch prostheses fabricated with the passive fit cementation technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 119 (1): 60-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.02.006

Berejuk H. M., Shimizu R. H., de Mattias Sartori I. A., Valgas L., Tiossi R. Vertical microgap and passivity off fit of three-unit implant-supported frameworks fabricated using different techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29 (5): 1064-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3421

Balshi T. J., Wolfinger G. J., Slauch R. W., Balshi S. F. A retrospective comparison of implants in the pterygomaxillary region: implant placement with two-stage, single-stage, and guided surgery protocols. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013; 28 (1): 184-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2693

Thomé G., Cartelli C. A., Vianna C. P., Trojan L. C. Retrospective clinical study of 453 novel tapered implants placed in all bone types: Survival rate analysis up to 2 years of follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020; 35 (4): 757-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.8083

Martin C., Thomé G., Melo A. C., Fontão F. N. Peri-implant bone response following immediate implants placed in the esthetic zone and with immediate provisionalization--a case series study. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015; 19 (2): 157-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-014-0470-5

Kinsel R. P., Liss M. Retrospective analysis of 56 edentulous dental arches restored with 344 single-stage implants using an immediate loading fixed provisional protocol: statistical predictors of implant failure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007; 22 (5): 823-30.

van Steenberghe D., Jacobs R., Desnyder M., Maffei G., Quirynen M. The relative impact of local and endogenous patient-related factors on implant failure up to the abutment stage. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002; 13 (6): 617-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130607.x

Jensen O. T, Cottam J, Ringeman J, Adams M. Trans-sinus dental implants, bone morphogenetic protein 2, and immediate function for all-on-4 treatment of severe maxillary atrophy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 70 (1): 141-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.03.045

Nicoli G., Piva S., Ferraris P., Nicoli F., Jensen O. T. Extra-long nasal wall-directed dental implants for maxillary complete arch immediate function: A pilot study. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2019; 31 (2): 349-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2019.01.004

Jensen O. T., Adams M. W., Butura C., Galindo D. F. Maxillary V-4: Four implant treatment for maxillary atrophy with dental implants fixed apically at the vomer-nasal crest, lateral pyriform rim, and zygoma for immediate function. Report on 44 patients followed from 1 to 3 years. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 114 (6): 810-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.11.018

Brunski J. B. Biomechanical aspects of the optimal number of implants to carry a cross-arch full restoration. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014; 7 Suppl 2: S111-31.

Benic G. L., Mir-Mari J., Hämmerle C. H. Loading protocols for single-implant crowns: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29 (Suppl.): 222-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g4.1

Han C. H., Mangano F., Mortellaro C., Park K. B. Immediate loading of tapered implants placed in postextraction sockets and healed sites. J Craniofac Surg. 2016; 27 (5): 1220-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002756

Maló P., Lopes A., Araújo Nobre M., Ferro A. Immediate function dental implants inserted with less than 30 N.cm of torque in full-arch maxillary rehabilitations using the All-on-4 concept: Retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018; 47 (8): 1079-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2018.04.008

Thomé E., Lee H. J., Sartori I. A., Trevisan R. L., Luiz J., Tiossi R. A randomized controlled trial comparing interim acrylic prostheses with and without cast metal base for immediate loading of dental implants in the edentulous mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26 (12): 1414-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12470

Jain A. R., Nallaswamy D., Ariga P., Philip J. M. Full mouth rehabilitation of a patient with mandibular implant screw retained Fp-3 prosthesis opposing maxillary acrylic removable over-denture. Contemp Clin Dent. 2013; 4 (2): 231-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.114862

Publicado

2026-06-15