Evaluación de la calidad y confiabilidad del contenido relacionado con la recesión gingival en YouTube y TikTok
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/efhxqh81Palabras clave:
Recesión gingival; DISCERN; Escala de calidad global; Redes sociales; YouTube; TikTok.Resumen
Este estudio evaluó la calidad y confiabilidad de la información sobre recesión gingival en YouTube y TikTok, y comparó los videos entre plataformas. Los videos subidos entre diciembre de 2017 y diciembre de 2022 fueron buscados y seleccionados el 13 de enero de 2023, obteniéndose 1.882 videos, de los cuales 248 cumplieron los criterios de inclusión (YouTube: 175, TikTok: 73). Los videos fueron evaluados en cuanto a credibilidad científica, calidad de la información y popularidad mediante la Escala de Calidad Global (GQS), DISCERN y los criterios JAMA. También se registraron la riqueza del contenido visual, la duración, los "me gusta", los "no me gusta", las visualizaciones, las fuentes y los tipos de video. En general, la calidad de la información fue de baja a media. Los videos de YouTube tuvieron puntuaciones más altas de GQS (2,55) y DISCERN (1,88) que los videos de TikTok (1,92; 1,42) (p<0,05). Los videos de periodontólogos mostraron una riqueza de contenido visual significativamente mejor en YouTube (p<0,001), mientras que no se observaron diferencias en TikTok (p=0,111). Los videos de TikTok tuvieron tasas de visualización más altas (440,5 vs. 174,9; p<0,05), pero los videos de YouTube fueron más largos (p<0,001). En ambas plataformas, los videos subidos por especialistas obtuvieron puntuaciones significativamente más altas de GQS y DISCERN que otras fuentes (p<0,005). YouTube y TikTok proporcionan información accesible pero de calidad general baja a media sobre la recesión gingival, con frecuente falta de confiabilidad en cuanto a causas y tratamiento. Se debe animar a los pacientes a abordar dicho contenido de forma crítica y a priorizar la información de fuentes profesionales verificadas.
Descargas
Referencias
Imber J.-C., Kasaj A. Treatment of gingival recession: when and how? International dental journal. 2021; 71 (3): 178-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/idj.12617
Dias J.J., Panwar M., Kosala M. Management of inadequate keratinized gingiva and millers class III or IV gingival recession using two-stage free gingival graft procedure. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. 2020; 24 (6): 554-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_531_19
Cairo F. Periodontal plastic surgery of gingival recessions at single and multiple teeth. Periodontology 2000. 2017; 75 (1): 296-316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12186
Albandar J.M., Kingman A. Gingival recession, gingival bleeding, and dental calculus in adults 30 years of age and older in the United States, 1988-1994. Journal of periodontology. 1999; 70 (1): 30-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1999.70.1.30
Addy M., Mostafa P., Newcombe R. Dentine hypersensitivity: the distribution of recession, sensitivity and plaque. Journal of dentistry. 1987; 15 (6): 242-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(87)90045-5
Hanham A., Addy M. The effect of chewing sugar-free gum on plaque regrowth at smooth and occlusal surfaces. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2001; 28 (3): 255-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051x.2001.028003255.x
Kassab M.M., Cohen R.E. The etiology and prevalence of gingival recession. The journal of the American dental association. 2003; 134 (2): 220-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0137
de Oliveira Júnior A.J., Oliveira J.M., Bretz Y.P., Mialhe F.L. Online social networks for prevention and promotion of oral health: a systematic review. Canadian Journal of Dental Hygiene. 2023; 57 (2): 83.
Carrie K., Bridges S.M., Srinivasan D.P., Cheng B.S. Social media in adolescent health literacy education: a pilot study. JMIR research protocols. 2015; 4 (1): e3285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.3285
Merijohn G.K. Management and prevention of gingival recession. Periodontology 2000. 2016; 71 (1): 228-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12115
Passos K.K.M., da Silva Leonel A.C.L., Bonan P.R.F., de Castro J.F.L., dos Anjos Pontual M.L., de Moraes Ramos-Perez F.M., et al. Quality of information about oral cancer in Brazilian Portuguese available on Google, Youtube, and Instagram. Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal. 2020; 25 (3): e346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.23374
Basch C.H., Hillyer G.C., Jaime C. COVID-19 on TikTok: harnessing an emerging social media platform to convey important public health messages. International journal of adolescent medicine and health. 2022; 34 (5): 367-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijamh-2020-0111
Dewshi C. Dentistry on TikTok-oh no. British Dental Journal. 2021; 231 (7): 379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-021-3546-2
Hassona Y., Taimeh D., Marahleh A., Scully C. YouTube as a source of information on mouth (oral) cancer. Oral diseases. 2016; 22 (3): 202-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.12434
Arslan S., Korkmaz Y.N., Buyuk S.K. Can TikTok provide reliable information about orthodontics for patients? Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet. 2022; 26 (2): 146-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15398285.2022.2045669
Naseer S., Hasan S., Bhuiyan J., Prasad A. Current public trends in the discussion of dry eyes: a cross-sectional analysis of popular content on TikTok. Cureus. 2022; 14 (2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.22702
Charnock D., Shepperd S., Needham G., Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 1999; 53 (2): 105-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.53.2.105
Topsakal K.G., Duran G.S., Görgülü S., Eser Misir S. Is YouTubeTM an adequate source of oral hygiene education for orthodontic patients? International journal of dental hygiene. 2022; 20 (3): 504-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/idh.12557
Gokcen H.B., Gumussuyu G. A quality analysis of disc herniation videos on YouTube. World neurosurgery. 2019; 124: e799-e804. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.146
Hamdan A.A., Shaqman M., Abu Karaky A., Hassona Y., Bouchard P. Medical reliability of a video-sharing website: The gingival recession model. European Journal of Dental Education. 2019; 23 (2): 175-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12417
Zhao Y., Zhang J. Consumer health information seeking in social media: a literature review. Health Information & Libraries Journal. 2017; 34 (4): 268-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12192
Antheunis M.L., Tates K., Nieboer T.E. Patients’ and health professionals’ use of social media in health care: motives, barriers and expectations. Patient education and counseling. 2013; 92 (3): 426-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.06.020
Benetoli A., Chen T.F., Aslani P. Consumer health-related activities on social media: exploratory study. Journal of medical Internet research. 2017; 19 (10): e352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7656
Meriç P., Kılınç D.D. Evaluation of quality and reliability of videos about orthodontics on TikTok (DouYin). APOS Trends Orthod. 2022; 12: 101-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25259/APOS_141_2021
Menziletoglu D., Guler A., Isik B. Are YouTube videos related to dental implant useful for patient education? Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2020; 121 (6): 661-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2019.12.022
Kurian N., Varghese K.G., Daniel S., Varghese V.S., Kaur T., Verma R. Are YouTube videos on complete arch fixed implant-supported prostheses useful for patient education? The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2024; 131 (4): 684-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.02.013
Guo J., Yan X., Li S., Van der Walt J., Guan G., Mei L. Quantitative and qualitative analyses of orthodontic-related videos on YouTube. The Angle Orthodontist. 2020; 90 (3): 411-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2319/082019-542.1
Ustdal G., Guney A.U. YouTube as a source of information about orthodontic clear aligners. The Angle Orthodontist. 2020; 90 (3): 419-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2319/072419-491.1
Patel R., Chang T., Greysen S.R., Chopra V. Social media use in chronic disease: a systematic review and novel taxonomy. The American journal of medicine. 2015; 128 (12): 1335-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.06.015
Gage-Bouchard E.A., LaValley S., Mollica M., Beaupin L.K. Cancer communication on social media: examining how cancer caregivers use Facebook for cancer-related communication. Cancer nursing. 2017; 40 (4): 332-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000000418
Loeb S., Sengupta S., Butaney M., Macaluso Jr J.N., Czarniecki S.W., Robbins R., et al. Dissemination of misinformative and biased information about prostate cancer on YouTube. European urology. 2019; 75 (4): 564-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.056
Oakley M., Spallek H. Social media in dental education: a call for research and action. Journal of Dental Education. 2012; 76 (3): 279-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2012.76.3.tb05256.x
Graziani F., Karapetsa D., Mardas N., Leow N., Donos N. Surgical treatment of the residual periodontal pocket. Periodontology 2000. 2018; 76 (1): 150-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12156
Nieri M., Pini Prato G.P., Giani M., Magnani N., Pagliaro U., Roberto R. Patient perceptions of buccal gingival recessions and requests for treatment. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2013; 40 (7): 707-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12114
Paksoy T., Şen S.C., Ustaoğlu G., Bulut D.G. What do TikTok videos offer us about dental implants treatment? Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2023; 124 (1): 101320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2022.10.019
Bernimoulin J.P., Curilović Z. Gingival recession and tooth mobility. Journal of clinical periodontology. 1977; 4 (2): 107-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1977.tb01890.x
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Omercan Aktar, Sadiye Gunpınar, Demet Sahin Aksoy.
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
ODOVTOS - Int. J. Dent. Sc. endorses CC BY-NC-SA
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms. CC BY-NC-SA includes the following elements:
BY: credit must be given to the creator.
NC: Only noncommercial uses of the work are permitted.
SA: Adaptations must be shared under the same terms.
