Push Out Bond Strength and Adaptation of MTA-Based Root Canal Sealers to Dentin with or Without Gutta-Percha: In vitro-Study

Eweda, Shady; EL-Deen Rashed, Nasr; Sharaan, Marwa

doi:10.15517/jth6x974

Autores/as

Shady Eweda Post graduate, Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, Egypt. Autor/a
Nasr EL-Deen Rashed Associate Professor of Endodontics, Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, Egypt. Autor/a https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1717-8185
marwa sharaan suez canal university Autor/a https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4373-6099

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/jth6x974

Palabras clave:

Adaptación; Gutapercha; Selladores a base de MTA; Resistencia adhesiva push-out; Selladores a base de resina.

Resumen

Este estudio in vitro investigó la resistencia adhesiva (push-out) y la adaptación de tres selladores endodónticos: AH Plus Jet (a base de resina), MTA Fillapex y EndoSeal Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA), tanto con obturación con gutapercha como sin ella, utilizando 90 dientes unirradiculares rectos asignados aleatoriamente en grupos y subgrupos. La resistencia adhesiva push-out se midió mediante una máquina universal de ensayos Instron, mientras que la adaptación se evaluó mediante microscopía electrónica de barrido. El análisis estadístico se realizó utilizando ANOVA de una vía y la prueba post hoc de Tukey (p<0.05). EndoSeal MTA mostró la resistencia adhesiva (push-out) más alta y estadísticamente significativa (p<0.001) en ambas condiciones, aunque no se observaron diferencias significativas entre MTA Fillapex y AH Plus Jet en ausencia de gutapercha, donde AH Plus Jet presentó una mayor resistencia adhesiva a nivel del conducto radicular que MTA Fillapex (p<0.001). Aunque la adaptación no mostró diferencias significativas entre los selladores en presencia de gutapercha, AH Plus Jet presentó el menor porcentaje de brechas en su ausencia. En conclusión, EndoSeal MTA exhibió la mayor resistencia adhesiva (push-out) en general, lo que convierte a su adhesión superior en una opción prometedora para la obturación de conductos radiculares.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Referencias

Darcey J., Roudsari R.V., Jawad S., Taylor C., Hunter M. Modern endodontic principle’s part 5: obturation. Dent Update. 2016; 43: 114-29.

Rathi C.H., Chandak M., Nikhade P., Mankar N., Chandak M., Khatod S., et al. Functions of root canal sealers-a review. J Evolution Med Dent Sci. 2020; 9: 1454-58.

Komabayashi T., Colmenar D., Cvach N., Bhat A., Primus C., Imai Y. Comprehensive review of current endodontic sealers. Dent Mater J .2020; 39: 703-20.

Raghavendra S.S., Jadhav G.R., Gathani K.M., Kotadia P. Bioceramics in endodontics-a review. Journal Ist Uni. 2017; 51: 128-37.

Ragab M., Sharaan M. Influence of the Remnants of Silicone Oil on Penetration of Three Different Sealers into the Dentinal Tubules: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy Study. Euro Endo J .2022; 7: 234-40.

ElAsfouri H.A., Saba A.A.A. Comparative evaluation of the adaptation of two calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers with a conventional resin-based sealer to dentinal walls: An In vitro scanning electron microscopic study. Egy Dent J .2019; 65: 2481-9.

Cabral M.A., da Silva Limoeiro A.G., De Martin A.S., Fontana C.E., Pelegrine R.A., da Silveira Bueno C.E., et al. Influence of root canal moisture conditions on the bond strength of endodontic sealers to dentine. Res Soc. 2022; 11: e285111133714-e.

Nagendrababu, V., Murray, P, Agendrababu, V., Murray, P. E., Ordinola-Zapata, R., Peters, OO.A., Rôças I.N., Siqueira, J.F. Jr, et al. PRILE 2021guidelines for reporting laboratory studies in Endodontology: explanation and elaboration. Int. Endo. J. 2021; 54: 1491-1515.

Pécora J.D., Cussioli A.L., Guerişoli D., Marchesan M.A., Sousa-Neto M.D. Evaluation of Er: YAG laser and EDTAC on dentine adhesion of six endodontic sealers. Braz Dent J. 2001; 12: 27- 30.

Zhou H.-m., Shen Y., Zheng W., Li L., Zheng Y.-f., Haapasalo M. Physical properties of 5 root canal sealers. J Endod. 2013; 39: 1281-6.

Arora S., Hegde V. Comparative evaluation of a novel smart-seal obturating system and its homogeneity of using cone beam computed tomography: In vitro: simulated lateral canal study. J Conserv Dent. 2014; 17: 364-8.

Nagas E., Uyanik M.O., Eymirli A., Cehreli Z.C., Vallittu P.K., Lassila L.V., et al. Dentine moisture conditions affect the adhesion of root canal sealers. J Endod. 2012; 38: 240-4.

Naser S.H., Al-Zaka I.M. Push-out bond strength of different root canal obturation materials. J Bagh Coll Dent. 2013; 325: 1-7.

Eltair M., Pitchika V., Hickel R., Kühnisch J., Diegritz C. Evaluation of the interface between gutta-percha and two types of sealers using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Clin Oral Investig. 2018; 22: 1631-9.

Andriukaitiene L., Song X., Yang N., Lassila L.V., Vallittu P.K., Kerosuo E. The effect of smear layer removal on E. faecalis leakage and bond strength of four resin-based root canal sealers. BMC Oral Health. 2018; 18: 1-9.

Al-Hiyasat A.S., Alfirjani S.A. The effect of obturation techniques on the push-out bond strength of a premixed bioceramic root canal sealer. J Dent. 2019; 89: 103169.

Loushine B.A., Bryan T.E., Looney S.W., Gillen B.M., Loushine R.J., Weller R.N., et al. Setting properties and cytotoxicity evaluation of a premixed bioceramic root canal sealer. J Endod. 2011; 37 (5): 673-7.

Dem K., Wu Y., Kaminga A.C., Dai Z., Cao X., Zhu B. The push out bond strength of polydimethylsiloxane endodontic sealers to dentine. BMC oral health .2019; 19 (1): 1-6.

Tyagi S., Mishra P., Tyagi P. Evolution of root canal sealers: An insight story. Eur J Dent.2013; 2: 199-218.

Brichko J., Burrow M.F., Parashos P. Design variability of the push-out bond test in endodontic research: a systematic review. J Endod. 2018; 44: 1237-45.

Pane E.S., Palamara J.E., Messer H.H. Critical evaluation of the push-out test for root canal filling materials. J Endod. 2013; 39: 669-73.

Kara Tuncer A., Tuncer S., Gökyay S.S. Correlation between sealer penetration into dentinal tubules and bond strength of two new calcium silicate-based and an epoxy resin-based, endodontic sealer. J of Adh Sci Tech. 2014; 28: 702-10.

Mohamed D., Ali R., Badawy R.E-s. Comparative evaluation of the interfacial adhesion ability of single versus lateral compaction obturation techniques using different sealer types. an in-vitro study. Egy Dent J. 2022; 68: 2967-83.

Silva E., Perez R., Valentim R., Belladonna F., De-Deus G., Lima I., et al. Dissolution, dislocation and dimensional changes of endodontic sealers after a solubility challenge: a micro- CT approach. Int Endod J. 2017; 50: 407-14.

Kim R.J.Y., Shin J.H. Cytotoxicity of a novel mineral trioxide aggregated-based root canal sealer. Dent Mater J. 2014; 33: 313-8.

Yoo Y.J., Baek S.H., Kum K.Y., Shon W.J., Woo K.M., Lee W. Dynamic intratubular biomineralization following root canal obturation with pozzolan-based mineral trioxide aggregate sealer cement. Scanning. 2016; 38: 50-6.

Kunert, M., Piwonski, I., Hardan, L., Bourgi, R.,Sauro, S., Inchingolo, F., Lukomska-Szymanska, M. Dentine Remineralisation Induced by “Bioactive” Materials through Mineral Deposition: An In Vitro Study. Nanomaterials. 2024; 14: 274.

Retana-Lobo C., Tanomaru-Filho M., Guerreiro-Tanomaru J.M., Benavides-García M., Hernández-Meza E., Reyes-Carmona J. Push-Out Bond Strength, Characterization, and Ion Release of Premixed and Powder-Liquid Bioceramic Sealers with or without Gutta-Percha. Scanning. 2021.

Vitti R.P., Prati C., Sinhoreti M.A.C., Zanchi C.H., e Silva M.G.S., Ogliari F.A., et al. Chemical-physical properties of experimental root canal sealers based on butyl ethylene glycol Di salicylate and MTA. Dent Mat. 2013; 29: 1287-94.

Arikatla S.K., Chalasani U., Mandava J., Yelisela R.K. Interfacial adaptation and penetration depth of bioceramic endodontic sealers. J Conserv Dent. 2018; 21: 373-7.

Almas Begum A. Characterization of a New Bioactive Calcium Silicate Cement: An Invitro study: Madha Dental College and Hospital, Chennai; master’s thesis 2020.

Gandolfi M.G., Taddei P., Modena E., Siboni F., Prati C. Bio interactivity-related versus Chemi/physisorption-related apatite precursor-forming ability of current root end filling materials. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2013; 101:1107-23.

Silva E.J.N.L., Carvalho N.K., Prado M.C., Zanon M., Senna P.M., Souza E.M., et al. Push-out bond strength of injectable pozzolan-based root canal sealer. J Endod. 2016; 42: 1656-9.

Dastorani M., Shourvarzi B., Nojoumi F., Ajami M. Comparison of bacterial microleakage of endoseal MTA sealer and pro-root MTA in root perforation. J Dent. 2021; 22 (2): 96.

Nagas E., Cehreli Z., Uyanik M.O., Durmaz V. Bond strength of a calcium silicate-based sealer tested in bulk or with different main core materials. Braz Oral Res. 2014; 28: 1-7.

De-Deus G., Brandão M., Leal F., Reis C., Souza E., Luna A., et al. Lack of correlation between sealer penetration into dentinal tubules and sealability in nonbonded root fillings. Int Endod J. 2012; 45: 642-51.

Sönmez I., Oba A., Sönmez D., Almaz M. In vitro evaluation of apical microleakage of a new MTA-based sealer. Euro Arch Paed Dent. 2012; 13: 252-5.

Asawaworarit W., Yachor P., Kijsamanmith K., Vongsavan N. Comparison of the apical sealing ability of calcium silicate-based sealer and resin-based sealer using the fluid-filtration technique. Med Princ Pract. 2016; 25: 561-5.