Protocolos de limpieza para cementos endodónticos biocerámico y a base de resina epóxica: adhesión y eliminación de residuos

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/caks2s94

Palabras clave:

Dentina intraradicular; Cemento biocerámico; Cemento de resina epóxica; Resistencia de adhesión; Protocolos de limpieza.

Resumen

Este estudio evaluó el efecto de diferentes protocolos de limpieza quimico-mecánica sobre la presencia residual de cementos endodónticos a base de resina epóxica y biocerámico, así como la resistencia de unión de un sistema adhesivo universal para cementar postes de fibra a la dentina intraradicular. Se utilizaron 160 incisivos bovinos que fueron preparados con el sistema ProTaper y obturados con un cemento a base de resina epóxica (Vioseal) o un cemento biocerámico (BioRoot RCS). Se probaron cuatro protocolos de limpieza: etanol (ET), acetato de amilo (AA), acetona (AC) y una solución experimental (EX) que combina acetato de amilo, etanol y acetona. El cemento residual fue analizado mediante microscopía electrónica de barrido, y la resistencia de unión se evaluó a través de pruebas de push-out. Los tipo de falla adhesiva se examinaron bajo un estereomicroscopio, y los datos se analizaron utilizando los tests ANOVA y Kruskal-Wallis (α=5%). Para los cementos a base de resina epóxica, AA y AC resultaron en una mayor apertura de los túbulos dentinarios que ET y EX (p<0.05), siendo AC el que dejó menos residuo. Por el contrario, ET y EX mostraron mayor presencia residual. Para los cementos biocerámicos, ET y EX lograron la mayor apertura de los túbulos (p<0.05). La resistencia de unión fue mayor con ET en el tercio apical (sellador epóxico) y en el tercio cervical (sellador biocerámico) (p<0.05). El etanol y la solución experimental eliminaron eficazmente los residuos del cemento biocerámico mientras preservaban la resistencia de unión. Aunque los selladores a base de resina epóxica dejaron más residuo, todos los protocolos probados proporcionaron una adhesión satisfactoria.

Referencias

De Moor R.J., De Boever J.G. The sealing ability of an epoxy resin root canal sealer used with five gutta-percha obturation techniques. Endod Dent Traumatol [Internet]. 2000 Dec; 16 (6): 291-7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-9657.2000.016006291.x

Troiano G., Perrone D., Dioguardi M., Buonavoglia A., Ardito F., Lo Muzio L. In vitro evaluation of the cytotoxic activity of three epoxy resin-based endodontic sealers. Dent Mater J [Internet]. 2018 Jun 8; 37 (3): 374-8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2017-148

Abreu Betinelli G.A. de, Modolon H.B., Wermuth T.B., Raupp-Pereira F., Klegues Montedo O.R., Vassen A.B., et al. Combustion synthesis of nanostructured calcium silicates: A new approach to develop bioceramic cements in endodontics. Ceram Int [Internet]. 2024 Feb; 50 (3): 4544-52. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0272884223036490

Sheela S., Nassar M., AlGhalban F.M., Gorduysus M.O. In Vitro Cytotoxicity and Mineralization Potential of an Endodontic Bioceramic Material. Eur J Dent [Internet]. 2023 May; 17 (2): 548-55. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1750778

Sanz J.L., López-García S., Rodríguez-Lozano F.J., Melo M., Lozano A., Llena C., et al. Cytocompatibility and bioactive potential of AH Plus Bioceramic Sealer: An in vitro study. Int Endod J [Internet]. 2022 Oct; 55 (10): 1066-80. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iej.13805

Olcay K., Taşli P.N., Güven E.P., Ülker G.M.Y., Öğüt E.E., Çiftçioğlu E., et al. Effect of a novel bioceramic root canal sealer on the angiogenesis-enhancing potential of assorted human odontogenic stem cells compared with principal tricalcium silicate-based cements. J Appl Oral Sci [Internet]. 2020 Jan 10; 28: e20190215. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2019-0215

Devroey S., Calberson F., Meire M. The efficacy of different cleaning protocols for the sealer-contaminated access cavity. Clin Oral Investig [Internet]. 2020 Nov; 24 (11): 4101-7. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00784-020-03283-8

Zaniboni J.F., de Souza V., Escalante-Otárola W.G., Porto T.S., Godoy E.F., Kuga M.C. Impact of cleansing protocols to remove endodontic sealer residues on the adhesive interface: Bonding with universal adhesive systems. J Esthet Restor Dent [Internet]. 2022 Oct; 34 (7): 1077-84. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12924

Zaniboni J.F., de Souza V., Escalante-Otárola W.G., Leandrin T.P., Fernández Godoy E., Besegato J.F., et al. Cleaning and microstructural effects of amyl acetate on pulp chamber dentin impregnated with epoxy resin-based endodontic sealer. J Esthet Restor Dent [Internet]. 2022 Dec; 34 (8): 1282-9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12966

Kuga M.C., Só M.V.R., De Faria-júnior N.B., Keine K.C., Faria G., Fabricio S., et al. Persistence of resinous cement residues in dentin treated with different chemical removal protocols. Microsc Res Tech [Internet]. 2012 Jul; 75 (7): 982-5. Available from: https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jemt.22023

Alencar C.M., Verbicário Dos Santos J., Jassé F., Dos Santos G.O., Escalante-Otárola W.G., Castro-Nuñez G.M., et al. Protocols for Mechanical Cleaning of the Post Space on the Bond Strength Between Root Dentin and Cementation System. Oper Dent [Internet]. 2021 Jul 1; 46 (4): 467-75. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/20-194-L

Castro-Núnez G.M., Dos Santos J.R.E.V., Zaniboni J.F., Escalante-Otárola W.G., Porto T.S., Kuga M.C. Effect of mechanical cleaning protocols in the fiber post space on the adhesive interface between universal adhesive and root dentin. Microsc Res Tech [Internet]. 2022 Jun; 85 (6): 2131-9. Available from: https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jemt.24071

Lima R.O., Barros A.P.O., Alencar C.D.M., Pereira K.D.F., Galvani L.D., Vaz L.G., et al. Influence of using different translucent composite resins for customizing fiber post on the bond strength of self-adhesive cement to root dentin. Dent Mater J [Internet]. 2024 Jan 30; 43 (1): 112-8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2023-184

Vitória M.S., de Almeida E.N.M., Barros A.P.O., de Oliveira E.C.G., Costa J.L. de S.G., Dantas A.A.R., et al. Evaluation of different mechanical cleaning protocols associated with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite in the removal of residues from the post space. J Conserv Dent Endod [Internet]. 2024 Mar; 27 (3): 274-9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_324_23

Escalante-Otárola W.G., Castro-Núñez G.M., Leandrim T.P., Alencar C.M., de Albuquerque Jassé F.F., Kuga M.C. Effects of Remineralizing Agents Based on Calcium Phosphate, Sodium Phosphate, or Sodium Fluoride on Eroded Cervical Dentin. Oper Dent [Internet]. 2021 Nov 1; 46 (6): E296-306. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/20-209-L

Li F., Liu X.Y., Zhang L., Kang J.J., Chen J.H. Ethanol-wet bonding technique may enhance the bonding performance of contemporary etch-and-rinse dental adhesives. J Adhes Dent [Internet]. 2012 Apr; 14 (2): 113-20. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a21853

Ayar M.K. A review of ethanol wet-bonding: Principles and techniques. Eur J Dent [Internet]. 2016 Jan-Mar; 10 (1): 155-9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.175687

Bitter K., Aschendorff L., Neumann K., Blunck U., Sterzenbach G. Do chlorhexidine and ethanol improve bond strength and durability of adhesion of fiber posts inside the root canal? Clin Oral Investig [Internet]. 2014 Apr; 18 (3): 927-34. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1040-1

Talungchit S., Jessop J.L.P., Cobb D.S., Qian F., Geraldeli S., Pashley D.H., et al. Ethanol-wet bonding and chlorhexidine improve resin-dentin bond durability: quantitative analysis using raman spectroscopy. J Adhes Dent [Internet]. 2014 Oct; 16 (5): 441-50. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a32695

Hosaka K., Nishitani Y., Tagami J., Yoshiyama M., Brackett W.W., Agee K.A., et al. Durability of resin-dentin bonds to water- vs. ethanol-saturated dentin. J Dent Res [Internet]. 2009 Feb; 88 (2): 146-51. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022034508328910

Alqarni H., Khan S., Alzaid A.A., Alfaifi M., Alsayed H., Alshahrani N., et al. Effect of silicone-based sealers on fiber post retention: An in vitro study. J Prosthodont [Internet]. 2023 Nov 15; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13799

Prado M., Marques J.N., Pereira G.D., da Silva E.M., Simão R.A. Evaluation of different surface treatments on fiber post cemented with a self-adhesive system. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl [Internet]. 2017 Aug 1; 77: 257-62. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.03.141

Vilas-Boas D.A., Grazziotin-Soares R., Ardenghi D.M., Bauer J., de Souza P.O., de Miranda Candeiro G.T., et al. Effect of different endodontic sealers and time of cementation on push-out bond strength of fiber posts. Clin Oral Investig [Internet]. 2018 Apr; 22 (3): 1403-9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2230-z

Cho B.H., Dickens S.H. Effects of the acetone content of single solution dentin bonding agents on the adhesive layer thickness and the microtensile bond strength. Dent Mater [Internet]. 2004 Feb; 20 (2): 107-15. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(03)00071-x

Soares J., Perdigão J., Chrispim B., Lopes G.C. Effect of Extra Hydrophobic Resin Layer on Bonding of Universal Adhesive Systems to Enamel. Oper Dent [Internet]. 2023 Mar 1; 48 (2): E48-59. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/21-140-L

Oliveira Barros A.P., Freitas A.P.A.R.A., Kokol F.G.O., de Souza E.M.P., Junior A.J., de Melo Alencar C., et al. Influence of the use of a mixed solution of equal amounts of amyl acetate, acetone, and ethanol on the cleaning of endodontic sealer residues on the bond strength of the fiber post cementation system: A laboratory investigation. Open Dent J [Internet]. 2024 Mar 5; 18 (1). Available from: https://opendentistryjournal.com/VOLUME/18/ELOCATOR/e18742106279970/

Elias V.V., Lima R.B., Lucisano M.P., Araujo L.D.C., Pucinelli C.M., Nelson-Filho P., et al. Inflammatory response to bioceramic and epoxy resin-based endodontic sealers implanted in mice subcutaneous tissue: An in vivo study. Microsc Res Tech [Internet]. 2024 Oct; 87 (10): 2447-58. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jemt.24631

Kwak S.W., Koo J., Song M., Jang I.H., Gambarini G., Kim H.C. Physicochemical Properties and Biocompatibility of Various Bioceramic Root Canal Sealers: In Vitro Study. J Endod [Internet]. 2023 Jul; 49 (7): 871-9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2023.05.013

Chen J.J., Thomas J.J., Taylor H.F.W., Jennings H.M. Solubility and structure of calcium silicate hydrate. Cem Concr Res [Internet]. 2004 Sep; 34 (9): 1499-519. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S000888460400211X

Torres F.F.E., Guerreiro-Tanomaru J.M., Bosso-Martelo R., Chavez-Andrade G.M., Tanomaru Filho M. Solubility, porosity and fluid uptake of calcium silicate-based cements. J Appl Oral Sci [Internet]. 2018 May 21; 26: e20170465. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0465

Naiboğlu P., Koşar T., Yücel A.Ç. Shear bond strength of calcium silicate-based cements to composite resin using a universal adhesive in different application modes: an in vitro study. Aust Dent J [Internet]. 2024 Jun; 69 (2): 102-11. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/adj.12990

Balbinot G.S., Leitune V.C.B., Ogliari F.A., Collares F.M. Niobium silicate particles promote in vitro mineral deposition on dental adhesive resins. J Dent [Internet]. 2020 Oct; 101: 103449. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103449

Pires-de-Souza F. de C.P., Tonani-Torrieri R., Geng Vivanco R., Arruda C.N.F. de, Geraldeli S., Sinhoreti M.A.C., et al. Effect of Incorporation of Bioactive Glass-Ceramic into Self-etch Adhesives. J Adhes Dent [Internet]. 2022 Apr 13; 24: 195-202. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b2916451

Aggarwal V., Bhasin S.S. Application of Calcium Silicate Materials After Acid Etching May Preserve Resin-Dentin Bonds. Oper Dent [Internet]. 2018 Jun 28; 43 (5): E243-52. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/17-306-L

Enrich-Essvein T., Benavides-Reyes C., Álvarez-Lloret P., Bolaños-Carmona M.V., Rodríguez-Navarro A.B., González-López S. Influence of de-remineralization process on chemical, microstructural, and mechanical properties of human and bovine dentin. Clin Oral Investig [Internet]. 2021 Mar; 25 (3): 841-9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03371-9

Dehghani Nazhvani A., Dehghanpour Frashah H., Haddadi P., Dehghani Nazhvani F. Ultrastructural and Chemical Composition of Dentin and Enamel in Lab Animals. J Dent [Internet]. 2019 Sep; 20 (3): 178-83. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/DENTJODS.2019.44912

Wegehaupt F., Gries D., Wiegand A., Attin T. Is bovine dentine an appropriate substitute for human dentine in erosion/abrasion tests? J Oral Rehabil [Internet]. 2008 May; 35 (5): 390-4. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01843.x

Silva E.J.N.L., Carvalho N.K., Prado M.C., Senna P.M., Souza E.M., De-Deus G. Bovine teeth can reliably substitute human dentine in an intra-tooth push-out bond strength model? Int Endod J [Internet]. 2019 Jul; 52 (7): 1063-9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iej.13085

Inoue T., Miyazaki T., Nishimura F. Tensile strength and durability of bovine dentin. Dent Mater J [Internet]. 2007 May; 26 (3): 348-54. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4012/dmj.26.348

Publicado

2025-10-13