Criterios de indicación de imágenes radiográficas en Odontología: una revisión actualizada
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.2025.65322Palabras clave:
Radiología; Diagnóstico por imagen; Radiografía panorámica; Radiografía interproximal; Tomografía computarizada de haz cónico; Protección radiológica.Resumen
Las imágenes radiográficas constituyen un examen complementario para el diagnóstico, plan de tratamiento y seguimiento en odontología. Debido a los potenciales efectos adversos biológicos de las radiaciones ionizantes, los estudios radiográficos deben indicarse luego de una adecuada anamnesis y evaluación clínica, solo cuando su uso sea justificado. Actualmente en odontología existen técnicas radiográficas que proveen imágenes intraorales y extraorales, bidimensionales y tridimensionales. Estas deben indicarse según la eficacia diagnóstica de cada técnica, es decir del rendimiento que cada técnica ofrezca en beneficio del paciente. Cada técnica de imagen presenta ventajas y limitaciones que dependen de factores técnicos y que deben adecuarse a la tarea diagnóstica, realizando un análisis individual de caso. La presente revisión constituye una actualización basada en evidencia, sobre los criterios de indicación de imágenes según las diferentes áreas de especialización en odontología.
Descargas
Referencias
Kim I.H., Singer S.R., Hong D.J., Mupparapu M. Fundamentals of Radiographic Interpretation for the Dentist. Dent Clin North Am. 2021; 65 (3): 409-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2021.02.001
Jain S., Choudhary K., Nagi R., Shukla S., Kaur N., Grover D. New evolution of cone-beam computed tomography in dentistry: Combining digital technologies. Imaging Sci Dent. 2019; 49 (3): 179-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2019.49.3.179
Gaêta-Araujo H., Alzoubi T., Vasconcelos K. de F., Orhan K., Pauwels R., Casselman J.W., et al. Cone beam computed tomography in dentomaxillofacial radiology: a two-decade overview. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2020; (20200145). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20200145
Nemtoi A., Czink C., Haba D., Gahleitner A. Cone beam CT: a current overview of devices. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013; 42 (8): 20120443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20120443
ICRP. Radiological Protection in Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). ICRP Publication 129. Ann ICRP. 2015; 44 (1): 9-127.
Consortium SEDENTEXCT, Horner K., Lindh C., Birch S., Christell H. Cone Beam CT for Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology: Evidence Based Guidelines, Radiation Protection Publication 172. 2012. 156 p.
ICRP. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007; 37 (2-4): 1-332.
Horner K., O’Malley L., Taylor K., Glenny A.M. Guidelines for clinical use of CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015; 44 (1): 20140225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20140225
Fryback D.G., Thornbury J.R. The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med Decis Making. 1991; 11 (2): 88-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X9101100203
Arancibia B., Schilling J., Schilling A., Correa-Beltrán G., Hidalgo A. Usos de tomografía computarizada de haz cónico en menores de 25 años en Talca, Chile. Rev Cubana Estomatol. 2017; 54 (3).
Barba L., Berrocal A.L., Hidalgo A. Uses of cone-beam computed tomography in San José, Costa Rica. Imaging Sci Dent. 2018; 48 (2): 103-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2018.48.2.103
Hidalgo-Rivas J.A., Theodorakou C., Carmichael F., Murray B., Payne M., Horner K. Use of cone beam CT in children and young people in three United Kingdom dental hospitals. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2014; 24 (5): 336-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12076
Barba Ramírez L., Ruiz García de Chacón V., Hidalgo Rivas A. El uso de rayos X en odontología y la importancia de la justificación de exámenes radiográficos. Avances en Odontoestomatología. 2020; 36 (3): 131-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4321/S0213-12852020000300002
Jacobs R., Fontenele R.C., Lahoud P., Shujaat S., Bornstein M.M. Radiographic diagnosis of periodontal diseases-Current evidence versus innovations. Periodontology 2000. 2024; 95 (1): 51-69.
Horner K., Eaton K.A. Selection Criteria for Dental Radiography. 3.a ed. London, UK: Faculty of General Dental Practice UK; 2018.
Salvi G.E., Roccuzzo A., Imber J.C., Stähli A., Klinge B., Lang N.P. Clinical periodontal diagnosis. Periodontology 2000. 2023; 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12487
Isaacson K.G., Thom A.R., Atack N.E., Horner K., Whaites E. Guidelines for the Use of Radiographs in Clinical Orthodontics. 4.a ed. Vol. 31. London, UK: British Orthodontic Society; 2015.
Patel S., Brown J., Semper M., Abella F., Mannocci F. European Society of Endodontology position statement: Use of cone beam computed tomography in Endodontics: European Society of Endodontology (ESE) developed by. Int Endod J. 2019; 52 (12): 1675-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13187
Waite S., Scott J.M., Legasto A., Kolla S., Gale B., Krupinski E.A. Systemic Error in Radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017; 209 (3): 629-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.16.17719
Ortega T.D., García M.C. Prevención de riesgo en radiología: el error y el radiólogo. Revista chilena de radiología. 2002; 8 (3): 135-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-93082002000300008
Hegde S., Gao J., Vasa R., Cox S. Factors affecting interpretation of dental radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2023; 52 (2): 20220279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20220279
Waite S., Scott J., Gale B., Fuchs T., Kolla S., Reede D. Interpretive Error in Radiology. Am J Roentgenol. 2017; 208 (4): 739-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.16.16963
Waite S., Grigorian A., Alexander R.G., Macknik S.L., Carrasco M., Heeger D.J., et al. Analysis of Perceptual Expertise in Radiology-Current Knowledge and a New Perspective. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019; 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00213
Hegde S., Nanayakkara S., Cox S., Vasa R., Gao J. Australian Dentists’ Knowledge of the Consequences of Interpretive Errors in Dental Radiographs and Potential Mitigation Measures. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2024; 10 (6): e70027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.70027
Robinson P.J. Radiology’s Achilles’ heel: error and variation in the interpretation of the Röntgen image. Br J Radiol. 1997; 70 (839): 1085-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.70.839.9536897
Horner K., Rushton V.E., Walker A., Tsiklaskis K., Hirschmann P., Van der S.P., et al. European Commission. Radiation Protection136. European Guidelines on Radiation Protection in Dental Radiology. The safe use of radiographs in dental practice. Luxembourg Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
European Society of Endodontology. Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology. Int Endod J. 2006; 39 (12): 921-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01180.x
Stera G., Giusti M., Magnini A., Calistri L., Izzetti R., Nardi C. Diagnostic accuracy of periapical radiography and panoramic radiography in the detection of apical periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiol Med. 2024; (11): 1682-1695. doi: 10.1007/s11547-024-01882-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-024-01882-z
Rosen E., Salem R., Kavalerchik E., Kahn A., Tsesis I. The effect of imaging modality on the evaluation of the outcome of endodontic surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2022; 51 (8): 20220164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20220164
Chugal N., Assad H., Markovic D., Mallya S.M. Applying the American Association of Endodontists and American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology guidelines for cone-beam computed tomography prescription: Impact on endodontic clinical decisions. J Am Dent Assoc. 2024; 155 (1): 48-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2023.09.007
Choi I.G.G., Cortes A.R.G., Arita E.S., Georgetti M.A.P. Comparison of conventional imaging techniques and CBCT for periodontal evaluation: A systematic review. Imaging Sci Dent. 2018; 48 (2): 79-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2018.48.2.79
Jacobs, R.; Fontenele, R.C.; Lahoud, P.; Shujaat, S.; Bornstein, M.M. Radiographic diagnosis of periodontal diseases - Current evidence versus innovations. Periodontology 2000. 2024; 95 (1): 51-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12580
Haas L.F., Zimmermann G.S., De Luca Canto G, Flores-Mir C, Corrêa M. Precision of cone beam CT to assess periodontal bone defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2018; 47 (2): 20170084. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20170084
Wang S., Ford B. Imaging in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Dent Clin North Am. 2021; 65 (3): 487-507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2021.02.012
Reia V.C.B., de Toledo Telles-Araujo G., Peralta-Mamani M., Biancardi M.R., Rubira C.M.F., Rubira-Bullen I.R.F. Diagnostic accuracy of CBCT compared to panoramic radiography in predicting IAN exposure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2021; 25 (8): 4721-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03942-4
Moreira-Souza L., Butini Oliveira L., Gaêta-Araujo H., Almeida-Marques M., Asprino L., Oenning A.C. Comparison of CBCT and panoramic radiography for the assessment of bone loss and root resorption on the second molar associated with third molar impaction: a systematic review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2022; 51 (3): 20210217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20210217
Matzen L.H., Schropp L., Spin-Neto R., Wenzel A. Radiographic signs of pathology determining removal of an impacted mandibular third molar assessed in a panoramic image or CBCT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017; 46 (1): 20160330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20160330
Schroder Â.G.D., Gonçalves F.M., Germiniani J. da S., Schroder L.D., Porporatti A.L., Zeigelboim B.S., et al. Diagnosis of TMJ degenerative diseases by panoramic radiography: is it possible? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2023; 27 (11): 6395-412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05293-8
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Lucía Barba Ramírez, Ana Cecilia Ruiz-Imbert, Deivi Cascante-Sequeira.
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
ODOVTOS - Int. J. Dent. Sc. endorses CC BY-NC-SA
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms. CC BY-NC-SA includes the following elements:
BY: credit must be given to the creator.
NC: Only noncommercial uses of the work are permitted.
SA: Adaptations must be shared under the same terms.
