Is the philosophy of law useless knowledge?: On the oxymoron of the usefulness of the useless
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/ejh17233Keywords:
Law, Philosophy, Philosophy of law, Academic teaching, Utility, InutilityAbstract
This article is a presentation posted as part of the I Cycle of Conferences on updating and training on socio-legal topics, given on february of 2024, in the Law School of the University of Costa Rica. Its main objetive is to question if law philosophy, as a branch of the philosophy, is a useless knowledge , and with it defend the survival of thought and vindicate the importance of the so – called superfluos branches of knowledge.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Following the policies of the University of Costa Rica and the Vice Rector's Office for Research, as well as the Budapest Initiative for Open Access, IUS Doctrina provides completely free access to its contents, considering that open access is an indispensable principle for "a scientific culture that promotes the dissemination, disclosure and recognition of science, technology and innovation, as a social and cultural heritage" (article 11.l of the University of Costa Rica's Research Regulations).
In accordance with the above, any user is allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search or use the content of IUS Doctrina for any legal purpose, without any financial, legal or technical barrier. Likewise, the reproduction and distribution of its content is authorized, with the only limitation of citing the original source. For further details, Revista IUS Doctrina uses for all its content the Creative Commons License: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
