Challenges and tensions in the contemporary context between new public management and judicial independence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/jgsw2w45Keywords:
New Public Management, Judicial Independence, Efficiency, Austerity, ImpartialityAbstract
With efficiency and accountability as rising priorities, the article examines how certain administrative practices can threaten the autonomy of the Judiciary. It highlights that New Public Management, in its effort to improve governmental effectiveness through private sector tools, may conflict with judicial independence, compromising the impartiality and quality of justice. The summary analyzes how efficiency and austerity policies, especially in times of crisis, limit judicial resources and undermine its independence by making it vulnerable to external influences. The text reveals the tension between efficient administrative reforms and the preservation of judicial integrity, reflecting on the need for a balance that respects the peculiarities of its function without compromising its independence.
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Since October 2024, the Journal of Legal Sciences has the CC BY-SA 4.0 license. Under the terms of this license, sharing and adapting the material is permitted as long as the following terms are met:
Regarding attribution: When using the material, you must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if you have made changes to it.
Share Alike: If you transform the material or create new ones from it, your new contribution must be shared under the same license as the original.