Bryophyte diversity by substrate in a lower montane humid forest, Filandia (Quindío), Colombia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/fztgkk53Keywords:
microclimate, community composition, substrate heterogeneity, Hill numbers, epiphytism, Tropical AndesAbstract
Introduction: Bryophytes are poikilohydric organisms whose activity and persistence are controlled by fine-scale humidity and temperature. Substrate heterogeneity creates contrasting microhabitats that can filter composition and dominance within the same forest stand. Objective: To test whether bryophyte diversity and community structure differ among substrates (corticolous epiphytes, soil, decaying wood and epiphylls) in a lower montane humid forest of Filandia, Quindío, Colombia. Methods: Georeferenced sampling was conducted using 62 quadrats adjusted to the substrate type (50 × 20 cm for corticolous and lignicolous epiphytes, 50 × 50 cm for terricolous species, and 10 × 5 cm for epiphyllous species), and taxon cover was estimated. The temperature and relative humidity were measured in situ at the same substrate stratum on Saturdays between August and September 2025, during sampling sessions conducted between 8:30 a.m. and 12:00 p.m., with several successive measurements taken throughout each sampling session. Alpha diversity (Shannon, Simpson, and Chao-type estimators) and compositional differentiation were summarized using Bray–Curtis and Jaccard dissimilarities and Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA). Species importance was estimated using the Importance Value Index (IVI). Results: The microclimate was persistently humid, with low thermal variation (RH 80-93 %; 18.0-22.9 °C), and a negative humidity–temperature association was detected only on soil. The epiphytic substrate concentrated the highest richness and diversity (S = 37, H' = 3.289, 1–D = 0.948), whereas epiphyllous communities showed the lowest values (S = 6, H' = 1.677). Compositional comparisons showed high dissimilarity among substrates, with relative affinity between woody substrates (epiphytic–lignicolous) and clear separation of epiphylls in the ordination. Conclusions: Substrate contributes consistently to local variation in richness, diversity and composition of bryophyte assemblages in this lower montane forest. The differentiation observed among microhabitats supports stratified substrate-based sampling for monitoring and ecological assessment.
Downloads
References
Ah-Peng, C., Cardoso, A. W., Flores, O., West, A., Wilding, N., Strasberg, D., & Hedderson, T. A. (2017). The role of epiphytic bryophytes in interception, storage and release of atmospheric moisture in a tropical montane cloud forest. Journal of Hydrology, 548, 665–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.03.043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.03.043
Benavides, J. C., & Sastre de Jesús, I. (2011). Diversity and rarity of epiphyllous bryophytes in a superhumid tropical lowland forest of Chocó-Colombia. Cryptogamie, Bryologie, 32(2), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.7872/cryb.v32.iss1.2011.119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7872/cryb.v32.iss1.2011.119
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
Bray, J. R., & Curtis, J. T. (1957). An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs, 27(4), 325–349. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942268 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1942268
Cataño-Díaz, E. A., Uribe-Meléndez, J., & Campos, L. V. (2021). Briófitos de troncos en descomposición de la estación biológica El Zafire, Amazonas-Colombia. Acta Biológica Colombiana, 26(2), 214–225. https://doi.org/10.15446/abc.v26n2.86245 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/abc.v26n2.86245
Chao, A. (1984). Nonparametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 11(4), 265–270.
Churchill, S. P., & Linares, E. L. (1995). Prodromus bryologiae Novo-Granatensis: Introducción a la flora de musgos de Colombia (Vol. 1). Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Museo de Historia Natural, Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
Crandall-Stotler, B., Stotler, R. E., & Long, D. G. (2009). Phylogeny and classification of the Marchantiophyta. Edinburgh Journal of Botany, 66(1), 155–198. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960428609005393 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960428609005393
Curtis, J. T., & McIntosh, R. P. (1951). An upland forest continuum in the prairie-forest border region of Wisconsin. Ecology, 32(3), 476–496. https://doi.org/10.2307/1931725 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1931725
Dunn, O. J. (1964). Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics, 6(3), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1964.10490181 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1964.10490181
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9
Frahm, J. P., & Gradstein, S. R. (1991). An altitudinal zonation of tropical rain forests using bryophytes. Journal of Biogeography, 18(6), 669–678. https://doi.org/10.2307/2845548 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2845548
Gower, J. C. (1966). Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika, 53(3–4), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/53.3-4.325 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/53.3-4.325
Gradstein, S. R. (2021). The liverworts and hornworts of Colombia and Ecuador. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49450-6
Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T., & Ryan, P. D. (2001). PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4(1), 1–9.
Hill, M. O. (1973). Diversity and evenness: A unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology, 54(2), 427–432. https://doi.org/10.2307/1934352 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1934352
Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales. (2010). Leyenda nacional de coberturas de la tierra: Metodología CORINE Land Cover adaptada para Colombia. Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales.
Jaccard, P. (1901). Étude comparative de la distribution florale dans une portion des Alpes et du Jura. Bulletin de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles, 37, 547–579.
Kruskal, W. H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952). Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47(260), 583–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441
Levene, H. (1960). Robust tests for equality of variances. In I. Olkin (Ed.), Contributions to probability and statistics: Essays in honor of Harold Hotelling (Vol. 2, pp. 278–292). Stanford University Press.
Mandl, N. A., Kessler, M., & Gradstein, S. R. (2009). Effects of environmental heterogeneity on species diversity and composition of terrestrial bryophyte assemblages in tropical montane forests of southern Ecuador. Plant Ecology & Diversity, 2(3), 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/17550870903341877 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17550870903341877
Missouri Botanical Garden. (2025, 26 December). Tropicos [Base de datos]. https://tropicos.org
Proctor, M. C. F., Oliver, M. J., Wood, A. J., Alpert, P., Stark, L. R., Cleavitt, N. L., & Mishler, B. D. (2007). Desiccation-tolerance in bryophytes: A review. The Bryologist, 110(4), 595–621. https://doi.org/10.1639/0007-2745(2007)110[595:DIBAR]2.0.CO;2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1639/0007-2745(2007)110[595:DIBAR]2.0.CO;2
Pypker, T. G., Unsworth, M. H., & Bond, B. J. (2006). The role of epiphytes in rainfall interception by forests in the Pacific Northwest. II. Field measurements at the branch and canopy scale. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36(4), 819–832. https://doi.org/10.1139/X05-286 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/x05-286
R Core Team. (2025). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4.5.0) [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
Richards, P. W. (1984). The ecology of tropical forest bryophytes. In R. M. Schuster (Ed.), New manual of bryology (Vol. 2, pp. 1233–1270). Hattori Botanical Laboratory.
Rodríguez-Quiel, E. E., Kluge, J., Mendieta-Leiva, G., & Bader, M. Y. (2022). Elevational patterns in tropical bryophyte diversity differ among substrates: A case study on Barú volcano, Panama. Journal of Vegetation Science, 33(3), e13136. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.13136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.13136
Spearman, C. (1904). The proof and measurement of association between two things. The American Journal of Psychology, 15(1), 72–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/1412159 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1412159
Statistical Graphics Corporation. (2000). STATGRAPHICS Plus for Windows (Version 5.0) [Computer software].
Tukey, J. W. (1949). Comparing individual means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics, 5(2), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001913 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3001913
Wolf, J. H. D. (1993a). Diversity patterns and biomass of epiphytic bryophytes and lichens along an altitudinal gradient in the Northern Andes. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 80(4), 928–960. https://doi.org/10.2307/2399938 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2399938
Wolf, J. H. D. (1993b). Epiphyte communities of tropical montane rain forest in the northern Andes. I. Lower montane communities. Phytocoenologia, 22(1), 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1127/phyto/22/1993/1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1127/phyto/22/1993/1
World Flora Online Consortium. (2025, December 27). World Flora Online. https://www.worldfloraonline.org
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista de Biología Tropical

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (CC BY 4.0)
Attribution (BY) • (BY) You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
