Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Scientific Papers

Vol. 20 No. 35 (2018): Journal 35

Environmental and socioeconomic criteria to prioritize investments in the road network of Costa Rica

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/1vdz9157
Submitted
November 14, 2025
Published
2025-11-14

Abstract

Given the absence of a formal implementation of a Pavement Management System for the National Paved Road Network of Costa Rica, there are no long-term planning processes of investments in the pavements. The research presented herein aims to demonstrate, in addition to the feasibility of perform long-term investment plans (20 years), that prioritization criteria on environmental, social and economical aspects can be included in the plan.
For the preparation of investment plans, the condition of the pavement was estimated through an index composed of functional capacity and structural capacity in each section of the National Road Network. Each of these sections contains characteristicsreferring to traffic, route hierarchy and others. Subsequently, costs of maintenance techniques are estimated using contract 2014LN-000018-0C00.
Through Woodstock software, linear optimization techniques were used to carry out investment scenarios incorporating different prioritization criteria. In this way, the Social Progress Index, the Cantonal Competitiveness Index and the CO2 emission are used as criteria to prioritize investments in the sections of the National Paved Road Network of Costa Rica.
With the results, it is possible to confirm the feasibility of preparing longterm investment plans based on the inputs available in Costa Rica. In addition, it is observed that the budget increases have a greater effect on the lapse with which a better condition of the pavements is achieved than in the condition itself. Likewise, the reduction of CO2 emissions will have an impact on the condition of the network, since reconstruction interventions are those that require activities with a higher emission of pollutants.

References

  1. Amador, L., Chaverri, J., & Rodríguez, J. (2012). A Pavement Management System for Costa Rica: a case study. San José: LanammeUCR.
  2. Castro, A. (2015). Fichero cantonal 2016. San José: Instituto de Formación y Estudios en Democracia.
  3. Chaverri, J., & Madrigal, D. (2011). Modelos de optimización lineal para realizar planes de inversiones de largo plazo en una red de pavimentos.
  4. Infraestructura Vial, 22-30.
  5. Chehovits, J., & Galehouse, L. (2010). Energy usage and greenhouse gas emissions of pavement preservation processes for asphalt concrete pavements. California: 1st International Conference of Pavement Preservation.
  6. CLACDS. (2016). Índice de Progreso Social 2016. San José: INCAE Business School.
  7. Dirección de Vialidad de Chile. (2014). Manual de Carreteras: Volumen N° 7 Mantenimiento Vial. Santiago, Chile: Ministerio de Obras Públicas.
  8. Mata, D. (2010). Índices de Condición de Pavimentos Flexibles. Trabajo Final de Graduación, Escuela de Ingeniería Civil, Universidad de Costa Rica.
  9. Rodríguez, J. D. (2012). Plan de inversión a nivel estratégico en pavimentos flexibles de la Red Vial Nacional. San José, C. R.: TFG: Escuela de Ingeniería Civil, UCR.
  10. Hass, R.; Hudson, W.R.; Zaniewski, J. (1993). Modern Pavement Management. R.E. Krieger Publishing Company, Florida
  11. Solminihac, H. (1998). Gestión de Infraestructura Vial. Chile: Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.