Revista de Biología Tropical ISSN Impreso: 0034-7744 ISSN electrónico: 2215-2075

OAI: https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/rbt/oai
A comparative analysis of three length based methods for estimating growth of the tilapia <i>Oreochromis aureus</i> (Perciformes: Cichlidae) in a tropical lake of Mexico
PDF (Español (España))

Keywords

growth
length based methods
jackknife
lake chapala
oreochromis aureus
crecimiento
métodos indirectos
jackknife
lago de chapala
oreochromis aureus

How to Cite

Arellano Torres, A., Hernández Montaño, D., & Meléndez Galicia, C. (2013). A comparative analysis of three length based methods for estimating growth of the tilapia <i>Oreochromis aureus</i> (Perciformes: Cichlidae) in a tropical lake of Mexico. Revista De Biología Tropical, 61(3), 1301–1312. https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v61i3.11960

Abstract

Several methods are now available to estimate fish individual growth based upon the distribution of body lengths in a population. Comparative analyses of length-based methods have been undertaken mainly for marine species; nevertheless, limited information is available for inland species. Tilapia is one of the most important freshwater fisheries and its growth parameters have been estimated by several authors, usually using one length-based method. Thus, the main objectives of this study were: a) to estimate growth parameters of O. aureus from Chapala lake, Mexico, using three length-based methods ELEFAN, PROJMAT and SLCA; b) to quantify the effect of input data variations in growth parameters estimates by the jackknife technique; and c) to compare the new estimates with those previously reported, through the standard growth index f’. We collected and analyzed a total of 1 973 specimens from commercial landings from January to December 2010. The three length-base methods used in the present study resulted in parameter estimates within the range of those reported in other studies. Results derived from jackknife analysis revealed lowest values in the error percentage and coefficient of variation for L∞ when applying ELEFAN, while PROJMAT showed lowest values in the precision estimators for K, which was very similar to ELEFAN. Estimates of the comparative growth index f’ were also very similar to those reported for the same species when studied in different reservoirs. Considering our results, we suggest the use of ELEFAN rather than SLCA due to its accuracy to estimate growth parameters for O. aureus.
https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v61i3.11960
PDF (Español (España))

Comments

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.