Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences ISSN Impreso: 1659-1046 ISSN electrónico: 2215-3411

OAI: https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/Odontos/oai
Validation of an Instrument to Determine the Level of Satisfaction of Patients Rehabilitated with Removable Prosthesis
PDF (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))

Keywords

Cognitive interview
Verbal probing
Standard Pretest
Instrument validation
Patient satisfaction
Oral health survey
Cognitive interview
Verbal probing
Standard Pretest
Instrument validation
Patient satisfaction
Oral health survey

How to Cite

Valverde DDS, A., Vargas DDS, MSc, T., & Fernández DDS, MSc, O. (2015). Validation of an Instrument to Determine the Level of Satisfaction of Patients Rehabilitated with Removable Prosthesis. Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences, 17(3), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.v17i3.22147

Abstract

The survey is an element of health data collection. The validity of the questionnaire is essential to achieve useful evidence, being a crucial aspect in identifying and correcting sources of bias during data collection. Verbal and cognitive tests are recognized as a tool to assess whether questions cause problems for both, the interviewer and the interviewee. The aim of this study was to validate the OHIP-49 and OHIP-19 instruments in a sample of Costa Ricans applying cognitive tests such as probing and thinkalouds and then a standard pretest. In a sample of 15 individuals rehabilitated with dentures a questionnaire of 42 items was applied that served as a cognitive test. Also 20 individuals performed a standard pretest using the telephone. The validation of this instrument served to determine the final sample for a further investigation and also to collect information about the duration of the survey as well as its comprehension.

https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.v17i3.22147
PDF (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))

References

World Health Organization. Oral health surveys: basic methods. s.l. : World Health Organization, 2013. ISBN: 978 92 4 154864 9.

Choi B, Granero R, Pak A. Catálogo de sesgos o errores en cuestionarios sobre salud. Rev Costarric Salud Pública. 2010; 19(2): 106-118.

Haeger H, Lambert A, Kinzie J, Gieser J. Using cognitive interviews to improve instruments. Annual Forum of the Assiciation for Institutional Research. 2012, pp. 1-15.

Presser S, Couper M, Lessler J, Martin E, Martin J, Rothgeb J, Singer E. Public Opin Q. 2004; 68(1): 109-130.

Schwarz, N. Cognitive aspects of survey methodology. Appl Cognit Psychol. 2007; 21(2): 277-287.

Castillo M, Padilla J, Gómez J. Utilidad de los métodos de pretest para la evaluación de los cuestionarios en la investigación mediante encuesta (Tesis Doctoral). Granada, España: Universidad de Granada, 2009.

Willis GB, Royston P, Bercini D. The use of verbal report methods inthe development and testing of survey questionnaires. Appl Cognit Psychol. 1991; 5(3): 251-267.

Willis, G. Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design. EUA: SAGE Publications, Inc, 2005.

Smith V, Molina M. La entrevista cognitiva: Guía para su aplicación en la evaluación y mejoramiento de instrumentos de papel y lápiz. Cuaderno Metodológico 5. s.l. : Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas, Universidad de Costa Rica, 2011. pp. 48-77. 1659-2921.

Slade, GD. Assessing change in quality of life using the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1998; 26(1): 52-61.

Allen F, Locker D. A modified short version of the oral health impact profile for assessing health-related quality of life in edentulous adults. Int J Prosthodont. 2002; 15(5): 446-50.

Comments

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.