Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences ISSN Impreso: 1659-1046 ISSN electrónico: 2215-3411

OAI: https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/Odontos/oai
Effect of Surface Treatment on the Bond Strength of Quartz Fiber-Reinforced Resin Posts to Resin Cements: In Vitro Study
PDF
HTML

Keywords

Bond strength
Quartz fiber-reinforced resin posts
Surface treatment

How to Cite

Herrera-Ocampo DDS, MSD, L. A., Montero-Aguilar DDS, MSc, M., & Alfaro-Mayorga DDS, MSD, E. (2017). Effect of Surface Treatment on the Bond Strength of Quartz Fiber-Reinforced Resin Posts to Resin Cements: In Vitro Study. Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences, 19(2), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.v19i2.28843

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength between resin cements and quartz fiber-reinforced resin posts. Materials and methods: Sixty quartz fiber-reinforced resin posts (DT Light-Post™, Bisco™) were randomly divided into 12 experimental groups (n=5), according to the resin cement used (Biscem™ or Duolink™) and the surface treatment: Alcohol (control group), silanized, primer, sandblasted, sandblasted + silanized or sandblasted + primer. Cylindrical resin specimens were obtained using nanohybrid resin. The posts were cemented to the resin discs and push-out tests were conducted. Data were analyzed with ANOVA and T test for averages comparison and the Tukey HSD test with a 95% level of significance. Results: Biscem™ cement generally showed higher bond strength when compared to Duolink™ Significant differences were found between the control group and the sandblasted + silane and sandblasted + primer groups when using Duolink™cement. With Biscem™ cement, no differences between groups or with the control group were found.. Conclusion: Surface treatments on quartz fiber-reinforced resin poles seem to have no significant effect on the bond strength to resin cements, except when using Duolink™ cement with sandblasted posts and using silane or primer.


https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.v19i2.28843
PDF
HTML

References

Asmussen E., Peutzfeldt A., Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent, 1999; 27: 275-8.

Fredriksson M., Astbäck J., Pamenius M., Arvidson K. A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber reinforced epoxy resin posts. J Prosthet Dent, 1998; 80:151-7.

Bru E., Forner L., Llena C., Almenar A. Fibre post behaviour prediction factors. A review of the literature. J Clin Exp Dent 2013; 5 (3): 150-3.

Monticelli F., Grandini S., Goracci C., Ferrari M. Clinical Behavior of Translucent-Fiber Posts: A 2-Year Prospective Study. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16: 593–596.

Luiz C. Cardoso, Élito Araújo, Luiz N. Baratieri, Juan C. Ramírez. Push-out bond Strength of quartz fiber posts luted with self-adhesive and conventional resin cements. ODOVTOS-Int J Dent Sc, 2016; 18 (2): 73-90.

Magni E., Mazzitelli C., Papacchini F., Radovic I., Goracci C., Coniglio I., Ferrari M. A microtensile bond strength test and an SEM investigation following different treatments of the post surface. J Adhes Dent, 2007; 9: 195-202.

Schmage P., Yalcin F., Nergiz I., Pfeiffer P. Effect of surface conditioning on the retentive bond strengths of fiber reinforced composite posts. J Prosthet Dent, 2009; 102: 368-77.

Boschian L., Cavalli G., Bertani P., Gagliani M. Adhese postendodontic restorations with fiber posts: push-out tests and SEM observations. Dent Mat, 2002; 18, 596–602.

Whiskott A., Meyer M., Perriard J., Scherrer S. Rotational fatigue resistance o seen post types anchored on natural teeth. Dent Mat, 2007; 22 (11): 1412.

Seefeld F., Wenz H., Ludwig K., Kern M. Resistance to fracture and structural characteristics of different fiber reinforced post systems. Dent Mat, 2007; 23 (3): 265-71.

Albashaireh Z., Ghazal M., Kern M. Effects of endodontic post surface treatment, dentin conditioning, and artificial aging on the retention of glass fiber-reinforced composite resin posts. J Prosthet Dent, 2010;103:31-39.

Prithviraj D.R., Soni R., Ramaswamy S., Shruthi D.P. Evaluation of the effect of different surface treatments on the retention of posts: A laboratory study. Indian J Dent Res 2010; 21 (2).

Radovic I., Monticelli F., Goracci C., Cury A.H., Coniglio I., Vulicevic Z.R., Garcia-Godoy F., Ferrari M. The effect of sandblasting on adhesion of a dual-cured resin composite to methacrylic fiber posts: microtensile bond strength and SEM evaluation. J Dent, 2007; 35: 496–502.

Choi Y., Pae A., Park E., Wright R.F. The effect of surface treatment of fiber-reinforced posts on adhesion of a resin-based luting agent. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 103:362-368.

Cekic-Nagas I., Sukuroglu E., Canay S. Does the surface treatment affect the bond strength of various fibre-post systems to resin-core materials? J Dent, 2011; 39171–179.

Monticelli F., Toledano M., Tay F. R., Cury A. H., Goracci C., Ferrari M. Post-surface conditioning improves interfacial adhesion in post/core restorations. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 602-609.

Monticelli F., Osorio R., Toledano M., Goracci C., Tay F. R., Ferrari M. Improving the quality of the quartz fiber postcore bond using sodium ethoxide etching and combined silane/adhesive coupling. J Endod 2006; 32: 447-451.

Monticelli F., Osorio R., Toledano M., Tay F.R., Ferrari M. In vitro hydrolytic degradation of composite quartz fiber post bonds created by hydrophilic silane couplings. Oper Dent, 2006; 31(6):728-33.

Brigitte Ohlmann, Florian Fickenscher, Jens Dreyhaupt, Peter Rammelsberg, Olaf Gabbert, Marc Schmitter. The effect of two luting agents, pretreatment of the post, and pretreatment of the canal dentin on the retention of fiber-reinforced composite posts. Journal of dentistry 36 (2008): 87–92.

Wrbas K.T., Schirrmeister J.F., Altenburger M.J., Agrafioti A., Hellwig E. Bond strength between fibre posts and composite resin cores: effect of post surface silanization. Int Endod J, 2007;40: 538–43.

Valandro L.F., Yoshiga S., Marques de Melo R., Prado Galhano G.A., Mallmann A., Marinho C.P., Bottino M.A. Microtensile Bond Strength Between a Quartz Fiber Post and a Resin Cement: Effect of Post Surface Conditioning. J Adhes Dent, 2006; 8 (2):105-11.

Rathke A., Haj-Omer D., Muche R., Haller B. Effectiveness of bonding fiber posts to root canals and composite core build-ups. Eur J Oral Sci, 2009; 117 (5): 604-10.

Bitter K., Noetzel J., Neumann K., Kielbassa A.M. Effect of silanization on bond strengths of fiber posts to various resin cements. Quint Int, 2007; 38:121–128.

Perdigão J., Gomes G., Lee I.K. The effect of silane on the bond strengths of fiber posts. Dent Mater, 2006; 22 (8): 752–8.

Aksornmuang J., Foxton R.M., Nakajima M., TagamiJ. Microtensile bond strength of a dual-cure resin core material to glass and quartz fibre posts. J Dent, 2004; 32 (6): 443–50.

Monticelli F., Osorio R., Sadek F., Radovic I., Toledano M., Ferrari M. Surface treatments for improving bond strength to prefabricated fiber posts: a literature review. Oper Dent, 2008; 33 (3): 346-355.

Martinez-Insua A., Benito-Rilo L., Santana U. Comparison of the fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with cast post and core or carbon-fiber post with a composite core. J Prosthet Dent, 1998; 80: 527-32.

Sahinkesen G., Erdemir U., Aybala Oktay E., Sancakli H.S. The effect of post surface silanization and luting agents on the push-out bond strengths of adhesively inserted fiber reinforced posts. Int J Adhes & Adhes, 2011; 31: 265–270.

Morris M.D., Lee K-W., Agee K.A., Bouillaguet S., Pashley D.H. Effects of sodium hypoclorite and RC-prep on bond strengths of resin cement to endodontic surfaces. J Endod, 2001; 27:753-7.

Ngoh E.C. Pashley D.H., Loushine R.J., Weller N., Kimbrough F. Effects of eugenol on resin bond strengths to root canal dentin. J Endod, 2001; 27:411-4.

Ari H., Yasar E., Belli S. Effects of NaOCl on bond strength of resin cement to root canal dentin. J Endod, 2003; 29: 248-51.

Bouillaguet S., Troesch S., Watah J.C., Krejci I., Meyer J.M., Pashley D.H. Microtensile bond strength between adhesive cements and root canal dentin. Dent Mater, 2003; 19:199-205.

Comments

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.